Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Can someone please advise on how to upload picture.  I’ve taken a photo of the first page of claim form and converted to pdf but it saying file too big. It’s only one page
    • pop up on the bulk court website detailed on the claimform. [if it is not working return after the w/end or the next day if week time] . When you select ‘Register’, you will be taken to a screen titled ‘Sign in using Government Gateway’. Choose ‘Create sign in details’ to register for the first time. You will be asked to provide your name, email address, set a password and a memorable recovery word. You will be emailed your Government Gateway 12-digit User ID. You should make a note of your memorable word, or password as these are not included in the email.  then log in to the bulk court Website .  select respond to a claim and select the start AOS box. .  then using the details required from the claimform . defend all leave jurisdiction unticked  you DO NOT file a defence at this time [BUT you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 ] click thru to the end confirm and exit the website .. get a CCA Request running to the claimant . https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332502-cca-request-consumer-credit-act-1974-updated-january-2015/ .. Leave the £1 PO unsigned and uncrossed . get a CPR  31:14  request running to the solicitors [if one is not listed send to the claimant] ... https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ . .use our other CPR letter if the claim is for an OD or Telecom Debt or Util debt]  https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/332546-legal-cpr-3114-request-request-for-information-when-a-claim-has-been-issued/ on BOTH type your name ONLY Do Not sign anything .do not ever use or give an email . you DO NOT await the return of ANY paperwork  you MUST file a defence regardless by day 33 from the date on the claimform [1 in the count] ..............  
    • you IGNORE THEM. stop being had blind nothing anyone can do to you. dx  
    • 3 threads merged for complete history of your debts. i suggest you re read from post 1 again. what are you doing still blindly paying a DCA on a historic debt?  
    • Hi, I have an old outstanding debt from 1994 due to MBNA for £20,000. The debt has been passed to various DCAs and is currently with PRA Group.  I sent them a CCA letter in January 2024. They acknowledged this letter and stated they would come back when they had more information, however the information did not arrive within the 12 working day scenario.. I have just received a copy of the agreement which goes back to 1994 from them. In their response letter they have stated " Please find enclosed documentation received to date: we are waiting further documents in order to complete your request. We have currently deemed this debt as unenforceable which means we are not able to take court or further action against you to recover the outstanding balance". They then go on to state "we are still legally entitled to:  1.Contact you to ask and repay what you owe 2.Pass your details onto a third party collection agency 3. Continue to report your account with the credit reference bureaux (as appropriate)". I'm at a loss as to what I should do next and would appreciate any guidance on this matter. I am currently paying £5.00 pcm. TIA      
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Problem with new conservatory


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4951 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 108
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Just while I am reading this, could you please state the following :

 

1. The name of the builder.

2. The name of the surveyor (did they work on behalf of the builder or id you appoint separately)

3. Did you pay for this on credit?

 

I know you maight have already mentioned these - I will get them if so. If not, please let me know the details (you can pm me if you don't want to name them publicly).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a few more things (it will be tomorrow before I can answer (apologies))

1. Was most of the negotiations (before you signed anything) done at your house or in their premesis or over phone?

2. Who is financing this? Is it a creditor who is separate from the builder, or is the builder themselves providing the credit?

3. Exactly what documents, plans, forms etc do you have that you can lay your hands on (that is - in your possesion - not ones that you would have to ask copies of)? These documents include EVERYTHING from when you first made contact.

4. During any negotiations, was there anyone else present?

5. Have you reported this to Consumer Direct yet?

6. Do you have a scanner to enable these to be sent to me (by PM - all confidential).

 

 

Also - click here to PM me (this is NOT an invitation for everyone else! Please post problems first as 99% of the time they can be answered!)http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/private.php?do=newpm&u=150908

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent a letter detailing my complaints and offered two alternatives - rebuild or accept enclosed cheque in full and final settlement (around 20% less than final invoice). I marked the cheque clearly - in full and final settlement.

 

Now it's getting interesting - the company have sent me a letter saying they are not accepting my offer of rebuild or accepting reduced payment in full and final settlement and demand full payment in 7 days. But I've just checked my account and they have obviously banked it as it shows cleared from my account.

 

So, they are going to take me to court in 7 days but they have banked the cheque which clearly stated in full and final settlement. Having banked this cheque does that mean that they have no legal basis to proceed?

Poppynurse :)

 

If my comments have been helpful please click my scales!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have written and informed you that they are not prepared to accept your cheque in F&F and are therefore entitled to bank the cheque as part payment. Some will argue that they are not allowed to bank the cheque, however in the majority of these cases the courts will allow it as they have written to you immediately refusing your offer of F&F and have merely banked the cheque as part payment. How many times has this forum given exactly the same advice to those who have been offered part payment as F&F for reclaiming bank charges?

 

I am very surprised that you have no drawings showing the design and measurements etc. as normal practice would be to have everything down on paper (they will have). Without knowing the full facts if it proceeds to court I honestly think you will have a major struggle on your hands to win this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's the only time I've ever bought a conservatory so I didn't know that normal practice was to have a set of plans - they definately have not gven me anything other then the dimensions and prive on a contract with so much small print it's unbelieveable.

 

Their reply basically says they have built it as I asked - which they have not but I see that proving it may be difficult - but why would I ask them to build something I can't access to maintain down one side and need a stepladder to get out of? I'm just reluctant to pay the full invoice as I'm NOT HAPPY with the end product.

Poppynurse :)

 

If my comments have been helpful please click my scales!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say that on the contract you have the dimensions, how are these written does it just say contruct a 4m x 5m conservatory or does it say contruct a 4m w x 5m l conservatory?

 

As for the maintenance aspect, lots of people have these built so close to party walls/fences that they are unable to get down the side to clean etc. so not really much use as a defence I am afraid. Again regarding the lack of provision of steps, they could simply argue that you never requested them. Please don't think that I am trying to deter you, it is just that I simply look at the facts and do not let emotion get in the way of them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a big difference between "proving beyond reasonable doubt" (criminal) and "balance of probabilities" (civil). It would boil down to what and who the judge believes. If the company tries to take you to court for the rest of the money, THEY will be expected to show that they have done the work for which they are claiming the money, which could make things interesting. The fact is, you are not refusing to pay outright, you are asking for redress in either a reduction in price or repair. A judge would have to decide, taking into account everything, whether he believes that you, a nurse with no knowledge of building, did in fact not get what she had ordered or whether you failed to specify what you wanted, also whether the company failed in its responsability towards their customer by not getting detailed enough instructions or whether they fully discharged their contractual obligations.

 

I don't know enough about buildings to fully understand what a previous poster has said about the wall and its possible import as regards building regulations, but if it is true, then there would be a very good argument to support your side of things, and I think you need to look into that further.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well I'm waiting a call back from Trading Standards (Consumer Direct decided I was too complex!). I've sent them another letter expressing my disappointment that they are threatening court within seven days without trying to resolve this informally (hopefully the judge will take a dim view of this) and another cheque for a bit more in the hope that they will settle, quoting the supply of goods and servies act 1982.

 

At the end of the day I'm not happy with the conservatory and have to pay out more for steps. The lack of access may even invalidate the guarantee as I have to maintain it in good condition and can't get access to do so despite clearly requesting this. I think I'll let them take me to court and see what the judge thinks! They are clearly not bothered that I am very disappointed and just want the money. I definately won't be receommending them to my friends and will name and shame once this is dealt with!

Poppynurse :)

 

If my comments have been helpful please click my scales!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You say that on the contract you have the dimensions, how are these written does it just say contruct a 4m x 5m conservatory or does it say contruct a 4m w x 5m l conservatory? It's just a brochure with the dimensions in and the model number on the contract with a rough sketch.

 

As for the maintenance aspect, lots of people have these built so close to party walls/fences that they are unable to get down the side to clean etc. so not really much use as a defence I am afraid. But I specifically told the surveyor that I required access down the side. Again regarding the lack of provision of steps, they could simply argue that you never requested them. He did not tell me there would be such a gradient or I would have factored that into my order/costings. I didn't request steps because I didn't know I would need them - surely he should have told me this? Please don't think that I am trying to deter you, it is just that I simply look at the facts and do not let emotion get in the way of them.

I know I appreciate your thoughts

Poppynurse :)

 

If my comments have been helpful please click my scales!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oooh keep us updated. Is it definitely Trading Standards? They will need to see the documents to give proper and accurate advice (which is why I could not be much more help!). fingers crossed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right - long chat with TSO. Basically she told me to let them take me to court, I'm to defend and counterclaim and go armed with photos and copies of all correspondance (apparently I've been reasonable in trying to negotiate a solution, judge will take dim view that they wouldn't discuss problems and immediately threatened court action). She said I could take them to court for failing to exercise reasonable care and skill but I'll let them do the running. The judge will decide who's telling the truth, me a mere nurse who knows nothing about construction or them the 'professionals' who should be very experienced in what they do and advise customers with due care. Worse case scenario - I lose and pay up, best case they lose and I live with what I've got and pay less than the full price.

 

We'll see what response the co. come back with to my 'legal' letter.

Poppynurse :)

 

If my comments have been helpful please click my scales!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Go for it! Good luck and let us know how it goes.

 

It might also be worth asking TS if they do provide any kind of suport or representation in court. Some do, some don't. If not, see if you qualify for any legal assistance.

 

All fingers and toes crossed (and the cat is trying to cross his claws but not having much luck!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they are going to take you to court how much will it be for?

 

I am just thinking of your exposure to their legal costs if you lose.

If I have been helpful please click on my star and add a comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right - long chat with TSO. Basically she told me to let them take me to court, I'm to defend and counterclaim and go armed with photos and copies of all correspondance (apparently I've been reasonable in trying to negotiate a solution, judge will take dim view that they wouldn't discuss problems and immediately threatened court action). She said I could take them to court for failing to exercise reasonable care and skill but I'll let them do the running. The judge will decide who's telling the truth, me a mere nurse who knows nothing about construction or them the 'professionals' who should be very experienced in what they do and advise customers with due care. Worse case scenario - I lose and pay up, best case they lose and I live with what I've got and pay less than the full price.

 

My thoughts are these: If you were to fight this in court, it would boil down to who the judge believes is telling the truth "on a balance of probabilities". Worse case scenario, he finds in the other side's favour and you end up having to pay the full amount and not getting your conservatory the way you wanted it. If you don't fight it... well, that's exactly what is going to happen too. On the other hand, if the judge believes you, then you could end up with less to pay or them having to put it right, etc..

It's always nice to know TS agree with me. :-D
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Poppynurse

I'm in the industry (conservatories) as a divisional manager for a large national (The 'Best' one ;) )

As far as too close to your neighbours boundary is concerned, had we done that - we would be liable for any responsibilities regarding actions brought by yourself or subsequent buyer of your property.

We are required to document ALL aspects/elevations including drawings that are supplied to the manufacturing department, fitters, planners, YOU, and anyone else involved such as original builders if covenants are in place etc etc. THEY WILL HAVE SUCH DRAWINGS... In particular the so called surveryors survey reports and subsequent documents.

Does your original contract stipulate width/projection? Did anyone make any enquiries to local planners?

Depending on local authorities and how close to the boundary wall, you may have needed planning permission (irrespective of size). The builder should not proceed on the assumption that this is taken care of without getting you to sign an indemnity letter first. Certainly we would have been responsible had we done the same.

The original sales person should also have a document relating to width/projection together with the contract, the surveyor will begin his survey on...

I think they know they've botched it and are hoping you'll back down from their threats of legal action.

Sadly this sort of thing happens far more often than you'd think. I moved to the 'Best' company from another national coz of the appalling way my customers were treated.

Best of Luck - I think you've a strong case...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi PoppyNurse, Just been reading your thread and would like to wish you all the best with this situation you are going through.

 

I cant see how they can win in court unless they stand and lie!

If you all agreed on A,B & C to be done for X amount of monies. Then anything less then A-B & C is a breach and they should be liable. simple as.

 

Good Luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...