Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I contacted them when it happened. The caretaker came over, looked at it, and walked off with the tree chunks of mortar. Next morning, they had a roofer come over and enter our garden to inspect it. Friday they were supposed to speak with a scaffolding company. I had to bring up liability and potentially calling the council to report 'an unsafe structure' before they even got moving. They know all about the wedding, the preparations, our patio contractors etc. but their attitude doesn't instill me with confidence. My fear is it will end up being a legal matter which is why I posted here to hopefully receive some advice. As far as I can see, the roof is in a state of disrepair, even if it's just the mortar breaking lose due to the size and weight of the chunks - and even from ground level it's visibly clear that multiple pieces have fallen over time (though never this size so we haven't been able to identify the issue till now - we thought it was rubble left in the garden by the previous owner). Currently, we can't use 25% of our garden due to the risk of more falling mortar which is more than just an inconvenience, we can't proceed with our contractors, and at worst, it will run up in several thousand of extra expenses for us, if we have to find a wedding venue. Even if they do have it fixed in time, and we have to settle for renting a marquee and floor for the marquee and furniture and whatnot it will be additional costs only due to the neighbour's roof.
    • please create your OWN topic by hitting create or + in the top red banner  
    • It will be years before Banks would sell to a debt buyer.  Sometimes Banks will use external debt collectors to try to collect, but generally Banks don't take Court action.  So you could be looking at 3 to 6 years, before any dca owning debt looks to take any Court action. And it is not definite that this would happen. So no need to feel pressured at this stage. In the event you found yourself unemployed, you have time to engage with Banks to advise of your situation and ask for time to deal with the situation, find new employment. As long as you inform the Banks they will offer assistance they can. E.g offer payment holiday or accept reduced payment for period. What you should not do, is not contact the Banks and simply default on payments. 
    • I'd get back to them tomorrow, and explain the circumstances, that you have a wedding reception, and just appeal to their better nature. Hopefully they will be able to move sooner rather than later, especially if you go in in person and speak to them, and show them the issue.
    • The 3 pieces of mortar that fell on the same day, at the same time, were approx. 25-30cm long and weighed around ½-1 kilo each from a roof that is above the 2nd floor; they were by no means tiny pieces of mortar but large chunks falling from a rather great height. I believe the size and weight is enough to cause serious injury and if it falls on your head, I assume it could potentially be lethal if unlucky, but we don't wish to put that theory to test... We can't in good conscience let a contractor install a patio and a gazebo as it is in the exact spot where the mortar fell, nor do I think anyone would be willing to take the chance. Looking at the roof, there are multiple other remaining pieces from the same 'line' or 'row' of mortar that can potentially fall. The mortar is right underneath the slate tiles on the neighbour's roof and I don't know whether the tiles are also (becoming) lose due to the loss of the mortar. I was trying to upload a photo but it seems it's not allowed. The first contractor to work in our garden in preparation for the patio and gazebo is scheduled to start on 10th June, that leaves the neighbour 5 workdays to sort their roof which is unlikely, so it seems we will have to postpone our patio contractor without knowing when they can come back. We have already had extensive work done in the garden in preparation for the wedding reception and it will become very costly for us if we have to move the wedding reception to a venue (if we can even get one at this short notice) rather than have it at home which was our dream.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Self Employed/Housing Benefit


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5615 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi every one ,I am having major problems with Housing Benefit because my partner and I are both self employed, we have our own seperate companies. As such the H/B have requested our books, fine we earn nothing, as our businesses are fairly new. Its all come about after a home visit which is meant to replace the yearly review ( I object most strongly to the home visit) we couldn't answer all the questions the woman had so are accounts were requested.

They have requested more info than the tax office do, it took a couple of weeks to get the books done. They have taken figures completely out of context. To give you an example no allowance has been made for travel expenses ect they have averaged our H/B & C/T on gross invoices. My partner has to travel for two hours to get to work it costs £45 every time he goes!!!! Then when we recieved the the out come of take your kids to school day (and let them do all the admin) they say they can't accept us doing our own books again, they have to be audited. Would I be trying to claim H/B when its the biggest pain in the neck ever if I could afford an account???? Does anyone know if they can actually demand this?

Sorry its turned into a bit of a rant. Is any one else going through this?? We have four kids, two of which are disabled. We are on the phone morning noon and night with people telling them we earn't 20p last Thursday so we don't get in to trouble. They have just hit us with a bill for £1600 over payment because they don't know how and what to add up.

Some one please any one HELP

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI, Got your PM.

 

This is a case for the CAB as it's way out of my league.

 

There is something that may help though with your overpayment.

IF you couldn't have known that an overpayment of housing benefit had been made AND someone within the benefits department has done something OR not done something that resulted in the overpayment.

 

The official line is:

Under the housing benefit regulations, all overpayments are legally recoverable

 

UNLESS The Overpayment was caused by an official error- this means the overpayment was due to some thing done, or not done, by us (the council) or the DWP (Department of Work and Pensions)

 

AND You, or someone acting on your behalf, (E.g An appointee), or someone to whom the payment was made, (E.g. Your landlord), could not have reasonably been expected to know that an overpayment was being made, at the time that the payment was notified or received.

 

AND You, or someone acting on your behalf, (E.g. An appointee), or someone to whom the payment was made, (E.g. your landlord),

did not contribute to the error's being made.

 

So long as you were renting your home and you gave them all the information and didn't hide anything they can prove, You may have a case.

Shouldn't matter whether you were self employed or not. They should have procedures in place to deal with that.

 

hope that helps

 

fox

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

No problem,

I come on here regularly so I'll kepp an eye out and I may be able to assist in the future.

The thing to remember is that councils have to follow the rules too so they may seem big but they can be brought to book is they have screwed up.

 

fox

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, its how to get them to back down and realise they are wrong. I have been called in now for an 'official interview' because they can't work out my benefit they have accused me of trying to fiddle the social. It's all wrong, but it will be money well spent getting them audited. When you talk to them on the phone they act like they are doing you a massive favour! One womans siad 'well its going to take me all day to go though your accounts' 1, sorry your going to have to do your job. 2, you asked for the truck load of info!! lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi LNOV,

 

We're in a similar position to yourself, in that hubby is self employed and we've unfortunately found ourselves in the position of having to jump through the hoops to claim HB and CTB from the local council.

 

Whilst searching for info on how they work out benefit when you are self employed, I came across the following web pages. Hopefully they will be of some use to you when you have to go for the interview.

 

DWP - Advisers - Technical guidance - RR2 - Working it out (continued)(e) The info for self employed earnings is about 1/5 down the page.

 

http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/content.aspx?LegType=S.I.+(All+UK)&PageNumber=19&BrowseLetter=H&NavFrom=1&parentActiveTextDocId=2478068&ActiveTextDocId=2478431&filesize=17746 It's a bit tough-going (well, it was for me :rolleyes::D) but the council have to abide by this, by law.

 

BTW, when you say your partner has to travel 2hrs to get to work - is that place permanent? May have a bearing on whether they take it into account or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Europa, Thanks for getting in touch and for the info. No, it wasn't permantent. The place he travele to was my partner customer rather than him being contracted by them, if you see what i mean. I've just been phone around local auditors and some offer to give you your first chat with them for free if that is any use to you. Maybe if they can't do anything for you they might be able to tell you where you can get help from. All the best keep in touch

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well if its free i say do it! I can not belive they are t6hreatenin me in this way. We have two disabled kids, no one will employ us 'coz both my partner and I have had to leave full time employment to look after them, one child is his and one is mine. So we went s/e so we could work from home around the kids, four altogether and another two every other week. I feel like we are been persecuted because we don't fit in one of their little boxes instead they accuse us of robbing the goverment. Any way thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its all come about after a home visit which is meant to replace the yearly review ( I object most strongly to the home visit) we couldn't answer all the questions the woman had so are accounts were requested.

They have requested more info than the tax office do...

 

In my opinion, they are going way to far! That they asked for your accounts, fine, ... and if they insist in having them audited at THEIR expenses, ... why not (as long as whoever audit them is someone independent!!!), ... but it is the home visit that I don't get, ... and I strongly would object to it too! Unless they have evidence of fraudulent activities, I would have thought that it amounts to invasion of privacy, which is a breach of Article 8 of the Human Rights Act.

 

I would be enclined to make a formal complaint about the way your claim is being assessed, ... even getting your MP on board!

 

Have you received a detailed breakdown on how they reach their figures, etc... You are entitled to that information! Also, you have the right to appeal against any decision made, ... which is where having THEIR breakdown comes handy, as you have solid facts you can dispute.

 

Hope this helps!

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have taken figures completely out of context. To give you an example no allowance has been made for travel expenses ect they have averaged our H/B & C/T on gross invoices. My partner has to travel for two hours to get to work it costs £45 every time he goes!!!!

 

Going through a similar 'ordeal' myself at the moment!

 

With regard to the vehicle expenses that are not taken into account, one wonders WHY there is a section for vehicle expenses in the expenditure section of any form a self-employed individual has to fill in, if such expenses are NOT to be taken into account! :confused:

 

It was very patiently explained to me, that vehicle expenses are not taken into account because it is used to go to and fro where my business is, and other errands connected with it! :confused::( YeeesSSS! That business would not be in existence if I was not able to do so, ... and I am the one paying for the fuel, etc.... It is NOT a case of my employer (which I haven't got by virtue of being self-employed!) paying for that kind of expenses, .... yet the latter is precisely what seems to be the line of thinking they are going along: an employer (me) pays for the car expenses of its employee (me again), ... i.e. those expenses are NOT taken into account for the employee (me)! What about the employer (me) who pays for these expenses? Of course I forgot to ADD the paid fuel expenses by my employer (me), to my income as an employee (me again!)! ;)

 

Seriously now, ... there need to be a shift of perspective when self-employment income is calculated, ... but as it is an employed individual who makes the calculations, that shift of perspective is very hard to obtain, as they are stuck in their very own personal little boxes, ....

 

Funny thing is, every time I ask them to look at the figures again, they every time come up with a different income!!!??? ... So, I keep asking, until they calculate an income we all agree on, ... which will probably be when they finally will concede that the breakdown I gave them from the very start (using the little boxes of THEIR form) IS a true reflection of my financial situation!:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Morning,

I don't half have some weird thought first thing in the morning. At 6:30 this morning I woke up and thought," Has Little nest of vipers complained yet"

 

The point is, If you feel they have done something wrong, you need to complain. There is method in my madness.

In lots of council disputes, you can complain to the Local Government Ombudsman BUT you must have made an attempt to resolve your complaint first.

There is normally 2 stages of complain to go through (coincidentally called stage 1 and stage 2 :D)

I find that by going the stage 1 route first doesn't produce much but instead of going down the stage 2 route, bypass it and go direct to either the head honcho of the department or even better, The Chief Executive of the entire council.

The chief exec doesn't like to be bothered with "petty little problems", gets annoyed and passes the complaint down to the head of the relevant department with the order, "GET IT SORTED"

I used that when I got an overpayment sorted out.

 

fox

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dano, have a look at the links europs has posted, I've had a look and inteand to wave it all under their noses on thursday when I have my 'interveiw' its very clear that the car expences must be taken in to concideration and more. It think it will be really useful to you.

 

Hi Fox, my partner has an appointment on tuesday with them to try and get this sorted so I think then will be the time to make a complaint, we are already appealing. They will be sick of the sight on sound of me when I'm done. I have read that the council has auditors, just not for this type of thing. We are in the processes of finding an independant auditor for when we resubmit our books.

 

More than anything I find it hard to belive that they have over paid us when it is so difficult to find out what your entitled to in the first place let alone claim it! Through doing a bit of ringing around and making the right noises I've found out that we are entitled to an increase in a couple of things so when we do resubmit our book our figures will be different again and we are getting more money (bonus!) that should confuse 'um but it wouldn't be a problem if that department were doing thier job properly!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...