Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "We suffer more in imagination than in reality" - really pleased this all happened. Settled by TO, full amount save as to costs and without interest claimed. I consider this a success but feel free to move this thread to wherever it's appropriate. I say it's a success because when I started this journey I was in a position of looking to pay interest on all these accounts, allowing them to default stopped that and so even though I am paying the full amount, it is without a doubt reduced from my position 3 years ago and I feel knowing this outcome was possible, happy to gotten this far, defended myself in person and left with a loan with terms I could only dream of, written into law as interest free! I will make better decisions in the future on other accounts, knowing key stages of this whole process. We had the opportunity to speak in court, Judge (feels like just before a ruling) was clear in such that he 'had all the relevant paperwork to make a judgement'. He wasn't pleased I hadn't settled before Court.. but then stated due to WS and verbal arguments on why I haven't settled, from my WS conclusion as follows: "11. The Defendant was not given ample evidence to prove the debt and therefore was not required to enter settlement negotiations. Should the debt be proved in the future, the Defendant is willing to enter such negotiations with the Claimant. "  He offered to stand down the case to give us chance to settle and that that was for my benefit specifically - their Sols didn't want to, he asked me whether I wanted to proceed to judgement or be given the opportunity to settle. Naturally, I snapped his hand off and we entered negotiations (took about 45 minutes). He added I should get legal advice for matters such as these. They were unwilling to agree to a TO unless it was full amount claimed, plus costs, plus interest. Which I rejected as I felt that was unfair in light of the circumstances and the judges comments, I then countered with full amount minus all costs and interest over 84 months. They accepted that. I believe the Judge wouldn't have been happy if they didn't accept a payment plan for the full amount, at this late stage. The judge was very impressed by my articulate defence and WS (Thanks CAG!) he respected that I was wiling to engage with the process but commented only I  can know whether this debt is mine, but stated that Civil cases were based on balance of probabilities, not without shadow of a doubt, and all he needs to determine is whether the account existed. Verbal arguments aside; he has enough evidence in paperwork for that. He clarified that a copy of a DN and NOA is sufficient proof based on balance of probabilities that they were served. I still disagree, but hey, I'm just me.. It's definitely not strict proof as basically I have to prove the negative (I didn't receive them/they were not served), which is impossible. Overall, a great result I think! BT  
    • Seeking further advice now. The 33 days in which the defendant has to submit a defence expires at 16:00 tomorrow. The defendant has submitted an acknowledgement of service but looking to get the claim awarded by default in failure to submit the defence. This is MoneyClaim Online and can see an option to request a default judgement but believe that is for failure to acknowledge the claim within 14 days??  So being MoneyClaim Online, how do I request the claim be awarded in my favour?
    • Have to agree with the above Health and safety legislation is specific in that the service provider in so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees and those not in the employ of the business. You claim is like saying you slipped in the swimming pool area while taking a dip. As rightly stated by by the leisure centre, a sports hall has dedicated equipment and you yourself personally have a legal obligation in mitigating danger or injury to yourself by taking account of your immediate surroundings. Where your claim will fail is if it is reasonable and proportionate to impose liability of the Leisure Centre? The answer has to be no.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Ihateinjustice v Civil Enforcement.... Bailiffs.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4736 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am another unfortunate victim of Civil Enforcement/newlyn and have been in touch with my MP and followed lots of cases each time more horrified than the last that this is allowed to go on. I have taken advice and wrote to Newlyn pointing out breach of contract etc and sat tight thinking they cannot touch me then I came accross the following l and my heart just stopped!

 

To whom it may concern,

 

I would like to know where or whom I should complain to about a recent visit from Newlyn Bailiffs sent by a local authority for outstanding parking fines on my cousins motor vehicle, a 2002 Toyota Celica.

 

The vehicle was apparently photographed with two wheels on the curb on two occasions, parking fines where dispatched to my cousins previous address as he had not changed the V5 DVLA vehicle registration document advising the change of address ( he has taken out a log book loan with a broker and had not finished repaying so the V5 was not in his possession to send to the DVLA to advise this change).

 

On Saturday 4th April 2009, a Bailiff vehicle with Automatic Number Plate Recognition cameras identified the Toyota as being a vehicle with outstanding parking fines.

 

The Bailiffs clamped the car around 6AM in the morning.

 

My cousin discovered the clamp around 11AM apon leaving his new address, two Bailiffs were standing by the vehicle, when asked why they had clamped the car they explained there was a Warrant Of Execution for two unpaid penalty charges, £155 for each PCN totalling £310 from Bromley Council, plus £690 Bailiffs charges, my cousin called me for help in settling this financial matter.

 

Apon my arrival my cousin advised me the Bailiffs had called a tow truck to take the car away as he could not come up with the money immediately,

 

From the Bailiffs I requested that they provide documentation showing the warrant they were executing and for them to show some identification. They took my cousin over to their van and opened a laptop computer and showed him two Warrant Of Execution documents, he requested a printout so the Bailiff went away for a period and came back with this, they also showed him their ID's.

 

I offerred to pay the £310 for the unpaid penalty charges on my credit card and this was promptly refused as they demanded £1000 or the car would be taken, I explained to them that I would not be willing to put that amount on my card and that taking the car would not be an option if they refused my offer of payment, their response was to call the Police on a pretext that there was about to be a breach of the peace. I recognized this as a intimidating tactic and suggested that they do call the Police as their charges were grossly exuberant and it appeared they were piggy backing the justice system to extort money for their own a personal gain or for others.

 

Two Police officers arrived promptly and later a tow truck, my cousins girlfriend sat in his Toyota vehicle while he ran around trying to contact the local authority to verify the unpaid penalty claims made by the two Bailiffs, as he had no previous knowledge of fines being levied against the vehicle. This took some time to get through to anyone so the Bailiffs started started knocking on his front door demanding that he come out.

 

After an hour of pleading for the Bailiff to accept my offer of £310 another Police Officer arrived (I am not sure why there was a need for three police officers as there was no raised voices or gestures being offered to the two Bailiffs). Two hours passed and a further two police officers arrived, now a total of five police officers. The Bailiffs still being unable to tow the vehicle as the young lady was still sat inside with the doors locked were no becoming angry and calling me an idiot as I was telling them their actions were unprofessional. The police officers were now fed up at being called to this dispute and getting deperate to go, telling us "the car now belong to the court as there was a Warrant of Executon", I told them respectively that they were wrong. In fact one said to my cousin, "can't you see that you have got five police officers here when that could be doing something more important", I asked the officer "why is there five of you here", he turned to me but could not provide an answer.

 

The Bailiff asked the tow truck driver for help in opening up the car door, he refused and said he was only there to tow the car and is not getting involved.

 

One of the Bailiffs (Mr Gideon Grundeling) then went to his van and came back with a car jack, he went away again and came back with a wheel brace and immediately started smashing at the drivers window, the first three blows echoed the street, the fourth blow shattered the drivers car door window showering the visibly shaken lady in shards of glass. The Bailiff entered the Toyota from the drivers side, reached over and opened the passengers door, one of the five police officers who stood by watching the Bailiffs unlawful actions approached the youg lady still sitting in the car and said she would be arrested for obstruction if she did not leave the vehicle, so she did.

 

The tow truck which had already lowered its spectacle lifts behind the wheels of the Toyota very quickly lifted the car and drove away, followed by the Bailiffs in their van and three police cars, leaving us with no notice that the car had been seized. The young lady was not cut by the flying glass luckily, but she was clearly shaken by the experience. The police who (apparently) have a duty of care to us citizens showed none, I hate to think what could have happened if the wheel brace flew out of his hand into the car.

 

I have since paid the outstanding fines directly to the local authority on behalf of my cousin, but I can't stomach paying extortion money, so unfortunately they still have the car and have since added charges for the tow truck and storage, they are now asking for £1400..........help.

 

OK SO THAT WAS THE EMAIL....

 

The car is under finance with logbook loans. Logbook loans contacted me saying that the bailiffs had been in touch with them and that they invoiced them around £300 to release the car. I told them not to get involved. So i spoke to the bailiffs like a day later and then quoted me £802.93 for the release. They still havn't said anything about the repair of my vehicle yet.

 

CAN SOMEONE PLEASE HELP!!!!

 

Criminal to say the least . . .:-o

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was about to say the same, lamma.

 

Worth a comparison...? The bailiffs started with being 'the right side of legal', referred to them as the Council had not got a reply. But the charges are unbelievable and bet you they include the cost of time spent arguing on the day with the bailiffs and a list of other things, then also storage charges to add while they hold on to the vehicle. Can challenge whether the charges are legally reasonable, can also challenge bailiff certificates...a bit more teeth than with PPC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am another unfortunate victim of Civil Enforcement/newlyn and have been in touch with my MP and followed lots of cases each time more horrified than the last that this is allowed to go on. I have taken advice and wrote to Newlyn pointing out breach of contract etc and sat tight thinking they cannot touch me then I came accross the following l and my heart just stopped!

 

To whom it may concern,

 

I would like to know where or whom I should complain to about a recent visit from Newlyn Bailiffs sent by a local authority for outstanding parking fines on my cousins motor vehicle, a 2002 Toyota Celica.

 

The vehicle was apparently photographed with two wheels on the curb on two occasions, parking fines where dispatched to my cousins previous address as he had not changed the V5 DVLA vehicle registration document advising the change of address ( he has taken out a log book loan with a broker and had not finished repaying so the V5 was not in his possession to send to the DVLA to advise this change).

 

On Saturday 4th April 2009, a Bailiff vehicle with Automatic Number Plate Recognition cameras identified the Toyota as being a vehicle with outstanding parking fines.

 

The Bailiffs clamped the car around 6AM in the morning.

 

My cousin discovered the clamp around 11AM apon leaving his new address, two Bailiffs were standing by the vehicle, when asked why they had clamped the car they explained there was a Warrant Of Execution for two unpaid penalty charges, £155 for each PCN totalling £310 from Bromley Council, plus £690 Bailiffs charges, my cousin called me for help in settling this financial matter.

 

Apon my arrival my cousin advised me the Bailiffs had called a tow truck to take the car away as he could not come up with the money immediately,

 

From the Bailiffs I requested that they provide documentation showing the warrant they were executing and for them to show some identification. They took my cousin over to their van and opened a laptop computer and showed him two Warrant Of Execution documents, he requested a printout so the Bailiff went away for a period and came back with this, they also showed him their ID's.

 

I offerred to pay the £310 for the unpaid penalty charges on my credit card and this was promptly refused as they demanded £1000 or the car would be taken, I explained to them that I would not be willing to put that amount on my card and that taking the car would not be an option if they refused my offer of payment, their response was to call the Police on a pretext that there was about to be a breach of the peace. I recognized this as a intimidating tactic and suggested that they do call the Police as their charges were grossly exuberant and it appeared they were piggy backing the justice system to extort money for their own a personal gain or for others.

 

Two Police officers arrived promptly and later a tow truck, my cousins girlfriend sat in his Toyota vehicle while he ran around trying to contact the local authority to verify the unpaid penalty claims made by the two Bailiffs, as he had no previous knowledge of fines being levied against the vehicle. This took some time to get through to anyone so the Bailiffs started started knocking on his front door demanding that he come out.

 

After an hour of pleading for the Bailiff to accept my offer of £310 another Police Officer arrived (I am not sure why there was a need for three police officers as there was no raised voices or gestures being offered to the two Bailiffs). Two hours passed and a further two police officers arrived, now a total of five police officers. The Bailiffs still being unable to tow the vehicle as the young lady was still sat inside with the doors locked were no becoming angry and calling me an idiot as I was telling them their actions were unprofessional. The police officers were now fed up at being called to this dispute and getting deperate to go, telling us "the car now belong to the court as there was a Warrant of Executon", I told them respectively that they were wrong. In fact one said to my cousin, "can't you see that you have got five police officers here when that could be doing something more important", I asked the officer "why is there five of you here", he turned to me but could not provide an answer.

 

The Bailiff asked the tow truck driver for help in opening up the car door, he refused and said he was only there to tow the car and is not getting involved.

 

One of the Bailiffs (Mr Gideon Grundeling) then went to his van and came back with a car jack, he went away again and came back with a wheel brace and immediately started smashing at the drivers window, the first three blows echoed the street, the fourth blow shattered the drivers car door window showering the visibly shaken lady in shards of glass. The Bailiff entered the Toyota from the drivers side, reached over and opened the passengers door, one of the five police officers who stood by watching the Bailiffs unlawful actions approached the youg lady still sitting in the car and said she would be arrested for obstruction if she did not leave the vehicle, so she did.

 

The tow truck which had already lowered its spectacle lifts behind the wheels of the Toyota very quickly lifted the car and drove away, followed by the Bailiffs in their van and three police cars, leaving us with no notice that the car had been seized. The young lady was not cut by the flying glass luckily, but she was clearly shaken by the experience. The police who (apparently) have a duty of care to us citizens showed none, I hate to think what could have happened if the wheel brace flew out of his hand into the car.

 

I have since paid the outstanding fines directly to the local authority on behalf of my cousin, but I can't stomach paying extortion money, so unfortunately they still have the car and have since added charges for the tow truck and storage, they are now asking for £1400..........help.

 

OK SO THAT WAS THE EMAIL....

 

The car is under finance with logbook loans. Logbook loans contacted me saying that the bailiffs had been in touch with them and that they invoiced them around £300 to release the car. I told them not to get involved. So i spoke to the bailiffs like a day later and then quoted me £802.93 for the release. They still havn't said anything about the repair of my vehicle yet.

 

CAN SOMEONE PLEASE HELP!!!!

 

Criminal to say the least . . .:-o

 

This is dreadful.

 

In the first instance can you contactthe Traffic Enforcement Centre on 01604 619450 and ask them to confirm to you the name and address on the Warrant of Executions. You will need the PCN numbers from Bromley before making the call.

 

From what you have posted, it is clear that all documentation had been sent to the wrong address and you will no doubt receive confirmation of this from TEC.

 

If correct, then you will need to complete an Out of Time Statutory Declaration IMMEDIATELY. TEC will e-mail a copy to you.

 

Can you post back when you have received confirmation.

 

PS: The local authority (Bromley) are wholly responsible for "all acts and ommissions" of their agents (bailiffs) and it is the council who will have to be responsible for the damage to the vehicle.

 

Have you made a formal complaint to both Bromley and Newlyn Collections?

 

PS: You need to be aware that many bailiff companies read posts on here so be cautious of what you are writing and it is best to remove the name of the bailiff !! (( edit button )

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have done some digging - this incident is kenze's and appears on thread entitled Newlyn Smashed Up Car Window While My Girlfriend Was In It After Refusing Part Payment Of £1000 In Police Presence !

Is there any point in continuing with this thread, as ihateinjustice seems to have simply quoted the case as an example?

ihateinjustice, it might help to know that Newlyns have a number of clients and much depends on what role they are carrying out. In this case they are operating in an enforcement role for the local authority. This has different powers attached as against carrying out debt collection on parking invoices for CEL. Hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

a very old thread still, i don't believe that the police never did anything when gideon was breaking the glass as when a vehicle is clamped it becomes the property of Northampton county court and thus according to you the bailiff was committing criminal damage.Secondly why is a bailiff a bastard when all he ask for is the fees,if your cousin had changed the address on time he would have recievd the letters and sorted it one way or the other with the bailiff before the vehicle got clamped.

gone are the days when bailiff used to be a essex gangster,now with companies like JBW in the market a bailiff is more of a salesperson then a rude boy and his task is to collect monies owed to debtor is most friendly and professional way.a BAILIFF works by the book on the instruction of the courts.

pay your fines and if you cant pay them then call the bailiff company before the vehicle is clamped and sort some kind of arrangement,a bailiff doesn't like the shouting and the swearing at them as at the end of the day he is just doing his job.

Link to post
Share on other sites

a very old thread still, i don't believe that the police never did anything when gideon was breaking the glass as when a vehicle is clamped it becomes the property of Northampton county court and thus according to you the bailiff was committing criminal damage.Secondly why is a bailiff a bastard when all he ask for is the fees,if your cousin had changed the address on time he would have recievd the letters and sorted it one way or the other with the bailiff before the vehicle got clamped.

gone are the days when bailiff used to be a essex gangster,now with companies like JBW in the market a bailiff is more of a salesperson then a rude boy and his task is to collect monies owed to debtor is most friendly and professional way.a BAILIFF works by the book on the instruction of the courts.

pay your fines and if you cant pay them then call the bailiff company before the vehicle is clamped and sort some kind of arrangement,a bailiff doesn't like the shouting and the swearing at them as at the end of the day he is just doing his job.

 

 

If only this were true, and bailiffs didn't load fees wrongfully, such as charging an attendance to remove for pushing a letter through etc.

 

they should be sent through a timewarp back to 1211 AD imho

 

We will have to agree to disagree perhaps a billy goat gruff will be along soon

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

the fees of bailiff are set by the council they are collecting for and are authorized by the court,by not pay fines in first place then shouting in the end when a car gets clamped.even from recieving the first letter the car is not clamped the second day so why not call the bailiff and sort the debt rather than wait for the clamp.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the fees of bailiff are set by the council they are collecting for and are authorized by the court,by not pay fines in first place then shouting in the end when a car gets clamped.even from recieving the first letter the car is not clamped the second day so why not call the bailiff and sort the debt rather than wait for the clamp.

 

What should I do if i am parked by an address and on the phone in my motor when a bailiff tries to levy my motor for a debt at the address he's attending that I happen to be parked outside then?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

the fees of bailifflink3.gif are set by the council they are collecting for and are authorised by the court,

 

No they are set by legislation it has nothing to do with the council or the court if its council tax or PCN

 

the only thing the local authority may have an input with is the attendance to remove fee (after a valid levy) where they may cap the fee a bailiff in there employment can charge and even then it can subject to a detailed assessment in court

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1988/2050/contents/made

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1992/613/regulation/34/made

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2003/1857/contents/made

Link to post
Share on other sites

What should I do if i am parked by an address and on the phone in my motor when a bailiff tries to levy my motor for a debt at the address he's attending that I happen to be parked outside then?

seems like you have had quiet a bad experience with a micky moss bailiff.how can a bailiff levy on a vehicle that doesnt belong to a debtor,he can only levy on the vehicle if the DVLA comes positive in the debtor name and the dvla report doesn't come overnight,a bailiff might commit a mistake ..... if he does he can loose his license..or making the company lose the contract cause of his actions..no matter how small or big the debt is surely the council is a phone call away and there to help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

seems like you have had quiet a bad experience with a micky moss bailiff.how can a bailiff levy on a vehicle that doesnt belong to a debtor,he can only levy on the vehicle if the DVLA comes positive in the debtor name and the dvla report doesn't come overnight,a bailiff might commit a mistake ..... if he does he can loose his license..or making the company lose the contract cause of his actions..no matter how small or big the debt is surely the council is a phone call away and there to help.

 

Seems like you need to do some more reading of some the tricks these "gentlemen" get up to.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems like you need to do some more reading of some the tricks these "gentlemen" get up to.

 

PT

 

PT I suspect there are defenders of Ogremor who reside under bridges on here looking for three billy goats gruff, or they are naive enough to think all bailiffs act according to the law.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

535 boy.

 

Can I just correct some points that you have raised in two of your posts: The first one is as follows:

"the fees of bailiff are set by the council they are collecting for and are authorized by the court,

This is NOT true. The fees are nothing at all to do with the council. For the collection of road traffic debts, the fees are statutory fees as laid down by Parliament ( and at this present, being ignored by many bailiff companies!!)

 

Your second error is this one:

"When a vehicle is clamped it becomes the property of Northampton County Court".

This is complete nonsense. All that NCC do is register the debt the unpaid parking ticket and provide the AUTHORITY for the local council to issue a warrant. The local authority have to pay a fee of £7 to NCC for each warrant requested.

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...