Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good afternoon,    I am writing in reference to the retail dispute number ****, between myself and Newton Autos concerning the sale of a Toyota Avensis which has been found to have serious mechanical faults.    As explained previously the car was found to be faulty just six days after purchase. The car had numerous fault codes that appeared on the dash board and went into limp mode. This required assistance from the AA and this evidence has already been provided. The car continues to exhibit these faults and has been diagnosed as having faults with the fuel injectors which will require major mechanical investigation and repairs.    Newton Autos did not make me aware of any faults upon purchase of the vehicle and sold it as being in good condition.    Newton Autos have also refused to honour their responsibilities under The Consumer Rights Act 2015 which requires them to refund the customer if the goods are found to be faulty and not fit for purpose within 30 days of purchase.    Newton Autos also refused to accept my rejection of the vehicle and refused to refund the car and accept the return of the vehicle.    It is clear to me that the car is not fit for purpose as these mechanical faults occurred so soon after purchase and have been shown to be present by both the AA and an independent mechanic.   Kind regards
    • Commercial Landlords are legally allowed to sue for early cancellation of the lease. You can only surrender your lease if your landlord agrees to your doing so. They are under no obligation even to consider your request and are entitled to refuse. You cannot use this as an excuse not to pay your rent. Your landlord is most likely to agree to your surrendering the lease if they want the property back in order to redevelop it, or if they wants to rent it to what they regards as a better tenant or at a higher rent. There are two types of surrender: Express surrender in writing. This is a written document which sets out the terms of the surrender. Implied surrender by conduct. (applies to your position) You can move out of the property you leased, simply hand your keys back and the lease will come to an end, but only if the landlord agrees to accept your surrender. Many tenants have thought they can simply post the keys through the landlord's letter box and the lease is ended. This is not true and without a document from the landlord, not only do you not know if the landlord has accepted the surrender, you also do not know on what basis they have accepted and could find they sue you for rent arrears, service charge arrears, damage to the property and compensation for your attempt to leave the property without the landlord's agreement. Unless you are absolutely certain that the landlord is agreeable to your departure, you should not attempt to imply a surrender by relying on your and the landlord's conduct.  
    • I had to deal with these last year worst DCA I have ever dealt with. Just wait for the constant threats of CCJ and how you'll lose in court and how they won't do mediation and they want the judge to question you with a load of "BIG" words to boot with the letter. My case was struck out in the end, stupidity on their part as I admitted to owing the debt in the end going through the court process was just a formality as they wouldn't let it drop despite me admitting the debt regardless. They didn't send the last part of the court paper work in so it ended up being struck out     .
    • Well, that's it then. Clear proof of the rubbish cameras. Clear proof of double dipping. G24 won't be getting a penny. Belt & braces, I would write to the address LFI has found, include the evidence of double dipping, and ask Fraser Group to call their dogs off.
    • LOL. after sending Perch capital a CCA request with a stapled £1 PO attached (x2) Their lapdog Legal team TM Legal have sent me two letters today saying "due to a recent payment on the account, your account is open to legal/enforcement action" so i guess they have tried to apply that payment to the account to run the statue bar along. dirty tactics lol.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Visits to Court


Ramseur
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5340 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

As stated, I am taking a Debt Collection Agency to the County Court. Well, the maximum amount of claim is £5000.

 

In this visit, this debt collection agency owes me £10 per month for the last 16 years, and if succesful, I have been told that with interest added this could amount to approximately £3500 which is a big slice of the £5000.

 

Can I then go back to Court and sue for a totally different complaint? How many times would they allow this?

 

It gould be placed in the High Court but I cannot afford anything like that.

 

Regards

 

Ramseur

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Harrassed Senior,

 

OK, here we go.

 

In 1993 I had a CCJ against my name and I was ordered to pay £10 per month. I commenced to pay that money, and I paid it for the next 16 years.

 

I thought I owed more, and they kept sending me differen account numbers with inflated amounts. I sent them an SAR.

 

They had I CCJ for £453 and had diverted my money to an account that was not mine. I am a 70 year old - with chronic heart failure.

 

When I saw what they had done, I phoned them and lost my temper: I ended up in hospital with another heart attack.

 

I am suing them for 16 years at £10 per month.

 

Then I will return to Court and sue them for misppropriating my money and causing an heart attack. There are a pile of other issues, as well.

 

This is a long story - cut short.

 

Ramseur

Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel you are going to need lots of help with this, Ramseur, I hope that you get it.

 

Sorry to hear that an incompetant DCA has had an ill-effect on your health.

 

I think you will need to Subject Access Request the OC and maybe the DCA to find out all the information they have on you including payment history, account numbers etc...

 

I also think you'll struggle claiming any more than 6 years (if indeed you can claim and it is submitted correctly) due to the Limitation Act 1980 unless you can invoke section 32.

 

I really think you need lots of help, so i'll alert the site team.

 

Good luck sorting these monkies out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know if you can take them back to Court, my guess is if it is for something totally different, then maybe....but there's no point in my guessing.

 

Have you already started court action? What did you put in your particulars of claim?

 

Out of my depth, but the Subject Access Request template is in the Library.

 

I assume you meant original creditor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Thailand.

 

I am talking to their solicitor. I have already received the Subject Access Request. They claim they have two Judgements. In The subject access request there is only the one from 1993. ( The case is about 3 CCJ - but there are two of them that are not mine.)

 

I have told their solicitor to produce the two offending Judgements. I have been waiting for 9 days. I email him about 10 times a day - and he ignores my requests.

 

Today, I told him he had 24 hours to produce hard coppies of the Judgements - or else it is all systems go.

 

 

Ramseur

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ramseur

 

You can find out about CCJs from the regsitry of CCJs - CCJs, court orders & fines - Search yourself and others - Trust Online

 

There is no problem in your case with claiming back over 6 years because you can invoke s32 of the Limitations Act 1980 for the remedy of a mistake. In that case, the 6 years starts from when the msutake was discovered not from when it was made.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Steven 4064.

 

Correct me if I am wrong! Are you saying that I can claim for the full 16 years. I have a record of every penny they took from me since August 1993.

 

And, they used every penny of that to clear an account that is not mine.

 

 

Thanks

 

 

Ramseur

Edited by Ramseur
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, I am sure you can - the relevant part of the LImitations Act 1980 is this s32(1)©

32 Postponement of limitation period in case of fraud, concealment or mistake

 

(1) Subject to subsections (3) and (4A) below, where in the case of any action for which a period of limitation is prescribed by this Act, either--

 

(a) the action is based upon the fraud of the defendant; or

 

(b) any fact relevant to the plaintiff's right of action has been deliberately concealed from him by the defendant; or

 

© the action is for relief from the consequences of a mistake;

 

the period of limitation shall not begin to run until the plaintiff has discovered the fraud, concealment or mistake (as the case may be) or could with reasonable diligence have discovered it.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

After all this time I don't think that they can come after you for the original CCJ

 

They applied your money to the wrong account so presumably you are entitled to all of this back, plus interest.

 

A letter demanding repayment might get a response (and some cash) but if you don't go to court you won't be able to enforce the 8% interest

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Steven4064

 

That is great! I really do not know how many times I might ask questioons of you?

 

For example, the debt collection agency took £1920 that should have paid my CCJ and decided to clear another debt (with no Judgement) and leave the amount owing on the the account that had a judgement - but that arrives later.

 

Right now, I am on the verge of appearing in Court, and the opposing solicitor must be licking his lips!!.

 

The first thing I need to do is to calulate how much I claim for the misappropriation of my money. I need to calculate 16 years at £10 per month.

 

Can you help me with this?

 

Ramseur

Edited by Ramseur
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi 2Grumpy,

 

I do appreciate all of this help. My problem is I am only relating what I think is important.

 

For example, when they took my money to clear this nefarious account, they left the original CCJ debt lying dormant since 1995. They then sent this to a debt collector called Response Credit management to pursue the debt - that is when I had my heart attack.

 

Ramseur

Edited by Ramseur
Link to post
Share on other sites

The first thing I need to do is to calulate how much I claim for the misappropriation of my money. I need to calculate 16 years at £10 per month.
16 years at £10/month is 16 * 12 * £10 = £1920

 

You should write a preliminary letter pointing out their mistake (and giving details - accountnumbers and so on) and asking for the money back. Tell them they have 14 days to comply. Tell them that, if they don't, you will then send them a Letter Before Action giving them a further 14 days and after that you will take them to court without any further correspondence.

 

If you get to take them to court, you can add 8% interest which, in your case, will come to an additional £1360

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

The original CCJ was in August 1993. The award consisted £301.33 + Costs. However, there was an accounting error and the "true" amount should have been £164.13 - and not £301.33

 

I had informed the Original Creditor that I no longer resided at the matrimonial of in Nottingham and had removed to London. They had a telephone contact number.

 

I was in the process of discussing the debt when I found that the OC had obtained a Judgement in Nottingham. The OC had sent the court notification to my ex-wife's address in Nottingham - but not to my London address. The OC had denied me the right to defend the case.

 

Although the debt has been dormant since 1995 and is statute barred, the debt collector has told me that they retained an option to activate the Judgement.

 

So, I intend to overturn the Court's decision of 1993 on the grounds that I was denied the opportunity of defending the case, and that the OC had inflated the value of their claim.

 

Can anyone see problems - if not I will continue to the next episode.

 

Ramseur

Edited by Ramseur
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, so glad that you are getting all this help.

 

Most of this is now going 'over my head' so to speak, but I do know that the Statute barred rule does not apply to a CCJ this remains for ever. The only thing that is restricted to 6 years in the CCJ Report on your Credit File.

 

I will keep reading with interest - good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

You've mentioned that you're going to court a couple of times. Have you already issued a claim or has someone issued a claim against you? If so please could you post details deleting any personal information.

 

You mention that you have been paying £10 a month since the judgment but you then say that you weren't aware of it at the time (the claim forms were sent to the wrong address). Please could you clarify this.

 

You need to tread very carefully here. It looks as though you have been the victim of an appalling administrative blunder by a DCA. However, there are only certain things that a court can do (at least on the small claims track) and if you word your claim too widely it may be rejected or put on a track that does expose you to costs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Seminole

 

Right now, I am in coversation with the opposing Solicitor and I have not issued a claim as yet.

 

In 1992, I asked the OC to take the car back as stated in a termination of agreement. The OC told me they didn't want it and instructed me to have the car auctioned and hand the proceeds to them - which I did.

 

I do have proof of this.

 

This mistake in the address. I do have three letters from the CAB to the OC stating that I no longer resided at the matrimonial home.

 

Ramseur

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Seminole,

 

When I found out that a Judgement had been issued, I travelled up from London and called in at the Court.

 

I told the people that I could not afford to pay the amount forthwith, I asked for time. I wrote in to the Court and they agreed £10 per month. This was in 1993.

 

During 1992, I received a letter from the OC telling me I owed on three accounts and they just provided numbers - like **/****** which made no sense to me, and they said I owed about £7000. I did not see the Judgemnt. I felt very relieved to be paying the £10.

 

I have discussed this with the CAB - after an hour - a supervisor arrived in the room and told be he believed that the whole issue was fraud - and suggested a solicitor.

 

Ramseur

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...