Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclaycard Can you trust them ?


blencathra
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5518 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Desperate Daniella. I was told I had contacted the wrong office by Mercers . They then gave me the right address and what happened, yes your right nothing at all. How can Barclay's not be able to transfer items when Barclay's, Mercers and Calder , I bet are all in the same office. They just change hats.

 

Well i suppose something did happen. that nice Elaine Mockler had added another £12.00 late payment charge. How can it be late if i have not paid it at all, When did i pay it what time , how much late was it ?. They fail to respond. But as Elaine Mockler does not talk to customers. I dont recognise her.How can they prove i owe them money without an agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there is it no surprise that i have not received a telephone call or a copy of my credit agreement from Barclay's. THEY CANNOT BE TRUSTED EVEN MORE SO. How do they expect the public not only to trust them but to respect them also. I do neither. I was promised a copy of my CCA would be sorted and she would call me back to let me know it had been found. Barclay's are all mouth and have lost all credibility with me. What little bit they had. Sorry no magic formula or CCA

Link to post
Share on other sites

Obviously, as we have all found out, they pass from pillar to post, they edited will say anything on the phone.

You should send all correspondance to their head office so they cant deny getting it.

You could have ask the numbskull if she can operate a fax and send it there and then, or convert it to pdf to send by e-mail whilst your on the phone so you can explain things very slooowly to them, they do hate that:D

Edited by slick132
libellous comment edited - site cannot risk being sued
Link to post
Share on other sites

I send all my correspondence by recorded delivery and then use the Royal Mails Track and Trace. so you know they have got it. I wasn't expecting a copy of the agreement Bazaar, It was more tongue in cheek. If they havnt got the CCA as i requested in July 2008. they are unlikely to produce it now.. Every time i write they write back and say its our final reply. they have more final appearances than Tina Turner.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right today I am going to write one strongly worded letter to this nice Elaine Mockler. I know there is no chance of her ever seeing my letter, but it is for the record and my file.

 

What kind of company puts managers automated signatures on letters. with contents that are breaking the law.? What kind of company ignores your letters and questions?

 

What kind of company tells you this is our final response. Then tells you again and again he he?

 

What kind of company? sends you mail from one address and has a different one on the envelope. Somebody has a long way to go to post the mail.

 

What kind of company Has telephone call center's, that have staff that talk down to you and treat you with contempt ?

 

What kind of company has staff that are totally ignorant of the law. To me that brings into disrepute the training . or they have no morals.

 

What race are these people? How can they treat fellow humans this way ?

 

What kind of company is it let me think ........... ah yes... i think i got it

 

BARCLAY'S who else. I bet i hear you saying why just Barclay's. they are all as bad and YES YOUR ALL RIGHT.

 

Regards Blencathra

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blencathra, now youve got that off your chest:). Have you thought about reporting them to FSA, FOS? They say its their final response, well thats just not good enough, so you now need to report them. If youve sent them an account in dispute letter due to their failures on your CCA request, then send them a reminder that you're under no obligation to pay anything until such time as you get physical sight of the executed agreement.

Let them know youve now escalated this complaint to the authorities. It may well do no good, but it'll show clear dispute and their obvious disregard for you.

Send it to their head office I think its Churchill Place, someone will correct me im sure.

Then see what happens, most likely, they will sell this on, but you'll have all this correspondence to hit back with. Oh and by the way, have fun with it. As you say they havent got the CCA, so what can they do except empty threats?:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's on-going debate about this point but some say there is merit in BC's contention that, by sending out their T&C's, they are fulfilling their obligations to reply to your CCA request.

 

It is not, therefore, certain that the a/c IS in dispute. Even if YOU believe it's in dispute, BC will maintain it is not and they are free to demand pay'ts, add charges and interest and enter Defaults.

 

This is why users are now trying the CPR route shown in Link No 2 in my signature.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agree with you slick, but we must be seen to be 'doing the right thing' as it were. We give them the option to produce the agreement with the CCA, they then try the bluff. Then we hit with default letter, next its the CPR route, before they get a chance to issue court proceedings.

My concern with all this is that some people just wont have the time to get everything going. Perhaps we should get the legal bods involved and create a sticky for this particular method. I personally believe in creating a step by step guide for the judges to follow. (Im not saying they are not educated people). IE, if a Judge can see that youve tried everything, legally to get sight of an agreement, then I cant see many Judges saying that the banks have any rights to litigation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The most important thing is to show you've acted properly and reasonably in your attempts to get sight of the Credit Agreement.

 

But ultimately, it is down to a judge on the day, and how (s)he interprets the various aspects of law.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

its been a while since i updated this thread. Now i think Barclay's have fallen out of their tree. They have sent me a final answer. worded in the same way as all the other letters are. Then i get out of the blue a letter from Calder Finance Based in Liverpool but in a Barclay's envelope. Do they

think we are stupid altogether. They make the usual demands ,, so i wrote to them. No reply until the 12th March 2009 then they write to me again saying Wait for it.....As have not paid. Barclay's intend to sell the debt off IF I WANT TO STOP THIS SALE. PHONE TODAY he he he he THIS IS MY LAST CHANCE. YIPPEE. What a lovely letter i am going to write. and today I got a letter from Mercers with a default notice. a Liverpool address in a Barclay's envelope from Northampton . Dont these companies go a long way to post mail Telling me i should contact them IMMEDIATELY who the hell do they think they are.

 

Why should i if its going to be sold off. If Barclay's sell it off. It will just another part of the Consumer Credit Act they have broken. Passing to a third Party . adding charges. Sending a default notice. Are they going for a full house. I believe that if it is sold Barclay's will be committing an offence of some sort as they know it is in default and should not sell it on when there is no chance to collect. It could be fraud

 

Mercers have the nerve to say UNDER THE TERMS OF YOUR BARCLAY CARD AGREEMENT. i must make at least a minimum payment. They ignore all requests to provide the legal agreement so how can they quote it to me cheeky things or words to that effect.

 

It is just one big farce from a company who cannot manage its own affairs. Continue to break the law and think its the right thing to do. WELL I DONT .... They even say i can pay by Barclay card. what a laugh What Barclay card ? and they say i have broken the agreement What agreement ? I shall have some fun with this little lot

If they think i am contacting three departments at the same time they are barking up the same tree they fell out off.. BARCLAYS....MERCERS..CALDER FINANCE all the same company. He who pays the piper calls the tune.

 

Regards Blencathra

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Blencathra,

 

Nothing surprises me any more.

 

I got a letter yesterday, after two months, banging on about Section 7 of the regulations, and I may have missed something but I don't think they have been writing to too many others here about this. I am hoping an expert comes on to my thread soon, as I am now very confused.

 

Anyway, what they were basically saying was that they can send anything they like and this constitutes an agreement. They said they had sent me an excerpt from my agreement, by which they mean a page entitled 'Conditions of Use', obviously taken from a folded leaflet as it was four small columns (landscape, not portrait) and this was sufficient. I wonder why I can't I have the excerpt with my details on it?

 

They say the account is not in dispute and they will continue with collection activities.

 

DD xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...