Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx, What you have written is certainly helpful to my understanding. The only thing I would say, what I found to be most worrying and led me to start this discussion is, I believe the judge did not merely admonish the defendant in the case in question, but used that point to dismiss the case in the claimants favour. To me, and I don't have your experience or knowledge, that is somewhat troubling. Again, the caveat being that we don't know exactly what went on but I think we can infer the reason for the judgement. Thank-you for your feedback. EDIT: I guess that the case I refer to is only one case and it may never happen again and the strategy not to appeal is still the best strategy even in this event, but I really did find the outcome of that case, not only extremely annoying but also worrying. Let's hope other judges are not quite so narrow minded and don't get fixated on one particular issue as FTMDave alluded to.
    • Indians, traditionally known as avid savers, are now stashing away less money and borrowing more.View the full article
    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. I'm not sure that I agree the reason why a barrister would say that, only to get new customers, I'm sure he must have had professional experience in this area that qualifies him to make that point. 🙂 In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Is it possible that a PPC (claimant) could refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

What's it like to work in Job Centre?


Jan4a
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5286 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Excellent post, antone - there you go guys, from the horses mouth.

 

Thanks Erika. Coming from you, that is high praise :D

 

I suppose I should also point out that when I went through the recruitment process I had no idea whether I would end up working in a BDC, a Contact Centre, or an actual High Street Jobcentre.

 

It's also worth noting that it's possible to end up on a waiting list. All candidates who pass the application/test/interview must be considered for available posts, so there is something called a "Merit List". As posts become available, they will work their way down this list. In general, people are recruited in groups, presumably because it's more cost-effective to train people in these groups rather than individually.

 

So a candidate might get a letter saying "Congratulations, you have passed the selection process" and then not actually get a job for months. That happened to me.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 87
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks Jan, Erika and Antone for interesting and informative discussion. :)

 

The temporary EO jobs at JCP seem now to be being offered for 12 months:

 

Current vacancies - DWP

 

The application form for the new posts is bizarrely called the 'EO Competency Choice Application Form':

 

Applying for vacancies using the EO Competency Choice form - DWP

 

The form asks for the names of 'two personal referees' who are 'people you know well but are not employers or relatives'. But it also says, 'Before we can offer you a post we will have to approach your employer, if you are currently in work.' So that might be to take up a third reference.

 

The guidance notes say, 'When applying for a post within DWP you may be subject to criminal records checks.' So CRB checks do not seem to be mandatory.

 

Of course, there is the usual 'Equal Opportunities Form' as well because the DWP 'embrace diversity'. They ask whether you are heterosexual or gay/? or bisexual or asexual. Curiously they omit transsexual. I hope no one feels left out ... :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

So a candidate might get a letter saying "Congratulations, you have passed the selection process" and then not actually get a job for months. That happened to me.

 

that's what happened to me - they didn't get in touch re interview until a couple of months later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding JC security staff - they are not directly employed by JCP, but instead by Trillium, the company that owns/manages the buildings. I'm surprised to hear about an individual being dismissed by Trillium and hired by JCP, but if they meet the criteria described above, I can see how it could happen.

 

Thanks for very helpful posting Antone. :)

 

Trillium manage the buildings for JCP and sub-contract security from various private security companies. At my jobcentre it is Sekurityass, and our former guard was a Sekurityass employee.

 

This security guard's position became untenable after my friend's acquittal in court. She told obvious lies about him in court and continued to be a big nuisance after he returned to the jobcentre after the trial.

 

But we are pretty sure she jumped before she was pushed. There was no way she could survive in her present job, as least not remaining as the guard in the same jobcentre.

 

On her side it was a smart more to get another job, but it may prove not so smart that she got it with the DWP. She was subject to several serious complaints to the DWP when she was a guard. And her past may easily catch up with her ... :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't worry too much about it. As frontline staff she'll only have very basic access and only then after training. The truth always comes out, pasts always catch up, and karma always bites the bad on their bottoms!

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see that the recently advertised EO and AO jobs are for working in jobcentres, but they say you may alternatively be offered an equivalent position in a Contact Centre or a Benefit Delivery Centre.

 

I'm wondering about a few things:

 

1. If someone applies for an EO job (Band C) may they, dependant on how their application goes, be offered a lower grade AO job (Band B) instead?

 

2. Is the decision to offer someone a position in a jobcentre/BDC/Contact Centre based on an assessment that someone is 'more suitable' for one position or another based on the selection process?

 

3. Or are geographical considerations more important (i.e. recruits nearer jobcentres or BDC's or Contact Centres get sent there because they live closer, saving travel time etc)?

 

4. Might someone, having applied for an EO job in a jobcentre, end up being offered an AO job in a BDC or Contact Centre?

 

5. Do BDC's process claims from specific areas (e.g. a defined region of their local county)? In other words, will claims from my jobcentre always be handled by the same BDC?

 

6. Do BDC staff and and jobcentre staff have much contact?

 

7. Are there rivalries or preceived hierarchies between jobcentres, BDC's and Contact Centres?

 

8. Are all telephone calls from claimants to BDC's and Contact Centres recorded; and to what extent are calls monitored?

 

Sorry about all these questions. I'd ask at my jobcentre, but I think they'd be reluctant to give full and frank answers. Also, they tend to freak out when I ask them things. :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see that the recently advertised EO and AO jobs are for working in jobcentres, but they say you may alternatively be offered an equivalent position in a Contact Centre or a Benefit Delivery Centre.

 

I'm wondering about a few things:

 

1. If someone applies for an EO job (Band C) may they, dependant on how their application goes, be offered a lower grade AO job (Band B) instead?

 

2. Is the decision to offer someone a position in a jobcentre/BDC/Contact Centre based on an assessment that someone is 'more suitable' for one position or another based on the selection process?

 

3. Or are geographical considerations more important (i.e. recruits nearer jobcentres or BDC's or Contact Centres get sent there because they live closer, saving travel time etc)?

 

4. Might someone, having applied for an EO job in a jobcentre, end up being offered an AO job in a BDC or Contact Centre?

 

5. Do BDC's process claims from specific areas (e.g. a defined region of their local county)? In other words, will claims from my jobcentre always be handled by the same BDC?

 

6. Do BDC staff and and jobcentre staff have much contact?

 

7. Are there rivalries or preceived hierarchies between jobcentres, BDC's and Contact Centres?

 

8. Are all telephone calls from claimants to BDC's and Contact Centres recorded; and to what extent are calls monitored?

 

Sorry about all these questions. I'd ask at my jobcentre, but I think they'd be reluctant to give full and frank answers. Also, they tend to freak out when I ask them things. :rolleyes:

 

My answers are not definitive, and are not official answers given by the DWP. So here you go:

 

1) I've never heard of this happening.

 

2) There isn't a simple answer to this. Assignments are based on business requirements, and it's not inconceivable that this would include the suitability of a particular person to a particular role.

 

3) Recruits can ask for such considerations, and if they can be accommodated, they will be. But that's a big "if".

 

4) See answer 1

 

5) Yes, BDCs process claims from a defined area, and they have a number of associated Jobcentres. It's done by postcode.

 

6) Some contact, much of which is via email. There are people specifically assigned to deal with any issues between a JC and a BDC. On the whole, I have few complaints about JC staff. You'd have to ask one of them whether they have complaints about us. As with all working relationships, there are occasional problems - show me a workplace where that doesn't happen.

 

7) No, not really. We are colleagues. We all focus on different aspects of the job we're trying to do.

 

8) Calls to telephony operators are recorded. Others are not. In general, calls are not monitored, though if you're speaking to a trainee, there may be a trainer listening in.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Antone,

 

I had the impression from the way the new jobs are being advertised that the prospect of working in a jobcentre is what is being pushed foremost (i.e. a people job with direct contact with the public).

 

My guess is that most applicants would prefer a jobcentre post (because people, on the whole, like working face-to-face with those they are helping) rather than a Contact Centre or BDC post (where the contact is less direct by telephone).

 

Like I say, just a guess. I think if I was faced with the choice of a position in a Jobcentre/BDC/Contact Centre I would certainly put the jobcentre first because I prefer to deal with people in person and actually see them.

 

Thanks for your answers. I thought perhaps our jobcentre had its own designated BDC because a friend of mine has been directed to the same office (which turns out to be a BDC) for benefits queries, crisis loans etc.

 

Now I'm freaking because I'm starting to use all these DWP abbreviations. EO, AO, BDC; and I've just been reading about AJCS (pronounced Ajax). My poor head ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fitzwilliam: Why? You thinking of applying?

 

No. I have an inquisitive mind. :roll:

 

Jobcentre staff have being pushing the new DWP jobs in recent months, but they didn't mention the possibility that applicants might end up in a BDC or Contact Centre.

 

Hope you are over the flu, Jan, and getting on well in the new temping position. By the looks of things, the DWP may be winding down their recruitment process. I am guessing this because the new contracts seem now to be for 12 months.

 

Maybe if you get some more temping jobs you will escape DWP recruitment. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

My guess is that most applicants would prefer a jobcentre post (because people, on the whole, like working face-to-face with those they are helping) rather than a Contact Centre or BDC post (where the contact is less direct by telephone).

 

 

I wouldn't as I'd be scared of violence and having my car trashed. Much better to be on a phone!

 

Hope you are over the flu, Jan, and getting on well in the new temping position. By the looks of things, the DWP may be winding down their recruitment process. I am guessing this because the new contracts seem now to be for 12 months.

 

Maybe if you get some more temping jobs you will escape DWP recruitment.

 

I have been doing a rapid reclaim from last Weds but I start another temp job next Mon so will only have been on JSA 8 days (it was 7 days last time). It was a good time to get the swine flu over with as it hasn't cost me money! I wasn't working anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Antone,

 

I had the impression from the way the new jobs are being advertised that the prospect of working in a jobcentre is what is being pushed foremost (i.e. a people job with direct contact with the public).

 

My guess is that most applicants would prefer a jobcentre post (because people, on the whole, like working face-to-face with those they are helping) rather than a Contact Centre or BDC post (where the contact is less direct by telephone).

 

Like I say, just a guess. I think if I was faced with the choice of a position in a Jobcentre/BDC/Contact Centre I would certainly put the jobcentre first because I prefer to deal with people in person and actually see them.

 

Thanks for your answers. I thought perhaps our jobcentre had its own designated BDC because a friend of mine has been directed to the same office (which turns out to be a BDC) for benefits queries, crisis loans etc.

 

Now I'm freaking because I'm starting to use all these DWP abbreviations. EO, AO, BDC; and I've just been reading about AJCS (pronounced Ajax). My poor head ...

 

I suppose that if new jobs seem to be pushing frontline Jobcentre work, that could be where the vacancies are. I was actually asked to select in order of preference - would I prefer Jobcentre a, Jobcentre b, the area BDC and so on. I asked for the BDC as my first preference, and that's what I got. Of course, I have no idea if they actually read that form :)

 

In the end I moved from telephony in one BDC to processing in another. It's a personal thing, really: I'm not all that gregarious, so I wouldn't intentionally seek out work that involves face-to-face contact with customers. In the end, though, I'll go wherever I'm sent.

 

Pretty sure there's no Jobcentre with its own dedicated BDC. The one I work in right now has about 15 or so JCs that it works with; the last one had 10. In most areas, Crisis Loans are handled by a different BDC from JSA, ESA, IS and IB. I won't swear that's universal, though - to find out, I'd need to spend all my spare time researching the operational delivery structure of the DWP, and I've got beer to drink and footy to watch :D

 

And yes, the abbreviations, oh ****, the abbreviations. Half of the staff (including me) don't know what they all mean. That's not me insulting my colleagues - you'd need a memory like one of those kids who can remember every London bus number and recite them at will to keep track of them all, heh. It doesn't help that some of them have more than one meaning: for example, PDCS is both "Personal Details Computer System" and "Pension, Carers and Disability Service", heh.

 

I like my job, but I do find some aspects of it to be...bizarre.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again Antone,

 

I think I put it badly when I said 'dedicated BDC'. I merely meant that all benefits enquiries from our jobcentre seem to be directed to the same BDC.

 

I think my friend's Crisis Loan was handled by the same BDC that has handled his other benefit enquiries, but would have to check.

 

Yes, those abbreviations are pretty crazy. I recently found a site listing 'DWP Corporate Abbreviations'. This link takes you to the first of six pages of abbreviations (for A-C alone there are over 300 abbreviations listed):

 

Department for Work and Pensions Corporate Abbreviations: A-C | Flexible New Deal Scandal

 

Probably better not to start reading them, and definitely don't read 'BPA'; but maybe useful to someone for reference.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...