Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Speaking of the reformatory boys, here they are with all of their supporters, some of whom traveled with them from miles away, all carefully crammed together and photographed to look like there were more than about 80 .. rather like Farages last rally with even fewer people crammed around what looked like an ice cream van or mobile tea bar ... Although a number in the crowd apparently thought they were at a vintage car rally as they appeared to be chanting 'crank-her'. A vintage Bentley must be out of view.   Is this all there is? Its less than the Tory candidate. - shut up and smile while they get a camera angle that looks better
    • in order for us to help you we require the following information:- Which Court have you received the claim from ? Canterbury If possible please scan redact and upload a full page copy of page 1 of the claim form. ( Name of the Claimant ? Moneybarn No 1   How many defendant's  joint or self ? One Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. 29/05/24 Acknowledged by 14/06/24  Defence by 29/06/24  Particulars of Claim PARTICULARS OF CLAIM   1.  By a Conditional Sale Agreement in writing made on 25th August 2022. Between the Claimant and Defendant, the Claimant let to the Defendant on Conditional Sale. A Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi (200 P S) 4x4 Wildtrack  Double Cab Pickup 3200cc (Sep.2015) Registration No, ******* Chassis number ***************** (“The Vehicle”).  A copy of the agreement is attached   2.  The price of the goods was £15,995.00.  The Initial Rental was £8500.00.  The total charge for credit was £3575.;17 And the balance of £11,070.17 was payable by 59 equal consecutive monthly instalments of £187 63. payable on the 25th of each month.   3.  The following were expressed conditions of the set agreement,   Clause 8: Our Right to End this Agreement  8.1   Subject to sending you the notice as required by law, any of the following events will entitle us to end this Agreement: 8.1.2  You fail to pay the advance payment (if any) or any of the payments as specified on the front page of this agreement or any other sum payable under this Agreement. 8.1.3 If any of the information you have given us before entering into this Agreement or during the term of this Agreement was false 8.1.4 We consider, acting reasonably, that the goods may be in jeopardy or that our rights in the goods may otherwise be prejudiced. 8.1.5 If you die 8.1.6 If a bankruptcy petition is presented against you; if you petition for your own bankruptcy, or make a live arrangement with your creditors or call a meeting of them. 8. 1.7 If in Scotland, you become insolvent or sequestration or a receiver, judicial factor or trustee to be appointed over any of your estate, or effects or suffer an arrestment, charge attachment or other diligence to be issued or levied on any of your estate or effects or suffer any exercise, or threatened exercise of landlords hype hypothec 8.1.8 If you are a partnership, you are dissolved 8.1.9 If the goods are destroyed, lost, stolen and/or treated by the insurer as a total loss in response to an insurance claim. 8.1.10 If we reasonably believe any payment made to us in respect of this Agreement is a proceed of crime. 8.1.11 If steps are taken by us to terminate any other agreement which you have entered into with us.   Clause 9.  Effect of Us Terminating Agreement   9.1 If this Agreement terminates under clause 8 the following will apply 9.1.1 Subject to the rights given to you by law, you will no longer be entitled to possession of the goods and must return them to us to an address as we may reasonably specify, (removing or commencing the removal of any cherished plates) together with a V5 registration certificate, both sets of keys and a service record book. If you are unable or unwilling to return the goods to us then we shall collect the goods and we'll charge you in accordance with clause 10.3 9.1.2 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you for all payments and all other sums do under this agreement at the date of termination 9.1.3 We will sell the goods or public sale at the earliest opportunity once the goods are in a reasonable condition which includes a return of the items listed in clause 7.1.4 9.1.4 We will be entitled to immediate payment from you of the rest of the Total Amount Payable under this agreement less: ( a) A rebate for early settlement ias required by law which will be calculated and notified to you at the time of payment (b) The proceeds of sale of the goods (if any) after deduction of all costs associated with finding you and/or the goods, recovery, refurbishment and repair. Insurance, storage, sale, agents fees, cherished plate removal, replacement keys, costs associated with obtaining service history for the goods and in relation to obtaining a duplicate V5 registration certificate   4, The following are particulars required by Civil Procedure Rules. Rule 7.9 as set out in 7.1 and 7.2 of the associated Practice Direction entitled Hire Purchase Claims:-   a)     The agreement is dated 25 August 2022. And is between Moneybarn No1 Limited  and xxxxxxxxx under agreement number 756050. b)    The claimant was one of the original parties to the agreement. c)    The agreement is regulated under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. d)    The goods claimed Ford Ranger 3.2 TDCi ( 200 PS) 4x4 Wildtrack Double Cab Pickup 3200 cc (Sep2015} Registration No ^^^^^^^ Chassis number ***************** e)     Thw total price of the goods £19570 f)     The paid up sum £1206 5 g)    The unpaid balance of the total price £7505 (to include charges) h)    A default notice was sent to the defendant on 20th February 2024 by Firrst class post i)      The date when the right to demand delivery of the goods accrued 14 March 2024 j)      The amount if any claimed as an alternative to delivery of the goods 7505 22 include charges ]= 5.  A the date of service of the notice the instalments were £562.89 in arrears. 6. By reason of the Termination of the Agreement by the notice, defendant became liable to pay the sum of £7502 7. The date of maturity the agreement is 24th August 2027. 8. Further or  alternative by reasons of  the Defendant breaches of the agreement by failing to pay the said instalments, the Defendant evinced an intention no longer to be bound by the Agreement and repudiated it by the said Notice the claimant accepted that repudiation 9. By reason of such repudiation the claimant has suffered loss and damage.   Total amount payable £19570 Less sum paid or in arrears by the date of repudiation £12064 97 Balance £7505 (to include charges.) ( The claimant will give credit if necessary for the value of the vehicle if recovered.)  The claimant therefore claims 1.    An order for delivery up of the vehicle 2.    The MoneyClaim to be adjourned generally with liberty to restore,  Upon restoration of the MoneyClaim following return or loss of the vehicle. the Claimant will ensure the pre action protocol for debt claims is followed. 3.    Pursuant to s 90 (1)  of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. An order that the Claimant and/or its agents may enter any premises in which the vehicle is situated in order to recover the vehicle should it not be returned by the Defendant 4.    further or alternatively damages 5.    costs.   Statement of truth The Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true. The Claimant understands that the proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes or causes to be made a false statement in the document for verified by statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth. I am duly Authorised by the Claimant to sign these Particulars of Claim signed Dated 17th of April 2024   What is the total value of the claim? 7502   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? No   Never heard of this   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? n/a Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? No   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After  Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? In a garage  Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes  Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. Original Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? n/a   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? They said sent but nor received   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? None seen   Why did you cease payments? Still Paying,   What was the date of your last payment? Yesterday  31st May 2024   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? Yes on 12 Feb 2024   What you need to do now.   Can't scan, will do via another means as you cant have jpg
    • Now that is an interesting article which adds afew perspective that I hadn't thought significant - but on reflection of the perspectives offered ... Now Starmer is no Blair, however 'blairite he may be perceived, but the Tories aren't tories and aren't even remotely liberal   The fast 'unannounced and unexpected election call from sunack may well be explained by the opinion linked that he hoped reform would be unprepared and effectively call a chunk of Farages largely empty bluster - making him look even more of a prat, leave scope for attacks on shabby reform candidates and mimimise core vote losses to reform - while throwing the 'middle ground' (relative) tories TO THE DOGS - and with the added bonus of likely pacifying his missu' desire to jogg off to sunny cal tout suite somewhat   thumb in the air - I expect about 140ish tory seats, but can hope for under a hundred Reform - got to admit the outside possibility of 1, maybe 2 seats with about 8% of the vote - but unlikely. I think projections of over 10% of the vote for reform is nudged and paid for speculation - but possible with the expected massive drives from Russian, Chinese and far right social media bot and troll prods targeting the gullible.
    • Commentary June 2024 WWW.ELECTORALCALCULUS.CO.UK Interesting article about just how bad it could be for the Tories.  Also Tories could be hoping on Reform not having candidates in many seats, as they were not ready.  
    • Even a Piers Morgan is an improvement and a gutless Farage Piers Morgan calls for second Brexit referendum WWW.THELONDONECONOMIC.COM Piers Morgan and Nigel Farage have faced off over Brexit and a second referendum in a heated reunion on BBC Question Time.   “Why don’t we have another referendum about Brexit?” he questioned. “I seem to remember when 2016 came around we were told there was going to be control of our borders and it was going to be economically beneficial to this country. And eight years later we have lost complete control of our borders… and economically it seems to have been a wilful act of self-harm.”   ... Piers missed off : after all somebody said a 48/52 decision would be "unfinished business" by a long way - was that person just bul lying (again)  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

A complicated marital issue (not mine)... your opinions would be appreciated...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5358 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just digressing for a moment

How many of you know, that even after marital assets have been divided, and the wife/husband has kept the marital home, that there is nothing to stop the other ex-partner coming back in say 5, 10 or even 20 years time and successfully suing the one with the home for half of the difference in value from the date of the decree absolute to the time of the writ?

I had a very spiteful ex wife who tried everything to get me to sell the house, even though the kids stayed with me and didnt want to be anywhere near her. Luckily, I had a very astute solicitor who took a personal dislike to her after she sent him a few threatening letters too ( best thing she did for me).

After a year of her kicking and screaming, and thanks to my solicitor and my kids staying with me, she had to walk away with next to nothing.

But out of all this, and through my solicitor, I discovered the "Clean Break Order" - stamped by the court at the time of divorce once signed by both parties.

This is the only remedy a divorcee has to stop a bitter ex coming back in the future and hitting you once more!

 

And how did I get a woman like this to sign the Order? Now that really is another story, but the old saying applies - Give someone enough rope...............

 

Your ex partner didn't come back for more if at your divorce it was agreed that she had 50%. If so any increase in value until sold 50% was hers by agreement

Link to post
Share on other sites

A small but significant update (I hope) Lula. My friend spoke to a solicitor on the 'phone a few days ago. This was the one her father used when he was alive and although he's not a family law solicitor, she trusts him and is comfortable talking to him and, he's in touch with people who are family law specialists.....

 

One of the reasons for the 'phone call to him was because her husband upped the threats last weekend and gave her 7 days to arrange the £20K payment to himself or he would go back to his own solicitor and take her to court for it, half the equity in the house and his costs (apparently).:mad:

 

Anyway... she explained the situation to her (deceased) father's solicitor and not surprisingly, he advised her not to pay him a penny... that he was being very greedy and to wait for him to strike first through his own solicitor before doing anything for the moment. He also said that no solicitor would tell him that he's entitled to what he's claiming and thinks that he must have been very economical with the truth to come away with this information. He also knows the solicitor.... and it just didn't ring true that he would say that.

 

I have just seen her this evening... her husband popped round to "babysit" the twins while she came out for a bit. He mentioned it again before she went out and now, she has to decide whether to tell him she doesn't need 7 days because she's already made her decision (not to pay him anything) or, to wait until the 7 days are up and then she'll have to tell him....

 

I'll keep you posted and thank you for asking after her... :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

A small but significant update (I hope) Lula. My friend spoke to a solicitor on the 'phone a few days ago. This was the one her father used when he was alive and although he's not a family law solicitor, she trusts him and is comfortable talking to him and, he's in touch with people who are family law specialists.....

 

One of the reasons for the 'phone call to him was because her husband upped the threats last weekend and gave her 7 days to arrange the £20K payment to himself or he would go back to his own solicitor and take her to court for it, half the equity in the house and his costs (apparently).:mad:

 

Anyway... she explained the situation to her (deceased) father's solicitor and not surprisingly, he advised her not to pay him a penny... that he was being very greedy and to wait for him to strike first through his own solicitor before doing anything for the moment. He also said that no solicitor would tell him that he's entitled to what he's claiming and thinks that he must have been very economical with the truth to come away with this information. He also knows the solicitor.... and it just didn't ring true that he would say that.

 

I have just seen her this evening... her husband popped round to "babysit" the twins while she came out for a bit. He mentioned it again before she went out and now, she has to decide whether to tell him she doesn't need 7 days because she's already made her decision (not to pay him anything) or, to wait until the 7 days are up and then she'll have to tell him....

 

I'll keep you posted and thank you for asking after her... :)

 

 

From reading this thread, I'd be prepared to guess that he may get even more threatening and nasty when she refuses.

 

I would seriously recommend contacting her deceased father's Solicitor and getting a recommendation for a good family lawyer to deal with this matter. A restraining order against the w**ker [as you justly call it] would work wonders for her in the future, me thinks!

 

CAG is an excellent group and support network, but despite the mass amount of knowledge, I don't think any of us are fully qualified or have any experience in such complex matters - thankfully. I would therefore recommend that she retains a Solicitor forthwith and without delay as she may get more trouble by delaying. Always better to err on the side of caution.

 

I know that it will be costly, but it could save her a substantial amount of aggravation, stress, hassle and funds in the future. In addition this could scare it, if a letter from a Solicitor arrived stating clearly that if it communicates with her again, a restraining order will be applied for [or that they are in the process of doing so] and that all further communication must be to him [the Solicitor].

 

I must recommend that she errs on the side of caution and involves a very good family lawyer at this stage. I also think that considering her age - as another poster rightly stated - she may likely want to enter into a new relationship in the future, therefore it is best to be rid of it as soon as physically possible. I would therefore recommend getting rid of it NOW.

 

Keep us posted please. Good luck and best wishes to your friend. I know the problems caused by disabilities first hand, and can only start to imagine how hard it is to take care of a disabled child, especially with another developmentally slow child of the same such young age.

 

legalpickle

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

:!: All the information I impart is my advice based on my experience. It does not constitute professional advice. If in doubt, always consult with a professional. :!:

 

:-) If you feel my post has been helpful, please click my scales. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I reckon she should just bide her time and not give in to his bullying and mind games, also, when he is in the house alone with the children, call me an terribly suspicious person, but I would hope that all her financial details and cards, cheque books etc, are safely well out of reach :-)

 

I wish her well

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I reckon she should just bide her time and not give in to his bullying and mind games, also, when he is in the house alone with the children, call me an terribly suspicious person, but I would hope that all her financial details and cards, cheque books etc, are safely well out of reach :-)

 

I wish her well

 

 

I would echo the suspicions of Lula! I would go as far as keeping this by somebody else!

 

I disagree on biding her time, as it is obviously causing her a lot of anguish and it is getting more and more desperate. If it isn't put into his place, who knows what it is capable of. I would recommend getting it put into it's place ASAP to prevent any further problems. Always better to err on the side of caution.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

:!: All the information I impart is my advice based on my experience. It does not constitute professional advice. If in doubt, always consult with a professional. :!:

 

:-) If you feel my post has been helpful, please click my scales. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I reckon she should just bide her time and not give in to his bullying and mind games, also, when he is in the house alone with the children, call me an terribly suspicious person, but I would hope that all her financial details and cards, cheque books etc, are safely well out of reach :-)

 

I wish her well

 

She is getting stronger over this, but the loss of both parents keeps reminding her that she's all alone in the world now as far as family goes.... and this is a huge concern for her at times because of the health needs surrounding the twins. She was trying to keep the peace in order to keep him in her life as a friend, so to speak... but this is slowly changing, now that she's beginning to see what a cold, selfish pig he is....

 

As for having him in the house.... I totally agree with you !! He's probably already had a good snoop this evening, although I doubt he'll have found anything useful. ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would echo the suspicions of Lula! I would go as far as keeping this by somebody else!

 

I disagree on biding her time, as it is obviously causing her a lot of anguish and it is getting more and more desperate. If it isn't put into his place, who knows what it is capable of. I would recommend getting it put into it's place ASAP to prevent any further problems. Always better to err on the side of caution.

 

 

It's a difficult one to call.... because he could make the situation much more stressful for her if she strikes first through solicitors. If she responds to his solicitor however, then he only has himself to blame.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am suspicious that part of the problem might be that he has psychologically abused your friend. Domestic abuse doesn't have to be physical or sexual- it can consist of psychological and financial abuse.

 

She sounds afraid to cross him because of what he might do- she sounds scared that he will act in a manner that may not cause her physical harm but definitely harm.

 

This is just as bad as physical abuse and the damage can last much longer.

 

It might be an idea to get some info regarding this, as if your friend realised what this man was doing to her, she might start to find her anger and fight back.

 

She's still lucky to have a good friend to help and support her through this horrid experience.

  • Haha 1

Nationwide-A&L-Halifax 1-Student Loans Company-NatWest-Virgin Media-Link-Capital One ALL WON!

Thames Credit -statute barred sent 13/11/08

BCW- prove debt letter- 14/08/08

Apex- CCA 14/08/08

Redcats UK- SAR 14/04/09

Call Serve- CCA 14/08/08

Littlewoods- no CCA letter 03/09/08- Lowells now

Wescot- CCA 19/9/08

Capital One/Debitas- now with Lowells

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All information has been obtained from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're quite right Emma.... he has mentally abused her for years. In fact, she's one of several of my friends who've been/are with mentally abusive men. She does know it... but it's always a problem finding yourself again after living with such a person and also, to try and break the thought patterns of the past.

 

As an outsider looking in... I'm able to see things that she can't, but I can't take the situation away. She has to do that herself.... and she's been afraid to cross him for far too long already, so it's going to take a while longer.

 

The sh*t will definately hit the fan this week-end though as he's constantly pushing for an answer, so I'll let you all know as soon as she's told him he's not getting what he wants. Oh dear.... :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

With my previous partner it wasn't until I saw a sign on a door in a health centre loo detailing financial and psychological abuse that I realised I was being abused. It still took me another six months to get out of the relationship, plus another six before he heeded my solicitors letters and got lost. Sad but true.

 

Funnily enough it took me getting a solicitor and refusing to speak to him or his mother or respond to their abusive letters and phone calls. (They wanted money off me too- even though I had none.)

 

I hope your friend finds the strength to stand up to him. The one thing I am eternally grateful for is that me and my ex never had children together. It must make it all ten times more difficult.Because they will use any method to manipulate and control.

 

You can tell her til you're blue in the face, but (from my experience) until something clicks inside her head she won't be able to understand and fully fight back. I suppose she has to understand she is worth better than this.

Nationwide-A&L-Halifax 1-Student Loans Company-NatWest-Virgin Media-Link-Capital One ALL WON!

Thames Credit -statute barred sent 13/11/08

BCW- prove debt letter- 14/08/08

Apex- CCA 14/08/08

Redcats UK- SAR 14/04/09

Call Serve- CCA 14/08/08

Littlewoods- no CCA letter 03/09/08- Lowells now

Wescot- CCA 19/9/08

Capital One/Debitas- now with Lowells

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All information has been obtained from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

With my previous partner it wasn't until I saw a sign on a door in a health centre loo detailing financial and psychological abuse that I realised I was being abused. It still took me another six months to get out of the relationship, plus another six before he heeded my solicitors letters and got lost. Sad but true. I can relate to that one as well, as it happens :(. My ex was physically and mentally abusive, but because of the very gradual build-up over the years.... it took ages before I could accept what he was. That was a long time ago now.... but the journey to getting my true personality back was a long one; partly because I'd forgotten who I was anyway.

 

Funnily enough it took me getting a solicitor and refusing to speak to him or his mother or respond to their abusive letters and phone calls. (They wanted money off me too- even though I had none.)

 

I hope your friend finds the strength to stand up to him. The one thing I am eternally grateful for is that me and my ex never had children together. It must make it all ten times more difficult.Because they will use any method to manipulate and control. You were fortunate in that sense. I have a daughter with my ex, although she's now nearly 18... so can (and does) make most of her own decisions where he's concerned. The early years were a little difficult, but once I had a place of my own.... and agreed to let him in.... he never crossed me again.

 

You can tell her til you're blue in the face, but (from my experience) until something clicks inside her head she won't be able to understand and fully fight back. I suppose she has to understand she is worth better than this. Summed up very nicely there Emma.... :) I'm on her case where that's concerned... ;)

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok.... update time.

 

The husband has now extended his deadline until Friday :rolleyes:, suggesting that he's expecting her to just cave in and pay up under the pressure... without him having to go through a solicitor.

 

He's now said that he wants her to give him the £20K and in return he will go to his solicitor and agree not to come to her for anything else. However...he also wants her to sign the same.... that SHE won't come to him for anything else either !!:mad: She's not had anything from him other than what he pays in child support.... which got me wondering what game he could be playing with that one :cool:.

 

He is now saying that she can't have his pension as part of any divorce settlement, or if he dies while they are still married.... if she signs this agreement..... and neither can she have anything from the £42K endowment.... so effectively, if she signs.... she will have already paid off his mortgage (to reduce his outgoings and give him an easier life), given him £20K and possibly, surrendered any rights to anything else to help support her children.

 

She's not signing by the way.... When asked why he was doing this, his reply was that she had some money and he wanted it. I can't print the precise words he used, but if there was any doubt in my friend's mind over what a selfish, greedy pig he is.... it vanished after hearing the answer.:mad:

 

Oh and another thing.... if she was just to just trust him and give him the £20K without either of them going to solicitors.... then she could keep the entitlement to his pension. Yeah right....

Edited by PriorityOne
Link to post
Share on other sites

God he's a right *******, isn't he. what a truly wonderful human being.

 

As I read on a previous post (about some debt collectors), he's proof that cavemen did more with pigs that roast them.;)

 

You're friend seems to be becoming more enlightened about his true nature though, which is brilliant news. More power to such a wonderful woman.

 

He's not a gambling addict as well... because he really reminds me of an ex I used to know!

Nationwide-A&L-Halifax 1-Student Loans Company-NatWest-Virgin Media-Link-Capital One ALL WON!

Thames Credit -statute barred sent 13/11/08

BCW- prove debt letter- 14/08/08

Apex- CCA 14/08/08

Redcats UK- SAR 14/04/09

Call Serve- CCA 14/08/08

Littlewoods- no CCA letter 03/09/08- Lowells now

Wescot- CCA 19/9/08

Capital One/Debitas- now with Lowells

 

Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. All information has been obtained from this site. If you are unsure, please seek professional advice. .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi P1, more of the same old crap then eh? Is she keeping a log of all the things that he is saying and doing, because she might need them at some point.

 

Nasty nasty man. Cant say much else, gobsmacked!!

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Just thought I'd update this one....

 

Things got more and more complicated as time went on and the husband tried very hard to un-nerve my friend by any means going.... even trying to get her eldest son on side. However, she remained strong and finally divorced him. He repeatedly threatened to take her to court for £20k and then said he'd be going for half the house as well; despite him having sold it to her and taking her late father's money to pay off his ownmortgage on it.

 

However, I doubted that he would find the money to do all of this, so advised her to stand firm and let him instigate proceedings first if that was his intention.... which she did. He eventually caved and with much huff and puff... said he wasn't going to take her to court now for anything after his application for Legal Aid failed (Legal Aid?!!.... he was having a laugh there!!). They are in now in the process of going for a "clean break" settlement.

 

This just left the caravan. He behaved like an *rse over this for ages as well and wouldn't sign it over to her despite not wanting it himself because he'd since got himself a council flat. She even offered to sign it over to him as part of a settlement to do with as he wished, but he refused. I said that she needed to sort it one way or another because the site fees would be due soon (£3K), so she bluffed him that it would be sold back to the site and she'd take the loss. This wasn't part of his game plan, as he's now agreed to sign it over to her completely and papers are currently being drawm up.

 

Result! :D

Edited by PriorityOne
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...