Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The NTK is pretty good at complying with the Act  as is the Notice to Driver so no help there. I seem to remember OPS getting hammered by a Judge [in brighton I think] so they seem to have tightened po their act since. The organ grinder is the MA and the monkey is OPS.
    • @jk2054 and @BankFodder - Your feedbacks in posts #199 and #202 have been incorporated into the attached WS. As usual, amends are in blue in this draft. Based on other WS drafts I've seen where the issues in dispute are part of the WS, I built my first draft WS in the same format and hadn't seen it to be an issue before. You will notice that the 'witness statement' has been replaced with 'Claimant's Statement' so that issues in dispute does not need to be on a separate page before the WS. This is especially given the work that has gone in to reduce the size of the WS to 8 pages. Also thanks for the suggestions re: confidentiality - I agree with your views and will stand firm on this if a condition of confidentiality is brought up. I have not been approached by Evri on this forum or by email. I haven't yet had success in paying the hearing fee. I am calling the court as often as I can (during work breaks/lunch etc.) and have sent 2 emails to the court requesting a call back. If i don't have any success by the end of this week, I'll send another email chasing for a call back. @BankFodder - Also attached is an invoice from Packlink which shows that I was charged by Packlink for these services: "drop-off at EVRi - Next day delivery" and "Proof of Delivery". It also has the payer's address and there are "Origin" and "Destination" fields which have the postcode of the sender and the recipient (I have redacted personal details in the attached invoice).  I am already including this in my evidence bundle (without the redaction) but wanted to share this redacted version so that other people can consider this as example in their bundle of Packlink and Evri's contract being instigated by the sender of the parcel who has paid for the service, and further shows that there is information in the invoice to identify that a third party beneficiary (sender / recipient) is present in the contract between Packlink and Evri. If this invoice is no good, then please let me know / delete it from this post. Draft - Witness Statement and Court Bundle redacted.pdf Packlink invoice - REDACTED.pdf
    • It can be frustrating when clients fail to pay for services or products rendered, ignore payment reminders, or claim an inability to pay. How quick do you pass to a Debt Collection Agency like www.corporatedebtrecovery.co.uk 
    • The Court s pretty informal. The Judge [who you call "Judge" rather than Sir or madam] will not be wearing a wig and gown just a suit and it is advisable that you do the same and a tie. Other than that the Judge will do most of the talking .If they haven't received a WS from the scrotes either the case will probably be thrown out straight away. Usually the Judge will ask their lawyer a number of questions then ask for your take on things and then the case will be decided.  UKPC 0 Mystic Bertie 5. Then ask for your expenses time off work [if not being paid by your company while in Court, travelling and parking costs and occasionally they will allow something like 5 hours research at I think £8 per hour. Later celebrate and post us the result and how much fun it was. You will wonder  why you worried about it so much. Next time will be much easier.🙂
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

VG - Vs Northen Rock - Charging Order


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3147 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I obtained this:

 

Charging Order - an order of a court that a charge be placed on a property so that, when it is sold, the first part of the proceeds of the sale go to pay off an outstanding debt. A charging order effectively turns an unsecured loan into a secured loan. The existance of a charging order is noted on the deeds of the property in question. The Charging Orders Act 1979 allows creditors with a high court judgemnet or county court judgment the ability to secure the debt to assets. A charging order can't be made unless payments have been defaulted on a CCJ.

 

From this thread: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/161658-z-debt-terminology.html

 

I'm confused with this part: A charging order can't be made unless payments have been defaulted on a CCJ.

 

I'm on a DMP with CCCS, I missed one payment with permission from CCCS due to an unexpected high bill, because of that Northern Rock wrote stating that I have defaulted on the agreement with CCCS and they have applied for a CO I suspect they'll go through the CCJ process first, I had court papers come and filled them in.

So, if a CCJ is granted, and I continue to pay via my DMP, will NR be able to obtain a CO saying I’ve defaulted on the ORIGINAL agreement i.e. my official monthly payments, before I got into financial difficulties?

Trust the above makes sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 614
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi,

If they do obtain a CCJ against you, the judge will decide what your monthly payments will be. As long as you comply with this ruling, they CANNOT go for a charging order.

 

I think your focus needs to be to fight the CCJ.

When is the court date ?

Was this a loan or a credit card ? When was it taken out ?

Has the bank issued you with default notices ?

The more info you give, the more advice you'll get.

 

Debs

Link to post
Share on other sites

When is the court date ?

I've not had a court date, I completed the paperword and forwarded it to CCCS for completion.

Was this a loan or a credit card ? When was it taken out ?

It was a loan, taken out around end of 2006.

Has the bank issued you with default notices ?

Yes, I had one sometime ago.

The more info you give, the more advice you'll get

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

A couple of months ago I received some court papers behalf of one of my creditors, I sent the papers of to CCCS who completed them and offered what I've been paying for the last 12 months.

 

I heard nothing since then until today when I received further court papers saying "Judgement For The Claimant" I was not given an option to attend court and explain my reasons for a DMP, I have another 6 creditors who all seem OK with my DMP arrangement, apart from this one.

 

The creditor has refused the offer from CCCS even though I've been paying them the same amount for the last 12 months, I've phoned the court and they say the creditor is after a charging order, I've forwarded the papers of to CCCS to deal with, although I've no idea what the next step is.

 

Anyone with any advice as this is scaring me to death.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Erm - to be honest the order can be set aside, but you have already admitted the debt by confirming that in sending the forms back on CCCS advice.

 

I know it sometimes difficult to get the right advice, but please do not do as CCCS or other DMP companies say, as this is a sure fire way to get a CCJ.

 

Now that you are in this position, please please listen to the advisors on this Forum as they may be able to assist you.

 

I hope that someone with more knowledge and legal insight will be along very soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I know it sometimes difficult to get the right advice, but please do not do as CCCS or other DMP companies say, as this is a sure fire way to get a CCJ

I done what I thought was right, I thought if the court had confirmation from CCCS re my I&E they would refuse the claimants application.

 

I doubt it's any good me requesting a CCCA as I only took the debt out in 2006, and I remember chaising them at the time as the loan had not entered my account, they said they were waiting for my credit agreement, which turned up the following day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I heard nothing since then until today when I received further court papers saying "Judgement For The Claimant" I was not given an option to attend court and explain my reasons for a DMP, I have another 6 creditors who all seem OK with my DMP arrangement, apart from this one.

 

Did you/CCCS apply for a time order?

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Time orders under section 129 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 can be used for 'regulated agreement' debts. CCCS may not be aware that they could have applied for this.

 

What type of debt is this? When was it taken out?

 

Here's some info on time orders Debt Factsheets - Time Orders

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, I think it would be a good idea to give National Debtline a phone for some further support (Tel: 0808 808 4000).

 

Have NR applied for an interim charging order yet?

 

If you wish to defend the interim charging order being made final, objections must be made to the claimant no less than seven days before the hearing. The letter with your arguments must be sent recorded delivery to both creditor and court.

 

A time order is only a valid option if your agreement is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act (which yours is).

 

You can ask the court to consider a time order on its own initiative before making a charging order final. The court will usually look into the position of the creditor as well as your situation when deciding whether a time order is ‘just’. This means the court will look at the reasons you took out the loan, consider how long and how much you have repaid to date, look at how you have attempted to resolve the issue to date and the creditor’s actions.

 

Does anyone else have a beneficial interest in your property?

  • Haha 1

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, I think it would be a good idea to give National Debtline a phone for some further support (Tel: 0808 808 4000)

OK, I'll do that later on today.

Have NR applied for an interim charging order yet??

I don't know, some months ago I had a court paper come through from the court which I sent off to CCCS, they completed it and sent it back to the court.

If you wish to defend the interim charging order being made final, objections must be made to the claimant no less than seven days before the hearing. The letter with your arguments must be sent recorded delivery to both creditor and court. ?

OK

A time order is only a valid option if your agreement is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act (which yours is).?

Yes, as I owe over £20.000 and had my loan in 2006.

You can ask the court to consider a time order on its own initiative before making a charging order final. The court will usually look into the position of the creditor as well as your situation when deciding whether a time order is ‘just’. This means the court will look at the reasons you took out the loan, consider how long and how much you have repaid to date, look at how you have attempted to resolve the issue to date and the creditor’s actions. ?

OK

Does anyone else have a beneficial interest in your property?

Yes, my OH, we have a joint mortgage, strange thing is my OH also has a personal loan with NR, NR wrote to CCCS agreeing her DMP offer until 2009 very similiar amout to me (We have a joint DMP) hope that makes sense.

 

Why NR have targeted "Me" and not "Us" I don't understand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know, some months ago I had a court paper come through from the court which I sent off to CCCS, they completed it and sent it back to the court.

 

I think you need to get in touch with CCCS over this and find out exactly what is going on. You need to know exactly what they have done.

 

Here is some useful information on the process of charging orders and what they mean Debt Factsheets - Charging orders in the county court

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just an update, NR refused my monthly offer via my DMP through CCCS.

 

The case in now being transferred through to my local county court for a hearing, no date has yet been set, it was only last week the papers were being transferred.

 

I've been paying NR via my DMP for 12 months now, in view of an imminent court hearing, is it worth my applying for my CCA? (this personal loan is only around 18 months old, so I guess there is a valid CCA somewhere)

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you say in all likelyhood there will be a valid copy of the agreement somewhere but there's certainly no harm in asking for it.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello rory

 

I'm not sure if this is going to make sense, but I'll give it ago.

 

As NR have refused my offer of payment, they were granted a "Determination Order" I've appealed against that and now waiting for a hearing, however, I've found out today that when NR were granted the "Determination Order" a CCJ came with it :eek:

 

How can that be?

 

As yet, I've not had the opportunity to defend myself, I'm confused by it all, maybe I don't have the right to defend myself as I ow the money, which I've never denied as I've never missed a payment whilst on my DMP.

 

I spoke with CCCS and I'm informed because I've admitted the debt by offering a monthly payment, the CCJ is automatic.

 

The bottom line, NR are after a CO, I find it amazing that what was an unsecured loan can now be turned into a "Secured loan"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I spoke with CCCS and I'm informed because I've admitted the debt by offering a monthly payment, the CCJ is automatic.

 

I'm afraid so, yes.

 

Have you applied for a time order?

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a thought, did you admit the debt in the claim papers e.g. making an offer of payments? Or did you state that you would defend?

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't believe the CCCS have said that !!

42man, they did say that honestly.

what about disputing it due to excesssive charges

I don't know if I've had any excessive charges.

non production of a valid CCA, etc etc !!

I've not requested a CCA, as this debt is only around 18 months old.

 

(Thanks for your help)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm afraid so, yes

OK, I suffer with a psychotic disability, had I been warned about receiving a CCJ I could have prepared myself psychologically.

Have you applied for a time order?

 

No rory, I looked at your previous link within this thread re time orders, I don't digest / retain information very well, although I did speak to CCCS about a time order, and was informed it's something there not experienced with.

 

I may get critized here, but I am unable to deal with this due to my psychological disability, I relay on CCCS to guide me, and deal with my credotors that being said I don’t want to rock the boat with CCCS as I’m frightened in case they throw me off my DMP.

 

I’m unable to handle stress / anxiety very well, I have informed NR of this, yet they’ve proceeded down this road causing me countless sleepless nights.

 

One other issue that bothers me of my 9 creditors, only NR are taking legal action I’m scared in case the others decide to follow NR.

 

Although I’ve given brief details about my medical issues, I must make it clear I’m not after sympathy or attention.

 

I’ve never been so scared as what I am at the moment in case I lose my home, I’ve never missed a mortgage payment / utility bill / council tax, and yet NR can have this detrimental effect on me for what is after all an unsecured debt.

 

I’m grateful to you all for the advice you’ve given me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you admit the debt in the claim papers e.g. making an offer of payments?

CCCS completed the paperwork, I've never recieved a copy of what was said, but CCCS did make an offer (The same amount they've been paying for the last 12 months)

Or did you state that you would defend?

Since NR refused the offer and were granted a "Determination Order" I've now appealed against the Determination Order and I'm waiting for a hearing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ve never been so scared as what I am at the moment in case I lose my home,

Try not to worry about this (I know that's impossible to do at the moment but do try). Sale orders after a charging order are very rare and judges will only grant them in exceptional circumstances. Judges really don't like granting them and if you are making an offer to pay the charge then that strengthens your case.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I ask, do you have children and if so how old are they?

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...