Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Is it your land?  If its not then complain to the landowner..  Do you rent the garages?   
    • A) Bollards, or B) county court action for trespass onto your private land, or C) retain one of the private parking firms, ensuring that they'll offer to take payment for the private parking space(s) on your land. (What you don't want is for them to put up signs saying "no parking" ... as then there can't be a contract to park to be broken .... read up on the parking threads to see what can be used to get out of such a private parking charge....) The PPC offers parking, with the proviso that a) they pay, and b) they provide contact numbers for the cars to be moved when needed. Make the payment required sufficient that it isn't attractive to them to chose to park there (& pay)....... Bollards may not be your preferred option, but it will likely be the simplest / quickest / most cost effective.
    • You need to choose between ET and small claims, you cannot do both. For straightforward wages I'd go small claims. Faster and less messing about. Advice here Employment claims in the civil courts - Working Families WORKINGFAMILIES.ORG.UK Some types of employment-related claims can be brought in the civil courts, rather than in an Employment Tribunal. This advice page offers a high level...  
    • The garages are used - just car currently being fixed.  I have no need of what they offer.  It is conscious trespass - and the law allows. Which is frustrating.  It's just v annoying that they do this. Isn't there a law that someone cannot prevent access to a public highway from private land?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Not over yet! RGS1 vs HSBC


RGS1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5252 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

So after the ruling this morning it seems the power is back in our hands.

 

I currently have a Small Claims court stay in place (started the court case in 2007, was given a court date but then the stay came in) i am guessing after todays ruling this will be removed.

 

Obviously then things should carry on as two years ago.

 

My claim was based on the old particulars that included the arguement about the charges being penalties, will i need to go back and amend this? If so how do i go about that?

 

I have included sections 2 and 5 of the UTCCR already as well but dont know if these need to be the sole arguement now.

Edited by RGS1
Extra info
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello mate.

 

I'm with you on this, whilst the unsupreme court rulled against the OFT, they didn't rule as to if the charges are unfair or not, simply that the OFT can't investigate them.

 

I see us as being in the exact same place that we were some 30 months ago before the test case and before every case was stayed.

 

I'm currently waiting for people far more talented than me to read the full judgement and see how we proceed from there.

 

As far as I can see it, we can still go to court and ask the banks just how much it costs for them to pay a DD when overdrawn. As the newly revised charges that most customers are getting via email/post it is far from the £100 that they have charged in the past.

 

I very much doubt that the banks would be prepared to admit just how much it actually costs so they could still continue to pay out as before.

 

I don't at all see this as the end of the road, mearly a pause to check the map and find out which direction we go in from here.

 

For one thing, I'm glad that progress can now be made instead of the stalemate situation we've been in for all these months now.

25/01/07 Statements collected online

27/01/07 Prelim sent

09/02/07 Thank you letter received (and duly ignored)

12/02/07 LBA on its way

27/02/07 MCOL filed

26/03/07 Defence entered

02/04/07 Notice of transfer paperwork received

10/04/07 Lattie's hastner sent

19/04/07 AQ arrived (never mind lattie!)

20/04/07 Last Chance letter sent to DG, AQ filled out.

08/05/07 AQ returned to courts, cc'd to DG

11/06/07 Request for the defence to be struck out sent after not hearing from the court for 5 long weeks.

14/06/07 Directions hearing set for the end of August. 10 long weeks away.

14/06/07 rob-the-viking waits yet longer......

23/08/07 DG apply for a stay, instantly granted by judge.

29/08/07 The waiting begins again, 7 months since prelim was sent.

 

"If you kick a Tiger in the ass, you'd better have a plan to deal with it's teeth!!"

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Consumer Forums - Announcements in Forum : HSBC Bank

 

Give it a couple of days for the dust to settle and let those who run this site and others like it rear the full judgement and I suspect there will be an idea of how to proceed.

 

the fat lady aint even in the building, let alone warming up!!

25/01/07 Statements collected online

27/01/07 Prelim sent

09/02/07 Thank you letter received (and duly ignored)

12/02/07 LBA on its way

27/02/07 MCOL filed

26/03/07 Defence entered

02/04/07 Notice of transfer paperwork received

10/04/07 Lattie's hastner sent

19/04/07 AQ arrived (never mind lattie!)

20/04/07 Last Chance letter sent to DG, AQ filled out.

08/05/07 AQ returned to courts, cc'd to DG

11/06/07 Request for the defence to be struck out sent after not hearing from the court for 5 long weeks.

14/06/07 Directions hearing set for the end of August. 10 long weeks away.

14/06/07 rob-the-viking waits yet longer......

23/08/07 DG apply for a stay, instantly granted by judge.

29/08/07 The waiting begins again, 7 months since prelim was sent.

 

"If you kick a Tiger in the ass, you'd better have a plan to deal with it's teeth!!"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi rob, :)

 

I like your reasoning there ..... what has changed from when the 'Test Case' reared it's ugly head as a time wasting exercise ...... ?

 

Not a lot ! the banks still won't want to answer in court as to what their actual costs are , - that's why they were making 'Goodwill' payments before the Case kicked in ... to keep that info out of the public domain ....

It may mean that the courts will be inundated again ..... and they've only got the 'Supreme Court ' to thank for that if they are .....

 

Meanwhile, it may be worth a petition to the PM , just to let him know the strength of feeling over this judgement ..... but we'll obviously take our lead from Bankfodder and the ST members on this, and other methods of retaliation .....

 

Onwards and Upwards ! :)

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the banks apply for blanked dismissals to all cases in the small claims court, would we have a chance to appeal/oppose this action?

We didnt really have a chance with the stays but i am hoping this will be different.

Im chomping at the bit to get back to my claim, its quite liberating to know that its back in our hands not the OFT's.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't see how the banks can obtain blanket dismissals , if everyone argues that their cases are unique in some way.....

 

We will have to wait and see , but I wonder if the 'Penalty Charges ' argument might not come back into being ......

 

Have to wait and see what BF and the gurus come up with ....let's give 'em time ... :)

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Consumer Forums - Announcements in Forum : General

 

Things are happening already it would appear! They don't hang about on this site! Kudos to all the team!

25/01/07 Statements collected online

27/01/07 Prelim sent

09/02/07 Thank you letter received (and duly ignored)

12/02/07 LBA on its way

27/02/07 MCOL filed

26/03/07 Defence entered

02/04/07 Notice of transfer paperwork received

10/04/07 Lattie's hastner sent

19/04/07 AQ arrived (never mind lattie!)

20/04/07 Last Chance letter sent to DG, AQ filled out.

08/05/07 AQ returned to courts, cc'd to DG

11/06/07 Request for the defence to be struck out sent after not hearing from the court for 5 long weeks.

14/06/07 Directions hearing set for the end of August. 10 long weeks away.

14/06/07 rob-the-viking waits yet longer......

23/08/07 DG apply for a stay, instantly granted by judge.

29/08/07 The waiting begins again, 7 months since prelim was sent.

 

"If you kick a Tiger in the ass, you'd better have a plan to deal with it's teeth!!"

Link to post
Share on other sites

14. Further, under the UTCCR:

 

"5. - (1) A contractual term which has not been individually negotiated shall be regarded as unfair if, contrary to the requirement of good faith, it causes a significant imbalance in the parties' rights and obligations arising under the contract, to the detriment of the consumer.

 

(2) A term shall always be regarded as not having been individually negotiated where it has been drafted in advance and the consumer has therefore not been able to influence the substance of the term.

 

(3) Notwithstanding that a specific term or certain aspects of it in a contract has been individually negotiated, these Regulations shall apply to the rest of a contract if an overall assessment of it indicates that it is a pre-formulated standard contract.

 

(4) It shall be for any seller or supplier who claims that a term was individually negotiated to show that it was."

 

Schedule 2 also includes such clauses (to define examples of unfair clauses) as:

 

"(i) irrevocably binding the consumer to terms with which he had no real opportunity of becoming acquainted before the conclusion of the contract;

 

(j) enabling the seller or supplier to alter the terms of the contract unilaterally without a valid reason which is specified in the contract;

 

(m) giving the seller or supplier the right to determine whether the goods or services supplied are in conformity with the contract, or giving him the exclusive right to interpret any term of the contract."

 

The defendant is a multi-national corporation. The term regarding charges was inserted unilaterally in contract. The contract was pre and mass produced and I had no opportunity to negotiate the clause, or indeed any of the contract.

 

I have this in my witness statement, anybody know if this is enough or will iI need to send in an amendment to make it stronger??

Link to post
Share on other sites

VICTORIES TO DATE THROUGH THE HELP OF THIS SITE:

 

1. Littlewoods Catalouge - No pursual of debt & wrote off £4500

2. Three mobile - Debt written off in full, all adverse entries including default removed from credit files, even got an apology from the Chairmans office

3. HSBC Bank - Partial refund for bank charges & claim lodged at court for outstanding charges.

4. HFC Bank - Ongoing - SAR'd in may- Going to register at court for non compliance.

5. Barclaycard - Being very awkward but Ongoing - These are a tricky bunch but they will fold before I do.

 

GOD BLESS CONSUMER ACTION GROUP!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you think it is worth requesting the removal of the stay now and then changing POCif needed in a weeks time. It shows were doing something then, just worried about the banks trying to get claims struck out.

Do you think they could get struck out without anyone having the chance to argue?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't put it past them to try a sneaky one , not sure if they'd succeed - if they apply for the stay to be lifted I'd say you have to have a chance to continue with your case, before a judge would strike it out .

 

My son has already sent the letter to the court asking for his stay to be lifted and a hearing date set ...... if he has to change the POCs he can do it before the hearing ....... so it's really your choice I think , although I think the revised POCs will be out pretty soon ...

 

I'll keep the site informed on how my son's application goes .... I also got him to send a copy of the letter to HSBC - in the hope that it might prompt an offer of settlement before they have to go the court route again........ He had an offer of full refund and accepted 2 days ! before the bar dropped in July 07 ...... and they reneged ......... so it's cost them another few quid in interest since then :D

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have sent the letter out and one to DG solicitors too. I added in a bit about regecting a strikeout too on the same basis as the stay removal.

 

Like your son I can then change my POC's if I need to at a later date. Hopefully this works though, Im not too confident of getting a settlement offer though. I only had one right at the start of my complaint and it was for under half the amount I was asking for. So im sure the added interest will make the refusal even more worth while lol.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a case of wait and see then RGS , this is kind of uncharted territory at the moment ,,,,,, :)

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

What did your son put in the letter? Just basically asking for the stay to be lifted and for a court date to be appointed? A copy of his letter would be appreciated RGS1

Beating the DCA's day by day

 

My fight:

NDR - CCA'd 12+2 passed

Bank of Scotland - CCA'd 12+2 passed

CFS - Win by Technical Knock-out!:lol:

HFC Bank - CCA'd 12+2 passed

Chantry Collections - CCA sent

 

Time flies like an arrow

Fruit flies like a banana :D

 

<---------- Have I given you top advice, have I made you laugh, click on the scales, it won't hurt you! :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

There you go berrylover .... you can obviously adjust to suit your circs ....but that is the letter he sent .

DATE: xx xxx xxxx

 

Re. Claim no. xxxxxxxx

In xxxxxx County Court

 

XXXXX XXXXXX

 

-V-

 

 

HSBC BANK PLC

 

 

With reference to my claim for the refund of bank charges dated x xxx xxxx which was stayed by the court on xx xxx xxxx to await the outcome of the Test Case brought against the banks by the Office of Fair Trading ;

 

As you may be aware the Supreme Court pronounced its verdict on 25/11/09 and has indicated within its judgment that a challenge to the “fairness” of my banking contract under regulation 5 of the unfair terms in consumer contracts regulations 1999(UTCCR) may be an appropriate way of seeking redress.

 

My initial claim was centered on regulation 5 of the UTCCR and as such it is not affected by the Supreme Court judgment.

 

I would therefore respectfully request that the stay be lifted, any necessary directions be given and a date be given to hear my claim

 

Yours faithfully

 

If the forum here finds that the POCs need adjustment ....i.e. specific clause within Reg 5 then he'll have time to adjust it before a hearing.... he just wanted to get things moving .......

btw , the heading 'xxxx v HSBC Bank plc ' should be centred ... I can't get it to stay there at the moment :grin:

Edited by johnnymitch
Tidying up font markings......
  • Haha 1

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having said that berrylover , I would draw your attention to the Headline announcement above this site , which advocates waiting until the legal team can produce fresh advice on how to proceed ... with revised POCs if necessary .

 

The Consumer Forums - Announcements in Forum : HSBC Bank

Edited by johnnymitch

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

strange ...... that 'legal team ' above was originally leagal seagulls (with legal correctly spelt ! )- it always comes up 'I'm an orange' for some weird reason ..... :confused:

Edited by johnnymitch

Nemo me impune lacessit

 

 

Advice & opinions given by johnnymitch are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

 

If you think I've helped you please feel free to tickle my star :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...