Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bankruptcy threat - please help**Set Aside with Costs**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4606 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

I've read through lots of threads on this site and I'm still a bit (actually a lot) confused about what should I do and in what order.

 

Yesterday I received a letter from capquest threatening me with bankruptcy for a debt from 1998. I'm pretty sure that I have not made any payments or had any contact with anyone regarding this debt in the last 6 years. I have received letters from them but have just ignored them as I couldn't deal with them. I have some mental health problems and things like this I can't cope with. My first question is: is this debt outside the 6 years because I have received letters from them even though I haven't responded?

 

Secondly I'm not sure what exactly to do next and what order to do things. Do I send a letter stating that this debt is statute barred or do I send one asking for the CCA? Should I apply to the court for it to be set aside yet or do the letters first?

 

I'm sorry to have to write this when I know that there are lots of other threads about this but I just can't make sense of what to do first. As I mentioned, I do have some mental health problems so I'm very confused by all this. I'm panicing so much about this as well and it's making my health worse.

 

Any help would be really gratefully received.

 

Thankyou.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest forgottenone

Just a suggestion ... really ... for us/we to be exactly clear on what you've received ... then there can be no doubt whether it's a 'threat' or the genuine thing ... can you scan it, post it here using Photobucket? As I said, it's just a suggestion ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest forgottenone

Anyway, you seem already to have a grasp of the basic, reading again what you've posted. Someone else here will help you with what to do next.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it is a stat demand

 

The forms you need are as follows.

 

http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/pdfs/forms/6-4.pdf http://www.insolvency.gov.uk/pdfs/forms/6-5.pdf

 

I would file a defense as below.

 

I,

Apply for the statutory demand to be set aside as the creditor is aware the debt is in dispute, the creditor has failed to comply with its obligations under the Consumer Credit Act, and I believe that the creditor issued this statutory demand as an abuse of process intended to pressure me into paying the full amount of an alleged debt when such pressure is contrary to the OFT Debt Collection Guidelines.

 

I would point out that under the Limitation Act 1980 Section 5 "an action founded on simple contract shall not be brought after the expiration of six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued."

 

I would also point out that the OFT say under their Debt Collection Guidance on statute barred debt that "it is unfair to pursue the debt if the debtor has heard nothing from the creditor during the relevant limitation period".

 

The last payment of this alleged debt was made over six years ago and no further acknowledgement or payment has been made since that time. Unless you can provide evidence of payment or written contact from us in the relevant period under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, I suggest that you are no longer able to take any court action against us to recover the alleged amount claimed.

 

The OFT Debt Collection Guidance states further that "continuing to press for payment after a debtor has stated that they will not be paying a debt because it is statute barred could amount to harassment contrary to section 40 (1) of the Administration of Justice Act 1970".

 

Also, I have never received a legally valid default notice for the alleged account as required under the Consumer Credit Act 1974

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thankyou =O)

 

So what order do I do this in?

 

Am I right in thinking that I send a letter to capquest first? Should I combine the statute barred letter and the CCA letter into one?

 

Then do I apply to have it set aside after I've sent that letter? Do I need to wait for them to reply before getting it set aside or is my letter to them enough of a dispute to have it set aside?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Elenathion

 

I am in exactly the same situation as you, have a statue barred debt and got a SD yesterday off the same company as you, even with the same named person as a contact from capquest

 

you will get lots of advice on here there are a lot of helpful people what I am doing based on the advise is the following:

 

1. writing to Capquest recorded delivery with a statue barred letter (done this before in March but will do again) making reference to the Stat demand someone will be able to tell you what template to use or letter (if not I will copy and paste the one I used off this site back in March)

2. I will be filling in the relevant forms to get this set aside as soon as possible, you do have to attend in person.

3.Finally write a letter to OFT to complain, from what I can see CAPQUEST are using these as a form of imtimidating people and making them panic which is really not on

4. i am sure someone with more experience will perhaps imput, but it cost a lot to make a person bankrupt and based on what I have read and on other fourms this weekend, they have sent a load of these out and surely they do not have the funds or intention to make all these people bankrupt?

 

I am so angry with this company right now :mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

here is the statue barred letter I was given on here a few months ago

 

CapQuest Debt Recovery Limited

Fleet 27

Rye Close

Fleet Hampshire

GU51 2QQ

 

31st March 2008

 

 

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Acc/Ref No:

 

You have contacted me regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself.

 

I would point out that under the Limitation Act 1980 Section 5 “an action founded on simple contract shall not be brought after the expiration of six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued.”

 

I would also point out that the OFT say under their Debt Collection Guidance on statute barred debt that “it is unfair to pursue the debt if the debtor has heard nothing from the creditor during the relevant limitation period”.

 

The last payment of this alleged debt was made over six years ago and no further acknowledgement or payment has been made since that time. Unless you can provide evidence of payment or written contact from me in the relevant period under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, I suggest that you are no longer able to take any court action against us to recover the alleged amount claimed.

 

The OFT Debt Collection Guidance states further that “continuing to press for payment after a debtor has stated that they will not be paying a debt because it is statute barred could amount to harassment contrary to section 40 (1) of the Administration of Justice Act 1970”.

 

I await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed and that no further contact will be made concerning the above account after that last letter.

 

We look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

Mr A N Other

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that reply and letter smc. I'm really angry at them also. Threats like this are the last thing that I and probably any of us need at the moment.

 

Are there any links on here that show how to actually fill in the statutory demand form and how to submit it. I'm a bit confused about all the legal terminology as I haven't entered into a dispute with them yet, but does the letter count as the dispute?

 

Also does anyone know where do I stand if I'm wrong about not admitting the debt within 6 years. If I have and I send this letter to capquest does that reset the 6 years?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to send the letter above to Capquest and get the stat demand set aside at the same time.

 

There are strict guidelines for getting it set aside so the sooner the better.

 

The court will not look down on you. They will think that you know what you are doing.

 

The judge in the court will be very helpful.

 

Start making a list of costs as later you will submit a costs schedule to claim costs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll do these both tomorrow. Do I send the form to the court or take it there?

I didn't realise I could claim costs. What can I claim for?

 

I read that the SD is invalid if you can't contact by phone the person who is named on the demand. Do you think it is worthwhile phoning them, without admitting the debt to find out when the last payment was made?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll do these both tomorrow. Do I send the form to the court or take it there?

I didn't realise I could claim costs. What can I claim for?

 

I read that the SD is invalid if you can't contact by phone the person who is named on the demand. Do you think it is worthwhile phoning them, without admitting the debt to find out when the last payment was made?

 

 

i would advise you not to phone them but put everything in writing, I am no expert and I am only going on the advise I have received off the helpful people on the board to help me get through this horrible situation... but these people will just upset you over the phone and make things seem a hundred times worse than it already probably feels

 

also you need to take the forms to court and swear an affit davit? not sure if that is the correct spelling

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...