Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you everyone!  thought to share some points from my experience in court today that may help others who are taking Evri to court: The judge sets out how the hearing will go and how each party should behave; while i was certainly feeling anxious/nervous ahead of the hearing (and I'm sure @jk2054 may have also observed this), the judge really does try to put any non-legal persons at ease; refrain from talking to the other party and instead speak to the judge if you have any questions/responses; the judge and the advocate spoke about tort of negligence - i wasn't sure how this applied to my case but the judge was questionning the advocate about this so i chose to stay out of this; the judge made reference to a historical case of Donaghue v Stevenson which established a duty of care; the judge observed that some of the points in Evri's witness statement by george wood needed cross examination but george was not present today for questionning; While i was claiming 8% interest, the judge pointed out that is the upper limit and that today, savings accounts give 4-5%. I therefore opted for 5% interest which was agreed to by the judge and the advocate; above all else, ensure you know your court bundle and have any notes to help you refer to specific sections - it helped me to structure my answers to the judge/defendant's queries, and point to specific evidence where i was asked to prove e.g., the value of the item. @honeybee13 - yes, will confirm when payment is received. I have emailed the Evri.claims email with my bank details and also provided them after the hearing to the advocate. @BankFodder message received and i am replying to it
    • Looks promising then.  Well done   Dx
    • So a little update.  I sent a complaint to ico and have heard nothing. I just got the general reply email and that's it.  Sat twiddling my thumbs and thought about what I should do next. I searched for the CEO of Studio but then found that he'd left so as keep getting letters from studio about the arrears etc. I thought I'd email the David Twigg. Sent him all the bumpft and a copy of my original complaint and sars request.  Got no response. So didn't know what else to do. Then I thought I'd try through the financial difficulties option on the online form. One last try before I just give up and let them default me.  Then on the 5th June. I got an email from their customer services. That the items that had gone AWOL have all been cancelled. Nothing else on that email, so I had a look in an email account that I don't use anymore and there was an email from the customer service.  That they were sorry for the problems I've had for the last 9 months. That the sars info was emailed to me on 14/04, it wasn't I've kept all spam and deleted emails on that account, they have raised a complaint with their studio pay team regarding the issues, balance dispute, fee's and my credit file. They are hoping to resolve in 3 days but they have upto 56. They also said in regards to my other issues I have to raise a complaint with studio retail but haven't told me how I do that.  The sars info only goes upto the end of December 2023. It has my previous complaints on there but nothing after so I don't know how I get hold of that information. Luckily I've kept copies of every time I've contacted them. Every web chat or social media contact.  Apologies for the extremely long post but I wanted to add everything I could just incase.  I have checked my account balance and it's still minus 900 odd pounds but I'll keep checking to see if it's all cleared and on my credit file.  I'm hoping this is the end of the whole debacle and they close my account because I never want to do this again. Although it's been a learning experience.  Thanks to dx100uk for pointing me in the right direction. Much appreciated.   
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • If you want to cause DCBL trouble, then complain to the SRA.  It would be even more fun if mystic_bertie would complain at the same time, to show the SRA there is a pattern.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Is this a April fools wind up?? Car dealership and my deposit.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5898 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If you buy in or take a car in part exchange and then put it through an MoT and do a service on it before you put it in the showroom and it doesn't sell for 9, 10, 11 months or even longer, all that work will have to be done again, that is why it is left until after purchase.

 

Exactly and there is also the matter or right downs. One of the peugeot dealers I worked for also had a time limit of how long a car would be on the forecourt. After 90 days it would be exhanged with another dealer within the group to rotate the stock.

 

Obviously the transportation of these vehicles is another cost...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Oh Pleesae tbern in both your last posts your stretching credulity to it's limit

 

Sorry JonCris forgot you know everything about everything....

Remember if you find anything I say helpful, please click the scales

 

 

tbern123 vs Cabot

  1. Cabot again !!! Urgent Help Needed
  2. Litigation - tbern123 V Cabot Financial (Uk) Limited
  3. No more calls from Cabot... lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh Pleesae tbern in both your last posts your stretching credulity to it's limit

 

Also Caveat emptor does not apply in the case of a dealer selling to a private buyer but Caveat venditor could

 

Now this in an interesting read

 

http://www.whatcar.com/news-special-report.aspx?NA=217545&EL=3143810

 

By refusing to complete the sale you have agreed, you are technically in breach of contract and so forfeit your deposit.

Remember if you find anything I say helpful, please click the scales

 

 

tbern123 vs Cabot

  1. Cabot again !!! Urgent Help Needed
  2. Litigation - tbern123 V Cabot Financial (Uk) Limited
  3. No more calls from Cabot... lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry OP for taking over your thread, I was just trying to offer some advice from someone that used to work in the trade and has seen similar situations, instead of emotional responses that are based on observation rather then real life situations

 

I feel given the circumstance, you could try and reach a compromise with the dealer i.e a partial refund or a larger discount on another car. My old Sales Manager always used to resolve problems by offering stupid discounts on other cars.

 

Despite some of the posts on this thread, I think it is a good sign that this dealer performed the work before you took delivery. It would appear they had your best interests. they could have easily kept quiet, let you take the car and a few months down the line the brakes could have failed.

 

I think in this particular situation the dealer is dammed if they do and dammed if they don't.

Remember if you find anything I say helpful, please click the scales

 

 

tbern123 vs Cabot

  1. Cabot again !!! Urgent Help Needed
  2. Litigation - tbern123 V Cabot Financial (Uk) Limited
  3. No more calls from Cabot... lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

This dealership did not refund deposits. On each occassion if legal action was commenced by the customer they would automatically make a counter claim. Unless the company lied to their staff they successfully defended all claims against them.

 

That is what I have previously said, but what do I know. I only worked in the industry

Remember if you find anything I say helpful, please click the scales

 

 

tbern123 vs Cabot

  1. Cabot again !!! Urgent Help Needed
  2. Litigation - tbern123 V Cabot Financial (Uk) Limited
  3. No more calls from Cabot... lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Connif, deepthroat & tbern, thank you for your input and wise words. It has been hard work trying to get JC to understand how things work in the real world. I for one would have no hesitation in dealing with the company in question, as they appear to have acted with integrity in making sure the vehicle was without fault before the OP drove it away and not all dealers would have done so.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I do feel given the circumstances the dealer was not right to release the car. If you later had an accident you may have held them legally responsible. I also feel that the dealer has a good argument to retain the deposit. Admitedly they could have handled the situation better.

 

As previously posted, a number of dealers would have saved themselves money (sales departments have to pay service departments like any normal customer) and let the car go, thus not reducing the profit from the sale.

 

Just out of interest how was the deposit paid ? Debit or Credit Card ?

 

If you paid by Credit Card, you could request your Credit Card company to refund your deposit.

 

I am surprised that JonCris did not either ask this qestion or suggest this as a / former Solicitor I am sure he is fully aware of Section 75 of the CCA.

 

To recommend the commencement of litigation which could take in excess of 12 months and risk a possible counter claim, when it may not be required is poor advice.

Remember if you find anything I say helpful, please click the scales

 

 

tbern123 vs Cabot

  1. Cabot again !!! Urgent Help Needed
  2. Litigation - tbern123 V Cabot Financial (Uk) Limited
  3. No more calls from Cabot... lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh Pleesae tbern in both your last posts your stretching credulity to it's limit

 

Also Caveat emptor does not apply in the case of a dealer selling to a private buyer but Caveat venditor could

 

In relation to Caveat emptor I was refering to the literal translation "buyer beware" in relation to the payment of deposits rather then it's actual legal meaning. I do apologise for any misunderstanding JobCris

Remember if you find anything I say helpful, please click the scales

 

 

tbern123 vs Cabot

  1. Cabot again !!! Urgent Help Needed
  2. Litigation - tbern123 V Cabot Financial (Uk) Limited
  3. No more calls from Cabot... lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

Help needed

 

I was informed the car would be available for collection ......

....a 75 journey for the collection of the vehicle. Whilst making my way to collect the vehicle

I phoned on the Wednesday to see if the vehicle was ready for collection.....

 

 

Your splitting hairs Connif

 

Of course he was on his way to pick it up but that 'pick up' would have been on the assumption that is was as described & a satisfactory test drive by the OP

 

Sorry JC - I don't think you read it correctly.

 

I don't see anywhere the op saying he was going for a test drive or even wanted one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now this in an interesting read

 

http://www.whatcar.com/news-special-report.aspx?NA=217545&EL=3143810

 

By refusing to complete the sale you have agreed, you are technically in breach of contract and so forfeit your deposit.

 

Yes but that assumes there has been no breach by the seller & also refers to showroom sales where the buyer has had an opportunity to inspect the goods it does not include what amounts to distance selling

 

Every potential buyer must be given an opportunity to inspect the goods before agreeing to purchase. Even if it didn't the dealer must tell the customer that any deposit is non refundable. They can't just take someone's money without warning them they may not have it returned to them.

 

I do know about sec75 but the card company will only agree to invoke that if you have made every attempt to recover the money yourself

 

The dealers you refer to do retain deposits, as they are lawfully entitled to do but again I point out that applies to showroom purchases and where the customer has signed an acceptance note at the time of sale or in the case of an internet order agreed to their T's & C's which must specify that deposits are non refundable

 

Anyway I repeat to all you past & present 'car dealers' let's see how the OP gets on

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...