Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

perceived stealing at ASDA - using my own bags during shopping


Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

Thanks to DX100UK and silverfox1961.

I just read lots of your replies for each question, which is really useful.

I shopped at ASDA today, I hadn't shopped there in months before. 

I put what I was going to buy into my own bag during my shopping trip today to check if my bag was big enough to hold everything.

Since it was raining outside, I didn't really want to carry another bag.

It's a really huge bag and I didn't colse it, everyone can see it.

I just buy the food, that I need for the next week, cause my freezer is empty

. I didn't buy any thing expensive.

While I was still in the process of picking out my food, I was taken to the small room by the security guard and accused of theft. And I didn't even go to the cashier.

My bag is open and has nothing else but food. I was very polite and respectful throughout the process, I explained to them but they just threatened me for stealing.

They recorded my ID, name and address and warned me that I couldn't go to ASDA again.

I'm very depressed and scared. To be honest, I didn't go to ASDA for severel month, I never ever stolen anything in ASDA. They said some words that discriminate against Chinese. They didn't call the police and said to me, I will received a fine from ASDA.

According to this website, I think maybe the fine is from DWF. But I haven't received it, because it just happened.

Should I just ignore the following DWF letters and never put anything in my own bag during shopping?

I will throw the bag and never bring a bag to shopping again.

Thanks in advance, I will let you know once I get the DWF letter.

Finally, I want to check that nothing else will happen?

It's the first time this has happened to me, and it will be the last time.

Sincerely.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

its not a FINE, be very very clear on that.

only a magistrates court can fine anyone and asda nor DWF or whomever, have zero power to do so nor now refer it to the police then to CPS to do so. they are and will not be remotely interested.

its quite a region thing using your own bags, where i am, everyone does that , and no-one bats an eyelid.

forget it 

go get on with your life.

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to perceived stealing at ASDA - using my own bags during shopping

Have some concerns with this.

Retail security cannot just pull you off the shop floor in the middle of your shopping, detain you in a back room and take your details on an assumption you might be stealing.

 

If this was me would be writing a formal complaint to ASDA head office for unlawful detention, data protection issues and request personal details recorded be destroyed.

You will probably get some sort of voucher out of it as well

  • Like 1
  • I agree 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you write a letter, post it up here for the team to review and make any suggestions.

16 minutes ago, PhosenB said:

I just find they took my umbrella and didn't return it to me.

Put that in your letter.

Also, you didn't really make it clear... Did they allow you to pay for your shopping, or just confiscate it?

Did they give you any paperwork to take away?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for that, I will make it clear now.

Yesterday, I was still looking for food, then a woman staff come to me and ask me not to put anything in my bag.

All the stuffs in the bag and out of the bag must be paid now.

She ask me to pay for it at cashier, then the security came and they didn't agree, they yell at me and take me to a dark house.

Besides, they went through my bag without my permission.

My umbrella was in the bag too.

They took it and didn't give it back.

They checked the CCTV, but  everything I had was in my bag or outside of my bag, I didn't have it in my pocket or anywhere else, they can't say I stealing something.

Finally, they just told me, never came here again and wrote down my address and personal information.

They took a photo of me and say there will be "fine" from ASDA (Now I know it's impossible and ridiculous).

I didn't sgin anything on any profile.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would not be writing any such letter.

if they believed you were attempting to shop lift, even if you were not, they are quite entitled to detain and ask you questions. though the umbrella is another matter.😁

now if you want to write upon how you were treated , then fair dues. but be careful about stating they had no rights to do that at all. 

you are within their private property, if they wanted to make all shoppers to jump on one leg only whilst they shop, they could. 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Only the police have the authority to detain an individual.

A normal citizen can detain under s.24 Police and Criminal Evidence Act Act until a Police Constable becomes available and reasonable grounds an indictable offence has been committed.

A person is guilty of theft if they dishonestly appropriate property belonging to another and with the intention to permanently deprive.

Retail Security as part of SIA Training mitigate civil action for wrongful arrest and detention with S.C.O.N.E

Selection

concealment

Opportunity

Non Payment

Exit without paying

If none of these have been followed then the OP needs to speak to a solicitor for possible civil redress.

Retail security can request you8 accompany them into a back room but cannot insist without firm evidence an offence has been committed. 

Retail security now follow the acronym ASCONE

Approach

Selection

Conceal or carry

Unbroken Observation

Non Payment

Exit

Edited by whitelist
Link to post
Share on other sites

not relevant to the OP post

please go try and score browny points on another thread.

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...