Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agreed, let them default. Keep everything in writing, if they ring to discuss the accounts over the phone, simply say 'everything in writing please', and hang up. They'll soon get the message. Get all of your paperwork in order too, if you haven't got any, or are missing relevant documents, then you can SAR the original creditor, which is free and they have 30 days to supply the info. Keep a diary of events too. sit back and relax, YOU'RE in control, not them.
    • thought you said you had an sjpn? dx  
    • dont go near them bunch of scammers! ive removed ref. dx  
    • I used to post regularly in order to provide factual information (rather than advice) but got fed up with banging my head against a brick wall in so many cases when posters insisted black was white and I was writing rubbish. I have never posted anything which was untrue or indeed biased in any way.  I have never given 'advice' but have sought to correct erroneous statements which were unhelpful. The only username I have ever used is blf1uk. I have never gone under any other username and have no connection to 'bailiff advice'.  I am not a High Court Enforcement Officer but obtained my first 'bailiff' certificate in 1982. I'm not sure what records you have accessed but I was certainly not born in 1977 - at that time I was serving in the Armed Forces in Hereford, Germany (4th Division HQ) and my wife gave birth to our eldest.   Going back to the original point, the fact is that employees of an Approved Enforcement Agency contracted by the Ministry of Justice can and do execute warrants of arrest (with and without bail), warrants of detention and warrants of commitment. In many cases, the employee is also an enforcement agent [but not acting as one]. Here is a fact.  I recently submitted an FOI request to HMCTS and they advised me (for example) that in 2022/23 Jacobs (the AEA for Wales) was issued with 4,750 financial arrest warrants (without bail) and 473 'breach' warrants.  A breach warrant is a community penalty breach warrant (CPBW) whereby the defendant has breached the terms of either their release from prison or the terms of an order [such as community service].  While the defendant may pay the sum [fine] due to avoid arrest on a financial arrest warrant, a breach warrant always results in their transportation to either a police station [for holding] or directly to the magistrates' court to go before the bench as is the case on financial arrest warrants without bail when they don't pay.  Wales has the lowest number of arrest warrants issued of the seven regions with South East exceeding 50,000.  Overall, the figure for arrest warrants issued to the three AEAs exceeds 200,000.  Many of these were previously dealt with directly by HMCTS using their employed Civilian Enforcement Officers but they were subject to TUPE in 2019 and either left the service or transferred to the three AEAs. In England, a local authority may take committal proceedings against an individual who has not paid their council tax and the court will issue a committal summons.  If the person does not attend the committal hearing, the court will issue a warrant of arrest usually with bail but occasionally without bail (certainly without bail if when bailed on their own recognizance the defendant still fails to appear).   A warrant of arrest to bring the debtor before the court is issued under regulation 48(5) of The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992 and can be executed by "any person to whom it is directed or by any constable....." (Reg 48(6).  These, although much [much] lower in number compared to HMCTS, are also dealt with by the enforcement agencies contracted by the local authorities. Feel free to do your own research using FOI enquiries!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

The Funding Corporation Small Claim Summons - joint loan - backdoor decree against OH - mine was dismissed - help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5211 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thanx DD but I don't understand!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

xxxx

 

look down to your bottom left of the text box theres a green ball a set of scales and a red triangle

 

you hit the red triangle if you are desperate for advice (for instance if you have court deadlines to meet etc) and it alerts the site team to your predicament

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 277
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Pinky123

 

The PPP insurance has been added to the loan. A single premium policy is where the whole cost of the insurance is added as a lump sum at the start of the agreement, which is then repaid over the term of the loan. Many loan policies were sold like this until they were banned in May 09. The APRs and the actual monthly costs of the insurance contract and that of the associated loan amounts need to be clearly identified to you the customer.

 

You have a joint loan but the PPI sold to you does not cover all of the borrowers, i can see another name to the right on the agreement. Did you receive any Key Facts when the loan became active?

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

ukaviator

 

can i but in

 

i believe this is one agreement that is crap

 

is the premiun cash price ppi or some other insurance

that has been added to the principle loan

a plus b to make up the amount of credit

 

they have added the two before calculating interest

 

GAME OVER

 

WILSON V FCT

 

ITS YOUR LUCKY DAY

Link to post
Share on other sites

P, HERE ARE THE IMAGES YOU REQUIRE (I HOPE), THE THING IS THIS LOAN IS IN MY NAME WITH MY SIGNATURE BUT THEY HAVE SENT A SUMMONS TO MY HUSBAND ALSO!!!!

 

LAWLET1.jpg

Edited by pinky123
Link to post
Share on other sites

hi pinkie

 

ime asking for directions as this is a scotish claim

need rory it seems

hang fire and ill pm him

 

anybody else up on scotish claims

 

by the way

 

this case is done and dusted

 

interest on acceptance fee before calculating interest

 

wilson v fct will be enough to end this

Link to post
Share on other sites

SORRY FOR THE HASSEL, BUT FUNDING CORPORATION ARE TOTALLY FREAKING ME OUT, MAYBE I SHOULD JUST PAY UP THE PROSPECT OF COURT AND HAVIN TO FORK OUT EXTRA MONEY TO THEM IS MAKING ME WANT TO THROUGH UP xxxxxxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Pinky123

 

This is winnable and postggj has provided your defence. There is plenty of time since the Return Day is 1st September and this is the deadline for simply stating your intention to defend within the Small Claim Summons, the case will first call before the Sheriff on 8th September so you can relax for now.

 

They are totally stuffed on the PPI and accordingly the whole loan given comments by others.

 

I have experience of the Scottish Civil litigation process and have just had an interesting outcome with one Ordinary Cause Action :wink: and a Small Claims Summons from HFC just landed on my doormat.

 

Have you undertaken a SAR? It is too late to do this if you haven't so we should serve them an Incidental Application to get more information and make them in no doubt that this will be defended, we will also get the -ve CRA marks removed as part of the settlement.

 

I will post up an Incidental Application - ensure you fill in the gaps and send or take three signed copies to the Sheriff Court that issued the writ.

 

You should take a look at this and invite advice from other CAG ers if we need to ask for anything else in relation to this writ. I can then help you get it into the propert format and then submit it next week.

 

--------------

 

 

Court Reference Number: xxxxxxxxx

 

 

SHERIFFDOM OF XXXXX at YYYYYYYYYY

 

 

INCIDENTAL APPLICATION

 

in causa

 

Their name as on the writ

Their address as on the writ

 

PURSUER

 

against

 

You Name as on the writ

Your Address as on the writ

 

DEFENDER

 

The Defender seeks an order for the recovery of documents and further information from the Pursuer in relation to the Summons made against the Defender. These documents are vital to the Defender in order to compile a full defence and counter-claim. The Defender requires the following information to be supplied to him forthwith and at least two weeks prior to the Return Day of 1st September 2009:

1. A copy of the properly executed loan Agreement in relation to account referenced xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and specified within the Pursuers writ, together any terms and conditions that applied to the account at the time of alleged default and at the time the account was opened.

2. All records the Pursuer holds on the Defender, including, but not limited to:

a. Transcriptions of all telephone conversations recorded and any notes made in relation to the above referenced account.

b. Where there has been any event in the above account history that has required manual intervention by any person, the Defender requires disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to this account.

c. True copies of any Default Notice(s), Termination Notice(s) or enforcement notice(s) that the Pursuer claims to have served upon the Defender, together with a copy of any proof of postage.

d. Details of any collection charge(s) added to the account; specifically, the date these were levied, the amount of the charge(s), a detailed financial breakdown of how the charge(s) were calculated, and what the charge(s) cover.

e. Specific details of the fees/charges levied by any other agency in respect of this account and a detailed breakdown of said fees/charges and what each charge relates to and on what date said fees/charges were levied.

f. A genuine copy of any notice of fair use of the Defender’s data as required by the Data Protection Act 1998.

g. A list of third party agencies to who the Pursuer has disclosed the Defender’s personal data and a summary of the nature of the information that has been disclosed.

h. Copies of statements for the entire duration of the alleged credit agreement.

 

3. Any other documents that the Pursuer seek to rely on in court.

 

 

In respect whereof

 

 

Signed .................................................................

 

 

 

Date: xx July 2009

Your Name

Your Address

 

DEFENDER

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanx For The Great Info, So Do I Fill In The Form Above And Take 3 Signed Copies To Court, Also Why Have They Sent A Summons To My Husband When He Did Not Sign For This Loan This Was In My Name And Signed By Me Xxxxxxxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Pinky

 

Has your husband also received a summons? Or is the one you posted in both of your names?

 

I am not sure about joint loans, I am sure someone will be able to comment.

 

Three signed copies of the Incidental Application should be sent (Guaranteed Next Day Delivery) or hand delivered to the Sheriff Court that issued the Summons. Check that you have the addresses and all other details correct.

 

Please ask if you need any help or PM me.

 

Monty

Link to post
Share on other sites

on the agreement itself that you posted it up it has customer details twice, is this your name theor twice or yours and your other halfs?

 

ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

they have sent my husband a seperate summons, this is what I don't understand as he did not sign for the loan it was in my name and I was the one who signed.

 

Thanx to everybody for all the help XXXXXXXX

Link to post
Share on other sites

they have sent my husband a seperate summons, this is what I don't understand as he did not sign for the loan it was in my name and I was the one who signed.

 

Thanx to everybody for all the help XXXXXXXX

 

Hi Pinky

 

He will also have to defend his too since he is named on the loan agreement by the look of it. I have no experience of joint loan applications and other can comment BUT my understanding is that you are jointly liable and that they can chase either or both of you for the whole debt.

 

So ensure that your husband follows exactly the same process as yourself. Do you both have the same court date?

Link to post
Share on other sites

IdaInFife said:
on the agreement itself that you posted it up it has customer details twice, is this your name theor twice or yours and your other halfs?

 

ida x

 

 

there is some confusion that you need to tell us.

 

on your agreement it has customers details twice

 

is your details there twice or yours and your OH's?

 

and you are saying that your OH's signature is not on this document?

 

 

ida x

 

Postgg,

 

could you clarify something neebs,

 

are you saying that they cannot add interest on PPI? (i didn't see the agreement) it's just later in thread you said they cannot add interest to an acceptance fee?

 

is it they can't to both ?

 

ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ia Delivered Yesterday Morning To Court, Now Getting Ready To Get My Defence Together, Any Help Regarding This Would Be Greatly Appreciated As I Am Determind To Nail These Cowboys.

 

Xxxxxxxxxxx

 

Hi Ida,

 

No on the agreement (don't know why but it lists myself and my O/H name, but this loan was only taken out by me I was the one who applied for it and signed it not him and it is my name only on the PPI cover, that is why I am confused why they have gave him a summons, as he has nothing to do with it.

 

Pinky x

 

Have now completed my IA (thanks monty) and will be hand delivering it tomorrow, i'll keep you all posted on the outcome.

 

 

xxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Postgg or anyone

 

I am just putting together Pinky's Summary Cause defence and need to know what area of law that will form her defence with respect to the PPI. I have the fact that they did not send a DN.

 

Thanks

 

Monty

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...