Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

OMG Connaught/First credit SD**WON-Setaside plus costs**


MONX
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5680 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HAK

 

Rec the SD mid July or thereabouts, sent CCA and SAR a couple of days later and applied to have the SD set aside a couple of days after that.

 

About two weeks after I rec the SD I got a letter from Connaught (2nd class post) saying that they were going to make me bankrupt :rolleyes: the next day I sent a snotty letter back saying I had applied to have it set aside. I got a reply one week after that (first class post) saying that they werent coming.

 

I am not giving exact dates for prudence sake, there are a lot of "guests" around if you get my drift.;)

Advice given is my opinion only, I am not a legal or financial expert (far from it).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 220
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Cheers Monx

 

Ive got a SD hearsing shortly and have not heard out from CON.

 

Maybe thay are going to come??

 

Any thought

 

HAK

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting thing despite them saying they wouldn't come I don't think they actually said they were no longer pursuing the SD did they ?

 

You'll be fine HAK....

 

Remember to quote this brilliant piece that Monx found...

 

As a lone parent (could replace with low income family here HAK !!!) with limited finances I approached a solicitor by phone and asked for an estimate on how much it would cost. I was given an estimate of 3 to 6 hours at £170 per hour to prepare the Application (£510-£1020) plus extra for attending the court.

 

I respectfully request that the court give consideration to awarding these costs on the indemnity basis or, in the alternative, on the standard basis as I believe, in any case, that they have been proportionately and reasonably incurred and/or are of a proportionate and reasonable amount.

 

In support of this request, I would also like to refer the court’s attention to the authority of the High Court in the case of:-

 

Hammonds (a firm) v Pro-Fit USA Ltd [2007] EWHC 1998 (Ch)

 

In this case, Mr Justice Warren confirmed that it was usual for an indemnity award to be made:-

 

27 So far as disputed debts are concerned, the practice of the court is not to allow the insolvency regime to be used as a method of debt collection where there is a bona fide and substantial dispute as to the debt. Save in exceptional cases, the court will dismiss a petition based on such a debt (usually with an indemnity costs order against the petitioner).

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The letter from Connaught said:

 

We write further to your Application to Set Aside a Statutory Demand dated ******.

I confirm that we have written to the court confirming that we are willing to set aside the SD and would advise you that it is not our intention to attend the hearing of the ********. You see, here I think they realised that the debt was statute barred and they wouldnt have a leg to stand on and also I dont think they thought I would fight back so I think the SD and the letter after that was just wind and bluster.

We would also inform you that our files have been closed and returned to Ist Crapit Ltd. Yellow streak a mile wide!

We would request that all future correspondence in relation to this matter be forwarded to their offices.

Firstly there was always the confusion as to who was the "creditor" or DCA here as letters were from connaught but SD from 1st crapit and although I understand they are the same company I never really got to the bottom of that one. Secondly I think that they decided not to show or defend the SD as they knew that it wouldnt stand up and not only would I win but they would have a long train journey from Reigate to Yorkshire to get there. It may just be that your hearing is nearer to them.

 

I am not sure of the details of your SD but what grounds are you having set aside on?

 

Have you had any other letters from them since the SD?

Advice given is my opinion only, I am not a legal or financial expert (far from it).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, costs have not turned up so far - the judge ordered that they pay me by 22nd which means that if they had any intention of paying me I would have recieved the cheque today at the latest.

 

Anyone have any suggestions as to what I do next.

 

I was thinking of letting the judge know on Monday but not sure how to go about it - do you think I should send a letter to First Crapit and send a copy to the judge?

Advice given is my opinion only, I am not a legal or financial expert (far from it).

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would love to be a fly on the wall when a court baillif turns up to collect payment!

 

You know what they say....payback is a bitxh!:D

Advice given is my opinion only, I am not a legal or financial expert (far from it).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Really

 

OMG! do you have a link to the thread, I am obviously going to have to bone up on this one if this is how they are going to play?

Advice given is my opinion only, I am not a legal or financial expert (far from it).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear All,

 

first of all I am technophbe so sorry if I am posting out of turn and also this is my first post.

 

I have just received an SD this morning from 1st Credit, and I have absolutely not a clue what it means or what to do so any advice would be most grateful.

 

I am in a DMP with Harrington Brooks, and so far it has been working out - I owe a lot of money to a lot of people due to a massive change in circumstance.

 

Anyway, up until now HB have been handling everything for me, but this letter has blown me of course.

 

Reading the forum in panic this morning, I seem to perhaps come to little to late. I have however just sent off for a copy of my CCA this morning but fear this will not stall or doing anything to remedy my situation.

 

has any one got any helpful advice or suggestions?

 

I will send the letter to HB, but I would rather be in control of this myself.

 

Many thanks and sorry for the in correct post.

 

if anyone wants to e-mail please do so as I am not really a whizz at this site (which is excellent)

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK

 

Firstly you need set up your own thread so people can follow your claim/case from start to finish and also no one's circumstances are the same so in order for people to help you they need to post on your thread.

 

 

Copy your post and go back to the Debt collection forum thread, at the top and bottom of the list of threads is a "post a new thread" button if press this which will open a new box and paste your post, You need to start the post with a heading for example "c4currenc v first credit stat demand"

 

Hope this helps!

Advice given is my opinion only, I am not a legal or financial expert (far from it).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I think you're right CCM but it's worth it to have court bailiffs attend a DCA for non-payment and it's added to the bill so you get it back ;)

 

Absolutely!!.. and i cant wait to hear the details when it happens:evil:

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

but you have to wait till after your post has been monday as they may have posted it either yesterday or today.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could of course send them threatening letters stating things like CCJ's, bailiffs, attachment of earnings....etc....or write to them stating for every letter you have to write to them you are charging them an extra £25

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...