Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Can anyone help with my redundancy - pregnant


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5316 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Not sure if anyone can help, or offer any advice, but I was told last Tuesday that my role is possibly being made redundant and had my first consultation meeting yesterday.

I'm 21 weeks pregnant and my company are aware of this. There are two other people leaving, both directors, and then my role - a marketing exec, on the grounds that my role is diminishing or being redistributed.

I've worked for them for almost 3 years, so was offered 2 weeks salary with the option of pilon.

 

I have a couple of issues.

First, I don't believe that this is being done fairly, although I've been assured (obviously) that the decision has nothing to do with my pregnancy and that they compared all the roles throughout the company and came up with mine (even though they only had my job description from 3 years ago to go on). Apart from my defence of 'I really don't believe you' I don't know how to challenge this.

Second, I'm aware that I'm only 4 weeks away (my usual notice period) from qualifying for SMP. If I work one day into w/c 1st Nov, my employer is liable to pay me SMP. I pointed this out (when I asked if I had the option of working my notice rather than pilon) and the HR manager said something along the lines of 'he'd try to wangle it so that they pay me the 6 weeks at 90%, to sweeten the deal'.

Now, clearly he has no idea how SMP is calculated (I went to the HMRC site to double check my dates/figures as an employer and it all works out right) so I don't see how a) he can 'wangle it' like he's dong me a favour and b) how he can agree to pay me 6 weeks- SMP Is 39 weeks and they get it back anyway (which he pointed out to me, in a sense of 'we get that money back anyway, so I can write that off). Actually, I'm entitled to SMP if I qualify, which I will if this consultation goes on until that week.

Sorry for ranting - I'm pretty furious with them for making me feel so worthless, trying to make me think that they're doing me a favour by paying my SMP etc.

I'll call ACAS later this morning for more advice, but wondered what any of you thought?

My OH has suggested I put everything in a letter (i.e. stress this is causing during this vulnerable time, the fact that they've taken away my security and option of returning to work after my maternity leave, how no employer will touch me now anyway being this far along) and ask for a years salary as my package (which I think is way too much, but he said, they've come in with a low offer, seeing what they can get away with) and present it at my next consultation.

Oh, and he was half an hour late to my appointment, thinking it was 11am rather than 10am.:rolleyes:

Don't know what to do - it's zapping my strength.

Thanks for reading - any advice? Or wwyd in my situation?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand that bit, but if they don't pay me it, then they're trying to wriggle out of it, which they can't do.

Sorry, I'm all over the place at the mo, going between anger and floods of tears. I've drafted a very terse letter for my next meeting, and requested the resources used to select my role for redundancy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Not sure if anyone can help, or offer any advice, but I was told last Tuesday that my role is possibly being made redundant and had my first consultation meeting yesterday.

I'm 21 weeks pregnant and my company are aware of this. There are two other people leaving, both directors, and then my role - a marketing exec, on the grounds that my role is diminishing or being redistributed.

I've worked for them for almost 3 years, so was offered 2 weeks salary with the option of pilon.

 

I have a couple of issues.

First, I don't believe that this is being done fairly, although I've been assured (obviously) that the decision has nothing to do with my pregnancy and that they compared all the roles throughout the company and came up with mine (even though they only had my job description from 3 years ago to go on). Apart from my defence of 'I really don't believe you' I don't know how to challenge this.

Second, I'm aware that I'm only 4 weeks away (my usual notice period) from qualifying for SMP. If I work one day into w/c 1st Nov, my employer is liable to pay me SMP. I pointed this out (when I asked if I had the option of working my notice rather than pilon) and the HR manager said something along the lines of 'he'd try to wangle it so that they pay me the 6 weeks at 90%, to sweeten the deal'.

Now, clearly he has no idea how SMP is calculated (I went to the HMRC site to double check my dates/figures as an employer and it all works out right) so I don't see how a) he can 'wangle it' like he's dong me a favour and b) how he can agree to pay me 6 weeks- SMP Is 39 weeks and they get it back anyway (which he pointed out to me, in a sense of 'we get that money back anyway, so I can write that off). Actually, I'm entitled to SMP if I qualify, which I will if this consultation goes on until that week.

Sorry for ranting - I'm pretty furious with them for making me feel so worthless, trying to make me think that they're doing me a favour by paying my SMP etc.

I'll call ACAS later this morning for more advice, but wondered what any of you thought?

My OH has suggested I put everything in a letter (i.e. stress this is causing during this vulnerable time, the fact that they've taken away my security and option of returning to work after my maternity leave, how no employer will touch me now anyway being this far along) and ask for a years salary as my package (which I think is way too much, but he said, they've come in with a low offer, seeing what they can get away with) and present it at my next consultation.

Oh, and he was half an hour late to my appointment, thinking it was 11am rather than 10am.:rolleyes:

Don't know what to do - it's zapping my strength.

Thanks for reading - any advice? Or wwyd in my situation?

 

Hi,

 

Sorry to hear that you are in this situation. A couple of questions:

 

*The two Directors that you refer to who are also at risk of redundancy- are they male or female?

 

*"He'd try to wangle it so that they pay me 6 weeks SMP to sweeten the deal" - As you are in the consultation period, is he pre-empting the outcome of a 'possible' redundancy situation?

 

While consultation does not have to end in agreement, it must be properly carried out with a view to reaching agreement, including ways of avoiding the redundancies or minimising their effect, it does not always necessarily end in redundancy, with this in mind.....

 

*Have they provided you with any suggested suitable alternative positions or an alterntive way of working your current role (for example would you consider working shorter hours?) IF yours role is definitley made redundant?

 

I understand that they have said your role is dimishing or could be re-distributed but as they based it on a job spec from 3 years ago I would ask how they analysed your role and decided that you should be put at risk? If there anyone else in Marketing?

 

I'm not great with the financial side of your query but as a HR Manager who has been through redundancies recently and is aware of the do's and don'ts I may be able to help you on this side of things.

 

Let me know the answers to the above and I'll come to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Sorry to hear that you are in this situation. A couple of questions:

 

*The two Directors that you refer to who are also at risk of redundancy- are they male or female?

Thanks Rebecca - one is male, our MD, who volunteered to step down, the other is female, has been there for 8 years and is on a very good older contract so is happy with the decision.

 

*"He'd try to wangle it so that they pay me 6 weeks SMP to sweeten the deal" - As you are in the consultation period, is he pre-empting the outcome of a 'possible' redundancy situation?

I'm not sure what he's doing with this - I wanted to double check with him that he was aware that if I worked my notice, I'd be eligible for maternity pay, and that was his response (kind of left me open mouthed to be honest!)

 

While consultation does not have to end in agreement, it must be properly carried out with a view to reaching agreement, including ways of avoiding the redundancies or minimising their effect, it does not always necessarily end in redundancy, with this in mind.....

 

*Have they provided you with any suggested suitable alternative positions or an alterntive way of working your current role (for example would you consider working shorter hours?) IF yours role is definitley made redundant?

Nope - he was apparently looking for alternative roles throughout the company, including sister companies (I only heard this through my boss), but he didn't mention it to me.

 

I understand that they have said your role is dimishing or could be re-distributed but as they based it on a job spec from 3 years ago I would ask how they analysed your role and decided that you should be put at risk? If there anyone else in Marketing?

I've asked me clarification on how they came up with my role as being one at risk so hope to get that soon. I also mentioned that I wanted this info as I have 'suspicions that I was selected unfairly on the grounds of my pregnancy and my recent notification of maternity leave'. There are two others in marketing (I'm the lowest of the three), the middle one has only just started on a 3 month contract, so has a couple of months left. In my eyes, they should have just not renewed her contract, and then the headcount from marketing would have been down one, but I just feel that they've taken this opportunity to get rid of me before I go on mat leave rather than think longer term.

 

I'm not great with the financial side of your query but as a HR Manager who has been through redundancies recently and is aware of the do's and don'ts I may be able to help you on this side of things.

 

Let me know the answers to the above and I'll come to you.

Thanks for the help, my OH has asked his HR dept for advice too - they're just shocked that they're bothering with the pregnant woman! I fully understand that I'm not immune at all, but there are plenty of other roles that I think could have been considered.

I've been asked to come up with alternatives, but in all honesty, I can't afford to work reduced hours.

So I've asked for the selection information, pointed out that I feel I may have been selected unfairly, and requested a copy of the redundancy policy (which I thought was in my contract but it wasn't). My next approach (depending on the response) is a letter basically stating that I'd prefer to get this sorted without the need for me to raise a formal grievance.

Stressful times!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...