Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I contacted them when it happened. The caretaker came over, looked at it, and walked off with the tree chunks of mortar. Next morning, they had a roofer come over and enter our garden to inspect it. Friday they were supposed to speak with a scaffolding company. I had to bring up liability and potentially calling the council to report 'an unsafe structure' before they even got moving. They know all about the wedding, the preparations, our patio contractors etc. but their attitude doesn't instill me with confidence. My fear is it will end up being a legal matter which is why I posted here to hopefully receive some advice. As far as I can see, the roof is in a state of disrepair, even if it's just the mortar breaking lose due to the size and weight of the chunks - and even from ground level it's visibly clear that multiple pieces have fallen over time (though never this size so we haven't been able to identify the issue till now - we thought it was rubble left in the garden by the previous owner). Currently, we can't use 25% of our garden due to the risk of more falling mortar which is more than just an inconvenience, we can't proceed with our contractors, and at worst, it will run up in several thousand of extra expenses for us, if we have to find a wedding venue. Even if they do have it fixed in time, and we have to settle for renting a marquee and floor for the marquee and furniture and whatnot it will be additional costs only due to the neighbour's roof.
    • please create your OWN topic by hitting create or + in the top red banner  
    • It will be years before Banks would sell to a debt buyer.  Sometimes Banks will use external debt collectors to try to collect, but generally Banks don't take Court action.  So you could be looking at 3 to 6 years, before any dca owning debt looks to take any Court action. And it is not definite that this would happen. So no need to feel pressured at this stage. In the event you found yourself unemployed, you have time to engage with Banks to advise of your situation and ask for time to deal with the situation, find new employment. As long as you inform the Banks they will offer assistance they can. E.g offer payment holiday or accept reduced payment for period. What you should not do, is not contact the Banks and simply default on payments. 
    • I'd get back to them tomorrow, and explain the circumstances, that you have a wedding reception, and just appeal to their better nature. Hopefully they will be able to move sooner rather than later, especially if you go in in person and speak to them, and show them the issue.
    • The 3 pieces of mortar that fell on the same day, at the same time, were approx. 25-30cm long and weighed around ½-1 kilo each from a roof that is above the 2nd floor; they were by no means tiny pieces of mortar but large chunks falling from a rather great height. I believe the size and weight is enough to cause serious injury and if it falls on your head, I assume it could potentially be lethal if unlucky, but we don't wish to put that theory to test... We can't in good conscience let a contractor install a patio and a gazebo as it is in the exact spot where the mortar fell, nor do I think anyone would be willing to take the chance. Looking at the roof, there are multiple other remaining pieces from the same 'line' or 'row' of mortar that can potentially fall. The mortar is right underneath the slate tiles on the neighbour's roof and I don't know whether the tiles are also (becoming) lose due to the loss of the mortar. I was trying to upload a photo but it seems it's not allowed. The first contractor to work in our garden in preparation for the patio and gazebo is scheduled to start on 10th June, that leaves the neighbour 5 workdays to sort their roof which is unlikely, so it seems we will have to postpone our patio contractor without knowing when they can come back. We have already had extensive work done in the garden in preparation for the wedding reception and it will become very costly for us if we have to move the wedding reception to a venue (if we can even get one at this short notice) rather than have it at home which was our dream.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

A guide to Charging Orders & Orders for Sale


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2869 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Mrs. E. Blackadder, you've got that right. It's virtually impossible to make a complaint, and if you manage, it's abosolutely impossible for the complaint to come out in your favour, and don't they all know it! In my case, it just cost me loads of extra money. The message from the judiciary is loud and clear. If you try to complain about blatant bias and miscarriage of justice, it will only cost you more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I think If your debt is older than 6 years and you haven't contacted them or repaid anything then you can deny you owe the debt.

You should be covered by the Statute Barred legislation which stops any debt over 6 years being able to be enforced.

CAG NEEDS FUNDS PLEASE DONATE AS MUCH OR AS LITTLE WHERE POSSIBLE

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/paypal.php?go=donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if anyone can help me? Can a creditor get a charging order on a statute barred debt and if they have is it valid?

Quick reply would be most helpful' Thanks.

You can send them this..... http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/resources/templates-library/86-debt-collectors/599-letter-sent-when-debt-is-statute-barred

CAG NEEDS FUNDS PLEASE DONATE AS MUCH OR AS LITTLE WHERE POSSIBLE

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/paypal.php?go=donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your input Westie most appreciated can you help with the second part of my question i.e.If a debt is

statute barred and the creditor gets a judgement on it [by default] is it valid?

 

 

 

If a debt is statute barred the creditor can not get a valid judgment, and without a valid judgment the creditor cannot get a charging order.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If a debt is statute barred the creditor can not get a valid judgment, and without a valid judgment the creditor cannot get a charging order.

 

[caveat]................but the courts will do nothing and will not even know its a stat barred debt unless the charging order application/court claim is defended and you tell them its stat barred of course...:smile:

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting. Yes they have got a judgement and are now attempting an order of sale, but I'm wondering that if I point out that

the original CCJ was stat barred then all following judgements are invalid, Any advice would be most welcome. Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

AJ you can fill out an N244 for starters to set aside the Judgment.

 

When will the court agree to set aside a judgment?

 

The county court rules set out when you can apply to set aside a judgment. For example:

 

  • You may not have received the original claim form.
  • You may have moved house and not had post from your previous address.
  • An order was made against you in your absence in certain circumstances.
  • There may be an error in the judgment.
  • You want to put in a defence and did not have the opportunity to do this.
  • The proceedings did not follow the court rules

Maybe some of this post code help?

 

Help with N244 form - set aside CCJ

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?220589-Help-with-N244-form-set-aside-CCJ&p=2438635&viewfull=1#post2438635

 

CAG NEEDS FUNDS PLEASE DONATE AS MUCH OR AS LITTLE WHERE POSSIBLE

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/paypal.php?go=donate

Link to post
Share on other sites

A friend of mine has posted a thread further down that isn’t getting much attention and his internet has gone down so can I please post his situation here.

Basically he’s had a ccj registered against him and he decided to just ignore it in the hope it would go away, it didn’t and cabot got the ccj. The debt isn’t statute barred and stands at around 5k. Original creditors Morgan Stanley/goldfish.

Cabot have a hearing in Norwich set for the end of September for the charging order, can anyone advise him on what to do next. I’d imagine the goldfish account if full of holes, but he doesn’t now have time to SAR anyone because he’s just ignored the ccj and hoped it would go away and the hearing is in 3 weeks.

He thinks he needs to travel to Norwich, which obviously he doesn’t, he needs to transfer closer to home, but can he delay the hearing in any way to get his SAR out to cabot and Goldfish.

Any help would be much appreciated; this is just another example of someone being bullied by cabot when they just don’t have funds to pay. He’s made several verbal offers to pay which they’ve declined, he’ll not be speaking to them over the phone again.

Thanks people.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

just want to clarify the process regarding charging orders

 

if by the faintest chance i loose my case against MBNA/OPTIMA and get a ccj , do i automatically have an option to arrange monthly payments via the court?

 

if i make payments on time and do not miss any can they get a charging order?

 

can the force me to sell if i am paying in accordance with the payment plan?

 

debt plus costs if i loose would be approx £14k

Link to post
Share on other sites

A friend of mine has posted a thread further down that isn’t getting much attention and his internet has gone down so can I please post his situation here.

Basically he’s had a ccj registered against him and he decided to just ignore it in the hope it would go away, it didn’t and cabot got the ccj. The debt isn’t statute barred and stands at around 5k. Original creditors Morgan Stanley/goldfish.

Cabot have a hearing in Norwich set for the end of September for the charging order, can anyone advise him on what to do next. I’d imagine the goldfish account if full of holes, but he doesn’t now have time to SAR anyone because he’s just ignored the ccj and hoped it would go away and the hearing is in 3 weeks.

He thinks he needs to travel to Norwich, which obviously he doesn’t, he needs to transfer closer to home, but can he delay the hearing in any way to get his SAR out to cabot and Goldfish.

Any help would be much appreciated; this is just another example of someone being bullied by cabot when they just don’t have funds to pay. He’s made several verbal offers to pay which they’ve declined, he’ll not be speaking to them over the phone again.

Thanks people.

 

 

The claim should have been transferred to the Defendant's local court for enforcement so tell your friend to write to the court and request it be transferred as it is too far away and he cannot get time off etc. It will give him a few extra weeks if he's lucky.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that, but what is the process?

How do I get the party (in this case Shoosmiths - a highly responsive and helpful oganisation :flypig:) holding the charge to agree to move it? - or can I just do it via the County Court?

 

Getting them to agree to moving the charge is the difficult part.

 

Only the Claimant can remove it. First they would have to apply to the Land Registry to have the charge removed from your old property and then pay the Land Registry again to have it placed on your new property.

 

It would be a hassle and cost the Claimant money so is unlikely to happen, but easy enough if they wanted to.

 

Write to them and ask if they would be willing. It's worth a go...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

just want to clarify the process regarding charging orders

 

if by the faintest chance i loose my case against MBNA/OPTIMA and get a ccj , do i automatically have an option to arrange monthly payments via the court?

 

if i make payments on time and do not miss any can they get a charging order?

 

can the force me to sell if i am paying in accordance with the payment plan?

 

debt plus costs if i loose would be approx £14k

 

 

 

If you lose and get a CCJ, the court will either award the judgment forthwith (payable immediately) or set a rate of installments which you must maintain - this is entirely at the courts discretion and you can only try to convince the District Judge by taking your income & expenditure with you. If you miss a payment then the Claimant can then apply for a charging order.

 

However, you may still get a charging order even if you never miss a payment. It is quite common for the Claimant to apply to the court after it has set an installment rate to redetermine the order to allow for a charging order alongside the installment plan for security, especially if it will take hundreds of years to repay. There is some debate on here as to whether the Claimant can do this but trust me it happens a lot and is allowed.

 

Once the C/O is granted (if it is) then you can ask the court to set an installment rate that you can maintain and the Claimant will not be able to go for an order for sale and repossess your house unless you default. OFS are very rare but do happen if the debt is large and there is a lot of equity, but a court will almost certainly not grant one if you have kids etc living there. If you do default then there are a couple more hearing to go to before your house is repossessed so you can argue your case again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The claim should have been transferred to the Defendant's local court for enforcement so tell your friend to write to the court and request it be transferred as it is too far away and he cannot get time off etc. It will give him a few extra weeks if he's lucky.

 

Thanks for that, he's done just that and also got an extension on the hearing date which gives him time to SAR cabot and the original creditor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys need a some more help here. I have recieved a letter from the solicitors demanding that, under the CPR rules I furnish them with a copy of my most recent mortgage statement and a valuation of my house. Is there a provision in the CPR that a defendant supply the oppositionwith any documentation. Sw ift advice would be greatly appreciated. thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys need a some more help here. I have recieved a letter from the solicitors demanding that, under the CPR rules I furnish them with a copy of my most recent mortgage statement and a valuation of my house. Is there a provision in the CPR that a defendant supply the oppositionwith any documentation. Sw ift advice would be greatly appreciated. thanks.

 

Hmm what part of the CPR are they quoting....and do you have an ongoing court case or are they fishing prior?

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My OH received a CCJ in 06 for approx £10k. He was discharged from bankruptcy in 03. In 08 HMRC reduced OH's tax liability by £4,600.00 because they said that this sum should have been taken off due to his bankruptcy.

 

In 08 the court agreed that HMRC were not allowed to place a charging order on our house as long as OH kept to paying his £15 a mth. My OH has never been late and always paid this debt on time.

 

He has however been looking in to his tax debt with HMRC and found many many flaws and serious errors made by HMRC and has been in contact with them for nearly 8 months writing to find out why these errors are and the sum owed to HMRC was never correct from the beginning and my OH is disputing this with HMRC.

 

HMRC have now written to OH saying it may be necessary to apply to the court for a charging order to be placed on my property.

 

I know that HMRC are always receiving publicity as they botch up so many things, but my worry is are they allowed to place a charging order over my house as this is my OH'd debt? and would I be allowed to have a say because I do not want any charging orders over my house especially after the last time.

 

My OH wants to challenge HMRC as the mistakes they have been are beyond belief and I am more than certain that if these were put in front of the judge he would give HMRC a right rollocking.

 

So my question is that are HMRC alowed to apply for a charging order and if so is there anything I can do to dispute.

 

In fact I was thinking that if HMRC should apply for a charging order would the court give my OH an opportunity to have his say and if he disagreed what were his reasons. If that was so then it would be much easier to put his case forward about why he believes HMRC are wrong.

 

Any help would be great, nothing has happened yet but I just want to be prepared that's all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My OH received a CCJ in 06 for approx £10k. He was discharged from bankruptcy in 03. In 08 HMRC reduced OH's tax liability by £4,600.00 because they said that this sum should have been taken off due to his bankruptcy.

 

In 08 the court agreed that HMRC were not allowed to place a charging order on our house as long as OH kept to paying his £15 a mth. My OH has never been late and always paid this debt on time.

 

He has however been looking in to his tax debt with HMRC and found many many flaws and serious errors made by HMRC and has been in contact with them for nearly 8 months writing to find out why these errors are and the sum owed to HMRC was never correct from the beginning and my OH is disputing this with HMRC.

 

HMRC have now written to OH saying it may be necessary to apply to the court for a charging order to be placed on my property.

 

I know that HMRC are always receiving publicity as they botch up so many things, but my worry is are they allowed to place a charging order over my house as this is my OH'd debt? and would I be allowed to have a say because I do not want any charging orders over my house especially after the last time.

 

My OH wants to challenge HMRC as the mistakes they have been are beyond belief and I am more than certain that if these were put in front of the judge he would give HMRC a right rollocking.

 

So my question is that are HMRC alowed to apply for a charging order and if so is there anything I can do to dispute.

 

In fact I was thinking that if HMRC should apply for a charging order would the court give my OH an opportunity to have his say and if he disagreed what were his reasons. If that was so then it would be much easier to put his case forward about why he believes HMRC are wrong.

 

Any help would be great, nothing has happened yet but I just want to be prepared that's all.

 

 

 

Hi,

 

Firstly, has your OH stopped amking the payments at any point? If not, then unless HMRC go back to court and the judge has said otherwise, HMRC cannot apply for a charging order and I would get your other half to point this out to them in no u ncertain terms!

 

If it gets that far, you will be notified in writing of the application for an charging order and you can write to the court to object. I don't think you'll be allowed to speak at the hearing as it is your OH's debt but he will definitly have the chance to put his side across at the final charging order hearing. It is possible for your OH's sole debt to be registered against your jointly owned house in the form of a restriction, and unfortunatley in reality there is very little the co-proprietor can do about it.

 

If your OH wants to dispute the original CCJ then that is a different matter for a different day and will involve a seperate set aside hearing as most probably HMRC are just trying to scare you for now.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2869 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...