Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Wrong as usual Jugg    Did Michael Cohen Commit Perjury In The Trump Trial? WWW.ZEROHEDGE.COM ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero Michael Cohen. He still has one day of cross examination ahead of him on Thursday. With the government resting after Cohen’s cross examination, I believe that an honest judge would have no alternative but to grant a motion for a directed verdict and end the case before it goes to the jury. Judge Juan Merchan will now have to give the full measure of his commitment to the rule of law. Given the failure to support the elements of any crime or even to establish the falsity of recording payments as legal expenses, this trial seemed to stumble through the motions of a trial. Michael Cohen was only the final proof of a raw political exercise. For critics, some of Cohen’s answers appear clearly false or misleading. Like their star witness, the prosecutors have shown that they simply do not take the law very seriously when there is an advantage to be taken.
    • So to sum up. 1.  You & your friend did the right thing on 28 December and are in the right legally. 2.  You are in the early stages of the threatening letter cycle.  We've seen these letters quite literally over 10,000 times.  For the moment your friend has nothing to worry about. 3.  No-one will turn up at your friend's door. 4.  If months down the line this got to court, you would win.  It's blatant disability discrimination.  Some time back I looked through the results of Excel v Caggers court cases, well we won 85% of the time, and you would be 100& certain to win. But this is the bit that you won't like ... 5.  Excel don't care that they are legally in the wrong.  They want your money.  They will go on and on with their letters hoping you'll give in. 6.  They are also the most litigious of the private parking companies and it's perfectly possible, months hence, that they will take your friend to court.  You have to be prepared for this.  They would lose.  But they don't care about the losses since, sadly, presumably so many people are afraid of court and so give in and pay.  7.  We will of course support you all the way!
    • Hi, Just updating that I'll be submitting the SJPN shortly this evening electronically.
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Police Question. Very strange thing happened


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6010 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

It would also only be undertaking it you approached the traffic in the outside lane, pulled over to the lane on your left to pass said traffic and then pulled back into your right ahead of the traffic in the outside lane.

 

If however you are in the inside lane and approach and subsequently pass traffic which is in on your right then this is not undertaking, hence why you can be in the 'slow' or middle lane on the motorway and pass traffic in the lane to your right which is moving slower than you are.

 

So in the OP case by simply staying in the left lane and passing the lane hoggers no offence would have been commited

 

skb

Victory over Lloyds £890

Click!

Victory over Vodafone: default removal

click!

Victory over Lloyds PPI claim £2606 click!

Barclaycard lazygoing - £580 + £398 contractual int at 17.7 % click! (Received partial payment £110 21/11/06)

The GF's battle against RBS click! stayed awaiting the end of the world

Link to post
Share on other sites

Really?

 

It's bloody dangerous if you ask me - although the rule doesn't seem to apply on the M1.

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

If however you are in the inside lane and approach and subsequently pass traffic which is in on your right then this is not undertaking, hence why you can be in the 'slow' or middle lane on the motorway and pass traffic in the lane to your right which is moving slower than you are.

 

So in the OP case by simply staying in the left lane and passing the lane hoggers no offence would have been commited

 

Only in slow moving traffic.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only in slow moving traffic.

 

Or if the car you are undertaking has indicated to turn right

BEFORE starting your claim read through the FAQ's and if there's something you aren't sure of then ask.

If you win, donate to this site

Contents of my posts are purely my own personal opinions, some formed by personal experience and some from research. If in doubt seek qualified legal advice.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lots of interesting things being said about this, well just to let you know - I have not been paid a visit by the boys in blue. so far.

 

just clear a few points on this matter.

 

1. you can only overtake on the left side if the car in front is indicating to turn right.

2. the cars in front are queing in traffic and their lane is moving more slowly than yours.

3. in a 1 way street in all circumstances.

4. if the traffic on the right starts to break.

 

in my situation I was approaching from the near side lane, indicated to pull to the outside lane and left me indicator on in a jesture of I wish to pass. then indicated back to the left when a pass was not permitted, I had no intention of undertaking but I did have the intention of leaving my left indicator flashing to influence them in front to do the same.

 

let the debate continue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is ONLY supposed to be 50mph on a Single Carriageway for 'White Van Man'!...;)

 

Yeah right!!! Pull the other one

 

Next thing you'll be telling me is that white van man has to follow other traffic regulations too. Maybe looking out for bikers next

BEFORE starting your claim read through the FAQ's and if there's something you aren't sure of then ask.

If you win, donate to this site

Contents of my posts are purely my own personal opinions, some formed by personal experience and some from research. If in doubt seek qualified legal advice.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah right!!! Pull the other one

 

Next thing you'll be telling me is that white van man has to follow other traffic regulations too. Maybe looking out for bikers next

 

 

Or indicating:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah right!!! Pull the other one

 

Next thing you'll be telling me is that white van man has to follow other traffic regulations too. Maybe looking out for bikers next

 

Or indicating:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

well im a push cylcists and a white van was at a junction other day and waited till he saw the whites of my eyes before he decieded that the 2 seconds he would save we worth me going under his wheel he seemed to actually enjoy it how i missed him ill never know inch no more not the first time though and wont be the last but as i cant drive dont have an option but to cycle if i want to get from A to B sorry if this has sidetracked this but i feel very strongly about car drivers total disregard for cyclists cos im may as well be invisible most of the time cos im not seen by a lot and invisible im not sorry for off subject carry on now rant over :oxxkia ps sorry wrong pic that xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

ahem, for a lot of posters on here, i drive various vehicles with my job, one of which is a white van. I admit there are some ( quite a few) who are idiots basically, but please dont class us all the same. i do quite a few miles locally and some of the muppets are unbelievable. Sometimes i'm in 18 tonners, and they leave me enough room to get a dinky toy through. drivers of ALL vehicles can be piggin' stupid sometimes..

Please note that although my advice is offered, you should consult your legal representative before taking ANY action.

 

 

have a nice day !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The story at the start is the kind of "urban legend" that really p's me off

 

An urban legend is normally something that is a bit of fun and causes no harm, telling stories with no truth about rapists masquerading as policeman is not harmless fun, its sick beyond belief

 

Also since when did police cars have red lights?

 

And someone managed to get 4 police cars around that quickly i'd take my hat off to them - 1 would also be enough given the situation as any dodgy person would poo their pants and make haste as soon as they saw the blues and 2's

 

:mad:

 

In this rant I am not getting at the OP of the "myth" but we do need to be more careful about what we post and investigate such possibly damaging info before posting

 

Its right up there with the 101 supposed "dont open this email, its a virus and will melt your hard drive" posts I get to my facebook

omnia praesumuntur legitime facta donec probetur in contrarium

 

 

Please note: I am not a member of the legal profession, all advice given is purely my opinion, if in doubt consult a professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

A lot of Urban Myths originate from across the Pond + are corrupted to suit UK conditions etc.

Didn't Starsky & Hutch + Kojak drive an unmarked police car with a RED light??

...+ when U see a car chase on TV or at the flicks, isn't there ALWAYS zillions of cop cars involved??

btw...Mr OJ didn't seem to be in a hurry to make haste, that infamous time either?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

ahem, for a lot of posters on here, i drive various vehicles with my job, one of which is a white van. I admit there are some ( quite a few) who are idiots basically, but please dont class us all the same. i do quite a few miles locally and some of the muppets are unbelievable. Sometimes i'm in 18 tonners, and they leave me enough room to get a dinky toy through. drivers of ALL vehicles can be piggin' stupid sometimes..
i didnt mean u baz i know you drive carefully just some who spoil it :(xxkia
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...