Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If you’ve ever wondered how you might fare in armed combat, the first 20 minutes of Steven Spielberg’s Saving Private Ryan is likely to make you thank your lucky stars you were born too late to storm the Normandy beaches on June 6 1944. I suspect many of us might be driven to identify with those men who were absolutely turned to stone by fear. And yet these young men, mainly conscripts, screwed their courage to the sticking point and did the job the fate had chosen for them, heroes all.   .. UK PM Sunak perhaps thinks he understands mind numbing fear better than many as he dishonorably fled the beachhead to do nothing more than double down on dishonest spin and lies from the safety of a UK studio .. The Normandy heroes who did not just hold their positions but advanced through hell to a victory that changed the entire course of history .. undoubtedly hold a different perspective.     from a perspective in TheConversation     .. 'That was the slot that sunaks team offered for the interview
    • Yes, send a message to the purchaser but keep it very friendly and simply that you noticed that the package has now been delivered.  I suggest that you ask them if they want to keep the package still or if they would rather return it and that if they want to keep it then please will they return your payment to you to your PayPal address. Keep it as polite and friendly as possible and then we will decide what to do if he doesn't reply or refuses.  Meanwhile I will have a look at Google earth and see if you are able to spot the gas meter outside the house to get an idea if the delivery is real. Get a screenshot
    • Santander have sent their final response and have agreed that they were in the wrong. They will be refunding me the amount I am due and £50 for the delay.  Just the interest factor would be more than double the £50 that they are offering. Thinking to just close this and move on. Is this what you would do?  Opened a FOS case on the 1st of June but haven't heard back yet. 
    • It just been delivered and ive had a live chat with p2g to get some proof of deliverey and they send me a picture of the parcel placed in a gas meter box which they class as a ' 'Safe Place'  and not placed into the hands of the buyer which is either a good thing as the buyer can claim he never received It so i can claim against p2g or a bad thing . Do p2g have coordinators when taking pictures and scanning of parcels ?  I know Royal Mail do ... I'm going to send the buyer a message and see what he says
    • Eight in ten voters support blocking bonuses for polluting water firm bosses INEWS.CO.UK Polling for i exposes level of public anger over sewage dumping  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Letter out of the blue asking if I'm the Miss xx that lived in xx...?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5973 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, I would be very grateful if anyone could offer some advice on the following. I received a letter this morning from Lowell Portfolio I asking if I was the Miss X that had lived at address Y. Then asking that I contact them immediately; it also states that their records will be updated to show that it was in fact me if I don't contact them.

 

The address they state I haven't lived at for over five or six years and I ended a relationship and moved out of there (leaving ex-partner still living there.)

I really don't want to walk into a situation and was wondering if there was anyway I can find out what these people want without confirming that it could be me?

 

Thanks for any help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore it ... don't do anything.

 

File the letter for if and when they contact you again.

 

As Bookworm said, the debt they will be chasing will more than likely be Statute Barred so there is nothing they can do.

 

If they start trying to contact you by phone, NEVER talk to them ... straight from the word go just say that you want everything in writing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no earthly point in you responding because no matter what you write, or what you say, the result will be a demand for payment of a non-existant or statue barred debt.

 

Lowell Portfolio are a bunch of blood suckers who specialise in buy up old statue barred (i.e. not enforceable) debts for pennies and then spraying out fishing letters to anyone of the same name (or at the same address) hoping that they'll intimidate someone into paying up.

 

Click on the link in my sig which is a site another CAGer has set up to try and fight these people of undemonstrated parentage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont take this as advice...

 

But,

 

Cant she reply with...

 

'The debt you would be referring to was in dispute and has already been statute barred as it is over 6 years old meaning it is not enforceable!

 

Your recent correspondence explains that you are only just starting proceedings and is usable in court.

 

Any further correspondence from yourselves regarding this matter and I will file court action for harrasment.'

 

Surely, if Lowell know they cant get anywhere with it, a letter explaining to that tune (as long as it's not signed) will shue them off? No?

 

If she does ignore it, the floods of 'give us money' letters will start to fill her letter box wont they?

 

Perhaps nipping it in the bud early?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think she should respond with the relevant template (CCA or Statute Barred) when they've said what it is they're after. At the moment they are fishing and they well may have sent numerous people the same email about the same debt to see who responds.

 

Personally I would not respond to a contact from any company which simply asked me to confirm who I was and where I lived without giving information about what they actually wanted my details for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If notsurewhattodo moved out 5 or 6 years ago then it may not be statute barred yet

 

Plus she doesn't know what the alleged debt is for, who it belongs to, who owes it

 

So I agree with doing nothing, if they try again then she could ask them what it is all about, remembering it is up to the DCA to prove that it is her debt, not for her to prove that it is not.

 

Grumpy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think there is a lot of jumpiness in some of these replies.

 

Looking at the situation, Lowell have written asking if she was the person that lived there, if she doesnt reply they will assume she is. End of story!

 

So the advice at the moment is DO NOTHING.

 

Other than assuming that she is Miss so & so they have neither asked nor stated anything else at this time, I am sure they will later.

 

My personal opinion of all this Lowell rubbish with these statute barred BC accounts is why bother wasting a stamp and the time to do a letter, I should think they have a budget of around a £1 for each of these debts so that might mean another two letters at most.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

I just noticed this thread.

 

I`ve never had one of these kind of letters myself, but I don`t see why you need to confirm who you are to anyone. If they say you have a debt with them, then they should prove it with their first communication.

 

If you confirm your name and address they will only hound you.

 

As ODC says, wait until a letter with more substance arrives, including information such as original creditor, amount, account number etc. That way you will know if you owe and possibly owe. Then go from there.

 

So, just blank it, and just keep reading the CAG and enjoy.

 

Regards

 

 

N.P

If I have helped or made you laugh in any way in your hour of need, then please click my scales <<<<<<<<<< ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...