Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OK  so you may not have outed yourself if you said "we". No matter either way you paid. Snotty letter I am surprised that they were so quick off the mark threatening Court. They usually take months to go that far. No doubt that as you paid the first one they decided to strike quickly and scare you into paying. Dear Chuckleheads  aka Alliance,  I am replying to your LOCs You may have caught me the first time but that is  the end. What a nasty organisation you are. You do realise that you now have now no reason to continue to pursue me after reading my appeal since you know that my car was not cloned. Any further pursuit will end up with a complaint to the ICO that you are breaching my GDPR.  Please confirm that you have removed my details from your records. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I haven't gone for a snotty letter this time as they know that you paid for your car in another car park. So using a shot across their bows .  If it doesn't deter them and they send in the debt collectors or the Court you will then be able to get more money back from them for  breachi.ng your data protection than they will get should they win in Court-and they have no chance of that as you have paid. So go in with guns blazing and they might see sense.  Although never underestimate how stupid they are. Or greedy.
    • Thank you. Such a good point. They did issue all 3 before I paid though. I only paid one because I didn’t have proof of parking that time, only for two others.    Unfortunately no proof of my appeal as it was just submitted through a form on their website and no copy was sent to me. I only have the reply. I believe I just put something like “we made the honest mistake of using the incorrect parking area on the app” and that’s it. Thanks again for your help. 
    • They are absolute chuckleheads. You paid but because you entered a different car park site also belonging to them they are pursuing you despite them knowing what you had done. It would be very obvious to everyone, including Alliance that your car could not have been in two places at the same time. Thank you for posting the PCN so quickly making it a pity that you appealed since there are so many things wrong with it that you as keeper are not liable to pay the charge. They rarely accept appeals since that would mean they lose money but they have virtually no chance of beating you in Court. Very unlikely that they will take you to Court given the circumstances. Just in case you didn't out yourself as the driver could you please post up your appeal.
    • Jasowter I hope that common sense prevails with Iceland and the whole matter can be successfully ended. I would perhaps not have used a spell checker just to prove the dyslexia 🙂 though it may have made it more difficult to read. I noticed that you haven't uploaded the original PCN .Might not be necessary if the nes from Iceland is good. Otherwise perhaps you could get your son to do it by following the upload instructions so that we can appeal again with the extra ammunition provided by the PCN. Most of them rarely manage to get the wording right which means that you as the keeper are not liable to pay the charge-only the driver is and they do not know the name and address of the driver. So that would put you both in the clear if the PCN is non compliant.
    • Thank you so much. Yes, I wish I had done my research and not paid. It's all for the same car park. Here is one of the original PCNs, they are all the same bar different dates. PCN-22.03.24-1.pdf PCN-22.03.24-2.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HFO/ Turnbull Rutherford and Cabot Financial help needed


seachan1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5263 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

That's a great cartoon. I'm going to have that picture in my head when they next ring up to annoy me. I will smile to myself as I'm saying could you hang on while I press record!

One of the DCA's I am currently dealing with have a policy of not giving out their last names. Unbelievable!

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for that. i just wanted to put my mind at rest. The advice I have been given on here is excellent.

 

If you took copies of your correspondence (after Sig) then check any docs sent against them I if the bear to close resemblance they are almost certainly forgeries

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am confused about the signature situation.

 

Could we not use a request signature that has never been used on any real document and see what comes back. As an example if my normal signature is Gordon Brown and I sign the CCA request Gordon Stillamoron Brown it would be amusing to have a resultant CCA with the latter sig.

 

Just a thought,

 

GK

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am confused about the signature situation.

 

Could we not use a request signature that has never been used on any real document and see what comes back. Yes. As an example if my normal signature is Gordon Brown and I sign the CCA request Gordon Stillamoron Brown it would be amusing to have a resultant CCA with the latter sig.

 

Just a thought,

 

GK

 

Nothing stopping you from having a number of signatures, I do. I have one for official docs/cheques and another for general correspondence. I never sign anything send to a DCA but I will in future use one specifically for sending to DCA's (go on DCA, use it if you dare!! :p )

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi guys

I have two DCA's - AIC and HFO - who are chasing my other half. I have taken advice from the forum and have my own DCA's under control but both these two have had CCA requests and continue to call.

We do not mention that we have sent CCA but just refuse to speak to them point blank. AIC are particularly unpleasant though we know that both of them have received the CCA as they were sent recorded and received.

What is the line to take with them? Is is best to just keep playing this no comment game or send another letter reminding them of their obligations. Does anyone have any experience?

 

Thanks

 

Seachan 1

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Mr. Ton

Will do. I thought as much. Until they actually send an agreement - whether enforceable or otherwise - we are under no obligation to enter into any form of dialogue - including a response to a further letter. Is this the case? And I will recommend that my other half reports them to OFT etc

 

Thanks

 

Seachan 1

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the 12+2 days have passed since they received your request send this;

 

Account In Dispute

 

Ref:

 

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

 

 

Thank you for your letter of xx/xx/xx, the contents of which have been noted.

 

You have failed to respond to my legal request to supply me a true copy of the original Consumer Credit Agreement for the above account.

On **DATE** I made a formal request for a true signed agreement for the alleged account under consumer credit Act 1974 s77/8. A copy of which is enclosed for your perusal and ease of reference.

 

You have failed to comply with my request, and as such the account entered default on **DATE**.(12+2 days after you sent the CCA request)

The document that you are obliged to send me is a true copy of the executed agreement that contained all of the prescribed terms, all other required terms and statutory notices and was signed by both your company and myself as defined in section 61(1) of CCA 74 and subsequent Statutory Instruments. If the executed agreement contained any reference to any other document, you are also obliged to send me a copy of that document.In addition a full statement of this account should have been sent to me detailing all debits and credits to the account.

 

Furthermore;

 

You are aware that the Consumer Credit Act allows 12 working days for a request for a true copy of a credit agreement to be carried out before your client enters into a default situation. This limit has expired

 

As you are no doubt aware section 77(6) states:

 

If the creditor fails to comply with Subsection (1)(a) He is not entitled , while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.Therefore this account has become unenforceable at law.

 

As you have Failed to comply with a lawful request for a true, signed copy of the said agreement and other relevant documents mentioned in it, Failed to send a full statement of the account and Failed to provide any of the documentation requested. Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS. Furthermore I shall counterclaim that any such action constitutes unlawful harassment.

 

Please note you may also consider this letter as a statutory notice under section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect. This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencies.

 

Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data. It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a ‘legal right’; You must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends. Should you not respond within 14 days I expect that this means you agree to remove all such data.

 

Furthermore you should be aware that a creditor is not permitted to take ANY action against an account whilst it remains in dispute.

The lack of a credit agreement is a very clear dispute and as such the following applies.

 

* You may not demand any payment on the account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

* You may not add further interest or any charges to the account.

* You may not pass the account to a third party.

* You may not register any information in respect of the account with any credit reference agency.

* You may not issue a default notice related to the account.

 

I reserve the right to report your actions to any such regulatory authorities as I see fit. You have 14 days from receiving this letter to contact me with your intentions to resolve this matter which is now a formal complaint. I therefore request a copy of your official complaints procedure which you are obliged to supply.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

 

 

Yours faithfully,

Print name do not sign

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi,

 

Mentioning forged signatures, I CCA RBS, and what they sent back well confirms everything that is written above. They sent me a loan duty check list with my original signature, and the T&Cs there was a signature, but guess what it wasnt mine, I used that "fake signature" when I last corresponded with them, bearing in mind the latter signature contained a scroll of SP, whereas my initials are SI, work that out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do Digital Signatures

 

I Had Problems With A Well Known Micky Mouse Car Finance Co,

 

The One I Love To Hate Now

 

They Had No Agreement And One Appeared With A Sig WhicH Looked But Was Not Mine

 

I Spent 250 Quid On A Graphologist Report

 

It Scared The Hell Out Of Them

 

The Rest Is History

 

If You Suspect Underhand Tactics

 

Its Worth Its Weight In Gold

Link to post
Share on other sites

+ in the event of any court action, the original has to be produced anyway. ;)

 

I thought this was dependant on the judge lottery?

 

Microfiche has been used according to some posts and photocopies are acceptable by some judges.

We live in an unmoderated country why should the net be any different?

Bring back free speech we miss it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you demand to see the original? Doesn't the judge decide this. Isn't that the point. If the judge belioeves your demand is just there to happer the process and eviendence that the debt is owed is already present, it's hard if not impossible to reley on this.

 

From reading posts I really get the impression that Orginal is being worked out of the legal system for obvious reasons, more judges than not now have no interest in originals. A microfiche reader was used in one case, It's a silent victory for the DCA I think.

We live in an unmoderated country why should the net be any different?

Bring back free speech we miss it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

I have several old, pre 2005, unresolved cc debts. All have been the subject of cca requests and numerous responses. However, I moved house recently and am about to move again. Pretty soon my trail will go cold and they won't be able to find me for a while. But can they issue court proceedings in the meantime and I know nothing about it? Some thoughts from seasoned experts would be helpful.

Best

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its A Well Known Trick For A Dca To Send A Claim To A Prievious Address

 

Saying That. Its A Last Resort A Dca Doing A Court Calim, They Would Sooner Sell It To A Dca Further Down The Food Chain

 

It Depends On Things Such As

 

Size Of The Debt

Do You Own Your Own Home

 

Is It Worth My While To Issue A Claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have several old, pre 2005, unresolved cc debts. All have been the subject of cca requests and numerous responses. However, I moved house recently and am about to move again. Pretty soon my trail will go cold and they won't be able to find me for a while. But can they issue court proceedings in the meantime and I know nothing about it? Some thoughts from seasoned experts would be helpful.

Best

 

Have you thought about getting your mail redirected by Royal Mail , up to 2 years , that way you can see them but they cannot see you .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...