Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I am sorry about getting your status mixed up.  I have noticed one thing in your excellent WS. On their claim they are only pursuing you as the keeper-I think it is  in their Point C that  states along the lines of -the driver did not pay , so the keeper is liable. So on your No keeper Liability section  You may prefer  to alter 13 to    . It is trite Law that the driver and the keeper cannot be regarded  as the same person and the claimant has failed to offer any proof who was driving.  BY  only pursuing the keeper  when the PCN does not comply with PoFA must mean that their claim fails. See what the Site team thinks as it should  stop the Judge from looking at who was driving as your statement preempts them from even thinking about it.
    • What would suffice as proof? I just emailed them back my date of birth. Should I send a copy of driving licence? 
    • Which Court have you received the claim from ? Northampton   MCOL Northampton N1 ? Manual Claim CCMCC (Salford) ? New beta WWW.MONEYCLAIMS.SERVICE.GOV.UK ?   If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form.   This has been uploaded in my previous messages in the bundle of documents     Name of the Claimant ? Asset Link Capital (NO5) Limited   How many defendant's  joint or self ? Self   Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to./   14/02/2020   ^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN THE COUNT [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total Not relevant as his claim was set aside, and has now been brought to the court again by the claimant       Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? Please see bundle of documents in previous thread   What is the total value of the claim? £10,734.1    Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred?  Yes - this is one of the grounds for getting it set aside   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? No Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ?  Apparently 2000   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? I do not recall entering into an agreement with Barclays   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ?  It was, but it is not anymore   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Assigned to Asset Link   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No - although they have provided a copy of the assignment notice in their bundle of docs for the hearing   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? I don't remember - but again a copy of a letter has been provided (see bundle on previous thread)   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ?  No    Why did you cease payments?  2015   What was the date of your last payment? December 2015   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?  I wrote to Barclaycard back in 2015 to ask them to send proof of the original agreement but they just sent me a reconstituted document which had no personal deals on relating to me   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? yes - step change took control and set up payments of £1 pm
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Asda-drydens Solicitors-notice Of Intended Civil Recovery


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4976 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HI I HAVEN'T POSTED THREADS BEFORE SO BEAR WITH ME, A MONTH OR SO AGO I WAS, RIGHTFULLY, ARRESTED AND CAUTIONED FOR SHOPLIFTING IN ASDA-A BAG OF FROZEN MUSSELLS (??:confused:??) , A £3.99 BOOK AND SOME HAM...-

I BOUGHT THE REST OF MY SHOPPING COMING TO £20+

I WAS ISSUED PENALTY FINE WHICH IM PAYING IN INSTALLMENTS, AS IM ON BENEFITS FOR SOCIAL PHOBIA,ANXIETY ETC

I WAS PRETTY SCARED BUT POLICE WERE FINE WITH ME AND I LEARNED MY LESSON, ANY HOW I RECEIVED A LETTER FROM DRYDEN'S SOLICITORS ACTING ON BEHALF OF ASDA AND WANT £150 FOR SECURITY COSTS. IF I DO NOT PAY WITHIN 7 DAYS,WHICH HAS PASSED,IT WILL GO UP BETWEEN £80-£150 FOR COURT COSTS. IM TOO SCARED TO RING THEM AS I'VE READ ON HERE THEY'RE "AGGRESSIVE BULLIES" .

I ADMITTED THE OFFENCE.

IS THERE ANYTHING I CAN DO?

IM WORRYING LOADS OVER IT AS THE THREAT OF BAILLIFFS ATTENDING AND CCJ ETC IS KINDA BAD, ESPECIALLY AS I LIVE WITH MY MUM!!

I WAS ALSO BANNED FROM ASDA :|

THANK-YOU FOR TAKING THE TIME TO READ AND PLEASE, ANY ADVICE WILL BE GREATLY APPRECIATED!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Not sure if you understood, but the bump is to bring your thread back to the top, so it doesn't get missed.

Most of the cases posted here involve RLP, but Drydens are operating the same scheme, i.e., civil recovery. Just ignore them, it is unlikely that they will proceed to court. You are paying the police PND, I guess this is punishment enough, and you would be very silly to try to steal from shops again, as you have seen, it costs more than the stuff you stole.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Please keep us up to dat eon the progress of this.

 

If they sue you, they will have to establish their actual losses and will only be bale to recoup those

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Please keep us up to dat eon the progress of this.

 

If they sue you, they will have to establish their actual losses and will only be bale to recoup those

 

 

This is just a personal observation on this and not a case of this always happening. I was involved with a case of an employee who was caught stealing cash and phone top ups. During the civil recovery process the store management guesstimated the amount of costs at £300. The representative of the lad caught refused to pay and asked for a full breakdown. The profit protection manager came in and interviewed a few people about their involvement with the case. It turned out that in the new submission of costs came to over £2800, and this was a legitimate charge. Personally, I would have kept quiet and paid the money first time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Old_andrew2018

Hi Bill,

I was once involved in a similar case having calculated the actual costs it was a staggering, £280,000,000, I had to go to hospital shortly after.

PS your not the bill who used to be in the bed opposite where I was treated for an overdose of Bovine Excreta.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Old_andrew2018

Rebellfoxx, Sorry about the hijack of your thread, on a serious note dont worry these company's make plenty of money from people they frighten into paying, they even Troll forums like ours leaving, at best misinformation at worst lies to confuse the OP.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

You guys just dont get it do you. It isnt RLP, Drydens and the like that calculate the costs, it is the retailer. Like all solicitors, which is what they are, they are instructed.

 

Now oldandrew. Stop hijacking threads and try to be constructive rather than being petty and calling people names.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Old_andrew2018
You guys just dont get it do you. It isnt RLP, Drydens and the like that calculate the costs, it is the retailer. Like all solicitors, which is what they are, they are instructed.

 

Now oldandrew. Stop hijacking threads and try to be constructive rather than being petty and calling people names.

 

What names are being called, the OP needs to know what happens with these companies, and about Trolls, on this and other forums.

A Troll is typically on-line for a time then disappears in to the ether.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, I am genuine. There is only one of me.

 

 

Genuine or not....one of you is still one too many.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You guys just dont get it do you. It isnt RLP, Drydens and the like that calculate the costs, it is the retailer. Like all solicitors, which is what they are, they are instructed.

 

Now oldandrew. Stop hijacking threads and try to be constructive rather than being petty and calling people names.

 

 

It isn't the retailers who 'calculate' the cost it's RLP. Apart from the retail value their charges are fixed at time of contract. How do I know................ guess;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It isn't the retailers who 'calculate' the cost it's RLP. Apart from the retail value their charges are fixed at time of contract. How do I know................ guess;)

 

 

So the recovery companies guess how many hours people spend on investigation??

 

The recovery companies know what covert equiptment was used in an investigation.

 

The recovery companies know who worked on an investigation?

 

 

How do you know?

 

The same as all the rest of the thief supporting liberal whingers, oh I stole from a shop and look how much they are charging me. You know only what you want to know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thieves should be horse whipped

 

As for what amounts to a thieves well I would prefer them to be convicted in a court of law before claiming they ARE actually a thief & not rely on some jumped up little jobs-worth OR retailer who see a few bob in it for themselves especially when an item costs £3.99p & they demand £137! from each of the 2 elderly shoppers

 

Like I said apart from the cost of the item their charges are fixed

Link to post
Share on other sites

So the recovery companies guess how many hours people spend on investigation??

 

The recovery companies know what covert equiptment was used in an investigation.

 

The recovery companies know who worked on an investigation?

 

 

How do you know?

 

The same as all the rest of the thief supporting liberal whingers, oh I stole from a shop and look how much they are charging me. You know only what you want to know.

 

You should be banned from this forum for calling it's members "thief supporting liberal whingers".

 

That is an absolute insult to all who has posted on this board.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry Button, the poster in question is probably one of those who thinks anyone accused of a crime is guilty even before they've been tried in court. I find they don't believe in civil liberties............. except their own

Link to post
Share on other sites

Billybumpkins - Please spare a thought (whether you are a parent or not) of the innocent and vulnerable children and adults on this forum that haven't committed a crime, haven't stolen, haven't incurred a loss to a company but have been subjected to all the goings on relating to untrained security staff, loss prevention staff that haven't a clue, RLP plus their numerous debt collection agencies and threats that come with it.

 

I'm with you Button!

 

Joncris - Count me in on your meeting

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...