Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello, Just to check I understand things right, he moved to a nursing home, you then kept paying the rent for a period of time whilst you sorted his belongings. You have asked to give notice and asked for backdated payments of rent from when you first asked which went ignored? They are still taking rent payments.   Have I understood correct?   If I've got anything wrong please correct me.
    • I contacted Sanctury housing in August 2023 after informing them my father in law who had Dementia had moved into a Nursing home December 2022. We kept the flat for 8 months until such a time we could accomodate some of his furniture that my wife wanted to keep. I contacted them in August 2023 to let them know the situation by email as I was the named person that could speak on his behalf. I informed them that we had left it to late for POT and were seeing a solicitor for Deputyship of his financies. I asked them what information would they need in order to give notice on the flat and we could provide details of his condition and nursing home. This went ignored I left it a month and then called them October 2023. I was promised a call back from a manager over the next few days. This never happened and it was end of November when I contacted them again and they had no record of me calling them. I explained the email and again I was told the local manager to the area would call me. This never happened and I ended up emailing them in January 2024 with a copy of the email from August. Again this went ignored and I had explained to them that we couldn't just go to the bank and stop the DD as we had tried. This email again went ignored. I then had a letter written to our home address in February asking us to get in contact with them (local manager) as they were concerend nobody was living in the flat. He had an email address so I copied in the last 2 emails to say I had been trying to give notice since August 2023. I also stated that I would like the rent that was paid from August 2023 refunded back to his account as I had officially tried to give notice then and it went ignored. He replied to us about wanting to look at the flat then notice could be given once he had contacted the nursing home to confirm he was actually living there now. Notice was giving for the 22 March 2024 and this would be when rent would stop and no further payment would be taken by this point. The fact I asked to be back dated went ignored. I have since noticed on 2 banks statement for April and May that they are still taking Rent payments of £501 from his bank. Further to this which seems very strange. He was with Eon Next for his utility bill again we were having problems getting this stopped as they needed a named person on his account which there wasn't one despite me managing his online account for him. I didn't check the email address that often that I used to set it up and went to check as noticed the credit he had built up with not living there was all getting refunded in February. The email said £600 would be refunded to his account with a (sorry you are leaving us message) but how can he leave as nobody but himself had access to speak with them. I also noticed the lady in the flat above him had a letter from her bank sent to his address with his address details but his name which was dated 4th March well before we had given notice and it said (thank you for giving us your new address details) we have set all this up for your account.   So Sanctuary housing must have been aware he wasn't living there from the ignored emails for the lady above to start changing address details to move into his flat before the housing manager had even got in contact to ask if anyone was living there. What I basically want to know his do we have any legal standing to claim the rent back from when I first contacted them in August 2023? There is roughly £3000 to come back  
    • lowell letter = we've mugged you once - why are you not paying this other debt....😎
    • i see you are posting this all over the internet too. here you say it was returned by the safety camera dept UK, Wales Returned NIP Nov23 - Heard Nothing - Now It's been returned as refused and have SJPN Form. Help please? WWW.FTLA.UK UK, Wales Returned NIP Nov23 - Heard Nothing - Now It's been returned as refused and have SJPN Form. Help please?  
    • I see what you mean. I will wait till the 8 weeks is up and then take it up with FOS. Before I do will be on with some more details on the SAR. Thank you once again. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Paid less than person who held same position before me


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5582 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I discovered during my first week in a new job that I am being paid less than the person who had the job before me. In fact when she took the job 3 years ago, she was a recent graduate with no experience and I am 34 years old, with several years experience.

 

I have already signed my contract although I am still in my 3 month probationary period. How can I approach this issue? Is there any legal redress?

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, what does your contract say about how much you are to be paid?, it should specify how much you will get per week/month/year somewhere.

 

is this figure equal or more than what you are currently being paid?, if not, then you dont have any real claim to dispute the amount once your contract has been signed, regardless of previous experience, qualifications or what youve been told.

A job offer has been made to you, you have accepted, end of story, theres thousands of people out there at the minute who wish they were in your position, but arent, so be grateful at least for that.

 

If however, your contract does not specify your wage, either per week, per month or per year, then you do have the right to ask for it in writing, regardless of your length of service. This is one of your statautory rights, as everyone has the right to know how much they will be paid.

This should be part of your contract, if it isnt, then you do have the right to question them about your wages.

May i ask, how have you found out how much the other person who was doing the job was paid?, did said person show you their wage slip or contract?, or was it by way of chinese wispers?.

Im asking this because if you do challenge them on the matter, you will have to prove that you are being underpaid, and simply saying "well i got told that..." does not contitute proof, it constitutes that you listen to gossip.

 

Aslo, one thing i would like to say, is that as per your own admission, the person you replaced has 3 years service with the company,w hile you only have 1 week.

Over these 3 years they may have built up bonuses for good work and/or wage increases.

You have 1 weeks service, so none of this applies to you yet.

 

Simply put mate, you have a new job, something which i would kill for at the minute, id think long and hard wether you want to cause a stink in your first weeks employment, which could lead to you simply being sacked for causing trouble.

 

My honest advice, get your head down, get some money earned, and stop worrying.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It might be worth asking nicely.

 

also perhaps you could use this job as a springboard to a better paid job in the future

I am not a lawyer, so all my advice is provided on the basis that you will check them with a trained legal professional with legal insurance.:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya,

 

Are you in a union for your work sector?

 

Does your work place do job evaluations?

 

If you feel there is discrimination you need to contact your union if you are in one, if not in the current climate I would recommend to anyone to join. They are there to help.

 

You could look these matters up on ACAS website. Or go on the Citizens Advise site for help.

 

Thanks

Edited by orfoster
more info

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

My honest advice, get your head down, get some money earned, and stop worrying.

 

This is good advice for the following reasons:

 

a) You are a short service employee (less than 12 months) thus should your employer decide to dismiss you it won't be too difficult;

 

b) Provided the difference in salary cannot be linked to a discriminatory reason or a claim under the equal pay act, then there is nothing in law that says you must be paid the same as the person you replaced

 

 

Che

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is good advice for the following reasons:

 

a) You are a short service employee (less than 12 months) thus should your employer decide to dismiss you it won't be too difficult;

 

b) Provided the difference in salary cannot be linked to a discriminatory reason or a claim under the equal pay act, then there is nothing in law that says you must be paid the same as the person you replaced

 

 

Che

 

My advise still stands, however, I do agree here.

 

Under 12 months service restricts your employment rights.

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My advise still stands, however, I do agree here.

 

Under 12 months service restricts your employment rights.

 

I never said your advice (with a 'c' - sorry couldn't resist that!) was bad

 

My point is that with less than 12 months service you cannot, unless you can link your claim to one of the exemptions, bring a claim for unfair dismissal - thus a SS employee should always 'tread carefully'.

 

Furthermore, from a legal perspective, (subject to my previous comments) I don't really see where, on the facts thus far disclosed, the OP can go with this?

 

Kind regards

 

Che

Edited by elche

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

No sorry I didn't mean that either.

 

I always get that wrong. I've been corrected before advice advice advice!! I just need to get used to typing it.

 

No unless linked to equal pay or maybe sex discrim I don't know what can be done.

 

It may be as simple as asking them and them saying yes (if only).

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I always get that wrong. I've been corrected before advice advice advice!! I just need to get used to typing it.

 

Sorry once again - I'm not normally a pedant

 

Blame in on the keyboard - works for me :)

 

Che

...................................................................... [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.[/FONT] [FONT=Comic Sans MS] I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.[/FONT] [FONT=Arial Black][FONT=Comic Sans MS][COLOR=Red]'Venceremos' :wink:[/COLOR][/FONT][/FONT]

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just want to throw a question in. The salaries for jobs are usually influenced by the market demand. Thus in the 80s/90s IT consultants were being paid huge sums, but they don't any more. If an employer re-advertises a job, would he not be checking the current market rates and pay the 'new' employee accordingly? Can you argue with that?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I discovered during my first week in a new job that I am being paid less than the person who had the job before me. In fact when she took the job 3 years ago, she was a recent graduate with no experience and I am 34 years old, with several years experience.

 

I have already signed my contract although I am still in my 3 month probationary period. How can I approach this issue? Is there any legal redress?

 

Thank you

 

I was in a similar position three years ago. I was initially pleased to be promoted but then discovered that even with the pay rise I was still paid less than the chap who I took over from. I stewed over this for a few weeks then decided to write a polite letter to my line manager stating my case that I thought I should be paid the same as the previous occupant of the job. It paid off, I only had to wait two months and my pay was increased. However, the company could have refused and there's not a fat lot I could have done. I think it paid not to get angry about it, put your case in writing. Be honest and firm, but but at all times, polite.

 

Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

at the end of the day, your employer pays you what they think is fair, if you accept it but then decide you want more, then thats just tough.

 

if anyone out there who is working wants to moan about how much they are getting paid, then you can send me your total monthly earnings and in return i will send you my total monthly JSA payments (a whopping £242 per month)....then we will see which one of us is poorer and who has the right to moan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am in favor of job evaluation, does your employer evaluate the positions there?

 

I understand there are lots of people out there without work, I see it everyday, however, employers still need to treat staff fairly and equally during the economic climate.

 

I would ask them nicely and see what they say.... you may be suprised.

George Loveless - “We raise the watchword, liberty. We will, we will, we will be free!"

 

My advice is only my opinion, I am not a legal expert.

 

IF YOU LIKE THE ADVICE I'M GIVING AND ARE HAPPY WITH IT, CLICK THE SCALES ON THE BOTTOM LEFT OF THIS POST AND TELL ME.

Link to post
Share on other sites

at the end of the day, your employer pays you what they think is fair, if you accept it but then decide you want more, then thats just tough.

 

if anyone out there who is working wants to moan about how much they are getting paid, then you can send me your total monthly earnings and in return i will send you my total monthly JSA payments (a whopping £242 per month)....then we will see which one of us is poorer and who has the right to moan.

 

 

godpikachu,

 

He is not moaning-he is here to ask a legitimate question.

Theres nothing in their post that suggests he isnt aware of the credit crunch nor has any disrespect for those unfortunate not to have a job.

I can see your point-but a little tact would not go amiss.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well im sorry but i have very little sympathy for anyone who moans when they are getting paid for doing something.

 

he has a job, and he has been there a week and is moaning because he is comparing his weeks length of service to someone who was with the company for 3 years. there are people like me who genuinely want to work, who are available and willing, but we dont get the chance for one reason or another.

 

we have a right to complain about not having much money, or not getting much in the way of benefits, after all, ANY income is better than NO income, he is basically looking a gift horse in the mouth.

 

i always say the same to people who moan about money when they are working, if you dont want the job, then find another one or give it up for somone else who needs it, if you do want the job, then stop whinging and think yourself lucky you have one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Godpikachu

Paidless is not seeking our sympathy for his predicament, just seeking some advice.

Sometimes we can forget when we get so wrapped up in our own lives trials and tribulations, that there are others worse off than ourselves.

Keep your chin up. Hopefully, things will turn round for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

at the end of the day, your employer pays you what they think is fair, if you accept it but then decide you want more, then thats just tough.

 

if anyone out there who is working wants to moan about how much they are getting paid, then you can send me your total monthly earnings and in return i will send you my total monthly JSA payments (a whopping £242 per month)....then we will see which one of us is poorer and who has the right to moan.

 

Quote...

 

...your employer pays you what they think is fair...

 

Wrong, most employers will pay you what they think they can get away with. Unfairness in matters regarding salary often goes unnoticed because a lot of companies encourage an atmosphere of secrecy when it comes to pay, this makes it easy for bad employers to have "favorites".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wrong, most employers will pay you what they think they can get away with.

 

 

Of course an employer will do that, it's up to the potential employee to negotiate if he/she doesn't think the wage is adequate or if they think they are worth more.

 

I too find it a little odd to accept a wage (and presumably they were happy to do so at the time) and then a week later be questioning it. I wouldn't be too impressed if an employee came in asking for more money after only 1 week!

 

Get some experience with the company, see if you can do the job to the standard they want and, if all goes well, start talking about pay increases in a year or so - not after a week.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see Godpikachu's point. Even my rubbish Civil Service pay (4 yrs without a pay-rise) still came to far more than anything I'll get on JSA.

 

 

Most employers will pay you what they think they can get away with.

 

Unfortunately, it's an employer's market right now and until the economy picks up, there's going to be a lot of people being paid less than they're worth...

 

Get some experience with the company, see if you can do the job to the standard they want and, if all goes well, start talking about pay increases in a year or so

 

... I think this is the best thing you can do for now. If your experience proves that you can do a better job than the guy you replaced then that stands in your favour

Edited by ajax95
extra info
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...