Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The unpaid bill is EXACTLY  £300?? Sounds a bit odd...
    • Nothing will happen in regard to this one shoplifting event, other than Sainsburys won't let you shop in this store again.   But, if you continued to shoplift, then the consequences are more serious. Local to me, there  is a town where about 13 people have been banned from shopping in many of the shops. They are subject to some form of order, where if they set foot in any of the stores, they will be subject to arrest by Police.  
    • Agree with DX, Sadly, from the pics, it looks like you're bang to rights😪 The rules are very explicit. Before entering the box, you must ensure that you are able to completely exit. It looks like the car in front may have moved a couple of feet and tempted you to set off, but when you did that, there still wasn't enough room to completely exit the box. By all means ask to see the video evidence, but saying you had to stop because the vehicle in front stopped, isn't a valid defence.
    • Hello, welcome to CAG. I imagine the letter that the security guards talked about will be a letter from a company or lawyers who specialise in trying to extract money from shoplifters. I think Sainsbury's use DWF solicitors, otherwise it could be a company like RLP. It won't be a 'fine', only the police can do that. Look at this as a parallel 'justice' system that doesn't involve the plice. If you read around the forum for other cases of shoplifting, you'll get the idea of how this all works. If you think your behaviour has become compulsive, we suggest having a chat with your GP who should get you help for this. Best, HB
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Me & my Debts - Haydon DMP since 2001- they charge a £20PCM fee from my <£40 payment - CCA time? In Scotland too!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3290 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • 2 months later...
  • Replies 237
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Today, a family member recieved a call from Link financial requesting that i call them on a 0207 number.

I have received a letter from Cabot today, as follows

I refer to your letter dated january 2009.

I understand that your query relates to your request for all the relevent information required according to the consumer credit Act 1974.

Cabot does rely on the original lender to provide information in order to assist with your enquires. We have made several requests for a copy of the agreement from Barclaycard (formerly Goldfish Bank Ltd). However, as the accounts were opened in 2000, they have confirmed that they no longer hold this documentation.

Notwithstanding the above I am enclosing the relevant Cabot statement in relation to your account. This clearly shows that you acknowledge the above account as you have made repayment towards the same since 2008 by the way of a monthly repayment plan.

In light of the above, Cabot is of the opinion that you have been provided sufficient evidence that the account exsits.

I would recommend you contact our collections department, within 14 days to discuss the options available in order to settle this account.

I trust we have set our position clearly.

Supplied is a copy of the payments of 2008 until i stopped paying them after the account went into dispute.

Edited by blueda
Changed content.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Cabot have started this new tack. This is being discussed on this thread:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/223570-cabot-financial-dealing-cabot.html

 

It doesn't matter what they write. No CCA= no enforcement

 

Try not to get too stressed by this

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

what a shame,

 

up to you now what you do now safe in the knowledge they don't have a cca.

 

ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Blueda,

 

Usual tactics from this lot. Wait a few weeks/months then they try again.

 

First was this call to your number or another member of your family?

 

If it was to your number just ignore it. If it should continue to happen you could hit them with the 'I've told you only in writing letter and harrassment letters'

 

If it was to another family members number and it happens again they have good grounds for an official complaint.

 

Hang on a few days and see if they try this again... then hit 'em hard.

 

Come back to the site and I'm sure we can send them packing.

 

CP

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Cunning Plan, it was my phone number that they called, and i wont be calling them back.

Thanks Silverfox and Ida, i plan to do nothing for now and see what Cabot comes up with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again,

 

You're right Blueda don't waste your time, money or breath calling these bozos they will only hassle you and try and put pressure on.

 

As before keep a record of when they call, it all adds to your case against them. If they do call again, my guess is they will, just tell them to read your previous letters and then put the phone down.

 

CP

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a thread running to monitor comlaints about Link if you feel you have a genuine complaint i.e they have called your family or friends to trace you then add your complaint here

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/222298-complaints-link-financial.html?highlight=link+financial

Dont let the parasite dca's prosper

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is normal Cabot rubbish, saying they only need need to provide it if one still exists. The actual law says they don't have to provide it, only if one NEVER existed. Big difference, and typical of Cabot cherrypicking and twisitn parts of consumer law.

Cabot are getting desperate these days, maybe their 6 million losses for last year. You could also send Cabot a Final Response and say that until they provide you with a compliant CCA you will not enter into further

dialogue on this matter.

You should report them to TS and OFT as well for asking for payment while in default of sending any document, as they'll accept your complaint in this situation. Only a large numbers of complaints will ever get this mob shut down.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks veryweary, that is a good description of Cabot twisting the meaning of the rules, if Cabot send a follow up with a direct demand for payment then i will contact TS and OFT.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have received the following from Link financial today.

Dear Mr blueda

Account number ********

Our reference *****

Statement period 23-04 to 23-10-2009

Date assigned **-** 2001

Assigned to Link Financial

Current balance £1,6**.** Where interest is being charged on your account it will be shown in the statement data provided below.

 

Date Transaction Description Debit Credit Balance

23-04-2009 Balance brought forward £1,6**.**

23-10-2009 Balance brought forward £1,6**.**

 

MINIMUM PAYMENTS

If you make only minimum payments each month, it will take you longer and cost you more to clear your balance.

 

All advice from fellow Caggers are most welcome.

 

 

23-04-2009 Balance brought forward

Link to post
Share on other sites

do nothing,

 

 

dca's now have to send you statements whether you are making payments or not

 

ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I have this morning received a letter from Cabot, all advice will be greatly apprecieted.

OUR RESPONSE TO YOR CCA REQUEST UNDER SECTION 77/78

I refer to your letter received on january 2009 and our letter dated february 2009.

I understand you have made a request for a copy of your credit agreement with RBS, the original lender.

The Cabot financial group purchased your debt from RBS on July 2004.

In your letter received on january 2009, you state that you are entitled under sections 77-78 of the consumer Credit Act 1974 to a copy of the credit agreement that you signed with RBS.

We have made several urgent requests to RBS to forward any documentation relating to your account to us. Unfortunately, Cabot has not received documentation due to a delay in retreiving this information from their archives.

Please be advised, that the failure to provide a copy of your agreement within the agreed time time lines does not affect the legality of your debt with Cabot, but merely renders the credit agreement unenforcable until such time the agreement can be produced. To clarify "enforcement" only means obtaining judgment at court.

I can confirm that Cabot has taken the decision to treat the balance outstanding on this account as irrecoverable.

Please note that this decision is not to be confused or interpreted as a write-off of the outstanding balance on your account as the debt legally remains.

Not withstanding the above, Cabot will continue to request these documents from the original lender and in the event Cabot obtains the information as requested by you, at a later date, we reserve the right to recommence collection on your account.

I trust i have set out our position clearly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I think you can guess that they have thrown in the towel for now.

 

Personally I also think they will flog it on at the earliest oppotunity.

 

If you are lucky, this is the last you will hear from them so it is still a victory of sorts. :)

 

fox

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 7 months later...

Hi folks, Link have been phoning looking for me daily, and have been unable to speak to me as im never in at the time, for which the polite caller asks when i will be in so as to call back, i suppose they will be writing to me soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you think they would have the message by now,

 

the thing is althought it may not be legaly enforceable they are still within their rights to ask for payment but they should lay off when advised they are not getting anything

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Folks, i have this morning received a leter from Link financial, as follows

Dear Mr blueda

We have tried unsuccessfully to contact you in regards to your account.

Although you have not returned our telephone calls, we do have to make certain decisions on your account.

As the owners of yor account we must advise you that we expect to recover the balance from you. Our intentions are not to allow you to leave the account unpaid, even if our recovery action takes longer than we first anticipated.

Maybe you cannot afford to clear the balance today, butyou do need to contact us to discuss your circumstances, only then can we attempt to help to structure a payment plan on your debt.

In an attempt to help you, we would like to be able to make an informed assessment based on your current circumstances. In essence if you were to tell us why you have not paid your account we could help you to avoid paying back more.

One way we could help is to give you the opportunity to pay back the £ - - - - at an interest rate of 0% APR.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...