Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
    • its not about the migrants .. Barrister Helena Kennedy warns that the Conservatives will use their victory over Rwanda to dismantle the law that protects our human rights here in the UK.   Angela Rayner made fun of Rishi Sunak’s height in a fiery exchange at Prime Minister’s Questions, which prompted Joe Murphy to ask: just how low will Labour go? .. well .. not as low as sunak 
    • From #38 where you wrote the following, all in the 3rd person so we don't know which party is you. When you sy it was your family home, was that before or after? " A FH split to create 2 Leasehold adjoining houses (terrace) FH remains under original ownership and 1 Leasehold house sold on 100y+ lease. . Freeholder resides in the other Leasehold house. The property was originally resided in as one house by Freeholder"
    • The property was our family home.  A fixed low rate btl/ development loan was given (last century!). It was derelict. Did it up/ was rented out for a while.  Then moved in/out over the years (mostly around school)  It was a mix of rental and family home. The ad-hoc rents covered the loan amply.  Nowadays  banks don't allow such a mix.  (I have written this before.) Problems started when the lease was extended and needed to re-mortgage to cover the expense.  Wanted another btl.  Got a tenant in situ. Was located elsewhere (work). A broker found a btl lender, they reneged.  Broker didn't find another btl loan.  The tenant was paying enough to cover the proposed annual btl mortgage in 4 months. The broker gave up trying to find another.  I ended up on a bridge and this disastrous path.  (I have raised previous issues about the broker) Not sure what you mean by 'split'.  The property was always leasehold with a separate freeholder  The freeholder eventually sold the fh to another entity by private agreement (the trust) but it's always been separate.  That's quite normal.  One can't merge titles - unless lease runs out/ is forfeited and new one is not created/ granted. The bridge lender had a special condition in loan offer - their own lawyer had to check title first.  Check that lease wasn't onerous and there was nothing that would affect good saleability.  The lawyer (that got sacked for dishonesty) signed off the loan on the basis the lease and title was good and clean.  The same law firm then tried to complain the lease clauses were onerous and the lease too short, even though the loan was to cover a 90y lease extension!! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

banks- nothing to do with penalties


159user159
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5646 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

:rolleyes:I have taken one of the banks in court 6 weeks ago, I have also served them with a letter forbiding them from taking an action on my account while it is in dispute since last year, however today i received a letter from a debt collection agency, I was under the impression that under the 1974 consumers Act, while the account was in dispute they could not refer the account to a collection agency?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Consumer Credit Act does not apply to banks!:):):)

Please note: I give advice, in good faith, based on my reading and experience. Please satisfy yourself, that any advice given is accurate in content before acting upon it.

A to Z index

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/site-questions-suggestions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

 

...........................................................................

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're thinking of the Banking Code:

 

13.6 We may give information to credit reference agencies

about the personal debts you owe us if:

• you have fallen behind with your payments;

• the amount owed is not being disputed; and

• you have not made proposals we are satisfied with

for repaying your debt, following our formal demand

Link to post
Share on other sites

what is so stupid of them, is that i have a loan which i pay religiously for the past 3 years, and have had this account with Barclays for over 35 years. Their people's or customer care sucks, that they for up to today have not try to have a dialoque with me about the matter last year in August when the withdrawal of the cash took place, and now, only few weeks ago, i have being over deluged with phone calls even in the week-ends about payments which in fact have been in dispute since last year!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

i just received my statment today, and they still charge me interest on a disputed amount of continuous interest charges, are these people real, their barclays litigation section phoned and said that they will not charge any interest or ask for payments until this is settled by the courts about a week ago, i did ask this in writting, but have not received anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Micheal Browne thanks for your message can you tell me what you think regarding my messages, the amount which they try to collect has been in dispute, therefore how can they refer it to a collection agency?

Link to post
Share on other sites

can someone directly to do the proper steps legally concerning my case against Barclays bank please. I have requested acredit agreement, but i did not know that i had to pay, and they are late by 2 weeks, could they disputed on grounds of payment?

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes they have. However, and it goes like this. The particulars are summery and do not provide details of the account held with the defendant. Accordingly, this defence is summary in nature and the defendant reserves the right to amend this stament of case in due course.

 

3. It is admitted that the claimant has previously received a refund of 208.00 pounds from the defendant on 26/02/08 for alledged 'defaault" charges applied to her account.

 

4. To the extent it is alleged that the claimant (that is me of course) has incurred additional charges on her account for unauthorised borrowings (whether late payent fees, exceeding authorised credit limit fees, or any other such fees the "charges, the defendant puts the claimant to strict proof of each charge and the date thereof.

 

And it goes on and on sighting that i have mismanaged my account when in fact they have mismanaged the deductions back in August last year, and the withdrawl of the 100 pound cash which i had disputed, therefore since i could not get them to respond on the greavances i had i send them a letter asking them to have a dialogue with me before i filed which they ignored. Then is send them a letters asking a signed credit agreement on the 31/05/08, which they are now in default, because they have not send it to me. I did not know that i had to pay a pound for it, but it does not seem to be the problem, they actually in breach of their contract, as they suppose to have taken care of the problem back in September when i send them a letter stating that they have miscalculated the account charged against my payments made to the tune of 300 pounds including the 100 pounds withdrawal in cash, and the had charged interest on the amount which is wrong by all my calculations. Up to this date, even though the amount is disputed they still charge interest!!! Any way thanks for the help you provide me, i also have received the questionaire of which i returned back to the court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have Barclays acknowledged and filed a defence of the court claim?

 

yes they have, today I received a letter from the court giving me til 9th July to serve the partivulars of claim in compliance with CPR 16.4?

 

3) In daufaoult the claim shall be truck out (is that if they do not receive the above?

 

Please advice of this message from the court today!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you post your full poc please.

I Wish you everything you wish yourself.

 

NatWest Claimed £1,639. Accepted £1,344.

Natwest Paid me again as GOGW £1,656. Yes they can have it back if they say please.

Barclays 1 Claimed £1,260. Won by default. Paid in full

Barclays 2 Claimed £2,378. Won by default. Paid in full

Birmingham Midshires. Claimed £2,122. Accepted £2,075.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you post your full poc please.

 

Before District Judge Pelly sitting at Cambridge Court, 197 East Road, Cambridge, CB1 1BA.

 

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

 

1) the claimant do by 9 july file and serve particulars of Claim in compliance of CPR 16.4

 

2) In default the claim shall be struck out.

 

Date 23 June 2008.

 

Note: Any person affected by this order may apply to the court to vary, stay or set it aside, Any such application must be made within 7 days or service of this order upon them.

 

I will add that this Form of Judgment or order arrived in my house today from cambridge which is only 27 miles away. That means it took this 4 days to be delivered in my address?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you post your full poc please.

 

 

This is their response to my claim:1. Barclaycard is a trading division of Barclays bank PLC and not a legal entity in its own right.

 

2. The particulars of the claim are summary and do not provide details of the account held with the defendant. Accordingly, this defence is summary in nature and the Defendant reserves the right to amend this Statement of Case in due course.

 

3. It is admitted that the Clasimant has previously received a refund of L208.00 from the Defendant on 26 February 2008 for alledged "default" charges applied to her account

 

4. It is admitted that the Claimant has incurred aditional charges on her account for unauthorized borrowings(whether late payments fees, exceeding authorised credit limit fees, or any other such fees the "charges", the defendant puts the Clasimant to stict proof of each charge and the date thereof.

 

5. It is the responsibility of the account holder to properly monitor the account so as to ensure compliance, for example, with the oligation to make payments by the required date.

 

6. The defendant's standar's terms and conditions ("Terms') gave the Claimant a fair and transparent view of the obligations and entitlements set out above, incuding the basis on which the Defendant would be entitled to debit the Charges from the Claimant's account.

 

7. It further denied that the Carges were unlawfully debited from the Claimant's account. It is averred that the said charges and interest are and remain lawful and enforceable and that the Defendant was entitled to debit the same.

 

8. It is denied that there was negligent. The Claimant has failed to explain and /or identify how the Defendants were negligent and further fails to explain what the "problem" is that she refers to in the particulars of claim.

 

9. It is denied that there was an "illigal withdrawal" from the Claimant's account. This matter has been investigated internally by the Bank and the claimant's allegations has not been proven and as such is denied.

 

10. Further, the Claimant's claim for compensation for frustation is denied.

 

11. The Claimant is put to stict proof that her credit rating was affected in any way by the defendant. Any detimental effects that the Claimant may hve suffered is respect of her credit rating wre consequences of the Claimant's mismanagment of her account.

 

12. The claim for consequential loss, including, but not lismited to, the costof investigating the claim and drafting letters to the Defendant, is denied. The Defendant further asserts that such sosts, which the Claimant is put to strict proof of, are not recoverable undr the Small Claims track as set out in CPR 27.14 or at all.

 

13. The defendant dies that it is laible to the Claimant for the sums claimed and interest, as pleaded or at all.

 

STATEMENT OF TRUTH ETC ETC.

 

 

i WOULD LIKE TO ADD FEW FACT HERE;

 

Last August 2007, a withdrawl of cash from my gold card was made at a Co-Op shop which i never visited except to top up my mobile phone.

 

Uppon reseipt of my statment with the withdrawal I contacted Barclays that maitnained that cash was received by a singnature. I visited the Co-Op and asked one of the managers if that was possible, they told me that there was no possibility that anyone could either had withdrawn the cash by a signature. They had a cash point which charged a fee, and which i did not use.

 

I wrote to Barclays with the findings, and told them that, I personally did not make that transaction and that no one else could have had the card. The gold card was issued in February, and I paid it in full every month up to the withdrawl of cash in full. They disputed the fact, and said that a pin was used and therefore I make the transaction, I wrote back and ask that they provide proof of that transaction taking place form co-op on several occations by recorded mail, they ignored it. On September 22ns, I mail them an account of the balance owed to them, finding that there were 300 pounds over to what it was charged in the account, so I told them that they needed to check my account and correct the balance agaisnt pafyments received which were wrongly deducted. No reply, I sen various e-mails which gave the same reply of loads of BS. We are sorry for the disatisfaction bla bla bla, no word on the correction of that amount. But since then, that 400 pounds were accumilating interest, that 300included the 100 pounds cash. I have written over 15 recorded mail letters which I received no answer. Then I send them a priliminary letter for an action taken in court, they disregarded the whole thing, I also asked them to have a dialogue with me prior to an action to correct the mistake, nothing the letter was send for the priliminary approch on 30/03/08, i gave them 14 days for reply. In response they send a letter for the 208 pounds claiming no resposibility.I filed on the 02/05/08 long after the period stated in my preliminary letter tothem. Up to that period I had received no phone calls or any other contact from them. After I filled, i was deluged with calls including the week ends late at night.

Finally I receive a call from (a female) asking various questions regarding my claim, that was few days before they filled their response. Then I send a request for aformal request for a credit agreement on 31st of may 2008 which ahs not been responded. The female that called me said tha tshe would mail these papers to me, I have not received them up to date, which makes them to bre in default I blelieve, after that I also mailed a letter telling them to stop calling me by phone23/06/08 on the basis of harasment. Also send a letter the 22/06/08 a letter about breach of the privacy act for passing information to a company for collections, merchers. I received theri letter on 19/06/08. That is how the situation stands up to date, when of course I received the court request for particulars of the case. Any how, I know that this is legthy and I am sorry if overbuden someone with it, any help provided will very much appreciated to write the response. I know verabally what I would like to say, however writting it in proper context is my problem. Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi 159,

 

Can you please post your POC (Particulars of Claim) exactly as set out on the court claim you filed against BC.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

can i go back to something. Was the initial issue with regards to a credit card withdrawal of CASH in an ATM and then no further payments to the card were made and that is where it spiralled?

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

I filed to the court but i do not have a copy of the particulars, i will go to court Monday and ask for a ccopy, should the court have send me a copy of this?

 

also since then on the 31st of May i send them a letter asking for a credit agreement,which i have never received a response.

 

June 23rd, Im send them a letter because of the quantity of calls received for the past 6 weeks including the week-ends, Like today Mercers phoned me and told me they wish to speak to me, I had send a letter to them and copies of the court action 8 days ago, but i still get calls.24th June I requested a comprehensive list of charges that have been made in my account for the past 6 years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...