Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • more detest the insurrectional ex variety dx
    • Laura, I was surprised that the Director said that you hadn't appealed twice. I thought that the letter you posted on 24th June was the second appeal and that was to the IAS. And they did say that there was no further appeal possible. Could you please explain how many times you appealed. I am going to read your WS now. PS  Yes I meant to say that the keeper did not have a licence therefore it was wrong of them to assume he was the driver and the keeper. Thanks for picking that up.
    • In answer to your questions yes even though it wasn't called that, it was the NTK. Had it been a windscreen ticket you would not have received the NTK until 28 days had elapsed. In earlier times if the warden was present then a windscreen ticket would have been issued. It nows seems that the DVLA and the Courts don't see a problem  with not issuing a ticket when a warden is on site. A period of parking must mean that ther e has to be a start time and a finish time in order for it to be considered a period. A single time does not constitute a period. I am not sure what you mean by saying it could be taken either way.  All they have mentioned is  the incident time which is insufficient. There are times on the photos about one minute apart which do not qualify as the parking period because they are not on the PCN itself. The reason I asked if the were any more photos is that you should be allowed 5 minutes Consideration period for you to read the signs and decide whether you want to accept them and you do that by staying longer than 5 minutes. if  more  do not have photos of your staying there for more than 5 minutes they are stuffed. You cannot say that you left within the 5 minute period if you didn't , but you can ask them, should it get to Court , to provide strict proof that you stayed longer than the statutory time. If they can't do that, case over.
    • I recently bought some trainers from Sports Direct and was unhappy with them and their extortionate delivery and return postage charges. I tweeted about being unhappy, and received a reply from someone claiming to be from Sports Direct asking me to send my order number and email address by pm, so a claim could be raised. Which I (stupidly) did. The account used Sports Direct's name and branding, and a blue tick.  The following day I received a call from "Sports Direct Customer Service", and with a Kenyan number. They asked for details of the issue, and then sent me an email with a request to install an app called Remitly. They provided me with a password to access the app then I saw that it had been setup for me to transfer £100, and I was asked to enter my credit card number so they could "refund" me. I told them I was uncomfortable with this (to say the least), and was just told to ring them back when I did feel comfortable doing it. Ain't never gonna happen.  I just checked my X account, and the account that sent the message asking for my details is gone. I feel like a complete idiot falling for what was a clear scam. But at least I realised before any real damage was done. if you make a complaint about a company on social media, and you get a reply from someone claiming to be from that company and asking for personal details, tread very carefully.   
    • The good news is that their PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012  Schedule 4.. First under Section 9 (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates; (b)inform the keeper that the driver is required to pay parking charges in respect of the specified period of parking and that the parking charges have not been paid in full; The PCN does not specify the parking period. AS you rightly say the ANPR times do not include driving to the parking space and then from there back to the exit. And once you include getting children in and out of cars especially if seat belts are involved the time spent parked can be a fair bit less than the ANPR times but still probably nowhere near the time you spent. But that doesn't matter -it's the fact that they failed to comply. Also they failed to ask the keeper to pay the charge.  Their failure means that they cannot now transfer the charge from the diver to the keeper . Only the driver is now liable. As long as UKPA do not know who was driving it will be difficult for them to win in Court as the Courts do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person. Particularly as anyone can drive any car if they have the correct insurance. It might be able to get more reasons to contest the PCN if you could get some photos of the signs. both at the entrance and inside the car park. the photos need to be legible and if there are signs that say different things from others that would also be a help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Are you a victim of deceptive pricing? - Shrinking Groceries


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5495 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I don't think you are. If you buy the most natural stuff you can then add your own water and get a low fat version in bigger quantities than if you'd bought the low fat stuff - so the normal stuff is, in fact, cheaper.
Only if you want low-fat stuff, though and some (many) of us don't. The fact is if you want the stuff as is meant to be (full fat), you are expected to pay more than for the low-fat stuff.

 

When "diet" products started tocome out he said the manufactures were laughing all the way to the bank because it cost them so much less to produce than the normal stuff but it cost the punter the same to buy. Things haven't changed
Don't I know it. From hydrogenated fats and margarine (*spits*) to stuff filled up with sugar to thicken it and give it substance and binding... Disgusting... But that would be a whole new thread to itself... :-|
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 151
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Yes, bookie, you are paying (cost per unit when you buy) more for the full fat stuff than the low fat stuff because the low fat stuff is packed with cheap fillers and water. Therefore the normal stuff is, in fact, a better buy though, on the face of it, it may seem more expensive.

 

I don't understand why you have a problem with this.

 

If you buy the "natural" stuff you don't get the cheap additives. Yes, on the face of it is is more expensive. But check how much is filler in the low fat stuff and the fact is the low fat stuff is extremely expensive bearing in mind the cheap fillers.

My posts are offered informally, without prejudice and without liability. You should seek the advice of a qualified insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My problem with it is that people who are on a tight budget are being forced to make dietary choices which are unhealthier (even though packaged as healthier :rolleyes:). Don't get me wrong, it's not just the LF stuff I have problems with, I have the same issue with fast food, and many other things. :razz:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't agree.

 

If you're on a tight budget then why not buy a 500ml pot of "normal" natural yogurt. It's cheaper than the individual low fat pots, can be "stretched" by adding fruit (fresh or tinned) and is generally far nicer than the so-called fruit yogurts.

 

Mayonnaise - buy the expensive sort and add water.

 

Steak mince (low fat) is more expensive than cheap mince (high fat). You have a choice - do you want to eat less (but better) meat or more (but fatty) meat.

 

Double cream - more expensive than single cream. Add milk of you want thinner cream. I had "top of milk" when I was growing up.

 

I still don't see why, in your opinion, this is deceptive pricing. Better quality may seem to cost more per unit it but actually it costs less because it is "whole" and not packed with fillers; you can "stretch" it if you want/need to - but generally the better the quality of the food you buy the less you want to eat.

Edited by bottomburp

My posts are offered informally, without prejudice and without liability. You should seek the advice of a qualified insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

but generally the better the quality of the food you buy the less you want to eat.

 

Well I bought a pack of Tomatoes on the vine the other day - "finest" or whatever it is, and they're simply scrummy. Nearly as good as the ones I used to get from a local farm shop.

 

My flatmate however decided that they make a rather nice snack and polished them off on the day I bought them :mad:.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I bought a pack of Tomatoes on the vine the other day - "finest" or whatever it is, and they're simply scrummy. Nearly as good as the ones I used to get from a local farm shop.

 

My flatmate however decided that they make a rather nice snack and polished them off on the day I bought them :mad:.

 

Sorry, should have thought of that - my daughter does the same thing! There are exceptions!

My posts are offered informally, without prejudice and without liability. You should seek the advice of a qualified insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I usually get sausage rolls for my OH's son to take to work with his packed lunch. Now a few weeks ago they had packs of 6, so I got 2 packs for a £1, they have now reduced it down to 5 in a pack. I'm now waiting for them to be reduced to packs of 4, they call them Roll backs or price cuts, more like produce & packaging cuts.:mad:

--------------------------------

If you approve of my Post, please tip my scales.

13/07/07 **WON** Halifax

Any advice or opinion I give, is what I have learnt from CAG, If in doubt, please consult a professional.

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was looking for cosmetics stuff in tesco's yesterday I wanted moisteriser etc.. they'd got loads of Olay products on a 2 for £6 deal - but they'd been clever and separated these offer lines an a shelf well higher than where the ordinary priced products were.

 

I had to laugh when the products I bought were normal prices of £7.99 and £6.99 would be £14.98 and I got them both for £6.00 - just goes to show we need to look higher and lower at these shelves to spot the deals.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is another trick I have noticed, and the main culprits are Tesco, and to a lesser extent, Sainsbury's.

 

Take a closer look at those BOGOF offers. Looks tempting, doesn't it? Take a look at what the price really is - you'll often find that the price is too high to start with. Here's a ficticious (sp?) example:

 

A packet of biscuits is on a BOGOF offer - two packets for £1.25. Looks good in itself, but you know for a fact that you wouldn't pay £1.25 for a single packet, they are usually on sale at around 90p.

 

This tactic I consider to be sneaky. OK, so you are saving money, but they are exaggerating how much the savings really are...

 

You're right, this normally is the case - I used to work on the entertainment department of a major UK store and it took years to realise that when they had a BOGOF promotion, on say, DVDs - the price would be around £16.99 each.

 

When the promotion ended, they would be on at around £9.99 each.

 

It took me years to realise and I was the one changing the prices, so I'm not surprised no-one else noticed!!

 

It's crazy.

 

PS - good to see you back SpiceSkull!! :)

Disclaimer: Anything I write in these forums is my personal opinion and offered without prejudice. If in doubt, please seek independent legal advice.

 

*If what I have told you in this post has helped, please press the star at the bottom left and tell me!!*

 

My charges claims:

un1boy vs egg *SETTLED* | Un1boy vs LTSB-SETTLED | un1boy vs Black Horse-SETTLED | Un1boy v Smile *WON* | un1boy v HSBC - SETTLED! | Un1boy's HSBC CC - SETTLED! | Un1boy vs Co-Op *SETTLED* |un1boy vs Co-Op CC *SETTLED*

 

Default removals:

un1boy v Equifax - Default removal

un1boy vs Experian - Default removal

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd like to know how long HMV think a "sale" should last for. There is a boxset of CDs which has been "on sale" at a certain price for at least two years now.

 

The law really does need changing in this area

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone with young kids has gotta appreciate the hell I go through with this one....

 

BABY WIPES!

 

It's insane. Every brand comes in different quantities per pack, which seems to change along with price on a weekly basis (at least!). Not to mention the various 'offers' for bulk buys.

 

Theoretical figures, but proves a point.

 

Own brand baby wipes, 71p/pack

Named baby wipes, £3.54 for a 4-pack

Own brand has 54/pack

Named brand has 68/pack

 

Which looks best value? ;)

 

 

The wife gives me strange looks when I stand in the shop working out which one is best value each and every week. Many a time I've walked out with a bag full of individual packs instead of a multi-pack...

Edited by Aterlatus
Link to post
Share on other sites

I find the same problem with other products. I recently decided to bite the bullet and put up with the strange looks and take a calculator with me!

My posts are offered informally, without prejudice and without liability. You should seek the advice of a qualified insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There really should be no need. Unless its a small shop, they should be putting on the price per unit for each item so that a comparison can be made.

 

I've noticed though that Tesco label their own products in price per gram or ML and price brand products by the kilo or litre, making their own brand at first glance looking rather cheap!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There really should be no need. Unless its a small shop, they should be putting on the price per unit for each item so that a comparison can be made.

 

SHOULD being the operative word here! Is it a legal requirement?

 

Sometimes they do [put price per sheet] and sometimes they don't.

 

Sometimes they put £2 per kg less (and the less is so tiny you wouldn't notice it unless you look carefully).

 

The way the supermarkets price goods is getting increasingly confusing. As you say sometimes they put price per 250ml unit / per 100ml/100mg / per 1kg.

 

I frequently hear couples discussing which price is, in fact, better value.

My posts are offered informally, without prejudice and without liability. You should seek the advice of a qualified insured professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone with young kids has gotta appreciate the hell I go through with this one....

 

BABY WIPES!

 

It's insane. Every brand comes in different quantities per pack, which seems to change along with price on a weekly basis (at least!). Not to mention the various 'offers' for bulk buys.

 

Theoretical figures, but proves a point.

 

Own brand baby wipes, 71p/pack

Named baby wipes, £3.54 for a 4-pack

Own brand has 54/pack

Named brand has 68/pack

 

Which looks best value? ;)

 

 

The wife gives me strange looks when I stand in the shop working out which one is best value each and every week. Many a time I've walked out with a bag full of individual packs instead of a multi-pack...

 

Oh yes, been there. Luckily we have a Quality Save in our town which blasts everyone out of the water :)

PLEASE DONATE ANYTHING THAT YOU CAN

 

 

A government that robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul.

George Bernard Shaw

 

 

 

 

Go on, click me scales (if I have helped) :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got very annoyed the other day as I was trying to buy a bottle of good port to take to France. Tesco's prices were labelled as either £x / litre, then £x / 500 ml, and for some other bottles £x / 750 ml, making it virtually impossible to work out what was what simply by reading the labels, which is what they're supposed to be for after all. :mad:

 

Oh, and suntan lotion? Don't get me started on them!!! :-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

SHOULD being the operative word here! Is it a legal requirement? .

 

Yep it is under the Price Marking Order 2004 (i think - not got legislation to hand). Very basically, shops over a certain size must display the total price of an item as well as the appropriate unit price where appropriate and depending on how its sold and its quantity.

 

It is a little complex and a bit difficult to enforce (namely becasue the supermarkets just have to sign tick sheets to get away with murder). I usuall count myself lucky if I can find a price at all - never mind the unit price!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have a Lidl near you, use them. Years ago, I thought that cheap=poor quality. Not true. For example Lidl sell steak or chicken and ham pies for £1.79 and have large chunks of meat in them. Tescos nearest equivalent costs £2.99 (or more), contains small/tiny bits of meat and is chock full of onion to enhance the otherwise bland flavour.

 

Oh, and their baby wipes are 99p for 80 and have been that price for the last 2 years.

 

If Lidl can do it and still turn a profit, why can't Tesco? (that was a rhetorical question)

Link to post
Share on other sites

There really should be no need. Unless its a small shop, they should be putting on the price per unit for each item so that a comparison can be made.

 

I've noticed though that Tesco label their own products in price per gram or ML and price brand products by the kilo or litre, making their own brand at first glance looking rather cheap!

 

 

I see what you are saying here BUT when it comes to items like soap powder tablets/gel pouches - although it breaksdown per item/unit - often the packs have different units per wash = some liquid pouches you'd need two pouches per wash load - others you'd need only one pouch.

 

Some very clever labelling going on within supermarkets I must say.

 

I think the funniest item I seen to date was yesterday in BOOTS - OH wanted new blades for his electric razor/shaver - when I eventually found the prices for the replacement heads/blades things - it was cheaper to buy a whole new electric razor by £20 than to order the replacement parts I was looking for. Meant he'd a whole new razor updated version of same razor and a new guarantee etc..

 

It was absolutely pointless to buy the replacement parts when the razor was on a half price offer as a newer version of same thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Razor blades full stop are evil - one thing to look out for is often you get a full sized 'holder' for blades in a new razor, but only 1/2 blades actually in it. Can often seem like a new razor is the cheaper option when in reality you're getting half (or less!) the cutting-power for well more than half the price!

 

 

I recently had to switch to the old face shredders (disposables) because the price of blades rocketed so much :(

 

Oh yeah, the other one - often you'll find identical blades with vastly different prices. If a certain un-named brand has a regular razor and, say, one that vibrates you'll find the blades for the vibrator (ohh err missus) are invariably priced higher even though they're EXACTLY the same thing!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...