Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The firm has benefited from the AI boom, making it the third-most valuable company in the US.View the full article
    • Former billionaire Hui Ka Yan has been fined and banned from the financial market for life.View the full article
    • In terms of "why didn't I make a claim" - well, that has to be understood in the context of the long-standing legal battle and all its permuations with the shark. In essence there was a repo and probable fire sale of the leasehold property - which would have led to me initiating the complaint/ claim v SPF in summer 19. But there was no quick sale. And battle commenced and it ain't done yet 5y later. A potential sale morphed into trying to do a debt deal and then into a full blown battle heading to trial - based on the shark deliberately racking up costs just so the ceo can keep the property for himself.  Along the way they have launched claims in 4 different counties -v- me - trying to get a backdoor B. (Haven't yet succeeded) Simultaneously I got dragged into a contentious forfeiture claim and then into a lease extension debacle - both of which lasted 3y. (I have an association with the freeholders and handled all that legal stuff too) I had some (friend paid for) legal support to begin with.  But mostly I have handled every thing alone.  The sheer weight of all the different cases has been pretty overwhelming. And tedious.  I'm battling an aggressive financial shark that has investors giving them 00s of millions. They've employed teams of expensive lawyers and barristers. And also got juniors doing the boring menial tasks. And, of course, in text book style they've delayed issues on purpose and then sent 000's of docs to read at the 11th hour. Which I not only boringly did read,  but also simultaneously filed for ease of reference later - which has come in very handy in speeding up collating legal bundles and being able to find evidence quickly.  It's also how I found out the damning stuff I could use -v- them.  Bottom line - I haven't really had a moment to breath for 5y. I've had to write a statement recently. And asked a clinic for advice. One of the volunteers asked how I got into this situation.  Which prompted me to say it all started when I got bad advice from a broker. Which kick-started me in to thinking I really should look into making some kind of formal complaint -v- the broker.  Which is where I am now.  Extenuating circumstances as to why I'm complaining so late.  But hopefully still in time ??  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Erudio/Shoosmiths SPC claim - old SLC Loan


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1157 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Letter received from Shoosmiths saying I have failed to repay sums due and that my account has been terminated by Erudio. I have 14 days to pay-up/arrange a repayment plan, for fear of further action.

 

DSAR to SLC shows that I was erroneous in my belief I had updated my address and thus I was never sent deferment forms just after I moved house in late 2016.

 

In November I sent a DSAR to Erudio--no response yet.

 

I should say I am under the threshold for repayment. I have no issue making a small repayment every month to clear any arrears, but only once I can afford to.

 

Looking for a plan of action. Should I make a s77 CCA request to Shoosmiths? I'm in Scotland. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Read other topics about them.  They cant do anything. They do this to pretty much everyone.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send backdated slc forms for the years you missed

On the homepage of this slc forum

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

can you post up what you got from them?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

so a simple procedure cause claim.

 

moved to the Scotland forum 

please complete this:

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Erudio/Shoosmiths SPC claim - old SLC Loan

Name the issuing court: Edinburgh Sheriff

 

Who Is The Claimant: Erudio Student Loans

 

Who Are the Solicitors: Shoosmiths

 

What type of action? (Simple/Ordinary): Simple

 

What is the claim for – 

1.The claimants are a finance company which inter alia operates the business of debt purchasing.

 

2.By virtue of a debt purchase agreement ("the Agreement") between the claimants and Student Loans Company ("the Original Owner") dated 22/11/2013, the claimant acquired title to and was assigned the right to payment in respect of all debts and other monetary claims of any nature due or owing by the respondent to the Original Owner which were in existence as at the date of the Agreement, and in particular in relation to the contract hereinafter condescended upon.

 

3.The said assignation was intimated to the respondent by way of a written notice on or around 22/11/2013.

 

4.The agreement between the respondent and the original owner upon which this action is based was regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

4.Further information in relation to that agreement is contained in section D4, where we set out the sums due and the basis upon which they fell due.

 

type out ALL the text [minus pers details] [D4 BOX SPR FORM]

Please see D4 paper apart.

 

D4 paper apart

 

1.The said contract between the Original owner and the repondent is a regulated credit agreement in terms of section 189 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. It is also regulated by the relevant Education (Student Loans) Acts and related regulations. It is dated 07/10/1999, and relates to a Student Loan agreement with account number xxxxxxxxxxxx.

 

2.The said agreement required the respondent, following completion of their course of study, and upon meeting certain conditions relating inter alia to income, to make payment of the sums due by way of consecutive monthly instalments. The said instalments were required to commence in the April following the respondent meeting certain income criteria and were to be based upon a percentage of the respondent's income earned over the said threshold amount.

 

3.It was a term of said agreement that a failure to meet any instalment on a due date would render the account in default and would entitle the claimant to serve a notice of default on the respondent requiring the respondent to remedy the breach within 14 days which failing the claimant would be entitled to demand repayment of the loan in full.

 

4.On or around 25/10/2018 the respondent failed to make payment of a sum which had fallen due and the said account thereby entered into default. A default notice was issued to the respondent on 25/10/2018.

 

5.The respondent failed to remedy the default following upon service of the said notice and the account was accordingly terminated in accordance with that notice. The account remains in default. The sum due thereunder is due and payable now.

 

6.As at the date hereof, the sum due in terms of the said agreement amounts to £xxxx.xx In terms of the Agreement and the written notice hereinbefore condescended upon, the right to receive payment of the sums due in terms of the said account vests in the claimant.

 

date of raised claim :- Unsure, but papers were printed on 01/04/19, served 10/04/19

 

Last Date Of Service:- 13/05/19

 

Last Date For Response:- 03/06/19

 

What Documents are listed in Box E2-

A copy of the credit agreement, statements of account and notice of assignation will be produced in any defended process to follow hereon.

 

Is the claim for ......an Overdraft, credit card, loan account, HP Agreement, Catalogue or mobile phone debt? :- Mortgage style student loans x2

 

BOX D5 what has the claimant stated:

I want the court to order the respondent to pay me the sum of £xxxx.xx

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? 1999

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.:- Original Creditor (Student Loans Company) sold debt in 2013 to Erudio, who have issued claim.

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? I believe so

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Yes

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? I believe so

 

When was you last payment:- Unsure if I have made any payments.

 

Why did you cease payments:- I have not made any as I earn under the repayment threshold so have not been due any monies.

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No.

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No

 

In November 2018 I made a subject access request to Erudio. They have failed to respond.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I should say that this stems from an oversight by me, namely personal problems getting on top of me, and as a result my paperwork was a shambles thus I never sent my deferment form in for a couple of years and I forgot to update my address when I moved house.

 

In addition to these two mortgage style loans, I also have another three mortgage style that were sold to Honours Student Loans. I did have a period where deferment forms were not submitted but not for such a long period. HSL have acted much more like the SLC in respect to things, and have asked I make an arrangement to repay the arrears and have accepted my deferment application.

 

It annoys me that I have 5 different mortgage style loans that are with two different "lenders" and I have to duplicate everything with regards to deferment with the same conditions.

 

If I was earning above the threshold then they would effectively be treated as one with regards to paying back over 60 months. The government needs to take a look at the whole situation regarding the sale of student loans.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok well youve nothing to do till a few days before 3rd june.

 

So youve not earned over the threshold..?

When was the last deferment please?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will have to double check, but I think the last one for Erudio ended in December 2016, just after I moved house, so I never got the renewal forms. For HSL it was September 2017. Standby. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so not SB'd

did you fill out the forms erudio sent you.even the ones wanting DD details.

without reading about it all here on cag and not too but use the old blank slc ones?

 

have you ever earned over the threads hold since last deferement too?

I take it you've had nothing nor made comms since last deferment either?

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I never received forms after my last deferment ended because we had moved house and I thought I had updated my address with the SLC. I have never earned over the threshold.

 

I received a letter from Erudio I think in November 2018.

I sent a DSAR in response to the letter later that month, no response yet, and I sent a complaint email just this week.

 

I received a 14 days to pay/ make an arrangement letter from Shoos in March and was forming a reply to them but the Sheriff Officers came knocking today.

 

I told them I disputed that any money was due and that I was awaiting information from Erudio, and if that proved my loans were not deferred then I would happily arrange repayments.

 

I do not deny taking the loans, I just disagree with the fact Erudio are being heavy handed. 

 

I also had a type 1 income contingent student loan, which I paid off last year.

Having loans with three different lenders has muddied the waters. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I cant see you having to pay this , you are under the threshold then.

did you blindly sign the erudio forms and give them a signed DD mandate when you did get them without reading cag first?

so you don't know the background that the forms were deemed unlawful by the FOS etc? and they made you sign up to T&C's that were not part of the org SLC T&C's..you need to do some catching up.

 

 

 

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think I ever completed the Erudio forms and think I have only sent the standard ones to SLC, never to Erudio but cannot be sure so await the DSAR response.

 

I'm not sure, but the deferments since Erudio took over all show on my SLC DSAR.

I provided my bank account details to HSL via SLC in November last year, but never to Erudio.

 

Just realised that I have my HMRC records online.

 

Will I print them off to cover the period of non-deferment and send away with a covering letter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

to whom?

don't do anything  with regard to anyone concerned with this claim until just before 3rd june

other than p'haps with slc and that would be an sar.

 

so effectively, all that is missing toward this debt/claim is ONE missed SLC deferment form or 2?

and that you've make zero contact with erudio since they took over 

correct?

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Effectively that's the last two deferment I have missed, although in December when returning the form for the HSL loans to SLC I included the Erudio loan numbers in with it.

 

Just checked my emails.

I must have received a letter requesting repayment of arrears in October 2014, to which I emailed them in December 2014, disputing the arrears.

 

They responded saying that my deferment had ended in January 2014 and as such arrears totalling xxxxxx had accrued.

 

I responded disputing that I had not sent a deferment application because my loans with HSL at that time were also due for deferment and I always sent the two forms in together, and asked for proof.

 

Erudio responded by asking for personal details for security reasons before they could divulge any information.

I don't appear to have followed this up. 

 

In December 2016 I attempted to register for an online account, but I cannot access this for whatever reason. 

 

In November 2018 I sent the DSAR and this week have complained that they have not responded. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sar to whom?

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You wont get any info from erudio as a sar really. Theyre a dca. and will only hold basic info.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Effectively that's the last two deferment I have missed, although in December when returning the form for the HSL loans to SLC I included the Erudio loan numbers in with it.

 

have you a copy still?

 

if not sar SLC get it

that should do nicely to buff off the claim.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sar whom you sent it too.

but REMEMBER if you have MOVED and you did not inform them then inc a CTAX copy and list of relevant past addresses.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter from Erudio today in response to the SAR, asking to provide information for security reasons.

 

More interested in the return address of Capella Building, 5th Floor, 60 York Street, Glasgow. What odious arms length brand is this from?

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you inc a current CTAX copy and list of relevant old addresses?

 

FYI: 

https://www.checkdirector.co.uk/company/yuill-kyle-ltd-SC352604/

 

are process servers in Scotland.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...