Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Welcome to the National Consumer Service Buying any goods or any services??? A used car? - Paying by cash or bank transfer??? - BIG Fail!Share the love – Tell a friend about the Consumer Action Group - your National Consumer ServiceAre you buying a used car...? Protect yourself – read our used car guideESSENTIAL:: Read our Customer Services Guide!!!Twitter - Why you should open a Twitter account ESSENTIAL:: Read our Customer Services Guide!!!Have we helped you today...? Please help the CAG Had a car accident? Been offered a courtesy car?Follow @Real_CAG Parcel Delivery Insurance is Unlawful - The TimesWhy don't you change your profile picture?? Problem with utilities company or phone/broadband? Begin by sending a statutory request for your personal data. It’s free    Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.× Financial Legal Issues Complete My Profile Dismiss Next Step: Profile Photo (Profile Photo and Cover Photo) Your profile is 0% complete! Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why… The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini' Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.  You have received a Court Claim ISSUED IN ENGLAND & WALES What you need to do Rate this topic By citizenB March 4, 2014 in Financial Legal Issues style="text-align: center;">     Thread Locked because no one has posted on it for the last 3638 days. If you need to add something to this thread then   Please click the "Report " link   at the bottom of one of the posts.   If you want to post a new story then Please Start your own new thread That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help    Thanks   citizenB Posted March 4, 2014 #1   The questionnaires below provide important information which will allow us to help you. In order to use them, you will have to copy them into your own post and then give us the answers – preferably in red below each question. You can start by overwriting the prompt: "Give answer here" below each question – and your responses should automatically appear in red   Thank you +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++   You have received a claim form.   firstly - read all the posts in this thread FIRST...   then copy this first msg to your thread - and put your answer after each question   In order for us to help you we require the following information:- [if there are more than one defendant listed - tell us]     Which Court have you received the claim from ? Name County Court   MCOL Northampton N1 ? Manual Claim CCMCC (Salford) ? New beta WWW.MONEYCLAIMS.SERVICE.GOV.UK ?   If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. (not the response page or AOS)     Name of the Claimant ? Give answer here   How many defendant's  joint or self ? Give answer here   Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. Give answer here   ^^^^^ NOTE : WHEN CALCULATING THE TIMELINE - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THE DATE ON THE CLAIMFORM IS ONE IN THE COUNT [example: Issue date 01.03.2014 + 19 days (5 days for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 19.03.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 02.04.2014] = 33 days in total   Date of issue XX + 19 days ( 5 day for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = XX + 14 days to submit defence = XX (33 days in total)  if your defence filing date falls on a W/End, you must file by friday @4PM     Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim? Please type out their particulars of claim in full (verbatim) less any identifiable data and round the amounts up/down. state how many digits the account number has.. Give answer here   What is the total value of the claim? Give answer here   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Give answer here   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? Give answer here   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? Give answer here Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Give answer here   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? Give answer here   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Give answer here   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Give answer here   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Give answer here   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Give answer here   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Give answer here   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Give answer here   Why did you cease payments? Give answer here   What was the date of your last payment? Give answer here   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? Give answer here   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Give answer here   What you need to do now.   Answer the questions above   If you have not already done so – send a CCA request to the claimant for a copy of your agreement (If Applicable) (except for Overdraft/ Mobile/Telephone accounts)   Send a CPR31.14 request to the solicitor named on the claim form for copies of documents mentioned/implied within the claim form. There are two different versions - one for Loans/Credit cards the other for Current accounts   Request 1 - Loans/Credit Cards     Request 2 - Current Accounts     You may use a CPR part 18 request for any other information (not request documents) that you might require in order to defend yourself. Please note that CPR 18 is specifically for Fast Track claims and although technically the claim has yet to be allocated to a track the claimant may refuse to comply for this reason.   If you require CPR Part 18 - this will need to be drafted specifically.   If you are not planning on defending for one reason or another – then you will need to complete an Income and Expenditure form and contact the Solicitor with your proposal. The N9a is already enclosed in the claim pack for Admittance which should be sent to the solicitor named on the claim form   If you are considering making a partial admittance N9b must be completed and returned to the court. Please note in most cases a partial admittance will result in an automatic CCJ for the amount admitted.   You have received a Claim - What you need to do.pdf1.33 MB · 242 downloads     Before Printing the PDF TIP   If you DO NOT wish to print Page 1 (Cover Page) of the PDF, please ensure to do the following:   Ensure you go to your Printer Settings and set it to 'Print from Page 2' (this way Page 1 (Cover Page) should not print out).   Note: This will save you Ink & Paper     Bookmark   Report 3 weeks later...   AndyOrch Posted March 20, 2014 #2   Once you receive a Court Summons N1   As a defendant in a small claims case it is important that you act quickly and do not ignore the claim form when it arrives. Remember, the claim will proceed anyway even if you don’t respond. If the claim goes against you, it will be very difficult to make a counter claim as you didn’t respond to the initial small claim.   You may be unaware that you are the defendant in a small claims case that a Creditor has bought against you. When the small claims form arrives follow these initial steps:   1: Read the Form Carefully   The detail about the claim that is being bought against you will be in the ‘particulars of claim’ section. If this section isn't completed, or has the words ‘particulars of claim to follow’ take no action now and wait until you are sent details of the claim against you. You may want to consult a lawyer at this stage.   2: Respond in Time   It’s vitally important that you respond to the claim for you have been sent. Remember that there is a 19 day (5 +14) time limit on this to acknowledge the claim.You must submit before the 19 days are up, so post your response with plenty of time.If your intention is to defend the claim in full you get a further 14 days to submit your response ...so 33 days in total.   3: Talk to the Claimant   Just because a small claim has been bought against you and a claim form issued, this doesn’t mean you are not allowed to contact the claimant directly. In fact the court encourages you to try and settle the claim without the need for a court appearance. So, try and resolve your dispute directly with the claimant if you can.   Not Responding to a Small Claim   If you ignore the small claims form when it arrives this can have an adverse impact on your financial status. The court will continue with the small claims lawsuit that is being bought against you even in your absence as this is a legal requirement. When the small claim is processed you will be sent a bill showing the amount you owe and any additional costs. The small claims against you is a legal process that will be recorded on the Register of Judgements, Orders and Fines. This information is used to check your credit, so could have a negative impact when you next apply for any credit. To avoid damaging your credit rating reply to your small claims docket as soon as you can.   How to Respond to Your Small Claims Form   When you received your form from the court you will also have been sent a response pack. In this pack you will see the option that are open to you. These include:   • A dispute claim form. You can use this form if you do not agree that you are liable for the small claim being bought against you and wish to submit a Defence. • Details about how to pay the amount being claimed from you. • Details about how to admit to part of the small claim against you, and how you can ask the claimant for more time to pay.   There are Two Types of Small Claims:   Fixed Amounts:   If the claim against you is for a fixed amount of money your response pack will contain three forms. Form N9 (acknowledgement of Service), form N9A (admission form) and N9B (defence and counterclaim form).   Unspecified Amounts:   If the amount being claimed is unspecified you will be sent forms N9 and N9C (admission form) and N9D (defence and counterclaim form). It is vital that you read the accompanying explanatory notes before choosing which form to send back.   Paying the Small Claim   If you want to make full payment of the amount being claimed against you this amount will be shown on the claim for you have been sent, and will also have details about where to send the money. Don’t forget, this must be done within the 14 day time limit or your case will proceed to the next stage.   In some instances you would like to pay, but need more time, you can give details about the delay you would like on form N9A, which should be in your response pack. It’s also a good idea to read leaflet EX309: The Defendant Admits by claim as this gives more details on this aspect of your case when fixed amounts of money are involved. Leaflet EX308 gives details of cases when unspecified amounts are being claimed against you.   Also please read forms EX326 and EX160A   How to Defend a Claim Against You   Disputed claims are handled by filling in the appropriate form from your response pack. You have three choices: Form N9, N9B or N9D. Read the note accompanying each form carefully to ensure you completely correctly. Pay special attention to the allegations raised on the form. If you don’t respond to each the court will assume you are admitting guilt. Edited April 10, 2014 by stu007 Updated PDF added    1   Bookmark   Report 2 months later...   citizenB   Posted June 5, 2014 #3   PLEASE NOTE - WARNING   Once you have received your claim form - the Court timetable comes into force. Not that of the creditor or claimant. If you have requested information with them after the claim has been issued - or have entered into discussion with them and they say something like "We will put this on hold for a period of time". You cannot and must not ignore the timetable from the court.   This thread should serve as an example   http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?416202&p=4547677#post4547677   The OP in the case above was in communication with the CAG Vodafone rep. A claim was issued during this time. The Rep in good faith said he would ask the Claimant to put things on hold.... they did not.. the OP ignored advice from caggers to continue with the court timetable and did not submit a defence. The claimaint obtained a Judgment by default. Edited June 5, 2014 by citizenB     Bookmark   Report 3 yr AndyOrch changed the title to You have received a Court Claim ISSUED IN ENGLAND & WALES What you need to do   style="text-align: center;">     Thread Locked because no one has posted on it for the last 3638 days. If you need to add something to this thread then   Please click the "Report " link   at the bottom of one of the posts.   If you want to post a new story then Please Start your own new thread That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help    Thanks  This topic is now closed to further replies.  Share Follow3 Go to topic listing Next unread topic Recently Browsing   1 Cagger hugo1963 1,380 Members Viewed hugo1963 4 minutes ago   lolerz 4 hours ago   vicr76 8 hours ago   Moomoo11 Friday at 18:18   London1971 Friday at 11:26   AndyOrch Friday at 11:13   mollie5549 Thursday at 17:21   zyghom Thursday at 13:26   Magnusinfinity May 15   Newdogg06 May 14   Unique May 13   saberguy May 12   Mycathasfleas May 12   WantJustice May 9   Rain clouds May 8   MoltoModerato May 3   George2024 May 1   Badtimes123 April 30   LouLouDev79 April 29   northmonk April 29   mowbli April 29   WornOut55 April 27   paulhn757 April 24   UsedCarMan April 23   robertobaggio April 23   marksheff April 20   anotheruser0000 April 19   TT98 April 18   gatoradeqaz April 17   Murielme2 April 15   Frontera mixup April 11   BreadAndButter April 9   Karalius April 9   nurjeon03 April 9   Penglings April 8   Nick April 8   Edals April 5   thesixco April 1   lifttheveil March 30   dx100uk March 30   Stripeycat March 28   jon8214 March 27   sharkieuk March 25   HappyHolidays March 24   sandokan March 22   SimplyBeyondWords March 22   supernick90 March 20   iyam71 March 20   Nicky Boy March 18   StoryBoard March 18   Myth_007 March 15   kaze March 12   RodeMan March 8   eskimo123 March 7   JEDIKNIGHTS March 6   persha50 March 6   tobzas March 6   lancashirelad93 March 6   HappyDay2222 March 3   1penny March 3   nat8808 March 2   FTMDave March 1   lynzmeek February 25   Mike Mechanic February 25   Ethel Street February 24   Outoftoon February 23   anna may February 22   PJB5 February 22   iamgnome February 21   SweetCaroline February 20   EdinburghDude February 19   Grgw44 February 18   linbren03 February 15   whittymags February 9   flembo45 February 7   comebackjimmy February 6   MontyIsInnocent February 4   libra007 February 1   Eamonn77 January 31   xtonehari January 30   hlh49421 January 30   ceeferace January 29   catscratch January 29   Melbel January 25   Suggababe January 19   yorkshire_lufc January 17   ljrobinson69 January 16   makkyinuk January 15   yogii January 14   MadMat January 12   rocky_sharma January 4   mrskippy21 January 3   lookinforinfo December 29, 2023   europa16 December 28, 2023   MrsSl December 27, 2023   KP44UK December 23, 2023   Montego December 22, 2023   Worazz December 21, 2023   StopTheBullies December 21, 2023   hitman126 December 20, 2023   +1280 More   Have we helped you ...?                     Contact Us   Cookies Copyright Reclaim the Right Ltd - reg: 05783665Powered by Invision Community IPS spam blocked by CleanTalk.  
    • ITV News have got hold of an email and recording of a phone call between Vennells and Ron Warmington of Second Sight. People in the know are saying it's smoking gun everyone's been looking for. I love that this has come out the day before she appears at the inquiry. This should be interesting under oath. Paula Vennells' 'smoking gun' email reveals Post Office 'cover-up' | ITV News WWW.ITV.COM ITV News has acquired an email and recording of a phone call that suggests the former Post Office boss was aware of issues with the Horizon system...  
    • I think you may as well take the opportunity in your letter to tell them that if they won't take responsibility for it then you will see quotations for the repair, provide copies of the quotations to them and then proceed with your own repair and recover the money back from them in the courts if necessary. Separately, can I ask you whether this is the car that you then bought unseen and at some distance from you? Has it come with an MOT and if so what date was the MOT and who gave it the MOT? Have you read our used car guide
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell Portfolio I Ltd / Capital One


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3855 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Two years ago I CCA'd Wescot Credit over this debt. They wrote back to me to say that the OC (Cap 1) were unable to produce a credit agreement relating to the account, and therefore were closing the account on their files.

 

Great, I thought, that's the end of that. No agreement, no case.

 

But lo and behold, here is a letter from Capital One, telling me that the debt has been resold to Lowell Portfolio I Ltd, about whom I know nothing whatsoever.

 

in the same envelope was a letter from the aforementioned Lowell Portfolio, notifying me of the assignment of the debt to them.

 

Cheeky so and so's eh? They can't find a credit agreement but hey, we'll sell it again anyway.

 

Who is in the wrong here? I presume Wescot are, because the account was in dispute with them. They couldn't produce the CA so they were not entitled to pass it back to C1.

 

C1 also are, because of the same reasons.

 

What should I do? Write to Lowell and tell them that as the account is still in dispute they have no right of ownership of the alleged debt?

Edited by Yog sothoth
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I would guess ignoring them is an option you should seriously consider.

 

You already know there's no CCA, so getting involved in a long drawn out battle, during which you can be sure Lowell will ignore your protestations and bombard you with pointless letters full of lies, seems a bit pointless. Lowell are almost certainly unaware this has already been through the mill, and they have bought it for a few pennies amongst a load of others.

 

You could make a complaint, but again nobody seems to take a blind bit of notice to it anyway. Depends on your point of view.

 

I would ignore them and if they send court docs, then do the CCA thing because you know you are onto a winner.

Edited by dannyboy660
small correction.

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmmm, yeah, think you're right. If it was passed back to Cap 1, I'm guessing they probably had another look for the CA. The fact they've sold it on again without even contacting me beforehand does speak volumes, doesn't it? ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Save yourself the hassle of dealing with the Leeds Losers on the phone and by letter, just send them a copy of the 'bemused' letter - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/175840-halifax-problem.html#post1900426

 

It just tells them to scuttle back into the corner and stop bothering you as you've already checked this out and dismissed it!

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Yog

 

I have the same bozos after me re an alleged Capital One account as well...they must have bought a job lot LOL :p:rolleyes:

 

Bemused letter has gone off from me as well!

 

Love SG x

Please note I am not legally qualified, I am offering advice based on my own personal experience in the hope that it may be of help to others in a similar situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the bemused letter is all well and good, and I'm not knocking it, but you are confirming your identity to Lowell and acknowledging the debt is yours, so a default is their revenge. Once that letter is received you can't get the default removed, because you acknowledged the debt - just that it can't be enforced.

 

At least that's my understanding of it.

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, the bemused letter is all well and good, and I'm not knocking it, but you are confirming your identity to Lowell and acknowledging the debt is yours, so a default is their revenge. Once that letter is received you can't get the default removed, because you acknowledged the debt - just that it can't be enforced.

 

At least that's my understanding of it.

In this case, it's already been shown that a previous DCA could not produce the paperwork, therefore Lowell should not be making yet another attempt at recovery of the debt, hence the 'bemused' letter - why are they handling data unlawfully?

 

It tells them to pass the matter back as the previous DCA has failed to comply with the law - I can't see how they have any basis to issue a default as this would breach the Data Protection Act, if nothing else...

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In this case, it's already been shown that a previous DCA could not produce the paperwork, therefore Lowell should not be making yet another attempt at recovery of the debt, hence the 'bemused' letter - why are they handling data unlawfully?

 

It tells them to pass the matter back as the previous DCA has failed to comply with the law - I can't see how they have any basis to issue a default as this would breach the Data Protection Act, if nothing else...

 

 

Of course, and it relies very heavily on a DCA, or in this case a Purchaser/Factor playing fairly and by the rules and guidelines. But you and I both know the reality is very different......

 

If you ignore them they do not have the benefit of your written acknowledgement that you are who they think you are etc etc and the debt exists. Lowell's know nothing unless you tell them 'voluntarily'.

Edited by dannyboy660
small addition...

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course, and it relies very heavily on a DCA, or in this case a Purchaser/Factor playing fairly and by the rules and guidelines. But you and I both know the reality is very different......

 

If you ignore them they do not have the benefit of your written acknowledgement that you are who they think you are etc etc and the debt exists. Lowell's know nothing unless you tell them 'voluntarily'.

Should there be a modified version of the 'bemused' letter to state that the debt is not acknowledged and headed 'without prejudice' then ?

 

I realise this will exceed the primary school level of English that most of the Leeds Losers failed to acheive anyway, but at least the letter can not be used as any form of acknowledgement that the alleged debt was in any way attributed to the person telling them to s*d off...

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should there be a modified version of the 'bemused' letter to state that the debt is not acknowledged and headed 'without prejudice' then ?

 

I realise this will exceed the primary school level of English that most of the Leeds Losers failed to acheive anyway, but at least the letter can not be used as any form of acknowledgement that the alleged debt was in any way attributed to the person telling them to s*d off...

 

A slight tweak may be in order, but I'm not much of a letter writer really.

 

In this case, Wescot failed to satisfy the legal requirement so C1 'sell' the debt to a 3rd party purchaser to squeeze an extra few pennies and wash their hands of it. Creditors do poop on purchasers. Lowell now have a complete turkey on the books, but that's what they buy because they are cheap and have the biggest profit potential. The interesting part is they probably don't know for sure that it has already fallen at the first (last?) hurdle.

 

Ignoring them won't do any harm because you are salvaging some of your privacy from these 'people'. It's just a case of "Can you weather the storm, sit out all the threats??" If they do serve court papers, you can be fairly sure it will fail without the CCA so you have a pretty big advantage because even if it does exist, it's unlikely Lowell will get hold of it in time.

 

I just think the 'bemused' letter, although it's a useful shot across bows, acts as a warning in the sense they will now try desperately to get a CCA because they know what to expect from you. It's playing your Ace a little too early, perhaps, if you see what I mean.

HOIST BY THEIR OWN PETARD.

 

Blimey it works....:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I agree. Although I'd get a degree of short -term personal satisfaction from sending the 'bemused' letter at this stage, it does alert them that here is someone who's going to fight so let's step up the game a bit. I can weather the letters they may send; it's just paperwork. And none of them have my phone number; even my own bank don't.

 

I may play the 'bemused' card at a later stage, when the font on their letters gets BIG AND BOLD and starts to include words like URGENT and FINAL DEMAND or, most amusing of all, is on RED PAPER!

Edited by Yog sothoth
Link to post
Share on other sites

In Lowell's case I'd just want to point out that they are wasting their time even trying and I would prefer them to drop the matter now. It just seems simpler to be 'bemused' than ignore and have them pestering?

 

As far as I am concerned, they are forbidden to take any action, so there is no question of them trying harder to get a CCA? I would normally send the first DCA a letter when they fail to comply with the CCA request, which I could later return to if any other muppet started making a noise...

 

And, I've now been reminded that I have a ream of deep red paper somewhere. I never used it for the purpose it was bought as I was laser printing black onto the red and it was virtually unreadable as a 'poster' as intended, the red was too dark to provide contrast - perfect for future correepondence with Lowell I think. :cool:

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In Lowell's case I'd just want to point out that they are wasting their time even trying and I would prefer them to drop the matter now. It just seems simpler to be 'bemused' than ignore and have them pestering?

 

As far as I am concerned, they are forbidden to take any action, so there is no question of them trying harder to get a CCA? I would normally send the first DCA a letter when they fail to comply with the CCA request, which I could later return to if any other muppet started making a noise...

 

 

I am with you on this hillards. I sent to Lowells a copy of my original CCA request letter to the OC which was sent nearly 3 years ago (!) along with the bemused letter just to let them know that there is no CCA and they may as well call it a day now. I stated that I will not correspond with them further unless and until they provide a CCA (knowing full well they cannot as none of the other DCAs involved have been able to of course) so now I feel I am liberty to ignore anything else they send.

 

Personally I prefer not to ignore these pond lifes in the first place, but to let them know they are dealing with someone who knows what pillocks they are and they cannot pull the wool over my eyes (which I admit I do enjoy doing!).

 

I appreciate everyone feels differently and can totally understand where you are coming from also dannyboy :) There is no problem in ignoring them if that is what peeps wish, because whatever threat-o-grams they send they know they are on to a loser if they have no CCA.

 

Love SG x

Please note I am not legally qualified, I am offering advice based on my own personal experience in the hope that it may be of help to others in a similar situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yog sothoth google bbc lowell and you will find the kink so you can watch it. I had a court hearing that they didnt attend yesterday and won Stat demand set aside here is the link http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/dca-legal-successes/177871-me-lowell-financial-costs-6.html#post1946625 they are the biggest waste of space on the planet. Forget them they aint worth the worry they dont have paperwork they dont have credit agreements and neither do the dumb ass crappy one who sold the debt to these low loife pond **** worms.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe Lowlife Portfolio were on Watchdog the other day. I missed it. Was there anything of note?

not really just the usual pond life activity of trying to obtain money from jo public who seriously did not owe it,but when found out by watch dog they back tracked and apologised sayiny this kind of thing does,nt happen very often " but we know it does all the time".

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe Lowlife Portfolio were on Watchdog the other day. I missed it. Was there anything of note?

 

There is a thread about it, including links to the website where you can watch the video, or read the story. http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/180176-lowells-make-watchdog.html

Be good to those who give you advice that helps - click the star to give them your thanks by way of a reputation credit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just received a letter from Lowell FINANCIAL (shades of Cabot here). Stating they are acting on behalf of "our client" Lowell Portfolio I Ltd, and ugently requesting I get in touch with them on the BIG RED PHONE NUMBER, or alternatively, pay up.

 

Pay up?!! For a debt where I have it in writing that the OC does not possess the credit agreement? Dream on, Lowlife.

 

Time for the bemused letter now for sure. Send it to Lowlife Portfolio though, or to Lowlife Financial? Hmmm...choices choices.

 

Ah well, as they are both at the same address, I'm sure one will pass it to the other if need be. :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Sigh...I sent the bemused letter. All was quiet, but now I have a letter from Lowlife telling me one of their 'agents' is coming in person to have a word. Time for the doorstepper letter I think. I'm so tempted to point out that Capquest closed their files because they admitted they didn't have a credit agreement, but I doubt it would stop them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...