Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Between yourself and Dave you have produced a very good WS. However if you were to do a harder hitting WS it may be that VCS would be more likely to cancel prior to a hearing. The Contract . VCS [Jake Burgess?] are trying to conflate parking in a car park to driving along a road in order to defend the indefensible. It is well known that "NO Stopping " cannot form a contract as it is prohibitory. VCS know that well as they lose time and again in Court when claiming it is contractual. By mixing up parking with driving they hope to deflect from the fact trying to claim that No Stopping is contractual is tantamount to perjury. No wonder mr Burgess doesn't want to appear in Court. Conflation also disguises the fact that while parking in a car park for a period of time can be interpreted as the acceptance of the contract that is not the case while driving down a road. The Defendant was going to the airport so it is ludicrous to suggest that driving by a No Stopping  sign is tacitly accepting  the  contract -especially as no contract is even being offered. And even if a motorist did not wish to be bound by the so called contract what could they do? Forfeit their flight and still have to stop their car to turn around? Put like that the whole scenario posed by Mr Burgess that the Defendant accepted the contract by driving past the sign is absolutely absurd and indefensible. I certainly would not want to appear in Court defending that statement either. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I will do the contract itself later.
    • Yes - ignore. Because of another MET victim today I looked at all our MET cases back to June 2014 ... yes, 10 years. They have never dared take a motorist to court and argue their case before a judge.  They have started the odd court case, but as a means of trying to intimidate the motorist into coughing up, when the motorist defended and refused to give in it was MET who bottled it and discontinued.
    • Unpaid wages should be pretty straightforward if you did the work. Don't be intimidated. You need only show you were due money, and did not get money.   The risk is that they have no money to pay you (and legal fees) - frankly a solicitor maybe be costing them more than your claim is for and I might have expected them to make a commercial decision to settle before this point regardless of the merits of the case.
    • Thanks so much FTMDave.  This is so much better   I'm still tempted to leave the blue section in is as if I lose it will at least save me a little bit of money.  But I get your point that it's pretty superfluous.   Thinking I'll get this in the post on Monday unless you think it's worth delaying?   
    • Hi All I have now received a Final Reminder, which I have attached. Can you confirm that I should still ignore this letter and take no further action. It does not appear to say "Letter of Claim" anywhere on the document but I just wanted to check with you all. Many thanks FightUnfairParkingTickets Parking Charge Final Reminder issued 29th May 2024.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Car Towed.. Please help...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6062 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If it is the police that have your car - go to the Pound and ask for it back. They'll tell you what the cost will be for its return. Alternatively if it has been 'seized' then unfortunately it could be held pending court action or destruction.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chances are it will have been siezed, as no RFL, MOT or Insurance. Contact your local police station and explain that you thought the vehicle was parked on private land and not on the public highway. They will then tell you what they propose to do or what you are required to do to have the vehicle released.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The vehicle was untaxed and I'm presuming that the OP hadnt got it SORNed either, so this is irrelevant if it was seized

 

Quite true, but how long was it parked there, and is it SORN exempt?

 

If it was only parked there for up to 28 days, then the rules are different.

 

Before anyone jumps in and says, there is no 28 days with the DVLA, that is the allowed time to receive a tax disc from them, via post or website.

 

However if the police/DVLA checked and there was no application sent, then unfortunately, you are stuck - unless of course it got lost in the post ;) especially with the postal problems at the moment.

 

I am not advocating lying, or anything illegal - just if your request to the dvla was delayed/lost by the post office - well that is their problem.

 

Dani

Link to post
Share on other sites

As you where not driving the vehicle you have not committed any traffic offences.

 

I dont know why the POLICE would have it, its silly, but nonetheless.

 

Your licence will be required for ID purposes and the insurance so that you can drive the vehicle back from the pound, but you have no TAX or MOT, so no idea why the police want you to commit these basic of offences.

 

Best thing you can do is call a local tow company they should charge you about 40.00 quid, go to the police station with your drivers licence and recover the vehicle, and next time do not leave your vehicle where it can easily be picked by people with nothing better to do.

 

I think that you may also find that the DVLA may have recovered the vehicle, but you claim to have a producer in your posssession, who gave you that producer its called a HORT1 by the way, it stands for HOME OFFICE ROAD TRAFFIC form 1. PRONOUNCED HORTY.

 

Some strange story this is.

 

You may also have to pay the POLICE/DVLA removal fee which could amount to 200.00 quid.

 

Remember you have 7/14 days to collect otherwise CRUNCH!

  • Haha 1

** Credentials **

 

10 Years Finance Fraud Investigator

 

5 Year High Court Sheriffs

 

2 Years Tip Staff Royal Courts

 

Currently : HMCS Enforcement Officer

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think your problem is not going to be insurance but because the vehicle is kept on a public road it should have a tax disc displayed as this is the easiest form of identifying if a vehicle is upto scratch or not.

 

The insurance you can do as third party only, just to keep it on the road but again thats not the most important issue.

 

You must remember that the only way at present that a PARKED vehicle comes to the attention of any person is the TAX DISC. Stick one in the window and i asure you the vehicle will not be touched let us know how you get on

** Credentials **

 

10 Years Finance Fraud Investigator

 

5 Year High Court Sheriffs

 

2 Years Tip Staff Royal Courts

 

Currently : HMCS Enforcement Officer

Link to post
Share on other sites

If getting insurance - do make sure the policy will remain valid if there's no MoT in force. (Some firms will say cover is reduced or dropped to TP if there is no current MoT available for the vehicle).

Link to post
Share on other sites

The IPCC probably won't be that interested, but you should complain to the Force's professional standards department (write to the Chief Constable to complain and he will pass it on).

 

There is no requirement whatsoever for a vehicle to be insured if it is solely on private land. In fact, they committed trespass to take the vehicle. Even if they thought it abandoned, it is not a Police matter, it is a matter for the local authority - who must give notice (on the vehicle) prior to removal (14 days, I think)

 

It is, however, required to be on SORN with the DVLA.

 

If they the Police refuse to budge, then issue a County Court summons for the £272 as the vehicle was wrongfully removed and the fine/costs applied

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...