Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Between yourself and Dave you have produced a very good WS. However if you were to do a harder hitting WS it may be that VCS would be more likely to cancel prior to a hearing. The Contract . VCS [Jake Burgess?] are trying to conflate parking in a car park to driving along a road in order to defend the indefensible. It is well known that "NO Stopping " cannot form a contract as it is prohibitory. VCS know that well as they lose time and again in Court when claiming it is contractual. By mixing up parking with driving they hope to deflect from the fact trying to claim that No Stopping is contractual is tantamount to perjury. No wonder mr Burgess doesn't want to appear in Court. Conflation also disguises the fact that while parking in a car park for a period of time can be interpreted as the acceptance of the contract that is not the case while driving down a road. The Defendant was going to the airport so it is ludicrous to suggest that driving by a No Stopping  sign is tacitly accepting  the  contract -especially as no contract is even being offered. And even if a motorist did not wish to be bound by the so called contract what could they do? Forfeit their flight and still have to stop their car to turn around? Put like that the whole scenario posed by Mr Burgess that the Defendant accepted the contract by driving past the sign is absolutely absurd and indefensible. I certainly would not want to appear in Court defending that statement either. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I will do the contract itself later.
    • Yes - ignore. Because of another MET victim today I looked at all our MET cases back to June 2014 ... yes, 10 years. They have never dared take a motorist to court and argue their case before a judge.  They have started the odd court case, but as a means of trying to intimidate the motorist into coughing up, when the motorist defended and refused to give in it was MET who bottled it and discontinued.
    • Unpaid wages should be pretty straightforward if you did the work. Don't be intimidated. You need only show you were due money, and did not get money.   The risk is that they have no money to pay you (and legal fees) - frankly a solicitor maybe be costing them more than your claim is for and I might have expected them to make a commercial decision to settle before this point regardless of the merits of the case.
    • Thanks so much FTMDave.  This is so much better   I'm still tempted to leave the blue section in is as if I lose it will at least save me a little bit of money.  But I get your point that it's pretty superfluous.   Thinking I'll get this in the post on Monday unless you think it's worth delaying?   
    • Hi All I have now received a Final Reminder, which I have attached. Can you confirm that I should still ignore this letter and take no further action. It does not appear to say "Letter of Claim" anywhere on the document but I just wanted to check with you all. Many thanks FightUnfairParkingTickets Parking Charge Final Reminder issued 29th May 2024.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Distance selling, and returning goods


ratlover
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5421 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I have this morning received goods from an online retailer and they have arrived thus.

 

One item is broken.

The other item has been replaced with an inferior quality product without them contacting me for my approval to do so.

 

I have emailed them to ask for them to pick them all up and refund me.

 

Now, is it within my right to demand that they pick up the items at their cost, or is it down to me to incur further postage costs to sent it back?

 

Thankyou

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi!

 

I am happy to confirm that as per the Distance Selling Regulations your only responsibility is to immediately notify them of the goods being damaged / incorrect and then to "restore" them to the supplier.

 

"Restoring" is a messy word but it means you have to keep them in good condition and available to the supplier. You do not have to send them , if they want them back they have to get them back! They might ask you to send them to them, if you do keep a copy of this request and ensure the request confirms you will be refunded the cost.

 

Hope that helps!

 

Fin

 

source: Distance Selling (Mail Order, Telephone and Internet Shopping) Fact Sheet - BIS department for Business Innovation & Skills

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's incorrect tf.

 

You have a right to reject by giving them notificatin in writing within 7 'working' days, starting the day after you receive them, that you wish to reject the goods. Under DSR you can do this for any reason, ie; wrong colour etc; Who pays the postage for return depends on their terms and conditions.

Where they explain the DSR (if they haven't they are breaking the law) they must tell you who is responsible for the return postage cost. They can pay for them or they can say you have to pay for the return. If there is nothing, then they pay for the return.

 

In the case of damaged or wrong goods, (your problem), you should notify them and you can either send them back at your cost, or ask them to arrange collection, but they 'must' reimburse you that return postage cost as well as the purchase price and the delivery cost (if there was any). They have 30 days in which to refund you all the cost.

 

Just to add. The refund countdown begins with the time you sent them the letter/email and not from the time they pick up or receive the goods.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh ok, i just took it litterally of the government website as quoted. I would imaging what you have described is the best practice method from the OFT which has been drawn up based on the legislation.

 

Either way its good news for ratlover!

Link to post
Share on other sites

With regards to who pays,

 

If it is returned due to a breach of contract / rights (including implied terms), then the seller pays. They cannot contract otherwise, and any term that says so is ineffective. They must refund postage if they do not pay for it initially.

 

Where it is due to a right to return but there being no breach (i.e, returned under the "cooling off" period), then it is the responsibility of the seller to pay postage unless the contract says otherwise.

 

As connif said, the countdown begins from the day the notice of cancellation is received, and the seller cannot insist on the goods being received before the refund is made.

Link to post
Share on other sites

First, a big thankyou everyone who has replied :)

 

I have (I hope) one more question...

 

The retailer has agreed to arrange for collection on Wednesday 21-07-2009, now what are my rights regarding making sure I get some sort of receipt or proof of sending back?

 

What do I need to look out for from courier?

Will the courier give me some paperwork, or will I have to insist on some kind of receipt?

 

I ask, because when I was younger and a lot more naive a courier returned to pick up something I'd bought mail order, but I didn't get anything to prove I had returned the item. To cut a long story short, even with the help of the CAB I was unable to get either my money or item back!

 

Thanks again.

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any decent courier should leave some docket to say it has been picked up. In any case, the seller is responsible for it's return. Once you have given it to them, it is out of your hands. You could always make a note of the drivers name, their description, vehice reg etc etc.

 

Like I said earlier, the seller cannot insist on the goods being received before giving a refund. If something did go wrong, they would have to reimburse you and then if they wanted take separate action.

 

Not that they'd have much chance in succeeding.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick update...

 

Courier picked up this morning 09:30:), great no waiting around for them.

 

Before I handed the parcel over I asked if I would get any paperwork or receipt and he said he could give me a receipt, so off he pops back to the van.

 

He comes back saying he hasn't got any but have I got a piece of paper?. I said "Here's somthing I prepared earlier", explaining I had been shafted before not having proof of returning goods.

 

So I had knocked up (as suggested) a simple form stating...

 

This document hereby confirms that on the 22-07-2009:

 

COMPANY NAME:...........................................................

 

COURIERS NAME:..........................................................

 

TIME OF COLLECTION:...................................................

 

COURIERS VAN REGISTATION:.......................................

 

 

COURIERS SIGNATURE:...................................................

 

 

Collected a parcel for return to:

 

(Return address removed)

I had already got my digital camera ready, as I even thought about asking my Son to video the exchange! :lol:

 

I checked the bank this morning however, and still no refund. Anyway they have 25 days left to comply with the regulations.

 

It's great that we have forums like this where we can exchange experiences and help, and I hope that maybe one day this thread will provide good reference for someone else who needs a little help.

 

 

Thank's for reading.

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

and I hope that maybe one day this thread will provide good reference for someone else who needs a little help.

 

That is why we like to know the outcome, so others can learn from these experiences.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just a quick update.

 

Still no refund.

 

Amazing how quick they can take your money, isn't it?

If I do get the refund, I bet they hold off until the very last minute of the 30th day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...