Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • statute barring in Scotland is 5yrs from last payment/use date or date of default Notice + 14 days, whichever is the later. dont confuse that with the 6yrs debts show on credit files (DN's 6th bday regardless to payment or not). they'd never get a claim raised by august in 99% of cases . as long all these debts were taken out whilst resident in scotland and you have not moved since taking them out but failed to inform the original creditor before the debt sale....... then stay radio silent until sb date is reached. then if you wish send our scottish sb letter. just remember unlike E&W in scotland debts are extinguished, dead , gone , parrot. once SB'd dx  
    • Hi all, Love this site and it's no nonsense advice, have dipped in and out of the consumer forums over the years, mostly to assure myself that what I was doing was the right thing when dealing with various businesses (almost 100% success rate, thanks in part to reading and more reading here.). Anyway, the time is almost approaching where I might need to ask for some specific help and I have a couple of queries that I can't see definitively answered. Due to financial mismanagement and severe anxiety issues I stopped paying all unsecured debt in December 2018 (one slipped to the first week in Jan 2019 when the last payment was made having rechecked my bank statement from that period - all my unsecured debt direct debits were cancelled in early Jan 2019). This has left half a dozen debts;  a couple of credit cards, a bank loan, Shop Direct and some Hitachi Finance stuff having been sold on and passing the rounds through the usual suspects, Lowells, Link, PRA Group, others related to them, and then back to them again. I have somehow successfully managed to maintain radio silence and avoided anything more worrying than their begging letters.  I have blocked their phone calls and texts, bumped all emails to the spambox and had a chuckle at their desperate letters.  I've never had anybody at the door.  I have been at the same address since before I defaulted and all correspondence comes to my current home address.  I have NEVER contacted them or admitted any debt. In anticipation of them perhaps ramping up action at the last minute I've had a look at my credit report on Credit Karma (rec'd from this very place) and I see that the default dates on these range from May 2019 to November 2019. Also in preperation I've been reading, reading and reading lots here as advised. Obviously being in Scotland there are a lot fewer posts relating to these matters and it's always quite annoying when OP's do not follow up with any outcome on their cases - how rude! This has also left me a bit confused of when I am able to finally breathe easy (although cancelling all the direct debits in Jan 2019 was the biggest sigh of relief as I knew it was all going to be unmanageable and, well, default one, default all.). I've been reading that defaults should be filed 3-6 months after the missed payment but one of my larger debts was defaulted on 27th August 2019 when the last payment I made was 10th December 2018, meaning the first missed payment was 10th Jan 2019.   My query for now is - when should I infer that these debts are prescribed?  From when the payment was missed, or taking the default date plus 5 years from the credit report? The three I have with the May date are moot anyway as either way they are gone  - some letters from Lowell offering me 90% off to settle is what got me thinking these must have been near SB status, however I have one big 10k+ with a July date and another 10k+ at the end of August I am feeling a bit anxious again, even though I know there is nothing to worry about with the begging letters.  Reading the various forums I am not sure why the OC's didn't take action against me when I read time and again the surprise that other posters haven't already been taken to court for lesser amounts - I'm also surprised I've avoided any action this long as there are plenty in this forum and sub forum who are whisked off to the court by the beggers minions after only a year or so after defaulting.  There are no CCJ/decrees listed on my credit report and I have not received any such judgements against me.  I still just regularly receive the begging emails to the spambox, the blocked phone calls and the letters from the they. I'm also reading that there is no need in Scotland to send an LBC so what should I be looking out for to know that the time has come to engage with CCA requests etc? I'm afraid in a fit I threw a lot of the paperwork out but I have a box of stuff I'm going to go through which may have the original letters from the OC's. Thanks in advance for any advice.  
    • I'm at work now but promise to look in later. Can you confirm how you paid the first invoice?  It wasn't your fault if the signal was so poor and there was no alternative way to pay.  There must be a chance of reversing the charge with your bank.  There are no guarantees but Kev  https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/09766749/officers  has never had the backbone to do court so far.  Not even in one case,  
    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Like
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Me v Cabot


appo0712
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5046 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Below is the responce to my CRP request, Exhibit "a" is my applecation form as posted in previous post. Ehibit "b" is a copy repesentation of Prescribed T&C. Exhibit "c" redacted copy of Cabot's action history. Ehibit "d" representation of notice os assignment. Exibit "e" redacted copy that constitutes such a certitficate, in the course of business. exhibit "f" copies of statements of account. Exhibit "g" copy of claimant's statement of account.

Most of which have been posted in past posts, if you want my to post any of the others let me know and i'll scan them.

 

What i neen to know is how to get Morgan Sols to repledge the POC's and how to ask for another 28 day extention.

 

http://i898.photobucket.com/albums/ac188/appo66/cabot/Morgan/CCI09052010_00005.jpg

 

http://i898.photobucket.com/albums/ac188/appo66/cabot/Morgan/CCI09052010_00003.jpg

 

http://i898.photobucket.com/albums/ac188/appo66/cabot/Morgan/CCI09052010_00006.jpg

 

http://i898.photobucket.com/albums/ac188/appo66/cabot/Morgan/CCI09052010_00007.jpg

 

http://i898.photobucket.com/albums/ac188/appo66/cabot/Morgan/CCI09052010_00008.jpg

 

http://i898.photobucket.com/albums/ac188/appo66/cabot/Morgan/CCI09052010_00009.jpg

 

http://i898.photobucket.com/albums/ac188/appo66/cabot/Morgan/CCI09052010_00010.jpg

 

http://i898.photobucket.com/albums/ac188/appo66/cabot/Morgan/CCI09052010_00011.jpg

 

http://i898.photobucket.com/albums/ac188/appo66/cabot/Morgan/CCI09052010_00012.jpg

 

http://i898.photobucket.com/albums/ac188/appo66/cabot/Morgan/CCI09052010_00013.jpg

 

http://i898.photobucket.com/albums/ac188/appo66/cabot/Morgan/CCI09052010_00014-1.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 112
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks for the reply, I've removed the address.

They haven't supplied any DN's or a TN, Their POC states " The Caiment is the assignee if the debt

Credit Card Ref xxxxxxxxxx

Notice of assignment having been given to the Defendent in writing. Dispite demands for payment, £xxxxxx remains due.

The Caiment claims £xxxxx + interestlink3.gif under s.69 county courtlink3.gif Act 1984 & costs".

 

the amount that they are claiming is the full balance + £2K of their charges.

 

The Cridit Card Ref is Cabots account ref No.

 

Do i need to get them to repladge the POC? and if so how.

Edited by appo0712
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

They did this to me but for another creditor, they went to court for the initial hearing and were told by the DJ that thay needed to supply a fully particularised POC. I now have this but it is still wrong and has no DN or TN.

I think Cabot thinks they have found a way around the legislation and is failing now to supplfaulty DN's that have ben issued before they got involved. They were told by my DJ that they req'd a DN but they have still ignored it.

 

Cups

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Update: Acknowledgement receipt for my defence received on 12th May, from Hmcs.

Also received the aq which has to be completed on or before 14 June (case transfered to my local CC)

 

I found some examples on completing the aq, but there a couple of issues that still unclear, these are:

"Without production of the requested documents, I am at a disadvantage and am unable to serve a proper defence. Failure of the claimant to supply the requested documentation will make the case much harder for the court to deal with as without production of the requested documentation will inhibit the courts ability to deal with the case"

They have refused to send me the docs that was requested by CPR 31.14 as their POC's didn't state them, I also used CPR 18 and so supplied me with the same application form and docs as show in my past posts. The question i have is can i still use the paragraph as quoted.

The other question is can i also use this

"The Claimant shall within 14 days of service of this order file and serve the following:

* Copies of the Credit Agreement and any documents referred to within it which complies with the consumer Credit Act 1974 and all subsequent regulations, which the claimant seeks to rely upon. The original documents must be brought to the hearing.

* Default Notice compliant with s87 (1) Consumer Credit Act 1974 andConsumer Credit (Enforcement, Default and Termination Notices) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1561) as amended

* Document, contract or deed of assignment

* Notice of assignment, with proof of service of the same compliant with s196 of the Law of Property Act 1925.

* Copies of any statement or other document relied upon

 

If the Claimant fails to comply with this order, the claim will be struck out without further order.

 

The Defendant shall, in response, file and serve the following

 

* An amended defence sufficiently particularised in response to the documents supplied by the claimant"

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I direct you to this link, featuring a document written by Cabot? In it, Uncle Glen claims Cabot are NOT creditors as defined by the CCA.

 

So how can they claim, in their WS, to be a creditor who is only suing for the arrears?

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/158487-words-glen-crawford-md.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the OC did not at any time demand the whole amount as arrears, then it is fair to conclude that the reference to "Creditor" must refer to Cabot.

 

I'm sure that if Cabot are demanding arrears, then they are claiming the account has not been terminated? They appear to be somewhat confused.

 

Are they saying that a DN was NOT issued by the OC? It would be marvellous if you could find one - have you done a SAR to the original creditor to try and uncover one?

 

If a DN was not issued, and the account not terminated, that makes it a running account - and makes Cabot the creditor. Wish they'd make their minds up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Donkey,

 

I'm not sure if the OC me a termination notice, I'll send a SAR to them and hopefully get something from them before the CC case date; Having said that, from what Cabots's sols have sent me under the heading "Account Sales Agreement" it state that all the accounts within the agreement are: Charged-off post two agencies, where barclay's internal process of 180 days and two external collection agents of 90 days each have been exhausted, It also states that upon the request documentation will be supplied. So cabot should be able to access all documents regarding the account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Creditor must have the rights and duties under CC74 s189 not just the rights, if cabots DOA only assigns the rights then they are unable to enforce

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Creditor must have the rights and duties under CC74 s189 not just the rights, if cabots DOA only assigns the rights then they are unable to enforce

 

Hadituptohere

 

I think they can if the original creditor is joined in the action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

True Donkey

 

But just going of my copy of DOA received from morgans/cabot it clearly states cabot as having the rights but not duties therefore cabot cannot enforce the agreement and have no right to claim in court.

 

Thought it might be useful..

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Received letter from local CC, stating Claiment shall within 14 days serve:

 

True copies of the original Credit Agreement and docs whichcomplies with CCA 1974.

 

Default notice complient with s87 of CCA 1974 and Consumer Credit (Enforcement, Default and Termonation Notices) Reg 1983 (SI 1983/1561) as amended.

 

Docs, contracts or deeds of assignment.

 

Notice of assignment with proof, complient of the Law of Property Act 1925.

 

Copies of statment or other docs relied upon.

 

List for allocation - direction hearing to be heard in August, estimated time 15 mins ( I'm not sure about this step) any help please?

 

Morgan Sols set me the the same docs as in my post #74

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/show-post/post-2918143.html

 

Along with their cover letter: "We sent this same responce to in May, which was over a month prior to filing of your AQ. The Claiment contends that the points contained in the Draft Order which you submitted to the court had already been sufficiently answered."

 

I'm not sure of the next move to make, as I will have to build my defence upon the docs that they have sent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi apppo

 

morgans have been been ordered by the court to produce these documents, if these documents havent been supplied and this is the only responce your going to get from morgans then this leaves the door wide open for you to apply for the case to be struck out due to no compliance after the 14 days allowed, looking good :D

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Hadit,

 

Morgans are using the Application form as key evidence, The copies of statments are not easy legible. They also are insisting that they do not need to comply with the s77 / s78 request, nor do they need to supply the default / termination notices as they are only collecting the arrears, although the ballance is for the full amount.

 

Do I need to contact Morgans or just wait for the 14 day deadline to pass?

 

Copiy of App- form http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/show-post/post-2595176.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Theres no need for you to contact cabot/morgans, if you dont receive the documents after the 14 days allow a couple of days then contact the courts case manager and see if theve received anything, if not ask for their advise, you may then need to apply for a strike out check out my thread and at thread 271 which Meldrew kindly advised

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/127059-hadituptohere-cabot-case-struck-14.html

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Section 59 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 states that application forms are not binding.

I joined yesterday and not sure how to use the Forum.I would like to bring the followig new tactic used by Cabot to everybody's attention and look forward to receiving members views/advise/suggestions. Cabot have filed a case against me as assignee of debts from Providian & Barclaycard.I requested true signed copies of agreements under CCA 1974-paid £1 fee.They sent me one from Providian-acopy of a 'Reply Card' card saying 'Please reply by 15th Dec 2000'-it has my signature and dated 29 Nov 2000.No terms & Conditions.Another separate copy headed 'Financial And Related Conditions' which may be copy from any year-no link between the two.Willing to provide (not obliged as they are assignee) Barclaycard Credit Agreement when a copy is provided by the Assignor.My cheque was returned and they have stated that.

'You will observe that section 77 and 78 CCA74 states that ''The Creditor under a regulated agreement...shall give the debtor'' cetain documents.The Claimant also submits that it is an assignee of the contractual benefits of the agreement.Accordingly Cabot Financial (UK) Ltd(''Cabot UK'') is not the Creditor for the purpose of the CCA74 as defined by Section 189 of the CCA74.

The CCA states that the Creditoris ''the person providing credit under a consumer credit agreement or the person to whom his rights and duties under the agreement have passed by assignment or operation of law,and in relation to a prospective consumer credit agreement,includes the prospective creditor'' The Claimant in this case is the Assignee of the contractual benefits of the Credit Agreement and the Judgement.The contractual liabilities and the burdens of the Credit Agreement have not been assigned.The Claimants position is that as a matter of contract law,an assignment transfer the rights or benefits but does not relieve the Assignor of duties or burdons of liabilities to the other contacting party or entitle that party to enforce such duties or burdens of liabilities against the assignne of the debt.In the House Of Lords case of Linden Gardens Trust Ltd v Lenesta Sludge Disposals Ltd (1994) 1 AC 85,Lord Brown-Wilkinson stated that ''It is trite law that it is, in any event, impossible to assign ''the contact'' as a whole,i.e.including both burden and benefit.The burden of a contract can never be assigned without the concent of the other party to the contract...''Therefore, it is submitted that the claimant is an assignee and has not been assigned the burden or the liability of the the Credit Agreement.Therefore the Claimant is not bound by Section 77 or 78 CCA74 requests.

As we the Claimant is not the Creditor for the purpose of the CCA74, we return your cheque to you.

I have filed my Defence saying that there is no valid agreement and no monies are due to Cabot.

1)The Claimant has not provided true copy of agreement fully compliant with all the regulations made under the provisions CCA 1974.Proof Required.

2)No Statement of Accounts

3)No Default Notice from Cabot

4)No Notice of Assignment etc total claim £20645.62

Allocation Questionnare to be filed by 18/7/10.

Any advise will be appreciated.

Thanks

Ohm

Link to post
Share on other sites

ohm some words from pt that goes against cabots claims

 

'In my opinion, what cabot are suggesting is fiction, as if what they say is correct, Wilson v FCT would never have happened'

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a sad state of affairs, when they resort to this, even more so as their methods are too feeble and predictable. One would think that DCA’s have the knowledge and a full understanding of the CCA act, without having to troll through forums in search of answers to aid them in their profession.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cabots' sols time as expired I'v spoke to the CC this morning and no doc's have been sent to there. As it stands the key doc's that the CC ordered them to send have not been sent. Margans main argument will be that they don't need to.

 

CC advised me to point this out at the hearing.

I'm not 100% sure on what to base my defence should I work on their lack of cooperation regarding them not sending the doc's that the CC ordered or should I go towards the fact that they have no right to take the case to CC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi appo

 

List for allocation - direction hearing to be heard in August, estimated time 15 mins ( I'm not sure about this step) any help please?

 

Id say if they havent complied with Courts Directions then this does need bringing to their attention, Dont know if youre better filling an application or a skeleton argument for the direction hearing, im sure others will pop in and advise

 

Hadituptohere

I'm far from an expert, but learning all the time!!!!!

 

If i've been at all helpful please click my star.

 

Hadituptohere OH V Capital One, **WON**

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (providian/Monument/Barclaycard cc) - ** claim struck out ** due to non complaince of CPR, Wasted Costs applied for, Default Cost Certificate issued by Court, Warrant of excecution and CC Baliffs instructed...lol 😎

Hadituptohere V Cabot, (morgan stanley dean witter/barclays cc) - account in dispute, LBA sent to barclays, awaiting responce, no responce.

Hadituptohere V RBS, default removal x 2, case dismissed, judge used Balance of Probabilities against hard Evidence.

Hadituptohere OH v Santander, Santander issue claim in court, settled out of court via Tomlin, less solicitors fees and interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...