Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • is the home in joint names but this is solely your debt? need far more history to be able to comment if it's paid off and was not just written of by one partly on their books and sold to anther, thus the cra file says £0. dx
    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have the poops actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Advice please - court papers received Barclays credit card/ ** CLAIM STRUCK OUT**


Genelover
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5296 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 127
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Ok as per the default notice, I dont think you've posted it up so can you ensure that

 

a) The date it was sent was a weekday

b) if sent first class allow 2 weekdays for service

c) Count calender 14 days from day AFTER service day

d) Day it lands on should be the day before date mentioned in the DN

 

As to the Defence, CCM has given you a starter in post #30, it needs amending now you have extra info and a section you could possibly add is:-

 

4. The Default Notice sent to the Defendant on xx/xx/xxxx and later supplied in relation to the CPR 31.14 request is from a company called “Mercers”. The Defendant notes that the actual Creditors name and address does not appear on the Default notice and thus the Default notice is therefore invalid as per section 2 of the [Consumer Credit (Enforcement, Default and Termination Notices 1983)] which states:-

 

(2).

 

(1) Any notice to be given by a creditor or owner in relation to a regulated agreement to a debtor or hirer under section 76(1) of the Act (which relates to the duty to give notice to the debtor or hirer (non-default cases) before taking certain action to enforce a term of an agreement) shall contain--

 

(a) a statement that the notice is served under section 76(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974;

(b) the information set out in paragraphs 1 to 5 of Schedule 1 to these Regulations; and

© statements in the form specified in paragraphs 6 to 8 of that Schedule.

 

As per (b) above paragraph 2 of Schedule 1 states:-

 

(2)

(1) The name and a postal address of the creditor or owner.

 

5. The Default notice clearly states “We are acting as agents for Barclaycard” and therefore confirms the defendants assertion that Mercers are neither Creditor or Owner of the said debt.

S.
Link to post
Share on other sites

That's fantastic, thank you so much! DN was sent dated 4th July 08 which was a friday, and requesting payment by 21st July. Allowing two weekdays takes us to tuesday 8th July, then 14 more takes us to the 22nd. They were requesting payment by 21st. Not sure how relevant this is? Just one more question - since I submitted my last defence, have received a copy credit agreement showing no prescribed terms. Can I incorporate this into the defence? CCM's defence was blinding, but as of then no CCA (or anything purporting to be one!) had come to light!

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's fantastic, thank you so much! DN was sent dated 4th July 08 which was a friday, and requesting payment by 21st July. Allowing two weekdays takes us to tuesday 8th July, then 14 more takes us to the 22nd. They were requesting payment by 21st. Not sure how relevant this is? Just one more question - since I submitted my last defence, have received a copy credit agreement showing no prescribed terms. Can I incorporate this into the defence? CCM's defence was blinding, but as of then no CCA (or anything purporting to be one!) had come to light!

 

err no it gets better than that..

 

a) The date it was sent was a weekday You've stated Friday 4th July 08

b) if sent first class allow 2 weekdays for service, so deemed served Tuesday 8th July 08

c) Count calender 14 days from day AFTER service day.. 14 CLEAR days takes you up to Weds 23rd July

d) Day it lands on should be the day before date mentioned in the DN

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The defence HAS to be tweaked if you have now been given the CCA, you'll need to incorporate the DN being faulty on not just the date but the creditor's name and address also...

 

I think the Defence already had a bit in it about the prescribed terms not being on the application.

 

If you give it a stab and post it up then you'll get advice and comments....

 

Remember if it comes to court you'll be the one in front of the judge so you need to understand what's going in the defence and the best way to do that is to write it/amend it yourself.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick update - had a really busy weekend so phoned the courts today to see if I could get an extension. They said a new direction from the judge was in the post, basically saying that the claimant hadn't signed the POC and so the claim was being stayed until 1st October, and would be struck out if not received by then.

 

I'm surprised he's given them so long. Is this usual?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure that it's usual but your case has plenty of twists and turns. As outlined above the default issue is one strong line of defence the other is the application form.

Having seen a few of these Barclaycard don't have proper agreements. You need to take it apart.

Also go back to them again for those old statements - they will have them they just have this weird thing about not supplying anything over six years which is rowlocks as it has no lawful standing.

Do you also have any penalty charges etc you can go after?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Rhia. Yep, plenty of penalty charges! Do I go after DCA for statements, or Barclaycard? Also, I'm not entirely sure what is meant by 'stayed'. Does it mean nothing else happens untill they come up with the goods?

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK you need to send a Subject Access Request to Barclaycard and there should be a template of one here in the library.

 

Make sure you ask for a copy of the original agreement and the statements as part of this. They have 40 days to send this to you. Once you have the statements you can enter the charges and interest into one of the spreadsheets - also to be found here - a one-stop shop. Send this total off to Barclaycard and ask for them back.

They won't give them you without a fight and you may need to start your own court action against them for the refund or use the FOS if you don't want the hassle of court but that will take ages. Barclaycard will only offer you the difference between £12 and whatever they charged you so it if was £20 they will refund £8 and as it has been assigned they will say they will send it to the DCA.

Don't stand for either of these ploys.

 

But now for the good news. If the debt was defaulted and the total included penalty charges it renders it useless and it also means the assignment was incorrect and unlawful.

 

Add to this the stay means yes unless they can find the agreement no action will be taken. They can restart though but armed with all the info you now will have access to they can't win anyway even if it is the mst wondrously and properly executed agreement in the history of executed agreements.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

A quick update - phoned the court yesterday as hadn't heard a thing.

 

Claim has been struck out!! Hurrah!

 

Wanted to thank everyone who has taken the time and effort to respond to this threat, I wouldn't have been able to do it with you. Really, very much appreciated.;)

 

What are the chances of them restarting the claim? And coud they sell it on?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congratulations. You should receive notification in writing from the court. Because of the postal dispute, I would phone them at least once a week to see if it has been posted out to you:) Even offer to go in and collect a copy if needs be.

 

To start another claim they will need the permission of the court and have all the documents they have previously been asked to supply and havent.

 

Should they sell it on to another DCA, then either send them a Copy of the strike out notice (if you have received it by then) or just give them the claim number and the date it was struck out.

 

:D

 

Have amended your title to reflect your success and moved your thread to the success forums.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

;)hiya fantastic news this is really a heart warming and informative thread

 

will refresh myself of lots of points especially the dn notice and the penalty arrears if included in mine

 

keep your pecker up and fab help from cag again and its wonderful and generous members

 

have a fun eve trick or treating lol

 

laters angel x

Im happy to help with support and my own thoughts, but if I offer any thoughts to your problems please take it as from my life experience only and not of any legal standing. Always take further advice from the legal experts in your final action.:)

 

my new motto is,,,",Taking back control of your life and home - such peace is priceless"

 

This is all due to truecall device , have a serious peek at this you will be thankful like I am x laters angel :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...