Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Post #415 you said you were unable to sell it yourself. Earlier I believe you said there had been expressions of interest, but only if the buyer could acquire the freehold title. I wonder if the situation with the existing freeholders is such that the property is really unattractive, in ways possibly not obvious to someone who also has an interest in and acts for the freeholders.
    • i dont think the reason why the defendant lost the case means anything at all in that case. it was a classic judge lottery example.
    • Hello, I will try to outline everything clearly. I am a British citizen and I live in Luxembourg (I think this may be relevant for potential claims). I hired a car from Heathrow in March for a 3-day visit to family in the UK. I was "upgraded" to an EV (Polestar 2). I had a 250-mile journey to my family's address. Upon attempting to charge the vehicle, there was a red error message on the dashboard, saying "Charging error". I attempted to charge at roughly 10 different locations and got the same error message. Sometimes there was also an error message on the charging station screen. The Hertz 0800 assistance/breakdown number provided on the set of keys did not work with non-UK mobiles. I googled and found a bunch of other numbers, none of which were normal geographical ones, and none of which worked from my Luxembourg mobile. It was getting late and I was very short on charge. Also, there was no USB socket in the car, so my phone ran out of battery, so I was unable to look for further help online. It became clear that I would not reach my destination (rural Devon), so I had no choice but to find a roadside hotel in Exeter and then go to the nearest Hertz branch the following day on my remaining 10 miles of charge. Of course, as soon as the Hertz employee in Exeter plugged it into their own charger, the charging worked immediately. I have driven EVs before, I know how to charge them, and it definitely did not work at about 10 different chargers between London and Exeter. I took photos on each occasion. Luckily they had another vehicle available and transferred me onto it. It was an identical Polestar 2 to the original car. 2 minutes down the road, to test it, I went to a charger and it worked immediately. I also charged with zero issues at 2 other chargers before returning the vehicle. I think this shows that it was a charging fault with the first car and not my inability to do it properly. I wrote to Hertz, sending the hotel, dinner, breakfast and hotel parking receipt and asking for a refund of these expenses caused by the charging failure in the original car. They replied saying they "could not issue a refund" and they issued me with a voucher for 50 US dollars to use within the next year. Obviously I have no real proof that the charging didn't work. My guess is they will say that the photos don't prove that I was charging correctly, just that it shows an error message and a picture of a charger plugged into a car, without being able to see the detail. Could you advise whether I have a case to go further? I am not after a refund or compensation, I just want my £200 back that I had to spend on expenses. I think I have two possibilities (or maybe one - see below). It looks like the UK is still part of the European Consumer Centre scheme:  File a complaint with ECC Luxembourg | ECC-Net digital forms ECCWEBFORMS.EU   Would this be a good point to start from? Alternatively, the gov.uk money claims service. But the big caveat is you need a "postal address in the UK". In practice, do I have to have my primary residence in the UK, or can I use e.g. a family member's address, presumably just as an address for service, where they can forward me any relevant mail? Do they check that the claimant genuinely lives in the UK? "Postal address" is not the same as "Residence" - anyone can get a postal address in the UK without living there. But I don't want to cheat the system or have a claim denied because of it. TIA for any help!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Parents passed away - where do I stand with 3 week old credit agreement?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5767 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My parents have both just passed away, my father had just taken out a 6 month interest free credit agreement on an expensive (£2500) leather sofa. The sofa was delivered only 3 weeks before they passed.

The unsigned payment protection policy was sitting on my dads bedside table, he was probably going to sign and post it the day he was taken into hospital.

After paying for the funeral there will only be enough left in the estate to pay for the sofa.

I made enquires in the shop it was purchased but was told it is no longer anything to do with them and I was given a number for the company financing the credit agreement.

I have been asked to forward a copy of the death certificate but the person on the phone was unable to advise what will happen next but said it is likely the sofa will need to be paid for.

My understanding is that it will have to be paid.

 

What my family would rather do is send the sofa back! The shop however say this is nothing do to with them anymore.

 

Does anyone have any idea's or suggestions? The only thing we think we can do is pay for the sofa and sell it on ourselves.

Thanks Steve.

24 hours in a day... 24 in a case... co-incidence???

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sorry to hear of your loss.

 

The debt will become part of yor parents estate, and as there is no money to pay this debt then there is no action they can take.

 

Send them a copy of the death certificates and let us know how they respond.

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi thanks for the reply.

Unfortunately there will be enough in the estate, just, to pay for the sofa but that will be the estate gone.

Obviously the money doesn't bring our parents back but we would rather have had that than a sofa!

I was hoping there might have been some loophole that meant because not a single penny had yet been paid on the sofa it did not yet belong to my parents and we could have asked the credit company to remove it as it is thier property.

24 hours in a day... 24 in a case... co-incidence???

Link to post
Share on other sites

The retailer has been paid for the item, so has no interest it getting it back. I also feel for your loss, and clearly the softa is no longer required but it still has a value and you would be quite correct to sell it for the highest amount you can get selling it as NEW. The funds you get can then be paid into the estate and the debt settled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Anybody want to buy a top of the range fully electronic moving/reclining leather sofa and matching armchair? :(

24 hours in a day... 24 in a case... co-incidence???

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you buy something and later change your mind the shop can-not refuse to take it back, as long as you have good reason, and the sad loss of both ur head of house-holds means just that, the item can be returned, look into the matter further, when my Mother passed to the other side 2 mths ago, she also had items that were fairly new, some less than 2 weeks old, we contacted the shops there were bought from, and as long as the recipt was shown, there took the items back, with full refund, I'm sure under a credit agreement, such as the one with the sofa, UNDER THE COOLING OFF PERIOD it can be returned, look into the matter with the CAB..

Its very hard dealing with the left over estate, but help is at hand from verious units that give free and impartial advice. Don't be left thinking that you will have to pay for the sofa, as this won't be the case.... Get the help you need b4 contacting the finace company or shop again, go armed rather than blind. Hard as it might seem now, it does get better, take care m8y.

!2 years Tesco distribution supervisor

7 years Sainsburys Transport Manager

 

4 Years housing officer ( Lettings )

Partner... 23 Years social services depts

 

All advice is given through own opition, also by seeking/searching info on behalf of poster, and own personnel dealings.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry, but I have to disagree with that. If there is no cooling off period provided for in the contract, or if you are outside that period, then there is no automatic right to cancel. Nor is there one generally.

 

The only reason I made my last point was to determine if there were any provisions in legislation covering such sales taht would allow for cancellation.

 

It seems, in the absence of a defective agreement, that the sofa will have to be paid for unless the seller looks into their heart. My experience is that such organs do not exist in the corporate world.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm with gysmo. If you buy something and change your mind, the shop does not have to listen to any reason - the deal is done, and that's an end to it. They may agree to some modification under 'goodwill' but they are neither required or obliged to do anything. In this case there is a completely justifiable and reasonable reason why the goods are no longer required, but to some disliking the colour after delivery, spending the money on a USA holiday or losing it on the horses and needing to convert goods back into cash would be equally legitimate reasons for some, so a a blanket 'no' is the usual outcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys, I've written to the credit company explaining the death of my father with a brief outline of the circumstances.

The research I've done online leads me to believe it will have to be paid for out of what is left of my fathers esate. I dont expect them to show any sympathy.

 

I'll let you know what happens when I hear back from them.

24 hours in a day... 24 in a case... co-incidence???

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...