Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Write to the IPC complaining that UKPC have not observed the requirements of PoFA . IPC  Waterside House, Macclesfield SK10 9NR Dear IPC, I am writing to complain about a serious breach of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 by UKPCM. I feel that as it is more a breach of the Act rather than not just  complying with your Code of Practice which is why I am bypassing your operator. Should you decide to insist that I first complain to your operator, I will instead pass over my complaint to the ICO and the DVLA . My story starts with being issued a windscreen PCN on 8/3/24 which was almost immediately removed and a second  PCN was then  sent by post on 13/3/24  [deemed delivered 15/3/24] which I did not receive and had to send an sar to have that particular mess revealed later  but that is not the reason for my complaint. UKPC then sent a Keeper Liability Notice dated 12/4/24 warning me that as 28 days have now elapsed, I as keeper am now liable for the charge.  This is in direct contravention of PoFA since the keeper does not become liable to pay until the day after the original PCN is deemed to have been given which would have been 13/4/24 -a Saturday ]. Not only does it not comply with PoFA but it fails to adhere to your Code of Practice and is in breach of their agreement with the DVLA. You will be aware that this is not the first time that UKPC have fallen foul of the DVLA and presumably yourselves. I have included copies of both Notices for information. You will realise the seriousness of this situation if this is standard practice from the UKPC to all motorists or just those where windscreen tickets are involved since the Law regarding PoFA is being abused and is unfair to misguide motorists. I await your  response which I understand will usually be within a week. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I would think that should be sufficient for the IPC to cancel your PCN though  you should await comments from the Site team before sending your complaint. Don't forget to include both PCNs.  
    • Hi DX, Sorry, fell asleep as I was up all night last night writing that statement. Yes, I attached the rest of the witness statement on post 50, bottom of webpage 2. That's the important part.  It looks like the lawyer who wrote Erudio's Witness statement does not work for them any more. So, I'll have another lawyer representing instead. Not sure if I can use Andy's hearsay argument verbally if that happens.... I did not put it in writing. Apart from not sending deferral forms, my main argument is that in 2014 Erudio fixed some arrears mistake that SLC made and then in 2018 they did the same mistake, sent me confusing letters. What is the legal defence when they send you confusing material?
    • Chinese firm MineOne Partners has been ordered to sell land it owns near a US nuclear missile site.View the full article
    • That isn’t actually what the Theft Act 1968 S1 actually says, BTW. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/60/section/1 (1)A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it;   The difference between what you’ve said and the Act? a) intent to permanently deprive rather than  just depriving (which is why the offence of “taking without consent” was brought in for motor vehicles, as otherwise "joyriders" could say "but I intended to give it back at the end") b) dishonesty : If I honestly believed A's pen belonged to B, and took it and gave it to B - B might be found guilty of theft but I shouldn't be. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capquest - Statutory Demand for Bankruptcy!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4590 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all

 

I'm seeking some advice on how to deal with a letter I received from Capquest dated 25th July.

 

The letter contained a Statutory Demand for Bankruptcy!

 

To my knowledge I've not had any previous dealings with this company.

 

It referes to an unsecured overdraft my wife and I had with National Westminster Bank prior to 1995. To cut a long story short. We had a joint account, I was made redundant and we couldn't pay it back. I had a meeting with the Bank's regional manager who stated that as there was little chance of them getting their money back, he'd recommend the debt be written off. That was back before 1995.

 

Anyway, for some reason, we'd been paying NatWest £50pm to clear the debt since 1995. It was £11,000 + and now is £5,000. However, about 4 years ago because my wife and I seperated, she cancelled the payment for £50 to Nat West. No further payments have been made since then. This is of course within the 6 years!

 

What should I do?

 

I've spoken to the Bridgend County Court and they are sending me forms to apply to have the case set aside. Will the judge allow it to be set aside and on what grounds can I request this?

 

This is all very scarey!

 

Cheers

 

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi John,

 

I'm in the same boat with a Capquest SD. There are lots of others here also dealing with this so I'd reccommend reading through the threads, including the thread with sample letters ( http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html ). My own thread is here ( http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collection-industry/154556-me-capquest-hsbc.html ) which includes the letters I sent, to get you some idea of what you need to do. If you do use these letters, make sure that you take notes of the comments in the thread as I made some mistakes.

Edited by Elenathion
added url
Link to post
Share on other sites

Crapquest and 1st Credit are trying it seems a new tack of issuign as many SD's as possible without any recourse to the normal process, you must get it set aside as soon as possible. there are lots of threads on here telling you what to do.

 

Soon the judges are going to get really ****ed with these 2 companies and hopefully something will be done about it.

 

good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

Capquest did this to me Went to court weds Judge set aside SD Crapquest did not turn up or even write to court.Just yet anuother one of their scare tagtics.About time gov put a stop to this like they have in the states.If a DCA makes a threat like this there,they must carry it out by law.I have to tell you my dealings with these people has led me to believe nobody at crapquest has got a clue about the law or what to do next.Once you get the SD set aside they will send all the same compute gen letters again then anuother SD.Never admit the debt and as you have not paid for four years let them carry on with their silly games for two moe years then the debt will be stat barred and then they can never collect.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Well, I'm in court on 2nd September to ask the judge to set aside this Statutory Demand. I must confess, I'm scared stiff and for the past 3 weeks, this has caused me huge distress.Thanks for all the support and replies, they do help.Muffin - I'm interested in your reference to 4 years "as you have not paid for four years let them carry on with their silly games for two moe years then the debt will be stat barred and then they can never collect."Why 4 years? What sort of questions did the judge ask you and how long were you there?Personally, I feel like claiming for the distress and time this has taken, but I'm guessing that isn't possible.CheersJohn

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very briefly : after six years the debt becomes statute-barred and repayment cannot be enforced. Effectively the debt dies. You have not paid for four years so in another two years you will have reached that stage.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

what i don't understand is

 

DCA sends you a SD

 

you then have to apply to the court for set aside

 

but surely the court would never have received a copy of the SD from DCA

 

so, would this mean, you are actually starting a legal

litigation in the court?

are there any fees to pay?

how would you go about applying for a set aside

Reason i ask, Capquest now have my new address and they might send me one so want to me ready for them

Regards

Dave

Link to post
Share on other sites

Capquest and 1st Credit appear to be using the scare tactic of issuing Stat Demands like there is no tomorrow, this is a win win for them,

 

the SD costs them very little to produce, the alledge debtor if not in the know see's the court thing and bankcruptcy bit, and straight away phones these DCA's up to settle before court.

 

in the few cases an alledged debtor knows their rights and gets it set aside these scummy firms either fail to show or tells the court that if a debtor gets or applies for a set aside to drop the SD.

 

it seems that very rarely, (unless they think they have a watertight case) do these firms actually push through with the SD.

 

Dont know how legal or not this approach is but it must show up to the courts (and OFT/FSA Etc) soon, and hopefully something is done to stop it

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would send a SAR request to the Natwest if it was me. as no doubt this account would be made up of a substantial amount of charges, although claiming it back after 6 years might be a problem....however it is pretty unlikely that Natwest will have ANY records at all.....

 

I did a SAR to Natwest for an alleged account I held with them 6 years ago, and they couldn't even trace my name to ANY activity with their bank...!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, an update.

 

I attended the County Court this morning to request the Statutory Demand be set aside.

 

At 10:30am I was called to the court and less than 1 minute later I was out!

 

The judge said he had received a letter from Capquest stating the debt was not statute barred but as I'd raised other issues, he was setting aside the demand. He commented, something like 'you'll have to wait and see what action they take now'.

 

So, a few questions:

 

1. IF a payment to reduce this debt has been made within the last 5 years, I can't win in the basis of statute barred?

 

2. What should I do now? I haven't received any signed agreements or other documentation from Capquest.

 

3. What will Capquest do now? Lets assume they issue another Statutory Demand for Bankcruptcy!

 

Any other info would be great.

 

Cheers

 

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

So crapquest just sent a letter in to the judge? they obviously knew the SD would not stand close scrutiny.

 

Stat Barred means no payment or written acknowledgment of the debt for 6 years.

 

Have you send the OC a SAR to see what the state of the overdraft is

 

I would now wait for crapquest to respond to the judges decision

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I'm in court on 2nd September to ask the judge to set aside this Statutory Demand. I must confess, I'm scared stiff and for the past 3 weeks, this has caused me huge distress.Thanks for all the support and replies, they do help.Muffin - I'm interested in your reference to 4 years "as you have not paid for four years let them carry on with their silly games for two moe years then the debt will be stat barred and then they can never collect."Why 4 years? What sort of questions did the judge ask you and how long were you there?Personally, I feel like claiming for the distress and time this has taken, but I'm guessing that isn't possible.CheersJohn

 

Youve got nothing to be scared about - you are not on trial or anything, its not gonna be a courtroom with a jury there & you having to plead "guilty/not guilty" at the end of it or anything like that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies guys

 

Am I best off waiting for Capquest to provide all relevant documentation to me rather than me being pro-active and requesting it?

 

Is CCA a Consumer Credit Agreement? They say in their letter to me that I signed one in 1995! Of course, I have no recollection of this.

 

Cheers

 

John

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply babybear.

 

I really wasn't in the court room for more than 60 secs. All the judge said was:

 

"I've received a letter from Capquest saying it isn't statute barred but you've raised other issues so I'm setting this demand aside. Just have to wake and see what else they decide to do."

 

That was it! I thanked him and left.

 

I was a bit p****d off as I'd paid for 2 hours parking :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Hi

 

 

Capquest have gone a little quiet now so think it is about time you reported them to the OFT if you haven’t done so already.

 

 

Please bear in mind that the template letter on the first page of this thread:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o.uk...=1#post3422496

 

may not be suitable for all and you will have to adapt it to your own circumstances I.E

You applied to get it set asidelink3.gif and CQ didn't turn up

You applied and CQ agreed to discontinue

You ignored and CQ did nothing

 

 

Today the OFT set out some new guidance and sending SD's as a debt collectionlink3.gif tool is now frowned upon.

If you want to read it, here's the link

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/con.../OFT664Rev.pdf

 

You can complain by email and the OFT will email you back a form to sign and post back to them for them to be able to add your complaint to their list.

 

 

http://www.oft.gov.uk/contactus;jses...1D83BF00 04F6EA

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...