Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yeah I figured, unlikely I'll need credit anyway mortgage all paid off etc so I'll take that on the chin and learn from the experience. Probably would've beaten that too had I remembered the protocol, first time ever going through the process though sob it wasn't familiar to me  Oh well  
    • This is my slightly amended WS taking on board your previous comments, any suggestions for amendments would be most appreciated.  Thank you for you time.   1.        I am the Defendant in this matter. 2.        The facts in this statement come from my personal knowledge. 3.        I became aware of original Judgement following a routine credit check on or around 14th September 2020. 4.        The alleged Letter of Claim dated 7 January 2020 was served to a previous address which I moved out of in 2018, no effort was made to ascertain my correct address. 5.        The Judgement debt was not familiar to me so I began investigations to ascertain what the debt related to and how such a figure had been equated in any event. 6.        I made immediate contact with the Court, the Claimant Solicitors and the Claimants thereafter, asking them to provide me with a copy of the original loan agreement but this was not provided to me.  7.        I sent a Data Subject access Request to Barclays but no agreement was provided – See appendix 1 which details the timeline of communication between myself and Barclaycard as well as copies of correspondence between us. 8.        I do not admit to entering an agreement with Barclaycard in 2000. 9.       The claimant has failed to comply with the additional directions ordered by District Judge Davis and therefore this claim should be automatically struck out.  10.    The claimants have failed to disclose a true executed copy of the original agreement they refer to within the particulars of this claim. They are not entitled to enforce the agreement pursuant to section 78.6 (a) of the Credit Consumer Act 1974 12.   The reconstituted standard Barclaycard agreement that the claimant has included in the court bundle does not satisfy any CCA request and so the claimant is and remains in default of my CCA request and therefore unable to enforce the alleged agreement. 13.  The claimants have failed to provide proof the assignment, such as a deed of assignment. 14.  The claimant has failed to provide a statement of account setting out how the alleged debt accrued under that agreement 15.   Despite numerous requests to the claimant, I have still not seen any evidence, such as an original agreement or deed of assignment, that substantiates the claimant’s assertion that I owe the debt to the claimant, nor evidence of how the debt was accrued. 16.   As per CPR 1.4(2)(a) the court encourages parties to cooperate with each other in the conduct of proceedings in order to try and save time and costs for the parties and to also save the time and resources of the court however, despite vast attempts at mediation the claimants have been most unreasonable and have remained unwilling to mediate. I believe that the facts stated in this Witness Statement are true.  I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.
    • A set aside application costs £275 which is more than the judgement so not worth it. Not that they would grant a set aside anyway.  Set asides are granted, for example, to people who moved and didn't get the court papers, so have a genuine reason for not defending.  Forgetting doesn't count. Your only choices are to pay up within 30 days, or defy the court and not pay.  If the latter, we've never seen a PPC enforce judgement for a single ticket, ever, you would get away without paying - but you would have a CCJ and a knackered credit file for six years.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Beachy v Barclaycard/Mercers take 2


beachcomber60
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3367 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Beachy,

 

They're trying to grind you down 'cause they know they're on a loser...

 

Shameful yet pitiful at the same time... I hope you've got your doorstep in chains so they can't collect it. ;)

Have you tried FOS or are they just as bad as the rest?

 

Spam.:)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

They say money talks......mine just keeps saying "Goodbye"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 666
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Spam,

 

Of all our predators (sorry creditors) BC & co worry me the least, I do feel that its time TS took a further like at my complaint - didnt think it was allowed for two dca's to chase the same debt (albeit barclayshark hiding behind different names) I would welcome them taking it to court I think they'd get riped to shreads issuing so many DN's for the same arrears, let alone no cca.

 

If I have a problem over this then its convincing OH it's all huff & puff from them :D

 

Putting doorstep under padlock & chain :)

 

mean while back in the beer garden ........

 

Beachy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mercers given up, now with Calders (next floor up :eek:)

 

Phoned ICO today to chase my complaint, told that they are still working on complaints logged in December so its gonna be a long wait.

 

Also askedabout thelack of a cca but was told it was a different authority to deal with that one but asked what the problem was.

 

Told them BC just keep sending T&C's and when a pushed they stated I needed to give a legal reason for wanting the agreement, the ICO guy said it was definately a OFT or TS problem. He had heard what Barclaycard were doing but it had nothing to do with the ICO, BUT he did says that there were forums on the internet who could help - one very good one which he wasnt allowed to name but told me to type in 'Consumer Forum' in the search engine. :D

 

Beachy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning all,

 

Well after submitting my updated spready to the FOS (complaint yet to be acknowledged by them), I received a letter from Barclaycard informing me that they have investigated my complaint and acknowledge that procedures were not properly followed when I applied for the card and that they will refund the premiums paid. All I need do is sign for acceptance and return the form.

 

However this falls far short of what I require, they state that they are refunding premiums paid x 8% interest on the total paid not on each individual ppi payment, they also state that they want to put the account back to where it would be if ppi was not added (this in itself falls well short) the account was opened in 1998, but they are only refunding the past six years PPI, now if they want to put the account to where it would be had ppi not been added then they owe me a few grand more than what they have offered. They also state that this is their final response.

 

Will post up the letter later if it will make more sense.

 

Beachy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hiya beachy im using my phone right now which is slow to type so i will reply to this, this evening ok PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ill do some research this evening too and see where u can go with the debs card ppi issues PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I use that interest calculator myself. Turned £85 of PPI premiums into a claim for £1748 which they gladly paid out. It took a small claim though.

 

Hers how you do it-

 

Premiums- enter each individual premium then the date that the contractual rate- I used their cash rate of 26.8%

 

12 "rests" per year from the drop down box and click "360 day year"

 

Add up the totals.

 

This gives you the amount theyve scammed out of you and the amount of money you want back.

 

(With me so far?)

 

OK, when they make some insulting offer, such as the one you have had, you then need to start a small claim.

 

When any claim gets into the legal system it means that you may then ask the court to award judicial interest on top of the amount of your claim.

 

If the contract doesnt specify an interest rate you may claim 8%

 

BUT if the contact does specify an interest rate, you may then claim THAT rate in judicial interest. Got that?

 

Yeah - you can claim another 26.8% ON TOP!!!!

 

This figure is your total (ie premium + interest) minus the premiums.

 

Never fails.

 

Like I said at the start, this turned £85 of PPI premiums into £1748.

 

Premiums charged from Jan 2000 to June 2002 and claimed back at 26.8% plus judicial interest at 26.8%.

 

 

This was settled long before the hearing date- so Barclaycard were very, very keen to settle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent one letter asking for £1013.00 PPI on my Baclaycard, inc interest and the 8%.

 

They have offered me £1300.00 and actually went back further than I had asked to 2001 when I took out the card.

 

They say it has to come off the balance (which as defaulted, have been with CCCS for 3 years and always pay on time, no problems).

 

Someone said they can do this, another they have no right.

 

Any advice gratefully rec'd ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent one letter asking for £1013.00 PPI on my Baclaycard, inc interest and the 8%.

 

They have offered me £1300.00 and actually went back further than I had asked to 2001 when I took out the card.

 

They say it has to come off the balance (which as defaulted, have been with CCCS for 3 years and always pay on time, no problems).

 

Someone said they can do this, another they have no right.

 

Any advice gratefully rec'd ?

 

Hi Charley,

 

I am a little confused by your posting on my thread as you have a thread relating to the same amont but with the Halifax, do you have a thread that relates to your Barclaycard.

 

Beachy

Edited by beachcomber60
Link to post
Share on other sites

Pompey, letter received from Barclaycard, I am pretty sure what my next step will be, albeit after the FOS has dealt with it.

 

Obviously their offer differs vastly as to what I am claiming, my claim that has gone to the FOS is for £1448.39 plus contractual + statutory 8% = £6450 :-

 

Dear Beachy,

 

Further to your letter dated ** June 2009 Iam sorry you have had cause to complain about Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) policy provided by Barclaycard.

 

After reading you correspondence my understanding of your complaint is that you feel you were mis-sold the PPI policy.

 

My understanding is that to resolve this matter you would like us to refund the PPI premiums you have paid on your Barclaycard.

 

I have completed my investigation and would like to share my findings with you.

 

Having reviewed your complaint I feel there is a lack of supporting evidence to confirm that the sale of PPI was carried out in accordance with our standard procedures.

 

As a result I am willing to offer a refund of the PPI premiums you have paid and associated interest on this amount. Details of how we have calculated this amount may be found in "Summery of how your refund was calculated". Should you wish to accept this refund, please sign and return the attached settlement form within 14 days and payment will be made accordingly.

 

For the purposes of the FOS you may consider this letter our final response.

 

Summary of how your refund was calculated.

 

Our aim is to put you in the same financial position as you would have been in if you had not taken out payment protection insurance.

 

Calculating your refund involves:

 

a) reviewing the statements we have available and adding the total premiums you have paid with respect to your payment protection insurance and adding any interest which would have been paid on the total premiums paid.

 

(If Payment Protection Insurance was taken out over 6 years ago we have calculated the average monthly premiums paid, over the last six years, and multiply this amount by the number of months you had the PPI policy over six years).

 

Your refund offer

 

Value of PPI premiums paid £14**.**

Interest added at 8% £ 11*.**

 

Total Refund £15**.**

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Now if they want to put me in the same financial position as I would be if I had not had PPI then the following should apply,

 

The premiums relate to that taken from statements 2002 to 2005 when it was cancelled, however, the account was opened in 1998 so there is four years ppi premiums unaccounted for.

 

To put me back in the financial postion if I had not had the ppi then they have to refund the contractual interest as well as ALL monthly payments.

 

Beachy

Edited by beachcomber60
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Beachy,

 

Right as your claim is with the FOS, I would no longer deal with Barclaycard as they say its deadlocked.

 

So forward a copy of that letter to the FOS along with a letter of your own spelling out clearly why there offer was not good enough.

 

I was in the same position with the co-op bank and did this upshot is the FOS are not calculating my claim to there own guidelines.

 

Hope this helps.

 

Regards

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Beachy,

 

Right as your claim is with the FOS, I would no longer deal with Barclaycard as they say its deadlocked.

 

So forward a copy of that letter to the FOS along with a letter of your own spelling out clearly why there offer was not good enough.

 

I was in the same position with the co-op bank and did this upshot is the FOS are not calculating my claim to there own guidelines.

 

Hope this helps.

 

Regards

 

PF

 

 

Thanks PF,

 

Are you saying the FOS arent calculating your claim ? My claim against BC is approx £6500 on the statements that I do have, although there is still staements '98 - '02 somewhere with PPI, so if they want to put the account 'right' they'd better find them.

 

As they admit mis selling the FOS should be fairly swift in making a decision (once its in the system).

 

Beachy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry meant to say the FOS are calculating my claim to there guidelines using my agreements and spreadsheets.

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As they admit mis selling the FOS should be fairly swift in making a decision (once its in the system)

 

You would think so,but this is not the case it appears that all claims have to take there place.

 

I submitted my claim in December 2008 after the co-op made an offer of just over £5,500 and its only being seen to now.

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry meant to say the FOS are calculating my claim to there guidelines using my agreements and spreadsheets.

 

PF

 

Phew - You had me there for a minute (Barclaycard cant/wont provide my cca or statements pre 2002)

 

( 'ere you've changed your avatar again :))

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes beachy i changed it last night.

 

In memory of my late father, it is his royal marine cap badge.

 

PF

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I went the other way. calculated what I had been scammed out of then took the buggas to court.

 

They settled within six weeks. Contractual interest 26.8% compound and court interest also at 26.8% compound.

 

Thanks for the info, didnt think you could hit them twice with compound interest.

 

If that is the case then I've shot myself in the foot by filing with the FOS, if I did compound interest twice then the card would be wiped and there'd be enough left over to have a bleedin' good holiday :D.

 

Does the 6 years limitation act also cover mis selling of PPI ( especially as they now admit mis selling - four years more to be added if so - providing they have statements (they have been reported to the ICO over just providing 6 years statements) account opened in 1998).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Beachcomber- have you accepted the FOS decison?

 

- (sorry if youve already mentioned that you have, Ive no time to read through the entire thread)

 

That was quick :)

 

No its just gone to the FOS & awaiting their acknowledgement, Barclaycard where messing me around by keep asking for an extra month to 'investigate' so as they had ten weeks with no movement I wrote and told them that it was going to the FOS.

 

Have just received Barclaycard response admitting mis selling & offering a refund of the premuims paid 2002 - 2005 + 8% interest on the total which falls well short of what I was asking.

 

Beachy

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...