Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
    • Thank you for your responses. As requested, some more detail. Please forgive, I'm writing this on my phone which always makes for less than perfect grammar. My Dad tries but English not his 1st language, i'm born and bred in England, a qualified accountant and i often help him with his admin. On this occasion I helped my dad put in his renewal driving licence application around 6 weeks before expiry and with it the disclosure of his sleep apnoea. Once the licence expired I told him to get in touch with his GP, because the DVLA were offering only radio silence at that time (excuses of backlogs When I called to chase up). The GP charged £30 for an opinion letter on his ability to drive based on his medical history- at the time I didn't take a copy of the letter, but I am hoping this will be key evidence that we can rely on as to why s88 applies because in the GP opinion they saw no reason he couldn't drive i need to see the letter again as im going only on memory- we forwarded the letter in a chase up / complaint to the DVLA.  In December, everything went quiet RE the sleep apnoea (i presume his GP had given assurance) but the DVLA noticed there had been a 2nd medical issue in the past, when my father suffered a one off mini stroke 3 years prior. That condition had long been resolved via an operation (on his brain of all places, it was a scary time, but he came through unscathed) and he's never had an issue since. We were able to respond to that query very promptly (within the 14 days) and the next communication was the licence being granted 2 months later. DVLA have been very slow in responding every step of the way.  I realise by not disclosing the mini stroke at the time, and again on renewal (had I known I'd have encouraged it) he was potentially committing an offence, however that is not relevant to the current charge being levied, which is that he was unable to rely on s88 because of a current medical issue (not one that had been resolved). I could be wrong, I'm not a legal expert! The letter is a summons I believe because its a speeding offence (59 in a temp roadworks 50 limit on the A1, ironically whist driving up to visit me). We pleaded guilty to the speeding but not guilty to the s87.  DVLA always confirmed to me on the phone that the licence had not been revoked and that he "May" be able to continue to drive. They also confirmed in writing, but the letter explains the DVLA offer no opinion on the matter and that its up to the driver to seek legal advice. I'll take the advice to contact DVLA medical group. I'm going to contact the GP to make sure they received the SAR request for data, and make it clear we need to see a copy of the opinion letter. In terms of whether to continue to fight this, or to continue with the defence, do we have any idea of the potential consequences of either option? Thanks all
    • stopping payments until a DN arrives does not equal automatic sale to a DCA...if you resume payments after the DN.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Accompanied Doorstep Collections.


longroad
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5371 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Got to say I agree with this. Not all agents are fiddlers but you never know which are and which arent so be very careful. No matter how nice and friendly and honest your agent seems to be always make sure they sign your payment book and check they have entered the correct date which will be the Saturdays date and the correct amount. Never part with your book without a signed recipts stating the remaining balances and preferably keep copies.

 

A few years ago my wife had a Provi loan which she paid off. A few months down the line she received a letter from their head office demanding the balance due. There was no balance due & she had the payment book to prove it, yet they insisted that £xxx amount was due & unless payment was received etc., etc.

 

Anyway, after several letters, emails & 'phone calls from yours truly they 'told' me to send the payment book to them to be audited......as if. 'No chance' was my reply, although not as succinctly as that & embelished with a few well chosen Anglo-Saxon expletives. If they wanted to audit the payment book they could get their sorry asses here & then they could do it. Literally within the hour a manager turned up at my door & after examining it decided that it would need to go to head office. As it happened I had already scanned the book onto a 'floppy' and that's what the sorry soul left with.

 

A few days later I received an apologetic letter saying that there had been an 'administrative error' and my wife had in fact overpaid by £xx amount & please find enclosed cheque. The irony was that the agent involved was never seen again (she used to collect from my daughter too & suddenly stopped).

 

The moral of the story....check those repayment books with a fine toothcomb & no matter how nice they may seem trust collection agents as far as you can throw them. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

hi all

 

i have just had my regular collector from provident calling, asking if i had had a letter re littlewoods debt from 6 years ago, i just flipped on her and i have known her for years i am so annoyed and to top it off she said would you like to have a loan to pay it off no interest and £80 off the debt, i am so annoyed, she looked worried also as i have said i have known her for years, i am writing to the OFT this is terrible

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its called Fresh Start and its perfectly legal. Perhaps her choice of words are wrong as it isnt a loan as such. Basically Provident have bought old debt and are trying to get people to sign up to paying them and they are offering it interest free and with a reduction. If you are planning to pay the debt off then I would say go for it as you are getting it reduced but be careful not to fall into the trap they are planning on people doing and becoming a regular customer in future.

 

Agents always get the backlash being the one face to face with the customers but they are only doing what their managers have told them to do and they are not getting paid for converting you. This all comes from head office and agents and managers are not exactly pleased to be asking people to do this and even less so when they get people flipping on them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Longroad but it ISNT legal to collect on a 6 yerar old debt just by asking at the door. If the debt is statute barred Provident should NOT be collecting on it without a court order.

 

You really need to read some of the other Provident threads where this has been discussed. The days of the doorstep debt collector are now becoming numbered....

 

Provident are nothing more than loan sharks and need to be avioded at all costs, they do not operate 'ethically', perfect example is the above scheme - if they come round here the collector will be reported to the police and all relevant authorites including the taxman.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I hadnt realised it was a 6yr old debt.

 

I have read all the Provident threads on here and dont see how the days of the doorstep collector are numbered. Provident is as busy as ever and whilst there are still people choosing to pay their rates they will still be here providing their service. I thought loan sharks were unregulated.

 

Not sure why you would report a collected to the poilce or the taxman, perhaps you could explain that futher.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Demanding money at the doorstep (with or withouth menaces) for one on a debt that is unenforceable... that is one reason to report them.

 

I challenge alleged debts now and have had five debts passed from pillar to post when the original creditor failed to pass on that I had paid in full some time ago - five so far this year - hence the reason I am climbing out of the debt mountain.

 

We are entitled to our own opinions and I really feel that it is time the doorstep collectors ARE regulated, ie the no of hours they work, the fact that many actually DON'T get paid for the work they do and the fact that some collectors have been turning up with accompanied children. Is this the sign of an ethical business?

 

If you want to get into discussion on this I think you should start another thread where we can discuss our 'findings' with you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I already said I hadnt realised the debt was 6yrs old. I thought you meant they should be reported just for collecting.

 

I agree everyone is entitled to their own opinions and I havnt said otherwise. Provident agents are regulated and work under the Providents licenses. Im not sure what the number of hours have got to do with anything and I dont know which ones dont get paid but provident agents do get paid a commission based on what they collect and not what they sell. Agents are self employed and there is nothing in the company manual to say they cant collect with children. An agent knows her customers well enough to make the choice of if she taker her kids with her or not. Some customers have been on many many years and love to see the agents kids.

 

I am happy to discuss this on this thread or indeed another if you so wish. I am not out to cause bad feeling, I merely gave my opinion based on the knowledge I have.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had someone bring her kids to try to collect from me. I believe it was to try to guilt me into paying as I hadnt paid anything and didnt intend to pay. I half expected one of the kids to say "please pay so we dont have to live on bread and water", from the doe eyed looks I was getting. But I stuck to my guns and told her to get lost. I did feel guilty and can see that someone with a softer heart might have coughed up.

Edited by minmac
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply Longroad, forgive me if I seem a bit 'ratty', I've got flu at the moment and am on Tamiflu, don't think I have swine flu but the GP said to ring the helpline and they've deemed it prudent to put me on the stuff... nowhere near as bad as I was in November last year.... a new thread might be a good idea...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had someone bring her kids to try to collect from me. I believe it was to try to guilt me into paying as I hadnt paid anything and didnt intend to pay. I have expected one of the kids to say "please pay so we dont have to live on bread and water", from the doe eyed looks I was getting. But I stuck to my guns and told her to get lost. I did feel guilty and can see that someone with a softer heart might have coughed up.

 

What the.......:confused::eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've asked for all the posts from 7th Septe on this thread to be moved to a new thread "Accompanied Doorstep Collectors"

 

It clearly is a practice that should be condoned - psychological harrassment comes to mind here - if I don't get paid my kids don't get fed type thing.

 

As for hours, don't get me on the Working Time Directive which is there for a reason - again if collectors are out late at night with kids the kids aren't getting the best 'care' they need are they?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

i'm glad sillygirl1 said that as it does not seem legal to me, she was shocked to say the least, but i explained to her what i have said on here and she just said ok then i'll tell the office, also i am sure i am supposed to know if a debt of mine is sold? but as stated if it's over 6 years old then they can go whistle

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sillygirl I dont know what the working time directive says but I am assuming you think agents are working lots of hours per week. Is that correct?

 

I dont agree that collectors should have their kids out late at night collecting either. Sometimes it cant be avoided with a lack of childcare or whatever and believe me an agent has no choice with very little or no support whatsoever from a manager.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The working time directive says nobody should work more than 45 hours per week. It's a European directive and BRitain has an opt out clause very sadly in my opinion.

 

The whole issue of people having two or three 'commission only' jobs to get round the 'rules' comes into play here and again if ALL doorstep collectors were subject to the same sort of draconian licencing that parents taking kids on schooltrips go through the better this practice will become.

 

We've heard tales on here of people collecting for mulitple companies at the same time... surely that is a clash of interest and is again intimidatory.

 

Who wants to open their door and be faced with a person with a necklace of about 6 or more ID cards... makes a mockery of the cards themselves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well they could at least leave the kids in the car!!!

 

My sister has a lady from shop a check collect from her and she is as nice as anything, even when my sister was between jobs and didnt pay for weeks on end all the agent would say is ' thats ok, just txt me so I know not to come etc.

 

Now when I stopped paying my provi I got hounded to death with txts and calls from her. She was all nicey nicey when she was getting paid so nice she nearly made my xmas card list a few times, but hell hath no fury like an unpaid provi agent. Even the odd time I used to say I cant pay this week she would act like I just reduced her income to £0.

 

I had enough of her and her jeckell and hyde routime.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I cant say I know any agents who work that kind of hours. You are lucky if they work 20hours per week :)

 

As for collecting for more than one company then please report them as they are not allowed do to this unless of course they have a credit licence themselves and I would doubt that many have as it costs a fair whack to get one.

 

Provident own Greenwoods and an agent from one company should never collect a payment for the other company even as a favour for another agent. It happens because niave agents are not aware they shouldnt do this and the managers just let them do it as to them its another collection sorted. I know agents get a really bad press but they arent all bad and they are just trying to make money to pay their bills like the rest of us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am so annoyed not only that but the cheeky S*d made sure my neighbours knew all about it? and she never normally behaves like that so i think she sis know what she was doing, and i am going to report it defo and she soes have kids but thank god she never brings them, but i have heard that she just collects her hubby does all the figures and everything else

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...