Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Wow thats incredible. Thank you so much
    • If the purchaser denies having received it then sue P2G. If you simply don't hear anything more from the purchaser then you have the purchaser's name and address – and frankly for £48 I would go ahead and sue. As long as you have good proof of delivery then your chances of success are probably better than 95% and frankly the purchaser would probably put their hands up as they would effectively be being sued for the civil equivalent of theft. I wouldn't let it go if I were you. It would be a good exercise for you and gives you confidence the next time something comes up which is may be much more valuable
    • Thank you again Emmzzi for your insight. Not only did I do the work, but as a maths tutor delivering financial literacy workshops under the Govt Multiply project, the college were paid £400 for each student I recruited, which makes it an even bigger kick in the teeth! I spoke to Citizens Advice Bureau on Friday who advised me to go back to ACAS for advice and assistance, as ACAS are the experts in employment matters. They did also mention small claims court, as being more straightforward and less complex, but surely their solicitor would just contest this and I would lose the £80 court fee? If I did submit a claim through the small claims court, would I just leave the employment tribunal running until the outcome? The deadline for me to submit my schedule of loss is tomorrow, so I will submit today so that they cannot hold me in breach.
    • Ive just checked the tracking again and its actually out for delivery today! Anyway,  I refunded the buyer on Ebay off my own back on the 2nd of June they havent opened a case or anything like that so surely i cant take action against either the buyer or P2G/ Evri can i ? Id hope the buyer would see fit and pay but you know what people are like these days ... Once its delivered I'll send him a polite message asking for payment but i suspect there'll be no reply      
    • Thanks for this update. Let's not if you have any more difficulty – in particular if you have difficulty getting paid back from the purchaser. We can help you either against the parcel delivery courier or against the purchaser
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Barclaycard/Lewis/CL Finance/Cohen Court Claim Help Please **WON**


creditcardmug
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5507 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi CCM,

Often the court takes no notice of the parties proposed directions especially in a small claims track case. The DJ just fires off directions about how the parties should try to mediate and a set of basic directions for disclosure and exchange of statements and a fixture by when everyone should come to court.

 

Any way, if there's a chance an unless order could be obtained it's worth going for. Afix to the AQ your CPR 18 request.

 

Here's my proposed directions:

 

1 The Claimant shall not later than 4:00pm on (date) (being a date 2 weeks from the date of the making of the case management directions) deliver to the Defendant a verified true copy of each of the following documents mentioned in the Particulars of Claim

 

(a) the executed regulated consumer credit agreement made between the defendant and Barclays Bank Plc T/a Barclaycard under reference xxxxxxxxxxx together with any terms and conditions that applied to it

(b) the default notice

© a full and complete statement of account covering the period beginning with the day of the making of the agreement and ending on the date of the commencement of this case.

 

2 In the event that the Claimant shall fail to comply with paragraph 1 of this order the claim shall stand struck out and the Defendant shall be at liberty without further order to apply to this court for judgment and for costs on the standard basis to be subject to detailed assessmwent proceedings if not agreed.

 

3 In the event of compliance with paragraph 1 of this order this case shall be allocated to the small claims track and

 

4 The Defendant shall be at liberty to file and serve a consequentially Amended Defence by 4:00pm on (date) (being a date 6 weeks from the date of the making of the case management directions).

 

5 There shall be a stay of proceedings from (date) (being a date 7 weeks from the date of the making of the case management directions) until (date) (being a date 11 weeks days from the date of the making of the case management directions) to enable the parties to settle using the small claims mediation service.

 

6 Standard directions for the notification of the result of mediation to the court office whereafter in the event of mediation failing,

 

7 Standard small claims track directions for the disclosure of documents and exchange of witness statements with no provision for expert witness evidence; date for hearing with a time estimate of 2 hours.

 

Any questions just call me on my radio.

 

x20

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 139
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

just one thing, to add to what x20 has already come up with,

 

if the court goes with these directions, you will need to submit a certificate of service when you serve your amended defence upon the claimant

 

the form you need is N215

http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/n215_e.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCM, Thanks for your interest and input in my thread.

 

Reading yours has proved useful also, so I will update my thread with my questions!

 

FX ;)

 

Yes, please do, were all in the same boat here so lets help each other where we can.

 

Regards CCM

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I filed my AQ on 2nd October, and sent a copy to the claimant the same day, so far i have received NOTHING from the claimant or court.

 

Am i entitled to see a copy of claimants AQ? should i have had any correspondence from the court, or is this just a backlog situation?

 

Any thoughts anyone?

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

I filed my AQ on 2nd October, and sent a copy to the claimant the same day, so far i have received NOTHING from the claimant or court.

 

Am i entitled to see a copy of claimants AQ? should i have had any correspondence from the court, or is this just a backlog situation?

 

Any thoughts anyone?

 

 

Good practice to send a copy to the other side.

 

Ask the court to send you a cop[y of the one they filed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CCM

 

Insist on a copy of the Claimants AQ this will give you an insight into their intentions on how they wish to further their case.On submission of AQs both parties will normally recieve an Order from Court stating a Hearing date for proposed directions in the event of non settlement before that date ,usually 2/3 months in advance.Presuming you ticked settlement and they also on their AQ which you have no way of knowing until you request sight of said AQ.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to give you heart.............:grin: GE money through their solicitors Howard Cohen threw the towel in last week and discontinued their claim against me even though they were using the Rankine argument. I had defended on basis that the agreement was unenforceable and they had served a variety of faulty default notices..............:grin::grin: I was told the day before the case was due to be heard ..............now I'm just trying to workk out waht I can claim for costs...........:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update, received notice of allocation to small claims track.

 

Each party shall deliver to every other party and to the court copies of all documents on which he intends to rely at the hearing no later than 14 days before the hearing

 

The original documents shall be brought to the hearing.

 

The claimant shall file and serve by 30 Nov particulars of how the sum claimed is calculated, and copies of the agreement and default notice.

 

Any thoughts on this? does this mean what i hope it means i.e. file and serve copies, but bring originals to the hearing?

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

As it says on the tin CCM:D

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy, hope you're well.

 

Can i hold them to this, the notice from the court doesnt actually say its an order, i have the feeling they will try to wriggle out of this.

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Credit

 

Im very well thanks hope you are same

 

The allocation is actually an order and anything refered to in said order must be complied with.

 

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks andy yes im fine, will keep the thread updated, will be needing further help along the way.

 

Regards CCM

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, i'm not replying either, they have until the 30th to produce copies of the original docs, and they have to produce the originals at the hearing, so i just wait for now.

 

Regards

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi all, well its the 30th today and they haven't served me with any docs as per the order.............any suggestions on next move?

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, newbie here!

 

Very interesting thread, I am at the start of the battle with cohens/cl finance and barclays.

 

They have issued claim against me but before joining this forum I actualy admitted part of claim i.e debt less costs.

 

After cca request which are now 12+2 days I have received nothing.

 

Does anyone know how I can change my admission to a defend all of the claim??

 

Have started new thread, but can't seem to find it???

Lowell Financial (Monument) No CCA - File Closed ** WON**:D

1st Credit (Citi Financial) No CCA - Credit Report Marked 'Satisfied' ** WON **:D

American Express No CCA - Pending

RBS Mint No CCA - Pending

CL Finance (Morgan Stanley) No CCA - In Court:eek:

HSBC - No CCA - In Court:eek:

Link Financial (MBNA) No CCA - Pending

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, newbie here!

 

Very interesting thread, I am at the start of the battle with cohens/cl finance and barclays.

 

They have issued claim against me but before joining this forum I actualy admitted part of claim i.e debt less costs.

 

After cca request which are now 12+2 days I have received nothing.

 

Does anyone know how I can change my admission to a defend all of the claim??

 

Have started new thread, but can't seem to find it???

 

Hi there, i saw your thread earlier, this happened to a poster a few months ago, i think he got around the problem but cant remember how exactly, i think he phoned the court and said he'd done it in error, and asked nicely to be allowed to defend all. If you did it online it would sound even more plausible i.e.ticked the wrong box etc.

Please note i have no legal training any advice i give comes from my own experience and from what i have learned on this site

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...