Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house Alongside pictures of himself entering a house, Mr McGuinness said Surrey Heath residents “rightly expect their MP to be a part of their community”. - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins a Westminster seat - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

MBNA or DCA Advice


blueotter
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5165 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well my account was in dispute and it didn't stop them levying interest or charges and its particularly sneaky of them to default the account on the same day they sent out the cca. For all the good it is they may as well have sent a jam sponge instead.

 

My local MP is a particularly good one and i've seen the work he does at first hand so i think he'll take up the cudgel for me but for the time being i may as well sit back and wait to see what happens.

 

We live in crazy lawless times with banks and i have defaults outstanding on 2 amex cards since march and they're both defective.The accounts were sent to a dca who threatened all kinds of action so i cca'd them.Amex have found an app form for one and not sent anything for the other.So i'm waiting on them as well now and trying my best to brush up on all the techical jargon with help from people on here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 145
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Blueotter,

 

For all the good it is they may as well have sent a jam sponge instead.

That did make me laugh :D

Makes you think though...

Dear Sir ,

We are not obliged to send you a SIGNED copy of your Credit Agreement in response to a CCA Request, however the OFT has decreed that we MAY send you a jam sponge, as we ALWAYS buy a jam sponge for our teabreak whenever we complete a credit agreement, and WILL have done so when your agreement was taken out.

The fact that we have eaten our jam sponge is undeniable proof in Court that a Credit Agreement exists between us.

Yours,

Merchant Bankers

 

Elsa x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well my account was in dispute and it didn't stop them levying interest or charges and its particularly sneaky of them to default the account on the same day they sent out the cca. For all the good it is they may as well have sent a jam sponge instead.

 

My local MP is a particularly good one and i've seen the work he does at first hand so i think he'll take up the cudgel for me but for the time being i may as well sit back and wait to see what happens.

 

We live in crazy lawless times with banks and i have defaults outstanding on 2 amex cards since march and they're both defective.The accounts were sent to a dca who threatened all kinds of action so i cca'd them.Amex have found an app form for one and not sent anything for the other.So i'm waiting on them as well now and trying my best to brush up on all the techical jargon with help from people on here.

It is not in their interests to take notice of your letters. They just follow the process.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Blueotter

Subbing to your thread with interest ,Yes it is strange how some people get left alone or account just sold on to another bank and yet others MBNA pursues to the bitter end.! and set either Restons or optima on them (these are the soliciters they use to do all their dirty work) I think sometims if a person owns property that will prompt them to chase you more as they try and get a ccj and then a charging order i believe:mad:

Im happy to help with support and my own opinions but as i have no legal qualifications If I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action,

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Optima letters start from MBNA desks, typed, printed and sent by them. Must be misrepresentation to imply that they have come from a solicitor. Letters from Optima/MBNA probably come from Phil Robinson.

Hi Vint

Did not realise that optima was really MBNA! Learnt something new! I wonder why optima does not deal with all us MBNA deliquints! and why some people get Restons set on them instead?

Im happy to help with support and my own opinions but as i have no legal qualifications If I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Optima may not be part of MBNA, but the first letters come from MBNA. If you look on the envelope, the return address is same as MBNA in Chester. The first letter usually says, do not respond to us ( Optima) but to deptxxxx in Chester. But I responded to Optima just to be awkward. Heard no more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Optima may not be part of MBNA, but the first letters come from MBNA. If you look on the envelope, the return address is same as MBNA in Chester. The first letter usually says, do not respond to us ( Optima) but to deptxxxx in Chester. But I responded to Optima just to be awkward. Heard no more.

 

 

Debt Clear Recoveries is another part of MBNA where apparently sit together! DCR have a phone no in Manchester which re-direct it to Chester I believe, DCR also have a PO Box address in Manchester (just to confuse us all!) ;)

CAG NEEDS FUNDS PLEASE DONATE AS MUCH OR AS LITTLE WHERE POSSIBLE

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/paypal.php?go=donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

UPDATE

 

Received a letter from capquest today telling me mbna have sold them one of my accounts.

 

This despite the fact the account was in dispute and hadn't been terminated following issue of a defective default notice.

In fact i've received nothing from mbna telling me what they've done.

 

Also that shower at capquest have rung my gran asking questions,she's 87 years old and x directory. Just what kind of company am i dealing with here !

 

I need a plan of attack so advise welcome please.

 

Should i write to mbna asking exactly what's going on and pointing out that the account was in dispute and i've not received a termination letter or anything since they issued the deafult notice.

 

Should i write to capquest and tell them to return the disputed account to mbna ?

 

I also want to do something about them ringing my gran which is just reprehensible but short of losing it completely i don't know what to do .

 

advice welcome please so i can formulate a plan of action,thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to read about your poor gran getting calls, these companies have no morals. They are trying to make what few pence in the pound they can get for the debt and let somebody else have the hassle of hounding you for it.

 

Copied from another thread......

 

Furthermore you should be aware that a creditor is not permitted to take ANY action against an account whilst it remains in dispute.

The lack of a credit agreement is a very clear dispute and as such the following applies.

 

* You may not demand any payment on the account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

* You may not add further interest or any charges to the account.

* You may not pass the account to a third party.

* You may not register any information in respect of the account with any credit reference agency.

* You may not issue a default notice related to the account.

I read somewhere that there is actually nothing anywhere that states in the above that they shouldn't do it according to OFT guidelines, but that this wont stop them unfortunately. Its only enforcement via a court that they can't do it!!

 

Guess its up to Capquest now who has to provide you with all the eligibility of it now, so when they write to you (after all its in dispute) write back then with the acct in dispute letter advising them the acct is subj to a serious dispute and the date you pursued the CCA etc...

 

CAG NEEDS FUNDS PLEASE DONATE AS MUCH OR AS LITTLE WHERE POSSIBLE

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/paypal.php?go=donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

capquest can be very persistant but going by other threads and experiences normally can be seen of eventually by a number of account in dispute letters but you do need to show them you are fully aware of your rights and some people have had them on their backs for quite a few months before they give up A lot of people in crapital one disputes have had

these plonkers set on them!

Edited by sunflower99

Im happy to help with support and my own opinions but as i have no legal qualifications If I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action,

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear xxxxx

 

Your Ref xxxxxx

 

I do not acknowledge any debt to your company or to any company you claim to represent.

 

A request for my Consumer Credit Agreement (Consumer Credit Act, 1974) was received by xxxxxxx (name of company) on xx/xx/xx. Since they are now in serious fault of a legal request, I can only assume that xxxxxxx have either failed to inform you before supplying instructions to contact me or, have failed to inform you you before your purchase of this account; in which case, they would not be your clients in the sense that you imply. I therefore suggest that you liase with xxxxxxx before contacting me again.

 

In the meantime, please be aware that no action can be taken against a disputed account and this includes the following :

 

You/your "client" may not demand any payment on the account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

 

You/your "client may not add any further interest or charges to the account.

 

You/your client may not pass the account to any third party.

 

You/your "client" may not register any information in respect of the account with any of the credit reference agencies.

 

You/your "client" may not issue a default notice related to the account.

 

In addition, please be awre that your recent telephone calls (delete if N/A) and letter to my home could, under the Administration of Justice Act 1970 section 40, be construed as unlawful harrassment in the absence of such an Agreement. As you claim in your letter to have been "instructed" by xxxxxxx, please note that any court claim regarding harrassment would be brought against both xxxxxxx and yourselves should this be necessary; since you would be complicit in this action (delete if N/A).

 

You may therefore consider this letter a statutory notice under Section 10 of the Data Protection Act 1998 to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect. This means that you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from any records with any credit reference agencies. Should you refuse to comply, you must within 14 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data. It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a legal right; you must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends.

 

I look forward to a favourable response within 14 days of the date of this letter, informing me that on this occasion you have made a genuine mistake and that you files are now closed. Failure to respond favourably however, will result in me reporting this matter to Trading Standards, Office of Fair Trading, The Financial Crimes Branch of HM Treasury and any other authorities as I see fit.

 

I look forward to your reply in due course.

 

Yours faithfully,

Im happy to help with support and my own opinions but as i have no legal qualifications If I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action,

Link to post
Share on other sites

I used the above letter to see Wescotts off!:)

Im happy to help with support and my own opinions but as i have no legal qualifications If I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action,

Link to post
Share on other sites

You also need to include that it is strictly against OFT guidelines and DPA to contact a third party ( Your gran ) and as a lady of 87 years old, it has deeply distressed her. Demand to know how they got her phone number and why they called her.

 

Also complain to TS, OFT, ICO. PLus your MP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you people,i will draft a letter and fire it off,i'm particularly upset that they've contacted and had the temerity to ask questions of my gran.

 

On the same subject does anybody feel i have additional grounds as mbna haven't terminated the account following issue of that defective default letter ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you people,i will draft a letter and fire it off,i'm particularly upset that they've contacted and had the temerity to ask questions of my gran.

 

On the same subject does anybody feel i have additional grounds as mbna haven't terminated the account following issue of that defective default letter ?

You need to make them pay for that. Do you know how they had her number in the first palce?

 

MBNA do not tend to issue Termination Notices, although they need to. Just another example of how they ignore the law. You can take it as terminated if they have sold the account, or later gone on to demand the ballance in full. The sale of the account needs to be absolute.

 

Also, without a notice of assignment from MBNA, you should not even debate the issue with any third party. If I sent you a letter saying that I had purchaced your debt from MBNA, would you pay me? You need to respond to them along those lines.

 

There are regulations surrounding these matters and the more they ignore them, the more they foul up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to make them pay for that. Do you know how they had her number in the first palce?

 

MBNA do not tend to issue Termination Notices, although they need to. Just another example of how they ignore the law. You can take it as terminated if they have sold the account, or later gone on to demand the ballance in full. The sale of the account needs to be absolute.

 

Also, without a notice of assignment from MBNA, you should not even debate the issue with any third party. If I sent you a letter saying that I had purchaced your debt from MBNA, would you pay me? You need to respond to them along those lines.

 

There are regulations surrounding these matters and the more they ignore them, the more they foul up.

 

 

Cheers vinnt,so the line of attack is to

a) write to capquest telling them account is in default

b) write to mbna asking for a letter of assignment ?

 

I take it i don't want mbna to take the acc back or will that happen anyway if capquest decide they don't want it ?

 

final point ,regards them ringing my gran. I have never rung anybody let alone a bank or dca from her number and she's x directory so they've got it from somewhere.

She's never used the internet and never to my knowledge has ner number been used on the internet.

Somebody somewhere is getting phone numbers direct from bt,that's my guess and also collecting a lot more information that we realise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

final point ,regards them ringing my gran. I have never rung anybody let alone a bank or dca from her number and she's x directory so they've got it from somewhere.

She's never used the internet and never to my knowledge has ner number been used on the internet.

Somebody somewhere is getting phone numbers direct from bt,that's my guess and also collecting a lot more information that we realise.

 

Hmm if it were me then I would write to them and demand that they explain how they got that number as you have never lived there, never rung from there and have never given that number as a contact. Inform them that its your gran that lives there and that complaints are being made to the OFT / your MP / Your Grans MP (if different constituency).

 

Demand not ask that they remove that number from their database's and advise that if anyone from their company rings again you will not only issue court proceedings but you will contact every single press organization/company in the uk if you have to to report the harassment of relatives when the original company involved has not complied with the legal requirements of the CCA1974.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers vinnt,so the line of attack is to

a) write to capquest telling them account is in default

 

Yes, you can adapt the bemused letter below.

Ref Account xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Dear xxxxxxxxx,

 

I was somewhat bemused to receive your letter of xxxxxxxxx 2009, the content of which is noted. No debt to your company is acknowledged.

 

On xxxxxxxxxx 2009 I made a formal request to MBNA pursuant to s.78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. MBNA have failed to comply satisfactorily within the statutory time limit, or at all. In addition, this alleged account was placed in dispute with MBNA on the xxxxxxxxx 2009. It should not be necessary to have to remind you that the provisions of s.78(6) now apply. These letters are enclosed.

 

In the circumstances, your threat of legal action would appear to be a breach of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 and the Office of Fair Trading Guidance on Debt Collection and your attention is drawn to this guidance document.

Your attention is also drawn the ICO on Data protection, as passing details on to a third party while an account is in dispute is contrary to the Data Protection Act. I have previously issued letters to MBNA under s10 of this act. You may wish to refresh yourselves of the implications of ignoring the Data Protection Act.

Should you attempt litigation it will be vigorously defended and the failure to supply documentation under the CCA 1974 is a complete defence to any legal action and your actions will be considered vexatious and unlawful. The Court's attention will drawn to the above statutory breaches . Furthermore, I reserve the right to bring the conduct of your client to the Court when the issue of costs is being considered.

I would remind you that while this alleged account remains in dispute, that MBNA:

  • May not ask for payment against this account.
  • I am not obliged to offer any payment against this account.
  • Cannot register any data with a third party.
  • Cannot take any enforcement action, including registering Defaults.
  • Cannot pass the account on to a third party for collection.
  • Cannot sell the account.

I trust this out lines the situation and that you will take note of my comments, to avoid any further breaches of the Law, being committed by you.

 

 

 

b) write to mbna asking for a letter of assignment ?

 

I would write telling them that they are in breach of the regulations, in attempting to sell an account that is in dispute and without supplying you with a notice of assignment. Would they like all of their customers to start paying Tom, Dick or Harry that write to them, instead of MBNA

 

I take it i don't want mbna to take the acc back or will that happen anyway if capquest decide they don't want it ?

 

final point ,regards them ringing my gran. I have never rung anybody let alone a bank or dca from her number and she's x directory so they've got it from somewhere.

She's never used the internet and never to my knowledge has ner number been used on the internet.

Somebody somewhere is getting phone numbers direct from bt,that's my guess and also collecting a lot more information that we realise.

 

Can't add to the advice already given by Shaddow, but do follow it through.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...