Jump to content

Gaz Webber

Registered Users

Change your profile picture
  • Content Count

    44
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About Gaz Webber

  • Rank
    Basic Account Holder
  1. This topic was closed on 03/06/19. If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there. If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened. - Consumer Action Group
  2. This topic was closed on 03/06/19. If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there. If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened. - Consumer Action Group
  3. See my thread here:- http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bear-garden/16222-me-win-mackenzie-hall.html?highlight=MAckenzie+Hall The letter I used was this one. Reference:- M****** In response to your letters, dated the 15 of May, I need you to clarify the particulars of your claim before I can discuss this matter further. I do not acknowledge any debt to your clients, [companyname] PLC and have never received any correspondence from them. I require you to supply the following documentation before I will correspond further on this matter. 1. You must s
  4. Reply today from the Kilmarnock Trading Standards Office. Something of a result, perhaps. I need now to consider further what else to do. Personally I am thinking I shall ignore them from now on, and just contact the OFT as rquested here. Email reply follows:- Dear Mr Webber, I refer to your complaint concerning Mackenzie Hall and would advise that this service is aware of the company and their business practices. At present the Office of Fair Trading are dealing with this company and I would be obliged, therefore, if you would forward details of your complaint to them.
  5. Okay Will do. I've already fired off an explanation about this to the Kilmarnock TSO, and will send similar to Coventry. Many thanks
  6. This is a CCA letter, to be exact this one:- Reference:- M******** In response to your letters, dated the 15 of May, I need you to clarify the particulars of your claim before I can discuss this matter further. I do not acknowledge any debt to your clients, Citifinancial Europe PLC and have never received any correspondence from them. I require you to supply the following documentation before I will correspond further on this matter. 1. You must supply me with a true copy of the alleged agreement you refer to. This is my right under your obligation to supply a copy of the agr
  7. Right....nearly 40 days since I sent the letter and postal order demanding information, and no reply, other than another text and another letter telling me a settlement figure had been reached. What would you say should be my next move, folk?
  8. Strangely I had a letter yesterday from Westcotts. I glanced at the envelope, then opened it, before realising that it was adressed not to me, but to the previous occupier, who shares the same initials. A phonecall to them informing them of the mix-up followed. Apart from being sligtly miffed that I had no forwarding address they were quite happy to accept the people had moved on, and gave me an assurance that the letter dated 13th June would be the last one I received. Here's hoping
  9. Oh my, this gets better and better No reply regarding the letter requesting all the details they hold, but *another* direct debit mandate. Only this time, the balance has dropped from £4,700+ to £4,240. And the payments have dropped from £47 a week to £10 a month. Unbelievable I will not be replying...
  10. Well, having sent a letter and a £1 postal order to Mackenzie Hall, I have received no reply within the 12 days, and so I have two options. i can let the whole thing go, or send the details to the relevent authorities. Can you guess which of the two options I am drawn towards taking? I need to do a bit of research here, and maybe you kind folk can help. Given the circumstances I have noted in the thread do I continue by forwarding the information to the relevent authorities? And if I do, is there any possibility of any back-lash? Personaly I am of a mind to hang the buggers out to dry
  11. I don't think they would dare record their own conversations. They are always abusive and misleading. Recording themselves would be the financial equivalent of shoothing themselves in the foot
  12. Sadly I didn't on this occasion, as they rang me, rather than the other way round
  13. More fun and games Yesterday I got a Standing Order form to fill out, for $47 a week! Today they rang me to ask why I hadn't filled it out, and I explained I'd not bothered because I am not an idiot. Phonedroid told me I needed to get a crime number if I thought there was identity theft happening, and I explained that I had no idea what was happening, as they hadn't sent any details at all. He couldn't understand. I explained that I was not so simple as to blindly send money to a company I had never heard of, regarding a debt I was unaware of, to an organisation I had never heard of
×
×
  • Create New...