Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I see they're trying to round up asylum seekers and lock them up for about three months so they can be put on planes to Rwanda. I'm a bit surprised that this is legal.  
    • thought for the day "Prime ministers need a big strategy that tells you where you’re going, you need a bunch of tactics that get you there, and you need the ability to take everybody else with you."   Now I know you are all thinking 'why is the  UKs destination Rwanda ???
    • Asset Link filed for a default CCJ against me, in relation to an old Barclaycard debt which I apparently signed an agreement for back in 2000.   I did not own a Barclaycard in 2000 so I know this is not true.  The CCJ notice was sent to an old address so I did not receive it.  Years later when I found out about the CCJ when I applied for credit, I put an application in to have the CCJ set aside.   As part of the set aside case, I was asked by the judge to provide a draft defence, should the CCJ be set aside.   The defence I provided was that I did not admit to the debt as I had not been provided with any evidence of an original loan agreement.   I won the case and the CCJ was set aside.   Link then filed to court again to make me pay the debt.   We both filed directions questionnaires and the judge allocated the claim to the small claims track.   As part of the directions, additional directions given were as follows ' Additional Directions in a claim for an Assigned Debt - Because the claim is in respect of an assigned debt the Court makes the following directions for the management of claim.  The claim shall be automatically struck out at 4pm on 3 April 2024 unless, before that time, the Claimant delivers to the Court and to the Defendant the following documents'  It then listed various documents such as an original agreement, deed of assignment, notice of default, statement of account setting out how the alleged debt accrued under that agreement etc.     The Claimant failed to provide these documents within the deadline provided and instead I received a copy of a bundle of documents provided by them in preparation for the court date, this was received weeks after the deadline.    I have called the Court to ask if it has been automatically struck out and they advised that it is not automatic and that I should still send my witness statement by the deadline provided, which is Wednesday.  This does not give me much time to prepare my witness statement.   I have never done anything like this before and I am unclear what my witness statement should include.  My thoughts were that I should keep it simple and stick to the facts, like the fact thy have not provided evidence of the original agreement, or the deed of assignment of the debt.   They have provided a copy of a default notice from Baclaycard dated 2015, this states a figure of £550 but the debt they say I owe is £10k.   I am not sure what makes a valid default notice?   I have previously requested proof of the debt from Barclaycard directly and have evidence of emails between us where they have been unable to provide me with the agreement or any documents at all relating to the debt.   Should I include these as an appendix?  Are there any other documents I should include in my bundle?    I have also tried to mediate with the claimants, to save the court costs and time, on a without prejudice basis, but the claimants solicitors refused to mediate.   Should i state this in my witness statement too to show the judge that I have been reasonable and they haven't? Many thanks   Louise
    • Right that's exactly why so many drivers got caught, it had been that way for many years then suddenly changes with no warning
    • The hearing is 25th June, I have downloaded items to different organisations previously but they do it a simple way and I just cross out private things with a felt tip and sent to an email address.  I have looked at the instructions for CAG it seems extremely complicated especially this about having to use a system MSPAINT.EXE that removes your personal information. I am hoping one of my Grandchildren understands things to give me help, I have shown one of my daughters she said she does not understand the instructions. I have a PC and I mainly use a lap top, as previously advised I only understand the straightforward things, sending an email and using my scanner to send a document that I save in a file or send it to an email. I will try and find someone to help me, thanks for your help you have given me so far appreciate it        
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

The Stay - Here is the application grounds for the removal of the stay


BankFodder
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5671 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys

 

Im about to apply for a lift on the blanket stay my local court seems to have put up, waiting for the OFT outcome.

 

Should i still include the OFT case and POC in my whitness statement in light of the recent statements they have made regarding comprimising with the banks etc ?

 

Cheers

 

A

Link to post
Share on other sites

My case was stayed and I wrote to the District Judge and he has agreed that there will be a hearing on 21st Sept to decide whether or not my case should be heard. Not sure if my bank will send a representative. Now I have all the additional work to prepare for this! Take time off etc.

 

I will argue the points in the application, and that the delay is causing hardship and further charges, contarary to the FSA agreement.

 

Any others got any ideas for how I should persuade the District Judge to let this case go to trial before the test case is heard?

 

I will also ask him to make the bank stop penalising me until the test case, as I have been prevented from making a claim, but the bank has NOT been prevented form charging me!

 

Please give me some arguments. I really cannot afford to wait until the test case is resolved. I am also argung that my case should not be stayed as my business revenues are paid into this bank account, and business accounts are not covered by the Unfair Terms In Consumer Contract Regulations. The main issue to be dealt with in the test case.

 

Thanks

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I went to court today to have my application to have my stay set-aside. The bank sent a barrister. My application was copied from above, and I tried to argue a few extra points.

 

The case was listed for only 5 minutes so the whole affair was rather rushed. Thats and hourly rate of £2880 as my case has cost £240 in court fees so far! The District District Judge quickly told me that all my points had been considered and rejected in a case in the Mercantile Court Carlyle v Clydesdale Bank or similar. I cannot find this case. Does anyone have a link to it please so I can see if all my arguments were indeed rejected in that case? I wish I had known about this case before it was thrown at me in court. No time to read it obviously.

 

I argued that my account is de facto a business account and not covered by UCCTR (the issue to be determined in the test case), although it is a normal account which I pay business revenue into and out of. This is the only argument which the DJ was interested in hearing further argument on, and the hearing to set-aside the stay has been adjourned. But the bank's barrister tried to convince the DJ that I was a vexatious litigant! and I have been put on notice that I could be liable for all costs if I proceed and fail.

 

Any help much needed and appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

MartyR, did you know that a number of banks (I think it's three so far) have written to the courts requesting that their applications for stays be withdrawn? The reason given is that it has been drawn to their attention that business claims are not covered by the test case and therefore the waiver.

 

Something your judge could do with knowing about.

 

There is some unease and doubt about the banks' motives for doing this, but if you want your claim to proceed, it might well help you.

 

Els

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have asked about the carlisle v clydesdale case (merchantile 29th Aug)as well as it was quoted on an A&L case in writing on an order refusing lifting of a stay on A&L - but still dont know why this case in particular is so important?

 

jan

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

For anyone considering applying for a removal of stay can I suggest that you read about my experiences (along with the RBS' defence) in http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/cases-stayed-pending-oft/114983-hamster-application-removal-stay.html

 

 

Though a brief synopsis would be:

  1. Judge was reluctant due to no previous experience of others managing to remove this stay.
  2. Human Rights is not an issue as "reasonable time" can be acceptable up to 7.5 years.
  3. To remove the stay one must show how your case is sufficiently different from everyone else's
  4. If going for "financial hardship" then you must demonstrate how it will directly effect you. The response to my submission was "you're refusing to pay the charges anyway so they aren't causing you financial hardship" The fact I was paying interest on the charges and not claiming it fell on deaf ears.
  5. If going for "health reasons" then you need to show exactly how the stay will have an effect on your health. Stress is not a factor as "well you started the case didn't you?" was the response I got from the judge.
  6. "There's a bias in the status quo". The bank will argue that the status quo remains the same in that they were able to charge per T&C before the stay so they should be able to charge during the stay.

Basically it seems, at least in my case, that this is such an important case that DJs aren't going to want to stick their heads over the parapet. As such you will need an exceptionally strong case, e.g. terminal illness or somesuch.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Such bad luck Kurt Hamster you must be so angry and gutted.

 

Check out caro's new thread in the Bank Templates Library,

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/115023-application-removal-stay-grounds.html

 

Night Owl

Keep up the fight against Bank Charges.

 

 

Got Debt problems?

Don't panic, put the kettle on and read this

 

:-) Everything I write comes from my heart and head! The large filling cabinet that is my knowledge of life, however warped that may be!! :-)

 

<<< Please tickle my star!! if I have managed to help you or just made you chuckle!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Guest donna4473

I Had A Court Date For The 28th Sept Against The Abbey, They Applied For A Stay Which Was Given, Can I Still Apply For The Stay To Be Lifted Even Though It Is Now November Or Have I Left It To Late? Any One Won Against Abbey In Milton Keynes Court?

date For 28th Sept Against The Abbeyi Had A Cour

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I had a court date for Septemberbut it was stayed 2 days before.

 

I am currently off work mid August until current and am now down to statutory sick pay.

 

I have written to Hereford Court asking for a stay removal hoping to sneak (stupid!) around having to fill nout anothewr form and pay more money. The court have asked that I actually do fill out and pay more (!!)

 

My question

1) It would be unlikely that my case would be heard until January, with the OFT case being on the 24 Jan is it worth going ahead when the oft case is so close?

 

2) being on ssp am i some how entitled to not pay the court fee??

 

any help would be fab!

Link to post
Share on other sites

1) It would be unlikely that my case would be heard until January, with the OFT case being on the 24 Jan is it worth going ahead when the oft case is so close?

 

2) being on ssp am i some how entitled to not pay the court fee??

 

 

Hi ol34.

 

1. Well, don't expect a categorical result from the OFT case in January. It could drag on for months.

 

2. See here for details of exemption/remission from court fees.

 

Also read here to see if you have sufficient grounds for applying for a lift in the stay.

 

Els

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

Your best chance now of getting the stay rejected would be if you could demonstrate hardship, but it would need to be a strong case. Did you have to pay fees to file your claim with the court or were you exempt from them?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...