Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
    • he Fraser group own Robin park in Wigan. The CEO's email  is  [email protected]
    • Yes, it was, but in practice we've found time after time that judges will not rule against PPCs solely on the lack of PP.  They should - but they don't.  We include illegal signage in WSs, but more as a tactic to show the PPC up as spvis rather than in the hope that the judge will act on that one point alone. But sue them for what?  They haven't really done much apart from sending you stupid letters. Breach of GDPR?  It could be argued they knew you had Supremacy of Contact but it's a a long shot. Trespass to your vehicle?  I know someone on the Parking Prankster blog did that but it's one case out of thousands. Surely best to defy them and put the onus on them to sue you.  Make them carry the risk.  And if they finally do - smash them. If you want, I suppose you could have a laugh at the MA's expense.  Tell them about the criminality they have endorsed and give them 24 hours to have your tickets cancelled and have the signs removed - otherwise you will contact the council to start enforcement for breach of planning permission.
    • Developing computer games can be wildly expensive so some hope that AI can cut the cost.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Redetermination Hearing - Help Please


sapphire20
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5640 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone, i'm new here and am totally lost with all that is going on.

 

History - All was going really well and I had never had any problems paying back credit until the Tax Credits people made an error and told me I owed £7000 in 2002. They then stopped my tax credit (£200 per week) and sent us spiralling out of control. Our bad luck didn't stop there, my partner was then made redundant for a period of time making things even worse. We used credit cards to live, accruing debts to the tune of about £50,000.

 

Since then, we have struggled to keep our heads above water, including selling our house and buying a cheaper one, selling our cars and buying one to share etc.

 

I have since negotiated agreements with most of our creditors and we pay between £10 and £20 per month to each of them. We have been issued with 2 CCJ's however, for an egg loan of £20,00 and an Egg Credit Card debt that we were unable to maintain payments on. We now also pay £10 per month of each of those.

 

Due to bank charges and the inability to get out of our overdraft, we opened a basic bank account with another bank as the TSB were taking anything up to £350 a month in fees. Due to the time it took in swapping over to the other bank we missed 2 of the agreed payments to the creditos. Now most of them were absolutely fine about it and let us resume payments, but Phoenix Recoveries Limited (acting on behalf of Weightmans Solicitors who were dealing with Marbles Credit Card (HFC Bank)) sent out a Court Claim form. The debt is for £3,740.94 including fees now accrued. I filled in the income and expense bit and sent it off.

 

I should mention that I have 5 children ranging in ages from 17 down to 2 and I am long term incapacitated so can't work.

 

The judgment for claimant then came back saying I had to pay £330.80 a month back to them. I was then sent into ablind panic as there is absolutely no way on earth I can afford that. We barel;y have enough to feed us some months and rely on my Mum to buy shopping sometimes!

 

I rang the court and asked what to do next and he told me to send a letter in asking for a Redermination, which I did.

 

I now have a date of 2nd October and a time of 10.30 in my local County Court.

 

After all that ramble, the question I am asking is what do I do now? And also what to expect and does anyone know the likely outcome? Do I have to take naything with me as all I have recieved is the letter with the date and time on it.

 

Oh I should also mention on the Appeal I offered to double my monthly payment to £20 per month and during all this I have still continued to pay Weightmans the £10 per month.

 

Any help would be very gratefully recieved. I have tried to deal withthings as best I can but now I feel like I am truly in over my head and just don't understand what to do.

Marbles Mastercard - HFC - Weightmans - Phoenix Recoveries - CCJ Issued 25.07.08 - Letter sent to court requesting Reconsidertion 04/08/08 - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)/CCE/CPR18 Sent 19.9.09 - Redermination Hearing 02.10.08. HELP!!

 

JJB Store Card - Creation Financial - Greenhalgh's Solicitors - Judgment for Claimant (in default) issued 14.09.08 - SAR/CCE/CPR18 sent 19.09.08.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Sapphire, The first thing to do is read as much as you can on this forum to educate yourself, plenty of people have been in your position and help can be sought on here.

With regards to Tax Credit they can’t just stop it all together no matter what you owe especially if it is their mistake, they have to claw it back at a rate that you can afford and over a long period so as not to leave you without the basic requirements.

Regarding your credit card debts make a list of who they are and how much you owe, it does not matter to us on here how much you owe that is for your benefit because the principles behind how to deal them are pretty much the same.

Redetermination? Not sure about that one I suspect there may be another plan of attack I am sure someone will advise on that.

Do not offer to pay more you can afford remember these are unsecured debts. Read as much as you can about the Consumer Credit Act I think it will help you.

Keep an eye on your thread if it starts to dissapear do not be shy in bumping it to the top there are plenty of people on here who will give you sound and advice and sincere help GOOD LUCK

Dispatch, “We have a 911, Armed Robbery in progress, see Surplus Store corner of Peebles Drive and West 24th Street”

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for replying, I really appreciate it. The Tax Credit fiasco happened in 2002, so too late now to do anything about it, but at the time they just completely stopped my payments for a year, which is when the trouble started.

 

I've had a good read on the site and realise that maybe I need to send for SAR and CCA with the company, but with the hearing being on 2nd October the 40 days time scale they have is well beyond that. I got this card in 2005 so I wondered if it would qualify for the thing i've been reading about on here where the contract is wrong? Sorry, i'm really not up to speed on a lot of this and there is so much stuff it's very confusing. (Doesn't help when you have a poorly 2yr old tugging at your arm either!!)

 

Is there anything I can do to put back the hearing so I can get these documents together first? Anyone?

 

Thanks xx

Marbles Mastercard - HFC - Weightmans - Phoenix Recoveries - CCJ Issued 25.07.08 - Letter sent to court requesting Reconsidertion 04/08/08 - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)/CCE/CPR18 Sent 19.9.09 - Redermination Hearing 02.10.08. HELP!!

 

JJB Store Card - Creation Financial - Greenhalgh's Solicitors - Judgment for Claimant (in default) issued 14.09.08 - SAR/CCE/CPR18 sent 19.09.08.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sapphire dont worry, someone will be along shortly.

Yes you should CCA them, also if they have started court proceedings, then double this up with A CPR18 request, this essentially gives you proof that you have requested info for later on. Remember that the CCA is £1. so get a postal order and DO NOT SIGN ANYTHING you send to the other side (or should that be dark side) Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Here is the CCA letter...Don't sign it and remember to take a copy of it and also send it recorded delivery...

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Re:−

 

With reference to the above agreement, I would be grateful if you would send me a copy of this credit agreement.

 

I understand that under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Sections 77−79), I am entitled to receive a copy of our credit agreement on request. I enclose a payment of £1.00 (Postal Order Number - ) which represents the fee payable under the Consumer Credit Act.

You are further notified that you are obliged to supply these documents, whether you are the original creditor or not under section 189 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

I understand a copy of our credit agreement should be supplied within 12 working days.

I understand that under the Consumer Credit Act creditors are unable to enforce an agreement if they fail to comply with a request for a copy of the agreement under these sections of the Act.

 

I look forward to hearing from you.

 

Yours faithfully

:)** Any opinion expressed by me is given with the best intentions - But I could be wrong so bear that in mind**:)

Missed Call Checker - http://whocallsme.com/Phone-Calls.aspx/077/m

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the SAR....Same things as above - don't sign etc and remember your £10 postal order for this one....

 

[your address]

 

 

 

[their address]

 

 

[DATE]

 

 

Data Protection Act 1998

Subject Access Request

 

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxx (or multiple numbers if more than one account)

 

 

Please supply me with a complete list of transactions and charges relating to my banking history with your organisation. Alternatively, a complete set of statements for that period will be acceptable.

 

Additionally, where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any member of your staff, or any other person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my banking business with you.

 

If you are unable to supply this data because there has been no such manual intervention, then please be so kind as to confirm this in your response.

 

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10. You have 40 days in which to comply. Furthermore, if I discover that you have levied disproportionate penalties against me, then I shall be reclaiming them, and also reclaiming the enclosed £10 Data Protection Act subject access request fee.

 

If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know by return. However, please note that the above address is the one which you normally use to communicate my private business to me and which you have hitherto found to be acceptable.

I would be happy to collect the Data from my local branch.

 

 

Yours faithfully,

 

:)** Any opinion expressed by me is given with the best intentions - But I could be wrong so bear that in mind**:)

Missed Call Checker - http://whocallsme.com/Phone-Calls.aspx/077/m

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you both so much.

 

Multay, those letters are fab!! I have just printed them off and they are sitting in front of me. I will post them tomorrow when the Post Office next opens and I can buy the postal orders.

 

Bazaar, what is a CPR18 request and who do I send it to? The court or Phoenix Recoveries? Will this put back the date of the hearing giving me time to get the relevant documents together?

 

So sorry for all these questions, I am a total novice at all this and to be honest I had given up hope until I found this forum! I didn't realise there was anything we could do about our debts. This has given me new hope and for the first time in years there is a light at the end of the tunnel!!

 

I have been through the awful phone harrassment thing, where we were getting 20+ calls a day from morning until night and I had a new baby at the time so it was really terrible. I just wish I had found this site then.

 

Thank you all again for helping me, I hope I can do the same for someone else when I have learned from all of you.

 

Best regards

xx

Marbles Mastercard - HFC - Weightmans - Phoenix Recoveries - CCJ Issued 25.07.08 - Letter sent to court requesting Reconsidertion 04/08/08 - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)/CCE/CPR18 Sent 19.9.09 - Redermination Hearing 02.10.08. HELP!!

 

JJB Store Card - Creation Financial - Greenhalgh's Solicitors - Judgment for Claimant (in default) issued 14.09.08 - SAR/CCE/CPR18 sent 19.09.08.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you sent them the harrasment letter?

 

I don't have it at the moment but I'll post it up tomorrow and I'll try find the CPR18 letter for you.

 

You need to send it to whomever the claimant is, not the court.

 

Bear in mind that they may ignore it though....

Edited by Multay
spelling

:)** Any opinion expressed by me is given with the best intentions - But I could be wrong so bear that in mind**:)

Missed Call Checker - http://whocallsme.com/Phone-Calls.aspx/077/m

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Saphire

Multay has it all in hand as regards letters, all you're doing at this stage is letting the other side know that you are looking into their dealings with you more deeply than they would probably like. Also, when you get to the court stage, If they don't comply with your perfectly reasonable AND legal, requests for information, you can ask the court to order them to, which will give you a little more time at least.

You are requesting the information in case they have added illegal penalties and fees, so this will give you something to counterclaim with at court, in all likelyhood, their fees add up to quite a bit, so you'd be able to negotiate a lower payment. Don't be intimidated by these people, its all a big game to them, they get paid regardless. If they can con you into paying more than you or your family can afford, they don't care. If you receive any calls, tell them in writing only, but log the times and dates, this helps the harrassment part. chin up

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again guys,

 

I found the CRP18 letter and did it to the card in question as well as to another one. Along with the CCE's and S.A.R.

 

I guess it's just sit tight now then and wait for my day in court?

 

Thanks again xxx

Marbles Mastercard - HFC - Weightmans - Phoenix Recoveries - CCJ Issued 25.07.08 - Letter sent to court requesting Reconsidertion 04/08/08 - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)/CCE/CPR18 Sent 19.9.09 - Redermination Hearing 02.10.08. HELP!!

 

JJB Store Card - Creation Financial - Greenhalgh's Solicitors - Judgment for Claimant (in default) issued 14.09.08 - SAR/CCE/CPR18 sent 19.09.08.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ps... I am still paying them both £10 per month, should I carry on or stop this?

Marbles Mastercard - HFC - Weightmans - Phoenix Recoveries - CCJ Issued 25.07.08 - Letter sent to court requesting Reconsidertion 04/08/08 - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)/CCE/CPR18 Sent 19.9.09 - Redermination Hearing 02.10.08. HELP!!

 

JJB Store Card - Creation Financial - Greenhalgh's Solicitors - Judgment for Claimant (in default) issued 14.09.08 - SAR/CCE/CPR18 sent 19.09.08.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sapphire

Well, you're not too far from a hearing, so stopping payment now, possibly wouldn't be in your favour. As long as you can afford it. You need to be seen as being as reasonable as possible, stopping 1 or 2 payments wouldn't help.

If they dont respond to your CCA request however, after 12 +2 days, you are perfectly entitled to withold payment until they do comply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it's all hitting the fan now, seems like I was too late with the other claim I mentioned. I faxed the Acknowledgement of Service back to the court but it was over the 14 days and it's too late! I've now received a Judgment for Claimant in default and have to pay £3885.21 within the month or they will come and take goods.

 

I have posted a new thread entitled No No No! with more details.

 

I'm beside myself to be honest. :(

Marbles Mastercard - HFC - Weightmans - Phoenix Recoveries - CCJ Issued 25.07.08 - Letter sent to court requesting Reconsidertion 04/08/08 - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)/CCE/CPR18 Sent 19.9.09 - Redermination Hearing 02.10.08. HELP!!

 

JJB Store Card - Creation Financial - Greenhalgh's Solicitors - Judgment for Claimant (in default) issued 14.09.08 - SAR/CCE/CPR18 sent 19.09.08.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The judgment for claimant then came back saying I had to pay £330.80 a month back to them. I was then sent into ablind panic as there is absolutely no way on earth I can afford that. We barel;y have enough to feed us some months and rely on my Mum to buy shopping sometimes!

 

I rang the court and asked what to do next and he told me to send a letter in asking for a Redermination, which I did.

 

I now have a date of 2nd October and a time of 10.30 in my local County Court.

 

 

What did you put in the original expenditure form you sent to the court - did you have a large surplus for the £330 to be determined? Why has the court date been cancelled? Can you keep your case in one thread so we know the full story.

Edited by gizmo111

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Gizmo, i've confused things a bit haven't I?

 

This thread is about one claim and the other thread is about one I didn't reply to in time. So 2 claims in total.

 

The one on this thread is dealing with HFC Bank which was a Marbles Credit Card. I returned the income and expenditure form showing a deficit, but when the court decision came back they were ordering me to pay £330 a month. I rang the court and the man I spoke to told me to put in an appeal letter and ask for a redetermination hearing. I did so, and THAT is the hearing on 2nd October.

 

I was asking for adivce re that on this thread.

 

However, since doing that I have now recieved a Judgment in Default for a store card I had for JJB Sports (Creation Financial) saying I have to pay over £3000 within a month. I've had some personal problems lately and I just ignored the court papers to be honest. Byt the time I found this forum and realised what i'd done it was too late to act on that one.

 

Am I confusing you more???

Marbles Mastercard - HFC - Weightmans - Phoenix Recoveries - CCJ Issued 25.07.08 - Letter sent to court requesting Reconsidertion 04/08/08 - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)/CCE/CPR18 Sent 19.9.09 - Redermination Hearing 02.10.08. HELP!!

 

JJB Store Card - Creation Financial - Greenhalgh's Solicitors - Judgment for Claimant (in default) issued 14.09.08 - SAR/CCE/CPR18 sent 19.09.08.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again,

 

Well I have just received this reply from Weightmans. So where to now please if anyone can help?? My court date is 2nd October, which is NEXT Thursday, so if anyone can advise me of what I do next i'd be very grateful Should I have told the court anything or do I just turn up?

 

Thanks x

 

Weightmans.jpg

Marbles Mastercard - HFC - Weightmans - Phoenix Recoveries - CCJ Issued 25.07.08 - Letter sent to court requesting Reconsidertion 04/08/08 - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)/CCE/CPR18 Sent 19.9.09 - Redermination Hearing 02.10.08. HELP!!

 

JJB Store Card - Creation Financial - Greenhalgh's Solicitors - Judgment for Claimant (in default) issued 14.09.08 - SAR/CCE/CPR18 sent 19.09.08.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ps...they don't mention anything about the redetermination hearing, is that strange? From what I understand of the letter they seem to be implying that it is all cut and dried??

 

Help please? :(

Marbles Mastercard - HFC - Weightmans - Phoenix Recoveries - CCJ Issued 25.07.08 - Letter sent to court requesting Reconsidertion 04/08/08 - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)/CCE/CPR18 Sent 19.9.09 - Redermination Hearing 02.10.08. HELP!!

 

JJB Store Card - Creation Financial - Greenhalgh's Solicitors - Judgment for Claimant (in default) issued 14.09.08 - SAR/CCE/CPR18 sent 19.09.08.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sapphire, so they've just played with words, their last paragraph states that they will get the documents. Keep the letter for redetermination, but make sure you say at court that they appear to be frustrating your attempts to obtain a true breakdown of what they originally claimed for, also, that you feel there are illegal penalties charged on the original sum, so you would,'Respectfully' ask the court to order that they provide the information requested so that you may make a counterclaim, if required. You were originally 'naive' and you were not sure what to do, but now you need the proof that there was indeed such a huge amount outstanding. You might get a telling off if you didnt originally defend this, but if the judge is reasonable, he should be on your side.

Someone with more knowledge on here, may wish to add something at this stage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your speedy response Bazaar. On further reading, I have seen several people mention something about not owing the debt to the DCA? Well this is for a Credit Card from HFC, I don't have any agreement with Phoenix Recoveries do I? How does that work?

 

D x

Marbles Mastercard - HFC - Weightmans - Phoenix Recoveries - CCJ Issued 25.07.08 - Letter sent to court requesting Reconsidertion 04/08/08 - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)/CCE/CPR18 Sent 19.9.09 - Redermination Hearing 02.10.08. HELP!!

 

JJB Store Card - Creation Financial - Greenhalgh's Solicitors - Judgment for Claimant (in default) issued 14.09.08 - SAR/CCE/CPR18 sent 19.09.08.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, they have to refer back to the original creditor in most cases, because a lot of these Debt recovery firms, buy the debts from the banks and credit card companies etc.. They mostly hope to get payments by scaring you out of your wits, or in your case, going to court and hoping you don't turn up and defend. then they get what they asked for from the court. BUT, you are now better informed by way of this site, so you WILL be fighting back won't you??

You have made perfectly legal requests for information, if they fail to produce, then they are frustrating your quest for the correct information, It is very much a big game for the DCA's. But you have a few aces on this site which will help you in the end game.. Sorry for the gambling references, but that's my vice. Chin up:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again Bazaar, i'm just panicking with the court date being next Thursday and I haven't really got a clue what to say. I like being prepared usually, but I admit to having buried my head a bit over my finances, hoping it would all go away. *sigh* Now it's payback time, in more ways than one I fear!

 

But you are right, if I can fight this then I will, but I DO need help...LOTS of help!!! :-)

Marbles Mastercard - HFC - Weightmans - Phoenix Recoveries - CCJ Issued 25.07.08 - Letter sent to court requesting Reconsidertion 04/08/08 - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)/CCE/CPR18 Sent 19.9.09 - Redermination Hearing 02.10.08. HELP!!

 

JJB Store Card - Creation Financial - Greenhalgh's Solicitors - Judgment for Claimant (in default) issued 14.09.08 - SAR/CCE/CPR18 sent 19.09.08.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again Bazaar, i'm just panicking with the court date being next Thursday and I haven't really got a clue what to say. I like being prepared usually, but I admit to having buried my head a bit over my finances, hoping it would all go away. *sigh* Now it's payback time, in more ways than one I fear!

 

But you are right, if I can fight this then I will, but I DO need help...LOTS of help!!! :-)

 

Chin up kid...you're fighting and that's all that matters...Good luck

  • Haha 1

:)** Any opinion expressed by me is given with the best intentions - But I could be wrong so bear that in mind**:)

Missed Call Checker - http://whocallsme.com/Phone-Calls.aspx/077/m

Link to post
Share on other sites

application notice

 

Hi looloo, what does this mean please?

 

Thanks D x

Marbles Mastercard - HFC - Weightmans - Phoenix Recoveries - CCJ Issued 25.07.08 - Letter sent to court requesting Reconsidertion 04/08/08 - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)/CCE/CPR18 Sent 19.9.09 - Redermination Hearing 02.10.08. HELP!!

 

JJB Store Card - Creation Financial - Greenhalgh's Solicitors - Judgment for Claimant (in default) issued 14.09.08 - SAR/CCE/CPR18 sent 19.09.08.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...