Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well we can't predict what the judge will believe. PE will say that they responded in the deadline and you will say they don't. Nobody can tell what a random DJ will decide. However if you go for an OOC settlement you should still be able to get some money
    • What do you guys think the chances are for her?   She followed the law, they didnt, then they engage in deception, would the judge take kindly to being lied to by these clowns? If we have a case then we should proceed and not allow these blatant dishonest cheaters to succeed 
    • I have looked at the car park and it is quite clearly marked that it is  pay to park  and advising that there are cameras installed so kind of difficult to dispute that. On the other hand it doesn't appear to state at the entrance what the charge is for breaching their rules. However they do have a load of writing in the two notices under the entrance sign which it would help if you could photograph legible copies of them. Also legible photos of the signs inside the car park as well as legible photos of the payment signs. I say legible because the wording of their signs is very important as to whether they have formed a contract with motorists. For example the entrance sign itself doe not offer a contract because it states the T&Cs are inside the car park. But the the two signs below may change that situation which is why we would like to see them. I have looked at their Notice to Keeper which is pretty close to what it should say apart from one item. Under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 Section 9 [2]a] the PCN should specify the period of parking. It doesn't. It does show the ANPR times but that includes driving from the entrance to the parking spot and then from the parking place to the exit. I know that this is a small car park but the Act is quite clear that the parking period must be specified. That failure means that the keeper is no longer responsible for the charge, only the driver is now liable to pay. Should this ever go to Court , Judges do not accept that the driver and the keeper are the same person so ECP will have their work cut out deciding who was driving. As long as they do not know, it will be difficult for them to win in Court which is one reason why we advise not to appeal since the appeal can lead to them finding out at times that the driver  and the keeper were the same person. You will get loads of threats from ECP and their sixth rate debt collectors and solicitors. They will also keep quoting ever higher amounts owed. Do not worry, the maximum. they can charge is the amount on the sign. Anything over that is unlawful. You can safely ignore the drivel from the Drips but come back to us should you receive a Letter of Claim. That will be the Snotty letter time.
    • please stop using @username - sends unnecessary alerts to people. everyone that's posted on your thread inc you gets an automatic email alert when someone else posts.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

lowell portfoli1-asking for my address confirmation.


jts1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5926 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi

i recived a letter from the above this is as written

we are trying to contact you regarding the address of 379*************** llanedeyrn cardiff

we have recently been supplied information that suggests you previously resided there

it would be appreciated if you would contact us immediately on the phone number provided below to confirm the update to your address details

if we dont hear from you we will assume the information to be correct and update our system

 

just wondering if anyone else has had a letter like this and what was the outcome

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome, jts1.

 

Maybe they have a big fat cheque for you.;-) .Then again, maybe not.

 

You would be better asking your question in this Forum.....

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/debt-collectors-debt-collection/

 

People in that Forum should be able to help you out.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

 

 

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

i recived a letter from the above this is as written

we are trying to contact you regarding the address of 379*************** llanedeyrn cardiff

we have recently been supplied information that suggests you previously resided there

it would be appreciated if you would contact us immediately on the phone number provided below to confirm the update to your address details

if we dont hear from you we will assume the information to be correct and update our system

 

just wondering if anyone else has had a letter like this and what was the outcome

thanks

 

Yeh I received one yesterday with the exact same as above, except for the address obviously :)

It is a Yorkshire based DEBT COLLECTION company. My advice, is to not phone them, and wait until you get another letter from them stating exactly what they want. Just out of curiousity, did they give you a reference number beginning with 9?

I believe in Fair Debt - not chance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have moved thread here.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just out of interest what number do they give to call? If it is a mobile or high rate charge call them you do not have to contact them as this contravenes the Office of Fair Trading debt collection guidelines

 

0800 027 0194 which is a freephone number

I believe in Fair Debt - not chance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi to All (My first post to the Forum)

 

I too have received a similar letter quoting a ref number of 9xxxxxx3

 

Also gives a 0800 0270194 number interestingly a fax no of 0845 3009411

 

Also stereo-typed signature of Simon Armitage

Customer Contact Manager

 

Action taken? ................ filed

Kernow247

Cornwall, UK

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello everyone

 

Im new to this site and what brought me here was a letter i got from lowells is the same as in this thread, asking me to confirm old address details:rolleyes:

 

Funnily enough my ref number starts with a 9 also!

 

Im sitting tight and waiting for there next communication:cool:

 

cm

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi now recieved a second letter stating that i owe them £480.43 for a barclaycard account which has not been paid i have never had a barclaycard and dont want one any advice on dealing with this will be most welcome

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send the clowns this by recorded delivery

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am now totally intrigued and wonder how the hell do they get away with it - intimidation or what.

Further letter received claiming that I owe £458.51 to Barclaycard and the collection of this 'debt' is now being collected by Red Debt Collection Services (I smell a [problem] here!)

 

Needless to say letter duly sent 22Jan08 - recorded delivery to a PO Box No 203 which is the same as Lowell's - interesting to note that PO Box 172 at Leeds LS11 9WS is used to return letter to sender of original letter(curious).

 

Apparrently 'this debt' was purchased by Lowell Porfolio on the 14Dec2007.

 

Further interest. I haven't had or used Barclaycard for over 30 years!!

 

kernow247

Kernow247

Cornwall, UK

Link to post
Share on other sites

Red Debt Collection letter also received about a week ago too. I've filed it under B for "To Be Binned" (I've kept it obviously for now but its laying with the previous communication assuming that I live at the address)

 

From what I can gather after searching through the threads is this:

  1. Lowells Financial, Lowells 1, Red Star, eventually Hamptons, are all one and the same. They have bought or been handed a load of Barclaycard debts and are just trying their utmost to intimidate, frighten and scare people with debts that either never existed, or if they did, are over 6 years old and therefore apparently statue barred (I think this means they are legally unenforceable)
  2. You can send them reply letters, but even if you send them recorded delivery, special delivery, or by carrier pidgeon, it is likely you will still continue to receive letters, threats and maybe a Court Summons
  3. If you do get a Court Summons then obviously do NOT ignore that, otherwise by default, they will simply win

I think it would be great if we could all club together and take some sort of combined civil action against this people. I'm not sure if that's possible, but it certainly seems to me, that countless numbers of people have been targeted by this company, and thats only the ones we know about, who have been lucky enough to have an internet connection, and some know how to research these letters. I bet there are thousands who right now are scared out of their wits by this Leeds based company, and I'm just wondering if anyone agrees, that Watchdog should be advised of this?

 

I apologise if I sound like I'm trying to incite some sort of crusade, but I for one am really fed up with this fear of coming home to more letters about an alledged debt that I don't even recognise the quoted Barclaycard number on. People get used very quickly to remembering the last four digits because these always appear on all receipts! I do not recognise the last 4 digits quoted on my letter :-x

I believe in Fair Debt - not chance

Link to post
Share on other sites

A quick note to Watchdog may be a very useful way of letting other people know that this company is trying to intimidate them into paying through ignorance - ie lack of internet connections.

Perhaps the OFT and Trading Standards Office (Local and National) the Citizens Advice Bureau should be involved/notified as soon as possible?

 

I also get worried as to what an elderly/infirm person who has probably never had such a letter before would re-act - to avoid a visit from bailiff et al.... probably pay up - even sending a letter by post is another cost that they would needlessly incur.

 

kernow247

Kernow247

Cornwall, UK

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think from having read through many posts, elderly people have already been targeted too by this company. It really annoys me that this has happened to others, as well as me obviously, and I just wonder how these businesses would react if it was them being served with demands, summons, etc?

 

It's always the small person these b*ggers to go after, because they know they can get away with it

 

Whens watchdog on???? :D

I believe in Fair Debt - not chance

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think from having read through many posts, elderly people have already been targeted too by this company. It really annoys me that this has happened to others, as well as me obviously, and I just wonder how these businesses would react if it was them being served with demands, summons, etc?

 

It's always the small person these b*ggers to go after, because they know they can get away with it

 

Whens watchdog on???? :D

 

You're right, my Mam was one of them. Cheque written out and ready to send until I found it. She's never had a credit card in her life, yet this bunch of idots reckoned she owed Barclaycard. She was scared out of her mind and losing sleep. To me there should be a law against it! And as another poster has said, you could put your life on the fact that if more than one person paid they sure as hell wouldn't return the cash to innocent targets!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...