Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sunak actually nailed it in his boring speech yesterday  Starmers only offering is vote to be depressed  Just about sums up lefties  Humourless and Depresive🤣
    • Ah ok I will see if we receive it in the post tomorrow before I go to work. We want to see theirs so we know what documents they will list ? If their N265 is not received then best to send ours so that we do not miss the claimants deadline as per their draft directions.  What would happen if we did miss the deadline even by 1 day ? The claimant would use it against us in court ?  I scanned and posted in #159 the claimants continuation sheet attached to the N244 where they give a background of the case and reference e-mails etc. After this I will continue to work on the WS which is also causing me anxiety. This will also be used to object to their SJ application. I will advise tomorrow if anything else is received.  
    • Last September our 2019 plate Motorhome went to Brownhills of Newark for its annual habitation check/service. Whilst on their site for the day one of their drivers managed to drive it into a lamp post and put a 2m long scratch down the side of the body. They didn't own up to the damage, but luckily we noticed it before leaving the site, at which point the admitted fault and said they would fix it in house rather than go through the insurance. As they are an authorised Motor home repairer etc we agreed to this and a time frame of 3 weeks was given for the repair, which was booked in for late November. It could not be booked in sooner for the repair as we had a weekends away etc booked with the vehicle until mid November.  3 weeks, and a simple re-spray has now evolved to 18 weeks of them having the vehicle, due to the spray job having to be done 3 times, a window seal not been re-fitted correctly, leading to rain water pouring into the van and the replacement decals been applied wrong twice & having to be re-ordered from Elddis who originally built the camper. We finally got the vehicle back in late April, still minus 1 of the decals. Back in March we had an email from Brownhills asking what compensation we would accept due to the delays in returning the vehicle to us (They have had it for 18 weeks instead of the initial 3 weeks which was agreed). Once we finally got the vehicle back we told them what we expected (the value that the camper has depreciated by in the extra 15 weeks they have had it and which time we were unable to use it). They are now refusing to honour any compensation and are only offering us a free service for when this is due in September. Legally where do we stand?  Obviously we are not taking it back to them for a service, given that last time they managed to crash it and its taken so long for them to make such a simple repair. We are considering legal action, but are not really sure under what grounds/legislation we could claim. Any advice would be much appreciated.
    • Usual alarmist tripe from the Guardian exposed🤣     Many of the ‘Climate Experts’ Surveyed by the Guardian in Recent Propaganda Blitz Turn Out to be Emotionally-Unstable Hysterics – The Daily Sceptic DAILYSCEPTIC.ORG Last week, the Guardian published a survey of 383 'climate experts' and – shock – many of them turned out to be... The Guardian last week published its survey of ‘climate experts’. The results are a predictable mush of fire-and-brimstone predictions and emotional incontinence. This stunt may have convinced those already aligned to the newspaper’s ideological agenda to redouble their characteristically shrill rhetoric, but encouraging scientists to speculate and emote about the future of the planet looks like an act of political desperation, not scientific communication.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mackenzie Hall. Do any of you know of them?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4799 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

"They also stated that all they need is confirmation I lived at an address years ago and something stating I owe money and that that would be enough for a civil action based on the 'balance of probabilities'!!"

 

Based on that load of old bull invite them, no indeed encourage them, to take that to a court and put it to a judge! The judge would take a very dim view of their methods.

 

If you could get a word in egdeways between the guffaws of laughter from his honour and the angst expressed by Mac Hall's brief you could ask for costs and damages!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 973
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Advise MH to take you to court because based on the balance of probabilities they are talking out of their arses as usual. Report them to East Ayshire TS.

I'd say that based on the posts here, any legal action instigated by MH could be viewed as vexatious.

 

And yes, they're talking out of the arses.... :D

  • Haha 1

  • Barclays: WON!!! It took four months but was totally worth it!
  • Cabot: I'm still waiting for an enforcable agreement, more than a year after requesting it. Go on, Uncle Ken, take me to court if you dare. You know you want to!
  • Elephant.co.uk: VICTORY - they admitted there was no debt!
  • Ashbourne Management (gym membership): Finally got my default removed and out-of-court settlement; I'm not finished with them yet!

<--- If I've been helpful please remember the scales ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just got a letter from this "Company" out of the blue asking for me to contact them on a personal matter. i have no idea what this is about shoudl i just ignore it or return the letter to them them saying not known at this address?.

 

I have never had a credit check if i apply for one can outside companies track me down from this ot are credit checks completely ebtween me and the credit check company.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your advice they sound like absolute ****, should i juist ignore or return saying not at this address?.

 

Can outside companies get your information if you apply for a credit check?, i have never had one but i'm a bit worried that these slimeballs might get more information about me if i do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So is it basically a case that they are trying it on and haven’t got a leg to stand on as these dates are over 6 years so they are trying to bully people and play on their fears to admit their debt or make a payment?.

 

Usually.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So is it basically a case that they are trying it on and haven’t got a leg to stand on as these dates are over 6 years so they are trying to bully people and play on their fears to admit their debt or make a payment?.

If the debt is over 6 yrs old (5 in Scotland) it doesnt matter whether you admit it or not. Its STATUTE BARRED and CANNOT be enforced.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your advice they sound like absolute ****, should i juist ignore or return saying not at this address?.

 

Can outside companies get your information if you apply for a credit check?, i have never had one but i'm a bit worried that these slimeballs might get more information about me if i do.

 

It will show on your credit file that you have applied for your files - that's all. It only shows to companies who you apply to credit for for lending criteria and I had one listed from a tracing firm who had applied for my info in relation to an identity fraud [problem] on me. Applying for your credit files will not do you any harm wha so ever and alert nobody to anything. I'd suggest you do it to all three agengies Equifax, Call Credit and Experian . It only costs £2 and you can see what has been registered. You can do it free on line to the agencies for a 1 month trial, but you'll have to remember to cancel after the one month otherwise you'll be getting them monthly and being charged.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As has been discussed at length on a number of threads strange things happen when you apply for your credit report. Many Caggers have received debt claims from some of the bottom feeders of DCAs (arent they all????) regarding old debts which may or may not belong to you. They also have received unsolicited application forms for loans.

 

Be wary of applying for your Credit Reference report

Link to post
Share on other sites

As has been discussed at length on a number of threads strange things happen when you apply for your credit report. Many Caggers have received debt claims from some of the bottom feeders of DCAs (arent they all????) regarding old debts which may or may not belong to you. They also have received unsolicited application forms for loans.

 

Be wary of applying for your Credit Reference report

 

 

Geez's I never knew that, slime balls. How can they get access to your credit file without you applying for credit? I think, as someone else suggested an Application for a Subject Access Report on the CRA's might be in order. One person got over 2000 sheets of paper, but that just shows you what they hold on you but will also tell you what has been given out. Buggers!

Link to post
Share on other sites

well add me to the 'informed' trading standards about mac hall.

16th july.cca request +fee

..............................nothing

late aug. recieved call from meritforce.......basic, no to answering data q's. in writing only.................no letter from either.

so, just emailled their local trading standards

Link to post
Share on other sites

and can i just add, i started paying monthly for credit file online in june...........since then, i have got hundreds of loans leaflets etc, so i agree that accessing your credit file can trigger something.

i too, (soon) will be sending S.A.R. to all 3 cra's, not money a can afford, but it will give me plenty of reading, and to find out who has been checking my data without my permission.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i dont think they have 'passed' it on, i think mac hall know they have no right to collect this,(no credit agreement' i know that ) but they havent acknowledged nothing, only contact was call from meritforce late late month.

let trading standards deal with it now. all i want is for a letter from mac hall stating no credit agreement,thats it, but they burying heads in the sand hoping i wont do anything, then either start asking for money again, or 'pass' it on, but we all know........THEY CAN'T.lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

File it for the moment in case they come back to you later - i wouldn't advise putting "not known at this address" as they can check.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4799 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...