Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • That explains it then. MET's fantasy is that it's a pay car park.  You're only let off paying if you are a Starbucks customer which you can't be when Starbucks is closed.  'Cos otherwise lots of people would abuse the car park facilities on the far edge of the Stansted Airport area in the middle of nowhere to ... admire the bushes?  Look at the cloudy sky? The important thing is that we have around 140 cases for this site, and MET have only tried court seven times.  Even then, they had no intention of getting as far as a hearing, they were attempting to intimidate the motorists into paying, when the Caggers defended the cases MET discontinued.
    • She's an only child and he as a brother and sister. He has no will and we have done a check on this to find out if he had left one and nothing has come up. He has savings of around 28k His sister and brother are well off so 28k is nothing to them and aren't interested in his money. This just leaves my wife/his daughter. Would this still need to go to probate there is no estate e.g house or business to sell and the amount left in his bank is just small? When his wife died they just closed her bank account and moved her money across to his account and we just assumed that once my wife has handed in the death certificate and shown evidence of who she is the same would apply to her? We don't know yet the council have only just written to us today with a guide of what to do next.  
    • Did your FiL leave a Will and if so who is the Executor? Strictly speaking banks could refuse to take instructions until Probate is granted but In practice I would expect the bank to take instructions to cancel the DD if the Executor presents the death certificate and a certified copy of the Will
    • Hi   Sorry I probably wasn't clear enough. He had lived in the flat until December 2022 with Dementia by this time it was unsafe for him to have capacity to live on his own and he had to move into a nursing home. We had left it too late to apply for power of attorney so approached a solicitor in March last year for Deputyship. We were still in the process of dealing with it by May 2024. He passed away a few weeks ago and the solicitor was contacted to halt the application and we will just pay the fees of what work he has done up until now. My wife was the named person on her dads bank account but we didn't have the ability to alter any direct debits hence the reasons for applying for Deputyship as we were having problems trying to stop some payments coming out of his account Eon being another difficult company. We kept his flat on from December 2022 - August 2023. it was at this point I contacted Sancutary housing to inform them he was no longer living in the flat, it had been cleared out and was ready for a new tenant and that he had Dementia and had moved into a nursing home December 2022 and explained the reasons why we kept it on. As the named person to speak on his behalf I asked them what proof they needed in order to give notice on the flat e.g proof of dementia and proof that he was living in a nursing home and anything else they wanted. The lady in the upstairs flat and some of the other residence in the street had asked about him and we had told them he had moved into a nursing home. The lady in the upstairs flat wanted his flat for medical reasons so asked us once we had given notice could be let her know and she'll ask them if she can have it. We explained the difficulties and it was left at that but I did tell her I would let her know once notice was given. I contacted the company by email a number of times and also telephone conversations and nobody followed it up and it wasn't till the end of February this year that the housing manager for the area wrote to our home address to ask about him that he had been to the flat a couple of times and nobody answered and he had asked some of the residence in the street and they hadn't seen him for sometime. There was an email address on the letter so I contacted him and copied in the last 2 emails I sent Sanctuary regarding me wanting to give notice on the flat for at least 9 months explaining that it went ignored as well as telephone calls. I also stated I wanted to have his rent payments returned from the date I wanted to give notice which was from August 2023 as the bank wouldn't let us stop the DD without POT or deputyship explaining we were in the process of Deputyship. He gave some excuse about not having POT to cancel on his behalf and spoke to someone in HR and said he would contact the nursing home to confirm he was there with Dementia and if it all checks out we can give notice on the flat which came to an end on the 22 March 2024. There was not mention of back payments for the rent already paid or the fact I had asked to give notice in August 2023. Despite someone living in the flat from 1st April they continue to take DD payments for the flat and have taken another 2 payments of £501. another concerning thing despite Eon not allowing us to cancel the DD to his account the lady upstairs informed Eon that she was moving into the flat February 2024 and Eon refunding the account to his bank and said in an email sorry you are leaving us and canceled his account. Something they wouldn't let us do but a stranger. She also changed her bank account to his address despite the fact notice hadn't been given on the flat yet. So we need to find out how much information Sanctuary actually had for her to tell her power company she was moving into the flat in February despite the housing manager only just getting in contact to find out where he was. So a complaint is going into Eon and Sanctuary and we are going to take advice and ask the bank to charge back the rent. My wife hasn't taken the death certificate to the bank yet to inform them of his passing.  
    • Yes, I believe the Starbucks was closed at the time the car was parked there 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bank Charges on Benefits


Guest littlesally
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6019 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Guest littlesally

Not sure where to post this as I could not find a benefits thread.

I work with the homeles, most of which are on benefits.

Recently I helped one of the girls get her charges back. It was only one charge and after a few phone calls to Natwest, quoting bits about it being illegal to take money from benefits, the refunded.

Now I am helping a man try to get £38 refunded from RBS.

So far all RBS have said to him is - don't phone, go in to your branch.

Then in branch said it was rubbish and they can take benfits.

He took in something I found about it saying they couldn't/shouldn't but they still said that it is not true.

The branch said to phone but the answer would still be no. They said as the benefit was late being paid in, he should claim the charge from the DSS.

 

As he only gets about £50 a week you can imagine the hardship this has caused. He has not been able to pay the daily £2.50 we charge at the nightshelter (the council insist we charge this) so has had to sleep on the streets.

 

I have looked for a letter about claiming back benefit money, but can only see one about tax credits, and can't find the extreme hardship letter - although I believe that is meant to be sent before the money is taken.

 

Any help will be much appreciated, greatfully recieved and much needed.

 

Sally x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sally,

I dont work for RBS but I expect that all banks are the same in most ways! Why did the man you are helping get charged in the first place, was it due to returned DD or going over an agreed over draft? It make a difference what the charges were for!

Alex

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest littlesally

Oh, sorry missed that out.

He set up a standing order for £5 to be transferred from one account to another (both his) It was the first transfer. He has now cancelled and will do it himself.

 

Saly x

Link to post
Share on other sites

He needs to go into the branch - they will try to fob him off! The bank i work for would say the same thing that if the credit was late then the charges should be claimed from the creditor. This is because they dont want to do the paperwork!!!! However RBS like all banks have the ability to remove charges as good will gestures, especially as it was an internal (made to an account within RBS banking system not for example HSBC)transfer that was missed. Sound like you need to corner a cusotmer service advisor in branch even the manager will do and ask them to review the account. The should be able to refund especally if this is the first time its happened. If not then formally ask for a refund in writing also requesting a copy of their complaints procedure, If they still insist on charging him then ask for a right of appropriation to stop them taking the charg out of benifits that are paid in to the acct whilst you make a complaint. Might also help to mention you if pushed will inform the FSA and banking ombadsman and drop a hint to a local news paper especially in light of recent trend to claim bank charges back! Good Luck with them, good luck to the man your trying to help as well!

 

Alex

Link to post
Share on other sites

But is the taking of benefits legally wrong, and is there a letter saying this?

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

Bank Charges and Benefits and the First Right of Appropriation

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: xxxxxxxxx

 

I am writing to you following several charges debited from my account totalling £xxxx on (date).

 

Bank charges are unlawful penalties for breach of contract. However, the bank or building society is only allowed to charge you what it costs to cover their administrative charges. If they charge you more than this, you may have a legal right to get back the difference.

Notably, and in my instance, if the income in an account comes from benefits, they are also contrary to the legislation relating to benefits. If the income is from incapacity benefit, job seekers allowance, etc , they are contrary to section 187 of the Social Security Administration Act 1992. The working of this Act comes under the Treasury and the Department of Work and Pensions, respectively and are quoted below for your immediate attention.

 

Social Security Administration Act 1992

Miscellaneous

Certain benefit to be inalienable **

 

187- Subject to the provisions of this Act, every assignment of, or charge on-

(a)benefit as defined in section 122 of the Contributions and Benefits Act;

(b)any income-related benefit; or

©child benefit,

and every agreement to assign or charge such benefit shall be void; and, on the bankruptcy of the beneficiary, such benefit shall not pass to any trustee or other person acting on behalf of his creditors

 

When you open an account with a bank or building society and use their services, you are entering into a contract. The law says that the bank or building society must carry out its business:-

• with reasonable care and skill.

 

If the service is unsatisfactory you may be entitled to compensation if the contract has been broken. I believe that there has been a breach of contract as I feel your organisation has failed to handle my affairs with reasonable care and skill.

 

This failure on your behalf has caused me a great deal of hardship. I am left with no means to pay the rent/bills due to the unauthorised amount now outstanding. The incoming amounts due to be deposited into my account next week will only clear the amount outstanding leaving little if any to pay the rent, for housekeeping or utility bills such as gas.

 

I ask for a little compassion and request that the benefit amounts totalling £xxxx, debited in order to pay for your default charges, be refunded by return.

 

I am also writing to inform you that I am due to have the following payments made into my account:-

  • Tax Credit payment of £xxx on xx/xx/xx
  • Child Benefit payment of £xxx on x/xx/xx
  • Incapacity Benefit payment of £xxx on x/xx/xx

Totalling £xxxx,

 

I wish to use my first right of appropriation for this money, for the following purposes;

Rent £xx

Utilities bills £xx

Housekeeping money £xx

I will withdraw the money on the day that it is deposited for the above use, and I would be grateful if you would ensure that any other payments out of my account do not interfere with this withdrawal.

 

Yours faithfully,

  • Haha 1

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest littlesally

Ok, have left a letter for him to collect, but made a few changes to it as he is on Income Support - I am guessing that the law covers that as well - and his outgoings do not include utility bills or housekeeping money, but laundry, bus fare to apply for jobs and view flats/bedsits and lunch.

Hope that's right,

 

Sally x

Link to post
Share on other sites

made a few changes to it as he is on Income Support - I am guessing that the law covers that as well -

Yes, income support is an income related benefit as defined under s123 of the Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

finally found something about benefits and bank charges, so to would be grateful to know which benefits are protected from being taken as penalties etc.

 

OK I understand that invalidity benefit is an income related benefit, where does DLA fit into this, is this also a benefit that should not have charges taken? the person in question gets - Invalidity Benefit - long term rate, DLA at full level for both parts and housing benefit, she has a notional right to claim income support, but because of the other benefits does not get any (there is a letter to this effect somewhere).

 

any advice and pointers greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK I understand that invalidity benefit is an income related benefit, where does DLA fit into this, is this also a benefit that should not have charges taken?

Yes. They can use their First Right of Appropriation for this.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you rory - now have some more ammunition to get things sorted for my daughter! Cant believe how much they have taken from her in the months that she has been so very ill and not able to deal with her finances, and it has all snowballed to what appear to be unmanageable proportions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest littlesally

RBS wrote back and said until the test case they are not paying out any requests for charges.

He has sent another letter pointing out that they must have mis-interrupted the letter as the request was for benefits back and the test case has nothing to do with that.

Also inclosed a break down of out goings and said it is the first charge ever incurred.

Worded it as a friendly letter rather than a legal type.

Sally x

Link to post
Share on other sites

RBS are a nasty lot to deal with at the moment. They really are abusing their powers so I think perhaps a full written complaint to the FSO would be in order, the case clearly isn't linked to the Test Case and the bank are breaching their obligations.

 

I'd also advise your friend to try to get a Natwest Step account set up - it's a basic bank account and should give him a cash/debit card to use.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest littlesally

This is taking a little longer than it should as the person concerned is homeless and tends to dissappear for a few days or a week at a time.

There is what looks like a reply from RBS waiting for him,

Sally x

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok further update (still talkin to myself?)

just recieved a letter from Nationwide acknowledging the FOS complaint letter, NW state their 8 weeks exspires 17 jan 08

in the mean time they ask that i fill in a ' income and expenditure form'

i'll assume this is standard? and i should fill it out? and enclose a covering letter stating my case?

should i still get S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)? see other thread, all i've done so far is call FOS

anything else?

p s to MOD's if i reposted this too many times, please delete those incorrectly placed

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK I understand that invalidity benefit is an income related benefit

 

Not sure whether this changes things or not but Invalidity Benefit (now called Incapacity Benefit) is not income based.

 

Incapacity Benefit - Dicover Your Options

 

Best of luck and kudos on being such a helpful person!

:p Wanting out of the red and into the pink! :p

 

If I've been nice please tip my scales. If I've been naughty, tip 'em twice! ;)

 

CURRENTLY CAGGING -

 

NatWest Bank - no response to S.A.R - (Subject Access Request), 40 days passed

 

Natwest CC - no response to CCA, 12+30 days passed. Calls continue, I ignore.

 

Sainsburys CCs x 2 - Current T&Cs rec'd in response to CCA request. Letter sent re lack of prescribed terms. Calls continue, mobile set to auto ignore.

 

Capital One - Copy application form rec'd in response to CCA. Letter sent re lack of prescribed terms. Standard final response received. Calls continue, I ignore.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent news! Well done, you!

 

And thanks for the lovely rep comment - my first one! *blush*

:p Wanting out of the red and into the pink! :p

 

If I've been nice please tip my scales. If I've been naughty, tip 'em twice! ;)

 

CURRENTLY CAGGING -

 

NatWest Bank - no response to S.A.R - (Subject Access Request), 40 days passed

 

Natwest CC - no response to CCA, 12+30 days passed. Calls continue, I ignore.

 

Sainsburys CCs x 2 - Current T&Cs rec'd in response to CCA request. Letter sent re lack of prescribed terms. Calls continue, mobile set to auto ignore.

 

Capital One - Copy application form rec'd in response to CCA. Letter sent re lack of prescribed terms. Standard final response received. Calls continue, I ignore.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...