Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I doubt HMCTS holds any data on whether arrests by AEAs required police assistance.  They couldn't or wouldn't provide data on how many of warrants issued were successfully executed - just the number issued!  In my experience, arrest warrants whether with or without bail are [surprisingly] carried out with little or no fuss.  I think it's about how you treat people - a little respect and courtesy goes a long way. If you treat people badly they will react the same way. Occasions when police are called to assist are not common and, having undertaken or managed many thousands of these over the years, I can only recall a handful of occasions when police assistance was necessary. On one occasion, many years ago, I arrested and transported a man from Hampshire to Bristol prison on a committal warrant. It was just me and he was no problem. I didn't know the Bristol area (pre Sat Nav) and he was kind enough to provide directions - seems he knew the prison.  One young chap on another committal warrant jumped out of his back window and I had to chase him across several garden fences.  When he gave up (we were both knackered) I agreed to drive by his girlfriend's house to say farewell for a while.  I gave them a few moments and he was fine. The most difficult are breach warrants but mainly in locating the defendant as they don't want to go back to prison - can't blame them.  These were always dealt with by the police until the Access to Justice Act transferred responsibility from them to the magistrates' courts. The fact was the police did not actively pursue them and generally only executed them when they arrested someone for something else and found they had a breach warrant outstanding.  Hence the transfer of responsibility.
    • thats down to mcol making that option available for you to select, you cant force it. typically if there are known processing delays at northants bulk it will be atleast 14 days later if not more.
    • Thanks   Noting the day to apply for default judgement if necessary
    • nope, as the display model was not the colour the customer wanted. but your question is totally immaterial anyway as custom built doesn't come into it. dx
    • as long as aos is done by day 19 from the date on the claimform they get a total of 33 days to file a defence. (whereby the date top right on the claimform is ONE in the 33 day count) dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

If I moved out, could I afford to live?!


tom08
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5536 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I'm 24 and living at home with parents. I'm out of work due to a health condition, and I'm on Incapacity Benefit (my only income). I live in Havering.

 

I'm soon to move into a council flat, and I will need to claim Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit when I move in. In order to determine how much Housing Benefit I'll get, I used my borough's Housing Benefit calculator (http://payments.havering.gov.uk:8080/itemnet/webben/mtb.html).

 

The problem is, this came up short. Basically, it tells me that if I were to rent a place that was £70/week, I'd only get £50/week Housing Benefit. Taking into account bills, food, etc., it seems that I would not have enough money to live on.

 

Basically, I get £100/week Incapacity Benefit. If I had to pay £20 for the rent which Housing Benefit doesn't cover, that leaves me with £80. Then I have to pay bills, of perhaps £30, leaving me with £50. Then there are extra charges for the council flat, perhaps coming in at £20. That leaves me with £30. My food costs about £50, leaving me with -£20!

 

Are my calculations wrong, or can I simply not afford to live?

 

I've asked at my local CAB, rung up countless people, and yet I can't seem to get an answer this question. It's so frustrating. Please help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

On occasion a person on Incapacity Benefit can receive a "top up" of income support, if their incapacity benefit is not above the threshold. However, as you are receiving above the sum that the government allows a single person to live on I cannot see that you would be entitled to any other benefit, other than housing benefit and council tax benefit unless there was a change in your circumstances.

 

Food shopping at £50 per week for a single person seems excessive to me. I have two children and myself to feed and my monthly shopping bill comes to £100 at the very most. That includes toiletries, cleaning products and all else we require in addition to food. Could you perhaps do a budget planner?

 

People for example on Income Based Jobseekers allowance or Income Support who are single and aged over 25 receive only £60.50 per week, and all of their food, utilities and groceries etc have to be budgeted for within this figure.

 

You could try this calculator: http://www.entitledto.com by entering all your details to see if it throws up a different figure, however this calculator is only a guide.

Edited by ErikaPNP
entitledto calculator website

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that £50 a week for food for a single person is way over the top. I think once you get to 25, your HB goes up? Mine is £75 and I get JSA. You'll just have to learn to cut right down on your food. Have to stop getting a few luxuries and get the essentials in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The £50 was just for food -- no luxuries. Not even toiletries. The problem is that I have to follow a really weird diet due to this health condition.

 

So I don't suppose there's anything I can do other than rely on help from relatives. =/

 

Anyway, thanks for the info.

 

Tom

Link to post
Share on other sites

What sort of health condition/special diet is it, perhaps it is something that you can get help with

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you ever tried applying for DLA? I'm not sure, but DLA may be payable dependant on the extent of your condition. If you haven't looked into it, it might be worth trying to see if you qualify.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems that I would not be eligible for DLA, as my health condition is not so bad that I need help dressing, eating, etc., or getting around. It seems that DLA is only for people who are really severely limited.

 

Thanks anyway for the suggestion.

 

Tom

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...