Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Claim Stayed – Due to Unenforceable CCA Test Cases.


Blondie40
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4322 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

The OFT and Judge Waksman have backed lenders’ right to provide an accurate copy, rather than the original agreement, and to change the terms of a loan provided they keep customers informed.

 

Same thing as recreating

 

...An accurate copy!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi anyone any advice 10 yrs ago i took out a bussiness development loan to buy some land paid half and borrowed half,over the next few years i finished my bussiness and was sent to debt recovery i paid of my origanail loan but the bank kept interest on two accounts that were overdrawn through charges , they treatened court and everyting over 10 years and then i sent them cca letter sayin i had no agreement for overdraft so i should not been charged interest they demanded £25000 said they settle for bit less however since asking for cca agrement they rang didnt write and women was bit snotty i said am going to court give me my deeds she said think about it will ring you weds this never happened its now 1 year and they have had no response or given me a copy of an aggrement what can i do the suddunly stopped all contact all she said on phone was they didnt want to take me to court for 10 years they threatened to what would advise be to get me deeds of them like i said no reponse to my cca letter been a year since any contact cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

an accurate copy, rather than the original agreement

 

they will be asked to prove how they account this accuracy... and if they have been caught out in the past "forging" agreements... etc etc

 

a decent barrister would rip them a new one in court. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

they will be asked to prove how they account this accuracy... and if they have been caught out in the past "forging" agreements... etc etc

 

a decent barrister would rip them a new one in court. :D

 

I consider myself more than competent and I have a degree in law. I have studied the CCA for years. I also have the shameful past of working for a credit card company for 10 years - so I know a little bit of what goes on behind closed doors. (I even got to deal with my own letters requesting a credit limit increase on my own account - fun)

 

From past experience I would never in a million years act as LiP against the banks. Not just from the view of law but from the threat to the other side of having to pay a pros costs, that representation brings. Being taken seriously at a trial also helps. Not that is gets to trial most of the time if you have proper representation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I consider myself more than competent and I have a degree in law. I have studied the CCA for years. I also have the shameful past of working for a credit card company for 10 years - so I know a little bit of what goes on behind closed doors. (I even got to deal with my own letters requesting a credit limit increase on my own account - fun)

 

From past experience I would never in a million years act as LiP against the banks. Not just from the view of law but from the threat to the other side of having to pay a pros costs, that representation brings. Being taken seriously at a trial also helps. Not that is gets to trial most of the time if you have proper representation.

 

could not agree with you more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi anyone any advice 10 yrs ago i took out a bussiness development loan to buy some land paid half and borrowed half,over the next few years i finished my bussiness and was sent to debt recovery i paid of my origanail loan but the bank kept interest on two accounts that were overdrawn through charges , they treatened court and everyting over 10 years and then i sent them cca letter sayin i had no agreement for overdraft so i should not been charged interest they demanded £25000 said they settle for bit less however since asking for cca agrement they rang didnt write and women was bit snotty i said am going to court give me my deeds she said think about it will ring you weds this never happened its now 1 year and they have had no response or given me a copy of an aggrement what can i do the suddunly stopped all contact all she said on phone was they didnt want to take me to court for 10 years they threatened to what would advise be to get me deeds of them like i said no reponse to my cca letter been a year since any contact cheers

 

I suggest you start a new thread on this under the appropriate bank heading as you'll get lost on this thread which has it's own topic...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Folks

 

Am I right in thinking that a 'true copy' must be just that i.e. a photocopy of the SIGNED original agreement?

 

I have submitted a number of cca requests and have received copies of agreements with my/our details on but nowhere does it have our signature. In fact one has had our details handwritten on the agreement with a photocopy signature for the company rep. Again nowhere does it have a 'copy' of my signature.

 

The question is does this represent a 'true copy'? Creditors are saying it does.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Folks

 

Am I right in thinking that a 'true copy' must be just that i.e. a photocopy of the SIGNED original agreement?

 

I have submitted a number of cca requests and have received copies of agreements with my/our details on but nowhere does it have our signature. In fact one has had our details handwritten on the agreement with a photocopy signature for the company rep. Again nowhere does it have a 'copy' of my signature.

 

The question is does this represent a 'true copy'? Creditors are saying it does.

 

Signatures may be omitted according to the regs.

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

Paulwlton

 

Thanks does this mean that such agreements are enforceable in court? I am not trying to get out of paying the debt, i just need a bit more time to get other things paid off and i will then address this, I would not like to end up with a CCJ (plus interest, fees etc.) for £670!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Paulwlton

 

Thanks does this mean that such agreements are enforceable in court? I am not trying to get out of paying the debt, i just need a bit more time to get other things paid off and i will then address this, I would not like to end up with a CCJ (plus interest, fees etc.) for £670!!!!

 

Pursuant to new legislation even if the Agreements are enforceable (post them up) you can make an application for a time order (post default)....hit them before they hit you with a Judgment.

 

PW

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a master deed of assignment showing an High Street bank offloading £9.6 million of debt at nine pence in the pound.

 

Why would a bank sell off debt at such a low rate....could it be that most of it is unenforceable.

 

PW

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a master deed of assignment showing an High Street bank offloading £9.6 million of debt at nine pence in the pound.

Why would a bank sell off debt at such a low rate....could it be that most of it is unenforceable.

PW

-----------------

Bit off thread but relevant,

We are aware that a number of DCA's have bought questionable ie possibly unenforceable CCA regulated accounts at knock down prices. Now, what we don't know is who knew what, and when, during the negotiated sale of these CCA regulated credit agreements in the regard of their unenforceability ? IE was there full disclosure ?

 

Criminal law require that both the wrongful deed (Reus Actus) and the guilty mind (mens rea) be proved to secure a proper conviction.

 

IE - We do not know whether these (alleged) debts (ie unenforceable) were sold "in good faith" ( whether the seller was transparent on the issue of enforceability) or whether there are potentially criminal fraud issues where the accounts were not sold in good faith. Also, If these accounts were sold in good faith as unenforceable, were the individual debtors subsequently notified by the DCA's that they were being chased for unenforceable accounts ?

 

These are matters that would have interested my Dear old dad when he served on the Serious Crime Squad. These are matters which interest me because HHJ Jack QC, during the Story trial,opined that "if Natwest knew it had a problem with the CCA, the last person it would tell would be you [ie me, Story]. It would hand the matter over to its lawyers to sort it out "

 

John Story

 

www.ruinedbynatwest.com

Edited by ruinedbynatwest
typos
Link to post
Share on other sites

-----------------

Bit off thread but relevant,

We am aware that a number of DCA's have bought unenforceable CCA regulated accounts at knock down prices. Now, what we don't know is who knew what, and when, during the negotiated sale of these CCA regulated credit agreements in the regard of their unenforceability ? IE was there full disclosure ?

 

IE We do not know if these (alleged) debts (ie unenforceable) were sold "in good faith" or whether there are potentially criminal fraud issues where the accounts were not sold in good faith. Also, If these accounts were sold in good faith as unenforceable, were the individual debtors subsequently notified by the DCA's that they were being chased for unenforceable accounts ?

 

These are matters that would have interested my Dear old dad when he served on the Serious Crime Squad.

 

John Story

 

www.ruinedbynatwest.com

 

Interesting comment John.

An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last. <br />

Winston Churchill

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a master deed of assignment showing an High Street bank offloading £9.6 million of debt at nine pence in the pound.

 

Why would a bank sell off debt at such a low rate....could it be that most of it is unenforceable.

 

PW

 

I've known it to be 3p per 100p (3%) for some DCA's .....

 

Would be interesting to see that copy of the deed if you can put it up?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...