Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Daft question - but you filed the defence on-line on MCOL as dx indicated, right?
    • We looked up the e-mail address so communications would be in writing.  If you do stuff on the phone the other party can just deny the contents of the conversation.  They can't deny what's written in an e-mail. So time to sort Pete out.  Check the following for accuracy and change anything I've got wrong.  Then e-mail Pete this evening.  I was thinking of threatening the pub with legal action but let's initially be nice.   Dear Pete, Re: PCN no.XXXXX, claim form no.XXXXX on 23 July 2022 I was a customer at your pub and I attach proof of purchase. I was picking up my cousin Ms XXXXX and her family as she was working as a cook with you at the time.  I entered the pub through the back door, went to the bar, and ordered a drink and a meal.  At no point did any bar staff alert me that I needed to add my registration number or did I see any signs advising me to do so.  I then took a seat outside in a small seated area so I could chat to my cousin while waiting for her to finish work.  We were joined by the management of the pub and bar staff during my time waiting  I was shocked a few days later when I received a demand for £100 from Civil Enforcement Ltd.  i contacted the pub and was told "don't worry, it's not enforceable". Well, that information turned out to be nonsense because I have now received a county court claim form from CEL. I contacted the pub again on XXXXX and was extremely disappointed to be told "there's nothing we can do". Of course there is something you can do.  You are the organ grinder.  You called CEL in.  You can call your dogs off.  Your pub has absolutely superb reviews on Google Maps regarding the way in which you treat guests.  Do you really think customers should be dragged to court?  I'm sure you don't. I am therefore requesting that you intervene and instruct CEL to cease court action. Yours, XXXXX
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capone/cabot v OH (disputed Acc)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3328 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I hope Mrs B forgave you Beachy! :)

Im happy to help with support and my own opinions but as i have no legal qualifications If I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 455
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

so if what they have now sent you is different from what they originally sent you in response to s77/79 (and which they no doubt confirmed WAS a true copy), then they lied! unless you have two agreements

 

so, if the first copy was not a true copy then they have been in default of the CCA all this time so any charges added to your account and any enforcement action, bad credit references etc a]have all been unlawful!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great you got forgiven Beachy!:)

Im happy to help with support and my own opinions but as i have no legal qualifications If I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi all

 

Receved threats from capital one s driscle brothers FPC and demands and calls and told them politely to bug off as their client could not sent me the signed copy of cca and subject access report.

They said they are going back to crapone and let them deal with me.

any thought or advixce will be much appreciated

Hussy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

Receved threats from capital one s driscle brothers FPC and demands and calls and told them politely to bug off as their client could not sent me the signed copy of cca and subject access report.

They said they are going back to crapone and let them deal with me.

any thought or advixce will be much appreciated

Hi Hussy

i would call that victory of sorts! :DThey given up on you and passing you back to crapone,I would wait and see what crapones next move is now you made it clear to them account in dispute:)

Im happy to help with support and my own opinions but as i have no legal qualifications If I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi sunflower

Thank you for encouraging words.

almost exactly samething happend with MBNA .they threatend charging order through a legal firm and then reduced the debit to 3k from 9k if paid in 60 days as final settlement .

Told them cannot afford a penny today they have written me a letter offering all the interest frozen no further charges and set up standing order and pay the amount i wish to pay etc but the ccount will still be classed as default.

If they defaulting me anyway so what is the point of paying them?

any advice on this one will also be highly appreciated .

thanks

Hussy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi sunflower

Thank you for encouraging words.

almost exactly samething happend with MBNA .they threatend charging order through a legal firm and then reduced the debit to 3k from 9k if paid in 60 days as final settlement .

Told them cannot afford a penny today they have written me a letter offering all the interest frozen no further charges and set up standing order and pay the amount i wish to pay etc but the ccount will still be classed as default.

If they defaulting me anyway so what is the point of paying them?

any advice on this one will also be highly appreciated .

thanks

Hi Hussy

I never been down that road of settlements or default removal with any DCAS as yet but be very wary of MBNA

Im happy to help with support and my own opinions but as i have no legal qualifications If I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action,

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you come to any arrnagement with MBNA make sure it is a full and final and the fact that they not willing to remove default may mean it is not a full and final,If it is not a full and final the beggers may settle for something called a partial settlement which means that they will be able to pass on the remainder onto another pond feeder

Im happy to help with support and my own opinions but as i have no legal qualifications If I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action,

Link to post
Share on other sites

so the crafty beggers may be telling you the truth that they will not chase you for rest of debt but what they do not tell you is that they will reserve right to sell rest of debt onto some other ****:mad:

Im happy to help with support and my own opinions but as i have no legal qualifications If I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Beachy

we had better not turn this thread into an mbna thread! :eek:

Im happy to help with support and my own opinions but as i have no legal qualifications If I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hussy to avoid hijacking Beachy crapital one thread perhaps we ought to carry on posts on my MBNA thread! if you post on my Restons/MBNA thread on http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legal-issues/199523-restons-mbna-issued-court-27.html we could carry on discussion and help on there as being an MBNA thread it will be more appropriate!

Im happy to help with support and my own opinions but as i have no legal qualifications If I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Beachy

we had better not turn this thread into an mbna thread! :eek:

 

although it is good to cross the T's and dot the i's- at the end of the day you will find that NO court will entertain a claim subsequent to a Full and final settlement of an account- no matter how many people they try to pass the debt onto

 

the courts know exactly what the phrase means

 

IMO it is best to use the phrase "in full and final settlement of all matters between us" when making/confirming a settlement

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi all,

 

OH cca'd capone late 2008, got the same toilet paper as me & most others on CAG :-

 

Cap12ndagree.jpg

 

One sided, blank on reverse + a seperate 'generic' T&Cs which cannot be linked to the above.

 

Dispute letter sent, and in reply OH got this from ellie R :-

 

Cap1Sept.jpg

 

Next came the dodgy DN followed by the infamous Termination Letter.

 

Passed to Debitas, who got nowhere and passed back across the desk to capone then nothing for 12 months when suddenly cabot sent a letter stating they have bought the debt (exactly the same as some others have encountered with the Leeds Losers i.e. two letters in one envelope).

 

OH sent bemused letter to cabot who have now responded with a copy of C1's letter as above with capone stating that there is no dispute.

 

Cabot now wants OH to telephone immediately to arrange repayment.

 

Beachy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I take it you won't be contributing to the 'Lowlifes in Need' fund then? :D

 

:D

 

I wish it was sold off to the Leeds mob, at least OH would be in good company with other members of the capone fan club.

 

OH seems to have the only c1 account thats gone to cabot.

 

As for mine - its still in capones filing cabinet after CQ dropped it.

 

Beachy

Link to post
Share on other sites

when they say they have sent a "scanned image of the original agreement" what they really mean is that they have sent a COPy of the scanned image of the original agreement (probably on accoount of the fact that they destroyed the original agreement after they scanned it to free up their archives

 

anyhow, back to the point

 

so what you have is NOT a true copy of an original executed agreement, it is a true copy of a copy of an original credit agreement

 

in other words not worth diddly squat

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

Its another template.. Delaying payment etc. They have been sending me toilet tissue for nearly two years now, I used to feel that it was all aimed at me personally, but now see that they can not come up with anything new and are just regurgitating the same old crap over and over....

The Grand essentials of happiness are: something to do, something to love, and something to hope for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

they escalated mine to the pre-litigation dept... asked..begged..them to take me to court...was told...and you'll love this... you dont tell us to take you to court..we decide that!!!

oh, and can we offer you a substational discount of 50%?..no but I will take the substantial 100% discount..they asked me if i was being funny??

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

dear sirs

 

re accountXXXXXXXXXX Unlawfully Rescinded

 

I refer to your letter of XXXXXXXXXX.

 

I have not denied entering into an agreement with XXXXX and which was regulated by The Consumer Credit Act 1974 (The Act) However i make no admission as to the terms, conditions or other provisions of the agreement and the extent to which XXXXX may or may not have complied therewith and the extent to which I may or may not have complied therewith. Further and alternatively, it is denied that the agreement was properly executed and/or is now enforceable in whole or in part.

 

Further if it were to have been the case that a properly executed and legally enforceable credit card agreement did exist, then your client unlawfully rescinded it

 

I am waiting for XXXXX to advise me of the genuine arrears that were due at the time of their unlawful rescission (not including unlawful charges and interest added to the account) so that i can establish what amount, if any having regard to a counter claim for unlawful rescission, may be due to XXXXXXXXx

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

XXX

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

they escalated mine to the pre-litigation dept... asked..begged..them to take me to court...was told...and you'll love this... you dont tell us to take you to court..we decide that!!!

oh, and can we offer you a substational discount of 50%?..no but I will take the substantial 100% discount..they asked me if i was being funny??

LOL I love it! debt4get! What a great reponse ! Makes Dca baiting even more worthwhile getting gem letters like that!:D

Im happy to help with support and my own opinions but as i have no legal qualifications If I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...