Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In my time I've never seen a payout/commission from a PPC to a landlord/MA. Normally the installation of all the cameras/payment of warden patrols etc is free but PPCs keep 100% of the ticket revenue. Not saying it doesn't happen mind. I've done some more digging on this: Remember, what your lease doesn't say is just as important as what it does say. If your lease doesn't mention a parking scheme/employment of a PPC/Paying PCNs etc you're under no legal obligation to play along to the PPC's or the MA's "Terms and conditions". I highly doubt your lease had a variation in place to bring in this permit system. Your lease will likely have a "quiet enjoyment" clause for your demised space and the common areas and having to fight a PPC/MA just to park would breach that. Your lease has supremacy of contract, but I do agree it's worth keeping cool and not parking there (and hence getting PCNs) for a couple months just so that the PPC doesn't get blinded by greed and go nuclear on you if you have 4 or 5 PCNs outstanding. At your next AGM, bring it up that the parking controls need to be removed and mention the legal reasons why. One reason is that under S37(5b) Landlord and Tenant Act 1987,  more than 75% of leaseholders and/or the landlord would have needed to agree, and less than 10% opposed, for the variation to take place. I highly doubt a ballot even happened before the PPC was bought in so OPS even being there is illegal and breaching the terms of your lease. In this legal sense,  the communal vote of the "directors" of the freehold company would have counted for ONE vote of however many flats there are (leases/tenants) + 1 (landlord). It's going to be interesting to see where this goes.  
    • @Whyisitthisthank you very much for asking. I am still feeling anxious, especially when someone rings the doorbell, or when I receive a letter I feel a it paranoid. I stopped going to the shops unless I really have to. I shop online now. When I see security I feel paralised. 
    • My expectation was their WS would include the best paperwork, like at least true copies of originals, but these just look wrong somehow, perhaps the font and size of font... Not sending me the DN in CCA request but producing it for evidence I would argue could be a tactic used by them... - Page 11 with ticks - there is no reference to IP addresses - Home addresses are correct for dates in documents   Just looking up example Defendant WS's while awaiting your thoughts on this
    • Hello lovely, just posting to check in to see how you are feeling now? Hopefully your feeling better? 
    • Sorry my redactions made it harder dx. Tick dates are 11/12/2014
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

VG - Vs Northen Rock - Charging Order


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3161 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi HH

 

Thanks for your moral support, regarding the Mercantile case, I've tried to understand it, but cannot get my head round it :confused::oops: :oops:

it will overturn the Mercantile case on its head.

It's clear from various postings on the site, Evershi*s are monitoring the site, therefore I don't want to say to much here.

 

And if you're reading this thread Evershi*s, here have this :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 614
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

It's clear from various postings on the site, Evershi*s are monitoring the site, therefore I don't want to say to much here.

 

And if you're reading this thread Evershi*s, here have this :p

 

Well in my eyes if they are reading this they are not 100% confident in their case and are trying to find out what your next move is.

 

Keep plugging in:D

 

HH

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seems to me the financial institutions should be making sure they comply with the law, so if we can teach them something and they take it on board, it can only benefit everyone. ;)

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I see it you have a few options to consider, and the first one you probably won't like, but please think about it.

 

1. Bearing in mind the judges comments about extra costs, is it worth continuing to fight the case, taking into account the effects that all this could have on your family's and your own wellbeing and health. At the end of the day, it's people that matter.

 

2. If the judge is not willing to accept the debt is unenforceable, can you bring the amount of the debt into dispute? Have you had a breakdown of how NR have arrived at this amount? Were there charges which you can dispute as being unlawful?

 

3. Was there any PPI in the sum being claimed. If so, especially bearing in mind your health problems, was this mis-sold?

 

4. Read back over your whole thread and see if there may be advice you decided wasn't relevant at the time, but may add to your case if the judge doesn't accept it's unenforceable.

 

5. Have you any way of finding some money to offer a full and final settlement that NR might accept?

 

Just trying to open up your options a bit, and I'm sorry if there's nothing helpful. But if you think of different things maybe there will be something that might make a difference.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bearing in mind the judges comments about extra costs, is it worth continuing to fight the case

Yes, I owe xxx amount, another few more £s won't really make that much difference

 

taking into account the effects that all this could have on your family's and your own wellbeing and health

My confidence was dented at my hearing, however, having read various threads on here with and the moral support, I'm not prepared to just roll over unless I have to. Fair enough;)

 

If the judge is not willing to accept the debt is unenforceable, can you bring the amount of the debt into dispute? Have you had a breakdown of how NR have arrived at this amount? Were there charges which you can dispute as being unlawful?

I waiting for a financial breakdown.

You need to chase this up as a matter of urgency. Did you do a CPR 18 request for more information? http://www.justice.gov.uk/civil/procrules_fin/contents/parts/part18.htm

 

Was there any PPI in the sum being claimed. If so, especially bearing in mind your health problems, was this mis-sold?

I never took PPI out on this loan.

 

OK

 

Have you any way of finding some money to offer a full and final settlement that NR might accept?

I only wish I could find the funds.

 

I guessed that might be the case.

 

 

Just trying to open up your options a bit

It's not over till the fat lady sings at the moment, she's waiting in the wings ;)

 

Didn't know you'd seen a picture and recognised me Von :D

Edited by caro
Add CPR 18 link
Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you do a CPR 18 request for more information? PART 18 - FURTHER INFORMATION

 

Yes back in December sent SD, I have confirmation they received my request although they've never replied or even acknowledged it.

 

I tried to expalin to the judge they'd ignored my CPR18 request, but he was not intrested.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to get the court to enforce it then. You can't be expected to accept all this without knowing how the figure is made up.

 

I need to log off for a while but there is info around on what you need to do. Did you see the link I added above. I should be able to get back later though.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got the message Von. Looks like you've got things sussed.:)

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi VG, important question.

 

Have you notified NR at any time of your other creditors? If so does the application for the Interim Order they made on form N379 mention your other creditors. If not their application may be incomplete. CPR Practice Direction pt 73 states;

 

(5) if the judgment creditor knows of the existence of any other creditors of the judgment debtor, their names and (if known) their addresses;

I have a computer printout from the claimant's systems showing 6 months PRIOR to legal action they were aware I had xxx additional creditors.

 

The judge at my hearing stated as no idividual creditor listed priority to the claimant.

 

Who's right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, VB,

 

Have now read this epic but don't think that I can add anything to the PM I sent you. Contact the folk I pointed you at and they might be able to help.

 

Remember though, that even if they get the CO, which to be honest I think is likely, an order for sale is extremely unlikely.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kraken

Have now read this epic but don't think that I can add anything to the PM I sent you. Contact the folk I pointed you at and they might be able to help.

I did contact them, but due to the workload they have, there unable to assist.

Remember though, that even if they get the CO, which to be honest I think is likely, an order for sale is extremely unlikely.

I've taken your comments on board.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Immediately file a formal complaint with the FOS. The letter you received is standard and you actually need it to initiate a claim with the FOS. Don't worry about your complaint being rejected by NR. 99% are. You will probably receive a positive ruling from the FOS. Just be aware that the process can take a year or more!

 

The form you need and full information is contained on the FOS site.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Best of luck VG. I know what you are going through as exactly same happened to me - unsecured loan with Northern Rock, they were the only company to refuse CCCS proposal and hit out of the blue one day with a hearing date stating that a charging order had been prelimary granted in favour of NR. I was unsure what to do, CCCS kept saying ignore them as they cant turn an unsecured loan into a secured one, and yes they did!!! I wrote to the then head of NR Adam Applegarth who actually responded stating that they would accept my CCCS payment with the CO going through. So being naive I accepted and didnt defend in court and kept paying the monthly amount. (£10.79 a month on a £10,000 debt). The shock came when I was forced to look for a better mortgage deal 18 months later and the CO stood in my way. I asked for a settlement and was quoted £12,500. I queried why so high - was told the court interest rate was being added!! So the debt was spiralling higher and higher and if I kept on paying the £10.79 month the debt would never get paid off and the debt due to NR got higher and higher (and secured with the CO)!!! With the help of a great mortgage broker we worked out if we paid them off with what we could scrape from the equity it could work - so I offered £10k full and final and it was accepted and the CO lifted. Though I have a CCJ registered for the next 6 years.

 

NR made my life hell - out of 6 creditors they refused to accept the pro-rata payment the CCCS were offering.

 

I have sent a SAR request to see what credit agreement they come up with. I know its a long shot but if they had no legal right to demand money and force a CO on me I want to pursue it as much as I can.

Debt Managers (Barclaycard) £7150 - CCA sent - poor photcopy of app form - they rtnd acct to BC. Then Robinson Way come on scene - sent packing straight away. Will they try a third attempt????? :) Yes they did, roll on Westcot, told them were to stuff it. Not heard anything since but Lowell Financial have been searching my credit file. Round 4, ding a ling ling!!:D Now Crapquest on the scene - bought the debt and want the balance... don't think so 8)

 

Equidebt (Co-Operative Visa) £6800 - CCA sent in June - no response still!! Was Ex-Northern Rock card so probably lost. Equidebt have now agreed to write off and remove credit ref listing completely!!! :lol:

 

 

Robinson Way (Abbey) - debt sold to RW £1840 - await letter from them....cant CCA as bank account.... agreed to settle for £368 :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi MIMW

 

Thanks for your support, I'd have beat them in court had the judge granted my set aside application, I have 21 exhibits showing where they've coc*ed up in ingnoring legislation, what can you do when you're faced with a biased judge.

 

As soon as I walked into the hearing first thing the judge started on was explaining how a charging order works, I knew at that stage I was stuffed even before he got to my set aside application.

 

I have until this week to decide whether to appeal against the judges decision to dimiss my set aside application.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes this seems to be the consensus-especially as you will be able to show the paperwork.

Question is,theres not a lot of time left-so will need to find one that can fit you in pronto.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi 42man

VG....have you had any luck with a solicitor ? My feeling is that you need proper legal backing on this, most will give a free 30 mins to you at the start....

No, all the solicitors I've spoken to are not willing to take the case :confused: :confused:

 

I've been informed by several independant solicitors "It's a pro creditor" climate at present :mad:

 

I've tried explaining that does not mean my case is doomed ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...