Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The postcode is an important point. You cannot be in two postcodes at the same time and the contract only covers the F area and not the E area where Met placed your car. See there is some   advantages in with idiots.🙂 The other fact about the electric spaces is that as you are not allowed to park there, the sign is prohibitory so cannot  offer a contract anyway. and another biggie in your favour is you were not the driver and the PCN does not comply with PoFA. I had another look yesterday at the PCN and there is another error since it does not say that the driver is responsible to pay the charge during the first 28 days. Schedule 4 Section 9 [2][b] (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; so that is another nail in their coffin and it s something I would include in  your WS since that is one that every Judge would accept as a failure to comply. As far as their WS is concerned some of them leave it to the last minute to prevent Defendants being able to counteract their claims. However if they leave it too late [ie after the stipulated time] you can email yours to the Court on the last day and complain at the bottom of your WS that you have not received it and therefore you are asking the Court not to accept their WS. In your case it isn't that important since you have a virtual walkover in Court. I would be surprised if they don't concede beforehand. It is a lost cause for them. Not that I would advocate parking in their electric bay in future with a petrol driven car again.🙂
    • I think the post code 0 v O is nonsense personally and would just annoy the judge.  Cases are decided informally at small claims and judges are not interested in the weakest of trivialities. Understood re FY v EY.  So add to the Unfair PCN section that the PCN includes the wrong post code and places you at a residential area rather than the car park in question. You should wait till 7 June before filing your WS - as a Litigant-in-Person you wont't be penalised for being a day late - to see if MET's WS turns up.  It will also give you a chance to see if they have paid the hearing fee.  If it doesn't turn up you can attack them for defying court directions.  If it does turn up you can ridicule their arguments.  Win win. Also you can see if they have bottled it - which they have done with the last two cases we have here. I think the exact points of your WS have become a tad confusing - and I have heartily contributed to the confusion! - so can you please add the latest version. I think the post code 0 v O is nonsense personally and would just annoy the judge.  Cases are decided informally at small claims and judges are not interested in the weakest of trivialities. Understood re FY v EY.  So add to the Unfair PCN section that the PCN includes the wrong post code and places you at a residential area rather than the car park in question. You should wait till 7 June before filing your WS - as a Litigant-in-Person you wont't be penalised for being a day late - to see if MET's WS turns up.  It will also give you a chance to see if they have paid the hearing fee.  If it doesn't turn up you can attack them for defying court directions.  If it does turn up you can ridicule their arguments.  Win win. Also you can see if they have bottled it - which they have done with the last two cases we have here. I think the exact points of your WS have become a tad confusing - and I have heartily contributed to the confusion! - so can you please add the latest version. I think the post code 0 v O is nonsense personally and would just annoy the judge.  Cases are decided informally at small claims and judges are not interested in the weakest of trivialities. Understood re FY v EY.  So add to the Unfair PCN section that the PCN includes the wrong post code and places you at a residential area rather than the car park in question. You should wait till 7 June before filing your WS - as a Litigant-in-Person you wont't be penalised for being a day late - to see if MET's WS turns up.  It will also give you a chance to see if they have paid the hearing fee.  If it doesn't turn up you can attack them for defying court directions.  If it does turn up you can ridicule their arguments.  Win win. Also you can see if they have bottled it - which they have done with the last two cases we have here. I think the exact points of your WS have become a tad confusing - and I have heartily contributed to the confusion! - so can you please add the latest version.
    • Thank you Dave for jumping in yesterday and advising not to send off the letter I wrote. I am sorry Clou but I thought at the time that both car parks were owned by Alliance. Before doing a snotty letter does anyone in your family able to alos drive your car apart from yourself and are you the keeper?
    • Thanks for this. UPS never said they delivered to the wrong address. Tracking just showed as delivered. EBay couldn’t find it for weeks and then said they found it and it had chocolate in it. Something clearly doesn’t add up here.
    • Try to think things through logically & legally - the two go together as the civil court system in England is pretty decent and easy to get your head round. 1.  Say you & I got into legal dispute.  Who could sue who?  Well I could sue you and you could sue me.  My next-door neighbour couldn't sue you and your best mate couldn't sue me because the case would have nowt to do with them.  The same goes for a DCA.  It's not their debt.  They can do nothing. 2.  Of course a DCA can't affect your credit score.  If they could, then there would be nothing stopping you picking on someone you dislike, saying they owed you a billion pounds, and affecting their credit score.  Logically there must be more to it than some daft allegation.  CCJs are issued and credit scores wrecked after a judge has decided on the matter and the losing party has still refused to pay.  With nine grand in play the matter will not magically go away but you need to gen up and seperate daft threats from paper tigers from concrete threats which could really cause you trouble. The others are right - you need to inform the original creditor of your address in order to avoid a backdoor CCJ. Also, why did you decide not to sue UPS who have admitted to delivering to the wrong address which in turn led to the theft of your goods?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

OH HSBC credit card debt


benjibutton
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4047 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I just sign mine now with a squigle if it turns up on your agreement then write to them and state that is my computer generated signuture the laws doesnt state that i have to hand sign it and tell them this will now be passed on as fraud

Regards DK

Please Tip My Scales if Info was Use full

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 223
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

As I understand it, the reason why it is not a good idea to sign a CCA letter (or any other letter) to a DCA is in case they try to use that signature to fraudulently create a CCA agreement that appears to be genuine, because it bears your signature.

 

Is it worth giving a DCA some rope to hang themselves with, by getting someone else to sign the letter in your name. Then, if an agreement miraculously appears, with this signature on, you can prove that they have acted fraudulently, and they would presumably be deep in the brown stuff. Only possible problem I can see is that if I have knowongly agreed to let someone else sign the letter to the DCA in my name, have I also acted fraudulently? Any suggestions?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do like i said do a computer generated one that way you cannot get done for fraud. Has it is my signuture on all out going letters i send and i always use this do to todays incraese in fraud courts will also see it that way

only time i use my pen to sign is a chq

Regards DK

PS knowhere in law does it state you have to use a pen

all the DCA letters a standard PC Signed

Please Tip My Scales if Info was Use full

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rory, I was under the impression that if the company in my case M n S does not give me a valid cca I would then 1. stop making any payments, which would make them start to send me threatening letters and to get the whole debt written off I would have to take it to court stage as in the unfair bank charges? is that incorrect?? skeggsy

muffintop

Won Nationwide £900 and £1908 Bank Charges

Lloyds personal account 1,861

Lloyds Bus Account 2k

Abbey bank acc. Stayed 2008

 

CCA requested Barclaycard Nov 08 - n1 issued - GAVE UP

CCA Mbna Nov 08- n1 issued - GAVE UP

Marks and Spencer Money Nov 08 -lost found 2b enforceable.

Tomson Holiday - WON

 

if I help you tip my little scales it gives me a thrill. MT

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I understand it, the reason why it is not a good idea to sign a CCA letter (or any other letter) to a DCA is in case they try to use that signature to fraudulently create a CCA agreement that appears to be genuine, because it bears your signature.

 

Is it worth giving a DCA some rope to hang themselves with, by getting someone else to sign the letter in your name. Then, if an agreement miraculously appears, with this signature on, you can prove that they have acted fraudulently, and they would presumably be deep in the brown stuff. Only possible problem I can see is that if I have knowongly agreed to let someone else sign the letter to the DCA in my name, have I also acted fraudulently? Any suggestions?

 

If a company decides to fraudulently impose your signature and you have provided a false signature by getting someone else to sign it, this would contaminate any criminal offences of deception in court and perhaps weaken or discredit the case, I would suggest just acting whiter than white and if they want to hang themselves they will get caught out, expecially if you do what is recommended on this thread about how to provide a valid signature.. skeggsy

muffintop

Won Nationwide £900 and £1908 Bank Charges

Lloyds personal account 1,861

Lloyds Bus Account 2k

Abbey bank acc. Stayed 2008

 

CCA requested Barclaycard Nov 08 - n1 issued - GAVE UP

CCA Mbna Nov 08- n1 issued - GAVE UP

Marks and Spencer Money Nov 08 -lost found 2b enforceable.

Tomson Holiday - WON

 

if I help you tip my little scales it gives me a thrill. MT

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you really want to sign it draw a couple of wavy lines, then sign over them, take a photocopy and keep it for proof, if that sig then appears on any other document you can prove its fraudulent.

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

and to get the whole debt written off I would have to take it to court stage as in the unfair bank charges? is that incorrect??

I've answered on your thread skeggsy.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Haha 1

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Just had a response from HSBC regarding CCA request Credit card debt 10k.

They have sent back ,within time limit which expires on 4/12/08, the following:

1,Photocopy of Midland Access/Visa T & C with MASS handwritten on front cover

2.Photocopy of HSBC booklet Important changes to your credit card agreement with section 8 Variations- highlighted

3. Credit Card Agreement Terms booklet

4.Photocopy of agreement signature form ( blank)

Plus yet again, they have returned our £1.00 postal order.

Nowhere have they produced an original document or signature.

Questions are -

What action next?

Do we have to wait for 4/12 deadline?

Are we winning?

ps Original credit limit was £350.00 then on resign to gold card was £3000.00

Thanks guys Do appreciate your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them this,

 

I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY DEBT TO YOUR COMPANY

 

 

Your ref: XXX

 

Re; your recent reply to my request under section 77-79 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

I note that you have replied to the above by sending your companies current Terms and conditions I must inform you that this is not sufficient to comply with the request and that your company is still in default under the act.

 

To clarify, just sending the Terms and Conditions is a breach of the Act and Regulations as, apart from the information that the Regulations provide that you may exclude, the copy must be a “true copy” of the agreement.

 

This breach of the agreement can be demonstrated as follows;

As you will know section 180(1) (b) authorises, “the omission from a copy of certain material from the original, or the inclusion of certain material in condensed form.” This refers to statutory instruments made under the heading Copies of document regulations and in this care in particular to SI 1983/1557.

 

Before leaving section 180 there are two other sections that should be remembered these are:

 

Section 2(2) (a) A duty imposed by any provision of this Act (except section 35) to supply a copy of any document is not satisfied unless the copy supplied is in the prescribed form and conforms to the prescribed requirements;

 

And more importantly

 

Section 2(b) A duty imposed by any provision of this Act (except section 35) to supply a copy of any document is not infringed by the omission of any material, or its inclusion in condensed form, if that is authorised by regulations.

 

You will see that this quite clearly states that whilst certain items may be left out of the copy document the rest of the document must be in the form and contain all items as prescribed by the regulations.

 

Turning to the regulations regarding what may be omitted from these copies these are contained with SI 1983/1557.

 

The regulations state:

(2) There may be omitted from any such copy-

(a) any information included in an executed agreement, security instrument or other document relating to the debtor, hirer or surety or included for the use of the creditor or owner only which is not required to be included therein by the Act or any Regulations thereunder as to the form and content of the document of which it is a copy;

(b) any signature box, signature or date of signature (other than, in the case of a copy of a cancelable executed agreement delivered to the debtor under section 63(1) of the Act, the date of signature by the debtor of an agreement to which section 68(b) of the Act applies);

 

It is quite clear what can be omitted from the copy document, this again asserts that all other details of the agreement should presented in form and content as required by the regulations.

 

The requirements of the Agreement regulations 1983/1553 are very explicit in describing the form and content of an agreement and this as I have demonstrated also applies to the copy of any such agreement with the above mentioned proviso.

 

Nowhere within these regulations does it state that part of the agreement can be presented on a separate document headed terms and conditions.

It does state that all terms and conditions should be within the agreement document and is explicit of the form in which it is presented.

 

I hope this explains why your reply was unacceptable I await a True copy of my agreement and would remind you again that whilst the request has not been complied with the default continues

 

Yours faithfully

__________________

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

There will be others on here in a better position to confirm this, but but IMO they cant avoid the commitment by sending you your PO back, no way! Looks to me more like a case of they can't / won't be able to find the original. What they do with your pound is up to them, but they have no choice in the matter of letting you have the info you've requested....or face the consequences of dealing with someone who knows their rights

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the letter advice creditcardmug. Very strange they keep returning the £1.00 postal order. Any thoughts from anyone? Is this a way of avoiding commitment to the default?

 

That's a smoke screen to give you the (wrong) impression that somehow they are not obliged to give you this information or to make you believe that if you re-sent them the pound the 12+2 time limit would start again. More fool them if they don't want your pound.

Link to post
Share on other sites

benjibiutton i have sent a cca request for my partner what happens next sorry to bother you but we are very worried , they keep calling her work and harrassing her for the full amount which we cannot afford thanks in advance

 

No matter where she receives the phone call she should just say she wants all communication in writing only and hang up. There is a letter in the templates section requesting no further phone calls and all correspondence to be in writing only.

 

If you have sent the CCA just sit back and wait now. Once they have responded then come back here for advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

dont have a new thread buttons/link on my page is it because im new ?

 

Go to the forum you want your thread in, (general debt or debt collection industry) then click on the new thread button near the top.

 

I think its because you have to make 5 posts first, but you have done that many now, so should work.

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Happy New year all

Well HSBC couldn't provide CCA -time ran out before Xmas, but they have sent same letter twice now saying we are not responding and will pass to DCA if nothing heard within 7 days, but can make them an offer. Debt 10k.We have sent dispute letter recorded delivery, responded every time, recorded and kept copies. The only contact we are refusing is by phone, and we are paying £5 per month. As debt appears unenforcable would they accept 2K ( all we can afford) or should we just ignore and wait for court etc?

 

Many Thanks

Benjibutton

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi,

As they've failed in your request to provide the CCA and you've sent the A/C in dispute letter they shouldn't be selling the debt on to anyone (but when has that ever stopped them :rolleyes:)

 

 

Any DCA that contacts you should easily be sent packing with the bemused letter but we'll deal with that should it happen.

Have you sent the telephone harassment letter?

As the debt is unenforcable (at the moment) you are well within your rights to stop paying them.

If they decide to take you to court and they don't provide the CCA then it's a complete defence.

They'd be silly to do that at the moment.

I would advise you not to speak to them on the phone unless you can record the conversation.

 

fox

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...