Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
    • when did they (who) inform you there was a 'police case' and when was this attained? i will guess the debt is now SB'd as it's UAE 15yrs. have you informed the bsnk ever by email/letter of your correct and current address? you can always ignore anyone else accept the bank,  Block and bounce back all emails. Block any text messages  Ignore any letters unless it's: - a Statutory Demand - a Letter Of Claim - a Court Claimform via Northants bulk.  
    • I left Dubai 8 years ago and intended to return. However a job prospect fell through. I’d been there for 15 years. I decided to pay my credit card and the bank had frozen my account. There is no means to pay the CC so completely unable to pay when I wanted to other than the bank advising me to ask a friend in the UAE to pay it on my behalf!  fast forward bank informs there is a police case against me for non payment. Years later IDR chased me and after months/ years they stopped. Now Judge & Priestley are trying their luck. Now I have received an email in English and Arabic from JP saying the bank has authorised them to collect debts. Is this the same as IDR although I didn’t receive anything like this from them. Just says they are authorised?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Halifax - getting serious now


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4616 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

I need some advice please

I asked for a copy of my agreement - they sent me T&C etc - I said not good enough account in dispute, asked again with a letter from site - they sent me this, I need to know how to respond please someone.

 

Cheers

 

Help I don't know how to attach a word doc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 138
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Try using photobucket.com to attach to the thread. Once you have loaded the image to that site copy the link to this button here:

 

Image.jpg

:!: -Any advise I give is based purely on my own experience. It should not be solely relied upon as I am NOT a legal expert and any major decisions you make should not be based on my opinion alone -

HFC Bank - Davey vs HFC

Barclays - Monthly payments made

Cahoot - Agreement received, awaiting 2nd agreement after DCA.

MBNA1&2 - Agreements received. (Currently in limbo)

Halifax - Davey vs Halifax/Cabot

MINT - Davey vs Mint

Amex - Davey vs Amex

Cap1 **WON** £1,500 Written Off Davey vs Cap1

 

Never Sign Anything

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll try this:

 

Dear…..

Thank you for your letter of….. and firstly accept my apologies for the delay in replying.

According to our records, we supplied a signed statement of account, copies of the agreement in place at the time the account was opened and the one currently in place on ……

The regulations define what is required of a “copy”. Whilst regulation 3 provides “every copy” of an executed agreement…. shall be a true copy”. Regulation 3(2)(b) provides that a copy can omit any signature box, signature or date of signature.

We have therefore supplied a copy of the agreement complying with section 78 which contains all the prescribed terms, a description of how the credit limit will be calculated, states the names and address of the parties and all original terms and conditions. The copy agreement provided does not show the signatures of both parties as this element is specifically excluded from being required by regulation 3(2)(b) of the Consumer Credit (Cancellation Notices and Copies of Documents) Regulations 1983.

You have stated that “Subject to section 127(3) of the Act the court has no discretion to make an enforcement order when there is a breach of this nature”, however your agreement was executed on …. 2003 and section 127(3) was repealed on 6th April 2007.

As stated in Wilson & Others V Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (2003), referred to in your letter, Lord Nicholls confirmed that even if an agreement to be unenforceable, then that fact “does not deprive a regulated agreement of all legal effect” and that the debtor may hold the creditor to the agreement.

Despite claiming to give the bank notice that the account is in dispute, you have given no valid reason to dispute the debt. Please note, you have no contractual or statutory right to withhold payment to your account. As such it seems clear there is no dispute over the fact that the funds borrowed are required to be repaid or the terms on which that repayment is due. Even if the agreement was not enforceable, which is not the case here, it is clear from case law, this only prevents one party from enforcing the agreement through the courts, it does not prevent Collections activity or the placing of information on the credit file.

Your account is currently in arrears and we will continue to ask to rectify this default and we reserve the right to notify credit reference agencies accordingly. For the avoidance of doubt the Consumer Credit Act does not prohibit collection activity when an account is in dispute.

I am declining your request to remove any detrimental information held on your credit file in relation to this credit card account. In signing the credit card agreement, you did give your agreement and consent to the processing of your information. It is clear that by signing the agreement, the customer agrees to their data being used as set out. This is also in compliance with the Data Protection Act. Unfortunately, as a credit file is a true reflection of the conduct of an account, I am unable to amend this information.

I hope this clarifies our position on the matter

Yours faithfully

 

Sorted

 

HELP PLEASE I urgently need to know what to reply

 

Thanks all

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some of what they say is right, some of it junk. Standard fob off letter really. What year was this application?

 

What exactly did they send in response to the CCA? Can you post it up?

:!: -Any advise I give is based purely on my own experience. It should not be solely relied upon as I am NOT a legal expert and any major decisions you make should not be based on my opinion alone -

HFC Bank - Davey vs HFC

Barclays - Monthly payments made

Cahoot - Agreement received, awaiting 2nd agreement after DCA.

MBNA1&2 - Agreements received. (Currently in limbo)

Halifax - Davey vs Halifax/Cabot

MINT - Davey vs Mint

Amex - Davey vs Amex

Cap1 **WON** £1,500 Written Off Davey vs Cap1

 

Never Sign Anything

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi tortilla, you will need to repost the document with the personal data removed as photobucket have removed it.

 

We have had similar from them and sent responses which we can post up for you later if applicable after seeing the edited document.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all me again

still cant seem to post any docs, so have been having a good look round and it seems that they have sent me the same as they sent Fingers60 (i hope you dont mind me taking your name in vain, or indeed quoting your post) except a copy of the application. Still trying to find another way to post docs as photobucket wont let me, any suggestions.

 

Cheers and thanks all

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't why photobucket isn't working for you. It doesn't like PDFs but is ok with jpegs. Have you checked the file format.

 

Try searching for image hosting on a search engine.

The only other one i have seen people use is ImageShack® - Image Hosting

:!: -Any advise I give is based purely on my own experience. It should not be solely relied upon as I am NOT a legal expert and any major decisions you make should not be based on my opinion alone -

HFC Bank - Davey vs HFC

Barclays - Monthly payments made

Cahoot - Agreement received, awaiting 2nd agreement after DCA.

MBNA1&2 - Agreements received. (Currently in limbo)

Halifax - Davey vs Halifax/Cabot

MINT - Davey vs Mint

Amex - Davey vs Amex

Cap1 **WON** £1,500 Written Off Davey vs Cap1

 

Never Sign Anything

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am new to this - so apologies for jumping on someones thread - not sure how to start a new one - I am trying to get info and my head is spinning round! Not sure if I am doing this right. Can anyone advise please?

 

Requested Credit Agreement from the Halifax and received an letter in response to my request - no signed agreement but they enclosed a typed document which they state is a copy of my executed agreement, a copy of my current terms and conditions and a signed statement of my account. Also this paragraph in the letter

 

" The copy of the agreement enclosed with this letter complies with the requirements of the Consumer Credit (Cancellatin Notices and Copies of Documents) Regulations 1983 (the "Regulations"). Regulation 3(2)(b) provides that a copy can omit any signature box, signature or date of signature. In summary we are not required to produce a copy with your clients signature on it. By providing a copy of this agreement complying witht he requirements of the Regulations the agreement remains enforceable.

 

By providing you with the documents attached to this letter, we have satisfield our obligation to provide a copy of the executed agreement under section78. As such, the agreement you have with us is fully enforceable and we shall continue to treat it as such. We will not be entering into any further correspondence with you regarding the requirements relating to the provision of copy agreements.

 

Finally, we must remind you that failure to make payments under this agreement will result in collection activities and any default may also be reported to credit reference agencies."

 

What should be my next response?

Halifax Card (OH) -2.9% reinstated - Sucess!

Santander/House of Fraser (1) PPI Refund plus 8% plus LOC

Santander/House of Fraser (2) PPI Refunded plus 8% plus LOC

Penalty Charge Notice - Representation accepted and PN cancelled - £120

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll try this:

 

Dear…..

 

Thank you for your letter of….. and firstly accept my apologies for the delay in replying.

 

According to our records, we supplied a signed statement of account, copies of the agreement in place at the time the account was opened and the one currently in place on ……

 

The regulations define what is required of a “copy”. Whilst regulation 3 provides “every copy” of an executed agreement…. shall be a true copy”. Regulation 3(2)(b) provides that a copy can omit any signature box, signature or date of signature.

 

We have therefore supplied a copy of the agreement complying with section 78 which contains all the prescribed terms, a description of how the credit limit will be calculated, states the names and address of the parties and all original terms and conditions. The copy agreement provided does not show the signatures of both parties as this element is specifically excluded from being required by regulation 3(2)(b) of the Consumer Credit (Cancellation Notices and Copies of Documents) Regulations 1983.

 

You have stated that “Subject to section 127(3) of the Act the court has no discretion to make an enforcement order when there is a breach of this nature”, however your agreement was executed on …. 2003 and section 127(3) was repealed on 6th April 2007.

 

As stated in Wilson & Others V Secretary of State for Trade and Industry (2003), referred to in your letter, Lord Nicholls confirmed that even if an agreement to be unenforceable, then that fact “does not deprive a regulated agreement of all legal effect” and that the debtor may hold the creditor to the agreement.

 

Despite claiming to give the bank notice that the account is in dispute, you have given no valid reason to dispute the debt. Please note, you have no contractual or statutory right to withhold payment to your account. As such it seems clear there is no dispute over the fact that the funds borrowed are required to be repaid or the terms on which that repayment is due. Even if the agreement was not enforceable, which is not the case here, it is clear from case law, this only prevents one party from enforcing the agreement through the courts, it does not prevent Collections activity or the placing of information on the credit file.

 

Your account is currently in arrears and we will continue to ask to rectify this default and we reserve the right to notify credit reference agencies accordingly. For the avoidance of doubt the Consumer Credit Act does not prohibit collection activity when an account is in dispute.

 

I am declining your request to remove any detrimental information held on your credit file in relation to this credit card account. In signing the credit card agreement, you did give your agreement and consent to the processing of your information. It is clear that by signing the agreement, the customer agrees to their data being used as set out. This is also in compliance with the Data Protection Act. Unfortunately, as a credit file is a true reflection of the conduct of an account, I am unable to amend this information.

 

I hope this clarifies our position on the matter

 

Yours faithfully

 

Sorted

 

HELP PLEASE I urgently need to know what to reply

 

Thanks all

 

Cheers

 

Hi tortilla,

I am in the same situation at the moment. They did send me exactly the same thing almost: an aplication signed by me back in 97, a statement of account(but it is a new one) and I was under the impression that it should have been provided by Halifax at the time you opened this account together with the Credit card agreement (which they have also enclosed and obviously a new one but not signed). It is what they have sent you as well??? Have a look at the link below which is mine: ...wait i have to go back to copy it

http://Halifax3 href="Halifax3 picture by americaninparis - Photobucket" target="_blank">Halifax3

 

They have given me till 14 MAY then they said they will divert me to the Collectors.

I have already typed one but I am going to use the CPR...at least I will show that I am trying to get the agreement.

I do not know if it is good as I did not have any reply yet but by tomorrow I have to give them an answer although they said that they will not correspond with me anymore.....very good...no more money from me, and that is for the last 2 months as well....

Good luck,

DD

Edited by London000
Link to post
Share on other sites

hello

i am having a lot of problems with the halifax credit card company, i cant afford to repay the amount owned. I am not working at the moment, if the debt has been more than 6 years, does it get wiped?

your pendle

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi to LB145, London000 and pendle,

 

i'm sorry you're asking me questions i don't have the expertise to answer, best advice i can give is start your own threads, post all the information you have and someone who does know will be along to help.

 

keep the faith

 

cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pendle and Lb145.. As tortilla says, best to start your own threads that way you will get some folks helping.

 

The Halifax thread is here:

Halifax Bank and Bank of Scotland - The Consumer Forums

 

Near the top left of that page is the 'New Thread' button that should get you started. ;)

 

Tortilla.. what date is the original application for this?

:!: -Any advise I give is based purely on my own experience. It should not be solely relied upon as I am NOT a legal expert and any major decisions you make should not be based on my opinion alone -

HFC Bank - Davey vs HFC

Barclays - Monthly payments made

Cahoot - Agreement received, awaiting 2nd agreement after DCA.

MBNA1&2 - Agreements received. (Currently in limbo)

Halifax - Davey vs Halifax/Cabot

MINT - Davey vs Mint

Amex - Davey vs Amex

Cap1 **WON** £1,500 Written Off Davey vs Cap1

 

Never Sign Anything

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No worries. Definitely pre april 2007 then.

 

Haven't been through your links with a fine tooth comb but can't see any signatures and that looks like it's dated 0608 from the number on the last page. So what they have sent is the varied unsigned(?) agreement.

 

Not enforceable without a signature and not the original but.. what they have supplied probably complies with their duty under Section 78.

 

Saying they have failed under Section 78 to supply you information isn't going to wash so you need to move away from S 78 and request the Original Properly Executed Credit Card Agreement. Something along the lines of:

 

After reviewing the documentation sent in response to my Section 78 request for information relating to the above account and after Legal Advice i note what you have supplied may, or may not, comply with Section 78 of the CCA1974 but in what you have supplied you have failed to produce a document signed myself that contains the prescribed terms as per section 61(a) and section 127(3) of the CCA 1974.

 

I am also aware that there are certain terms that are required to be within the “Agreement” and should these terms be mis-stated or not present within the Original documentation then agreement can be rendered irredeemably unenforceable in law and i therefore refer you to the following of which, as a large financial organisation, i am sure you are fully aware of:

 

s61(a) CCA - Signing of agreement:

(1) A regulated agreement is not properly executed unless—

(a) a document in the prescribed form itself containing all the prescribed terms and conforming to regulations under section 60(1) is signed in the prescribed manner both by the debtor or hirer and by or on behalf of the creditor or owner, and

(b) the document embodies all the terms of the agreement, other than implied terms, and

© the document is, when presented or sent to the debtor or hirer for signature, in such a state that all its terms are readily legible.

s127(3) CCA:

(3) The court shall not make an enforcement order under section 65(1) if section 61(1)(a) (signing of agreements) was not complied with unless a document (whether or not in the prescribed form and complying with regulations under section 60(1)) itself containing all the prescribed terms of the agreement was signed by the debtor or hirer (whether or not in the prescribed manner).

 

I understand that section 78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 sets out clearly what is required to comply with my request and quote “shall give the debtor a copy of the executed agreement (if any) and of any other document referred to in it” For clarification I require a copy of the agreement, any terms and conditions from the time when the agreement was executed together with a copy of current terms and conditions and a copy of the cancellation notice if the agreement refers to “Your Right to Cancel” within it. I also require a statement of account as laid out also within Section 78(1). If there weren’t any terms and conditions then please confirm this in your response

 

I am aware that the Consumer Credit (Cancellation Notices and Copies of Documents) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1557) at Regulation 3 allows the Signature box and signature to be omitted in a copy document but the copy document must contain all the terms off the agreement contained within the signed executed original document

 

I should also like to draw your attention to the decision in Wilson v Hurstanger (2007) EWCA Civ 299:

 

"...Schedule 6 is to ensure that, as an inflexible condition of enforceability, certain basic minimum terms are included which the parties (with the benefit of legal advice if necessary) and/or the court can identify within the four corners of the agreement. Those minimum provisions combined with the requirement under section 61 that all the terms should be in a single document, and backed up by the provisions of section 127 (3), ensure that these core terms are expressly set out in the agreement itself:

they cannot be orally agreed; they cannot be found in another document; they cannot be implied; and above all they cannot be in the slightest mis-stated. As a matter of policy, the lender is denied any room for manoeuvre in respect of them."

 

In light of the above I respectfully request that you provide a copy of the original agreement signed by myself that you hold on file and while I accept that you can omit the signature box for the purposes of compliance with my request, you will be aware that any challenge to the agreement in court would require the signed copy of the original agreement. If you still reject this, please provide clarification on the status of the Original Credit Agreement and confirm either that you hold the original signed agreement on file or a copy of it on microfliche or that you no longer hold the file.

 

I look forward to receiving the documentation requested and within the spirit of the Civil Procedure Rules shall allow 21 days for your reply.

:!: -Any advise I give is based purely on my own experience. It should not be solely relied upon as I am NOT a legal expert and any major decisions you make should not be based on my opinion alone -

HFC Bank - Davey vs HFC

Barclays - Monthly payments made

Cahoot - Agreement received, awaiting 2nd agreement after DCA.

MBNA1&2 - Agreements received. (Currently in limbo)

Halifax - Davey vs Halifax/Cabot

MINT - Davey vs Mint

Amex - Davey vs Amex

Cap1 **WON** £1,500 Written Off Davey vs Cap1

 

Never Sign Anything

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...