Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Still no CCA compliant paperwork then.. that's good for you. Response from them regarding your defence filing is funny! we enclose the 'application' haha no agreement in sight but they will continue with court anyway! the cheek.. No chance they go near a courtroom with that paperwork as exhibits. My advice is re-read your whole thread, many questions answered in 2023 it would be good to refresh your memory regarding the paperwork. Then read a load more claimform threads over the next week, in your downtime if still traveling alot.    
    • Good afternoon Stu i thought i had posted an update but i see i forgot. Your brilliant  suggestion has worked and for now they have credited my account with the court fees. Many thanks again  
    • Credit search will be for address varification in case you'd moved since the date of the speculative invoice I expect.  If you use our enhanced Google search box for.  Pcm Claimform, there are over 1000 threads that outline things.  Next for you will be ack from the court your defence has been registered OK.  To be frank.. If you'd been doing that from when advised a month ago, this would not have happened.  You've had a very very lucky escape here.... Now prepare and not allow another to happen.  We don't have the time to nurse maid those that don't self help.   Dx  
    • Thanks @FTMDavefor the quick and clear instructions.  All filed and submitted.  What should I be preparing next? If you’ve seen lots of cases with this lot what is likely their next move?   In the meantime they have been sending me letters offering me to pay them without going to court etc. i’ve also received a notification on my credit report about searches and can see that they’ve done a “soft search” on my file.   Are they allowed to do that? Why would they be doing that?
    • Just be aware that foliage covering signs is not persuasive if you reside in the area and regularly used the said route concerned.  One gentleman of recent, famous for disputing parking and speeding issues, just cost his client £1000's claiming that!!    Dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

old council tax nightmare (its a long one)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5821 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi folks

about ten years ago my mother started getting dementia and as i was unemployed i started helping her a task that gradually took more and more of my time.at the same time some bright spark at the dole office decided if you was more than a minute late for signing on your claim would be cancelled and you would have to start again this also applied to council tax benefit and as a claim takes months to be sorted out and i was continually late to sign on i found myself making new claims every fortnight none of which was ever completed and all of this time my council tax bill was increasing

As my mother got worse i found myself unable to cope with all the trash coming through the letterbox so i ignored it.i even got things saying you have a letter to be signed for at the post office i ignored them too

one day a few letters came and i opened them to find out it was bayliffs and i owed about £4000 in tax so i promptly ignored them too,not long after i had to move in with my mother and become her primary carer and all was shoved to the back of my mind

i dont think under the circumstances i should be billed for council tax as i was unemployed even though i could not meet their rules to sign on

but i doubt that would save me

Does anyone know if the debt will still be collectable by them or does the statute barred rule apply

i have not been on the electoral role since then and have not advertised my addresses so dont know how the situation stands and i`m reluctant to find out incase it brings a s**t storm to my door

thanx

S.C

Do you have a website? Add the following code to add a link to The Consumer Action Group:

 

<a href="http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o.uk"><b><font color="#FF0000" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The Consumer Action Group</font></b></a> - <font color="#FF9900" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Reclaim the Right as a consumer and reclaim your unfair bank charges! Free site with letter templates and helpful forum.</font>

 

IF I`VE BEEN OF HELP PLEASE TICKLE MY SCALES :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

copied from the Limitations act 1980

The Limitation Act 1980 states that most debts can become ‘statute barred’ after 6 years (12 years for mortgages and secured loans). This means they become unenforceable – you still owe the money, but the creditor can no longer take action to recover it.

 

This can only happen if:

  • the creditor hasn’t contacted you (at your last known address) or taken action (e.g. court action) in that time
    and
  • you haven’t made payments or acknowledged the debt in that time.
  • 6 years for most debts
    Most debts can be declared statute barred if they’re left ‘untouched’ for 6 years. You may be surprised to hear that this includes Community Charge or Council Tax debts.

Edited by questioning
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

As bailiffs are involved which means it has been to court, I believe the limitations act wont apply.

 

Unless the council let the debt run for more than the six years (unlikely), then they cannot apply for a liability order after the six years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes quite, I'm sure the council didn't let it run for 6yrs before taking court action but you never know, obviously the OP will know that.

I was surprised to find that the council tax is included though as the council often get out of lots of things so I thought that CT may have been exempt.

I haven't personally had any involvement with non payment of CT luckily.

Good luck OP.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

You will need a breakdown of the years that are unpaid and the date that the liability order was issued.

 

Ask the council for that information and post it on here and then we can see what is to be done.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

You will need a breakdown of the years that are unpaid and the date that the liability order was issued.

 

Ask the council for that information and post it on here and then we can see what is to be done.

 

hi folks and thanx

i would imagine it did go to court and that was what the recorded delivery letters were about but as i didn`t collect them i dont know

when i left the address in question the windows were smashed by the local kids and were boarded up so i would imagine if the bayliffs did visit this was noted and no further calls or correspondence was made.i have not been contacted further in 7 to ten years

Nobody has contacted me to date this is just me putting feelers out in case so i wont go through the above steps just yet but will surely be back if they appear

thanks again for your help i`ll click your scales :lol:

S.C

Do you have a website? Add the following code to add a link to The Consumer Action Group:

 

<a href="http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o.uk"><b><font color="#FF0000" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The Consumer Action Group</font></b></a> - <font color="#FF9900" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Reclaim the Right as a consumer and reclaim your unfair bank charges! Free site with letter templates and helpful forum.</font>

 

IF I`VE BEEN OF HELP PLEASE TICKLE MY SCALES :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

Council's are governed by the 6 year rule so they have to bring the matter before the Magistrates' within 6 years of the debt falling due. Once they have the Liability order there is no time scale in which to collect they debt by.

 

As long as the Council served documentation at the "last known address" then it is seen by the Magistrates' as good service even though you may have moved and not collected your mail.

 

As you're not on the electoral register they wont be able to pick you up from that.

 

Most Council's do have a write off policy. Generally if the bailiff returns it as absconder and the Council either passess it out to a tracing agency ior does the work themselves and they're unable to locate the person then they will write the debt off.

 

if you have any querie PM me

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

now thats what i wanted to hear.i was under immense stress at the time and also unemployed if you could call caring for someone unemployed i`d always hoped that if it came to the crunch a court would look at the circumstances but i`ll leave that untill the axe falls :eek:

thanx

S.C

Do you have a website? Add the following code to add a link to The Consumer Action Group:

 

<a href="http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o.uk"><b><font color="#FF0000" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The Consumer Action Group</font></b></a> - <font color="#FF9900" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Reclaim the Right as a consumer and reclaim your unfair bank charges! Free site with letter templates and helpful forum.</font>

 

IF I`VE BEEN OF HELP PLEASE TICKLE MY SCALES :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi S.C

 

Please keep an eye on the post. As council knows where you are, bailliff can start knocking your door. It is very unlikely council was unware of your 'arrears' in last 6 years, see you mentioned about bailiffs is involved means council or its nominated debt collection agency has got a judgement against you. But dont be stressful this is the time to act.

 

Please dont forget to reply to court and let it know your then and current financial position. I've witnessed quite a few cases when megistrate courts have written off old council tax debts on the basis of person's financial incapability.

 

One of my friends igonred everything and burried his head in sand. The total demand was more than £5000 and costs (though the costs were more than his actual CT bill) CT first tried to bankrupt him - failed - then took him to magistrate court expected to send him behind the bars. He told court he couldn't pay due to casual work he had in those particular years, couldnt claim benefits due to less or no information, now he is self employed and cant pay the amount. He can and is paying the current CT but cant afford to pay the previous one. He also provided some paperwork he had from those years and current financial statement (income and expend. form).

 

Result - Court wrote off his debt.

 

The best remedy has already been suggested to you. See your local welfare rights or CAB. Even Debt advisor can also deal with the case.

 

(please make sure your current liability is covered by council tax benefit - as you are a carer and you mother is a main housing and council tax claimnt you will not be classed as non dep so no effact on housing and council tax benefit).

Edited by adamrao

:-|Impossible is I'M Possible:lol:

If you think the advice given is useful then show your appreciation by clicking on the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

now thats what i wanted to hear.i was under immense stress at the time and also unemployed if you could call caring for someone unemployed i`d always hoped that if it came to the crunch a court would look at the circumstances but i`ll leave that untill the axe falls :eek:

thanx

S.C

 

Afraid the courts wont be interested in anything other than your 'liability' to pay. If you were on benefits etc and were entitled to a reduced or no tax, then they would, otherwise it is just rubber stamp and issue.

 

The courts don't even look at the names, it is just a big spreadsheet and is stamped at the bottom meaning all on the sheet are liable.

 

Just in case you had a worry about credit, council tax arrears or liability judgement does not get recorded on any credit reference agency file.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...