Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank goodness it's not your roof and you get to foot the bill! How big are these bits of mortar? How often are they falling into your garden? Hourly, daily? Just go ahead with your plans, of course, they're not going to be worried by your time pressures and the urgency of the situation, so simply carry on as you would have done and I'm sure everything will go fine. Unless there is a danger to life and serious structural issues which mean you cannot venture into your garden, then IMHO there is little more you can do less for what you have done so already and made them aware of the issue.
    • Hi all!   Thank you in advance for any help you can give me!!    I parked up (at 18:08) in a rush, entered my Reg and paid for an hour of parking. At 18:20 I got a ticket for not paying for parking.    I've just looked at my receipt and noticed why ... I put "22" instead of "21"  when i put in my Reg. yes... what a stupid mistake.    I seem to remember there being a court case or a rule change about entering the wrong reg but the company wasn't at a loss because i had paid for the parking just technically for the wrong car. Am i making that up?    Any advice would be gratefully received, even some key points i have to hit when doing the appeal      
    • You haven't returned to the thread to give us your views, but a couple of other things strike me which you should consider: 1. You say that at no time was your father's licence revoked by the DVLA. It didn't have to be revoked. It expired in September and his "entitlement to drive" (of which the licence provides proof) expired along with it. He could only continue driving whilst his application was being processed by virtue of s88, and it seems clear to me (based on what you have said) that he was not able to take advantage of the benefits provided by that section. 2. The letter he received threatening to revoke his licence was probably a template letter sent when any medical issues are brought to the attention of the DVLA. But it is clear that beyond September until it was eventually renewed, your father had no valid licence to be revoked. I believe a "not guilty" plea in court will fail. The basic facts are that your father's licence expired in September, it was not renewed until February because the DVLA were looking into his medical declaration and he could not take advantage of s88. So in December he had no licence and no entitlement to drive under s88. The facts that he believed he was fit to drive and that his licence was eventually renewed may mitigate the offence but they do not provide a defence. I also asked whether he had received a summons (very unusual these days) or whether he had received a "Single Justice Procedure Notice". The way to proceed from here differs slightly depending on what he has received so if you let me know, I'll advise further.  
    • Well, what I've read from various sources suggest if a CCJ is 6 years old that if becomes pretty much ineffective for enforcement purposes in its original form.  And that if it's about to expire then the claimant needs to apply to the court to extend the original CCJ within the final year.  Even if they do apply for an extension within the 6 years they have to have a very strong argument for doing so such as the person being out of the country or could not be traced, basically show they were actively still perusing the debt I guess. Now if a claimant ever does apply within the 6 years to extend the CCJ, would the person named on if be notified by the court that such an application has been made?.  In my case I've heard nothing from the court so assume no such application has been made.  The original CCJ in my own case is now a year beyond the 6 years of issue so must now make things even less likely again. So whilst the CCJ exists that they have not enforced it in that time must surely make it unlikely they can now take it back to court because as said it would be very rare for a judge to agree to such action now. That said, I guess they now can't use the CCJ to continue with any action for an attachment order to our mortgage either?
    • Donald Trump now banned from countries including Canada and UK as convicted felon WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK There are 37 countries that bar felons from entering, even to visit.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Central Trust £25 Loan PPP refund


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4301 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 200
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

no point

they have state dthey will not entertain a ppi refund.

 

post everything off to the FOS.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

last year i opened up a complaint with central trust against PPI, in the end it was a total fob off, i have loads and loads of paperwork which had been sent to and from them, i am needing someone to help me as i go through them to nail these people,

i started the loan in 2006 and then in 2010 cancelled the ppi as it was front loaded, i was self employed, it was forced upon me ( no ppi no loan) no explanation, no choices allowed, (take this ppi or no loan0

 

i can upload any paperwork needed, can talk privately

 

just need help

 

thanx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bobbydog

 

PPI forced on you eh?.........naughty bank!

 

Yes, reclaim it plus interest.

 

You say "In the end it was a total fob off" but surely it is not the end until you get your money back!

 

You know from your 400 odd posts that you will get a good deal of help here but you didn't say what help you needed. Have you got specific points you want help with?

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi ims21

i have a few questions,

now to start with is this,

when i wrote to them asking them to cancel the PPI, they did, but of the 7495 ppi upfront payment on a 25000 loan, they repaid to the account 2559.

this they deducted from the monthly payments. i recieved nothing.

but thet did not alter the length of time of the loan, nor did they reduce the monthly payment,

 

i am being led up the garden path here or what ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok bobbydog, so PPI cancelled and seems like a partial refund has been made.

 

You really need to go for them and get it all back plus interest and then deduct the amount you have already been refund. You didn't sign any type of full and final did you?

 

On that premium with CI and Stat you will probably find it is a sizeable amount you're due.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi ims21

yes a partial refund was made, but i asked for any refund to be made to me in cheque form, they refused to do that, i am not and have never had arrears with them, so they could not pay it from that,

also i am still paying the same amount 462 monthly as at the start of the loan

also the term is still over 10 years there has been no reduction in that

so to me i am still paying the amount as per the initial loan BEFORE i cancelled the PPI

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok bobbydog

 

So it seems that actually no refund has been made to you either by cheque or against any amount owing or to any other account. From reading what you have said, I think the £2,559 is the amount of PPI left to be paid over the life of the loan had you not cancelled it. in other words the "unused" amount which would have been charged in the future in the monthly payments.

 

IMHO what should happen is that either the life of the loan is shortened with the payments stayng the same (as you are now just paying loan amounts and not PPI) or the payments go down and the life of the loan stays the same.

 

So, as I see it, your claim for refund is the original amount of PPI (£7,495) less the rebate figure for the "unused" part (£2,559) which equals £4,936 plus interest.

 

You will know what the interest rate is from the agreement which is in your paperwork and remember you should go for compound interest plus stat interest.

 

Hope this helps.

 

ims

Edited by ims21
spelling

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

evening all

so where do i go from here, i've done all the SAR thing, quoted them argued with them, had a final response from them, been left with a mountain of paperwork.

all of this was prior the court ruling, now do i leave it for them to find me or do i go for the fsa/fos.

if it is the fsa/fos, that is where a step by step guide would be handy, and a guide to take me there to win

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi bobbydog

 

Are you able to post up a copy of the agreement MINUS ALL PERSONAL DETAILS but leaving the figures in place?

 

Lets see if a few of us can work through this with you.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

bobbydog,

Can I just check a couple of things -

Are they saying they have cancelled the PPI on the loan?

Are they refusing to redress/refund you?

Is the loan still active?

 

KX

PPI REFUNDS

HALIFAX - Loan PPI full refunded + 8%

HALIFAX - Credit Card PPI full refund + 8%

EGG - WON!

MARBLES/HFC - N1 Submitted

MORGAN & STANLEY - [/WON!]

 

CREDIT CARD CHARGES REFUNDS

 

HALIFAX - Credit Card Charges full refund + 8%

MARBLES/HFC - N1 Submitted

EGG -WON!

BARCLAYCARD - WON!

BARCLAYCARD 2 -WON!

MORGAN & STANLEY - Full refund + CI

 

CAG has been amazing and a real God send! Thank you so much to all the people who help to make this the place it is and dedicate their time to help people like me! Please donate to help keep this site alive! It's Priceless!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi kate

yes they cancelled the PPI

loan is still active, still paying the same amount as at the start of the loan, the duration of the loan has not changed

so i am still paying the same 462.00 as it was when i was paying PPI

they have given me their final response so i take it to be that they are refusing to yes

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok gone through your thread again.

I have dealt with a miss-sold PPI claim from a loan, it was with the Halifax and the loan was repaid. I got the full amount plus 8% statutory interest.

It appear you are just hitting your head against a brick wall. In this case I would definitely just pass it on the the FOS to deal with.

Quite clearly you have been miss-sold the PPI so it shouldn't be a problem with them finding in your favor.

Dealing with the FOS is quite straight forward. You need to fill in a copy of their questionnaire and send them all correspondence from you and central trust.

If the loan is still outstanding and you have not finished paying it back the FOS guideline will insist that they pay you back contractual interest + 8% - but the laon will be redressed and taken off the outstanding balance rather than in your pocket. If it was for a credit card it would be the same, just taken off the balance. The only way you would get it as a written cheque is if you had finished paying back the loan. Probably not what you wanted to hear, but a least you will get a big chunk taken off with the added interest, and it will add up to quick a large amount I think.

I will post the link for the FOS questionnaire when I find it.

it will take some time - but be patient and you will get there. Do not give up!

All the best

KX

PPI REFUNDS

HALIFAX - Loan PPI full refunded + 8%

HALIFAX - Credit Card PPI full refund + 8%

EGG - WON!

MARBLES/HFC - N1 Submitted

MORGAN & STANLEY - [/WON!]

 

CREDIT CARD CHARGES REFUNDS

 

HALIFAX - Credit Card Charges full refund + 8%

MARBLES/HFC - N1 Submitted

EGG -WON!

BARCLAYCARD - WON!

BARCLAYCARD 2 -WON!

MORGAN & STANLEY - Full refund + CI

 

CAG has been amazing and a real God send! Thank you so much to all the people who help to make this the place it is and dedicate their time to help people like me! Please donate to help keep this site alive! It's Priceless!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

PPI REFUNDS

HALIFAX - Loan PPI full refunded + 8%

HALIFAX - Credit Card PPI full refund + 8%

EGG - WON!

MARBLES/HFC - N1 Submitted

MORGAN & STANLEY - [/WON!]

 

CREDIT CARD CHARGES REFUNDS

 

HALIFAX - Credit Card Charges full refund + 8%

MARBLES/HFC - N1 Submitted

EGG -WON!

BARCLAYCARD - WON!

BARCLAYCARD 2 -WON!

MORGAN & STANLEY - Full refund + CI

 

CAG has been amazing and a real God send! Thank you so much to all the people who help to make this the place it is and dedicate their time to help people like me! Please donate to help keep this site alive! It's Priceless!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kate

 

Agree with what you say.

 

We do want to help quantify the claim including CI and 8% so that the OP has an idea of what he's claiming. The requeted agreement may help in this regard.

 

All the best

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you wont get CI and 8% ,,,its not a credit card. its a running loan [you never get CI on loan PPI anyhow!]

 

there are example at the end of those FOS PSF's

 

also use the FAQ's/Search there too for case example.

 

it matters not what they have given you back

 

lets just workout your PCM PPI - add 8% to those months actually PAID so far

 

then go from there

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx

 

Is there a difference between the court route and the fos route?

 

I am sure I have seen threads here where people with loans have claimed CI/Restitutional through the courts and 8% whereas thos that go through fos don't get the CI?

 

Thanks and regards

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

fos route ends the same - its legally binding

however courts maybe somewhat quicker!

 

i'm nolt firing on all cylinders at present

 

but nothing springs to mind about rest int on loan PPI

 

the 8% is in rest because they deprived you of the use of the money.

 

loans are fixed PPI whereby CC's are compounded int each month so's its ok on CC's

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

BB, apologies for the incorrect info about the CI% - and thank you for the correction dx - explains why I only got the 8% back.

Good luck BB!

PPI REFUNDS

HALIFAX - Loan PPI full refunded + 8%

HALIFAX - Credit Card PPI full refund + 8%

EGG - WON!

MARBLES/HFC - N1 Submitted

MORGAN & STANLEY - [/WON!]

 

CREDIT CARD CHARGES REFUNDS

 

HALIFAX - Credit Card Charges full refund + 8%

MARBLES/HFC - N1 Submitted

EGG -WON!

BARCLAYCARD - WON!

BARCLAYCARD 2 -WON!

MORGAN & STANLEY - Full refund + CI

 

CAG has been amazing and a real God send! Thank you so much to all the people who help to make this the place it is and dedicate their time to help people like me! Please donate to help keep this site alive! It's Priceless!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

probs i think with printer so here goes with my version

 

principal loan 25,000

120 payments at 363.75 monthly apr 13.1 variable

 

op ppi 7023.80

120 payments 94.54 apr 11.0

 

pricipal loan 25000

int chg 16625

legal fee 150

broker arrg fee 1875

 

total 18650

 

 

opt ppi 7023.80

int chg 4321.00

tot chg 4321.00

 

combined payment 458.29 monthly

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...